Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 1736 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched

MIS Original Quad: dilution?

2002-11-12 by chatzebussi

Hello Thanks to everybody on this forum who warned me not to try to dilute my dried up 25% grey (forgot to put the lid on the bottle)any longer. As I have

Thread view Attachments: 0

Photo Techniques Article

2002-11-12 by Chris Hargens

FYI -- in the latest issue of Photo Techniques there s an article, Darkroom vs. Digital Prints by Ron Harris, that, although short, is interesting. He compares

Thread view Attachments: 0

Duotone, Tritone Example Book

2002-11-12 by Mark Tucker

Several weeks ago, I mistakedly answered a guy s question here about quadtones. He was speaking of quad inks; I thought he wanted instruction on offset

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] scanners

2002-11-12 by Jerry Olson

Julian, all my tests indicate that Mirandas action produces sharper results than Genuine fractals. Not by much, but noticeable. You are right about the file

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] scanners

2002-11-12 by Julian Thomas

But the Miranda action doesn t reduce the size of the archive file and uses PS bicubic interpolation which gives softer results on many subjects (I ve tried

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] scanners

2002-11-12 by Jerry Olson

No. The coolscan 4000 is a 35mm scanner. Fred Miranda s Stair Step action filter is slightly better than genuine fractals, ten times faster, and only costs

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] MIS Fade Data

2002-11-12 by Paul Roark

Robert, ... No, if Matte black can t do any better than the low 1.5 s with most matte papers, most people will have no interest in it -- especially given its

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: scanners

2002-11-12 by Chris Hargens

Oops -- I guess I still haven t wiped the sleep from my eyes. I was thinking scanner while you were talking printer. Chris ... been ... the ... Epson s ...

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: scanners

2002-11-12 by Chris Hargens

I m curious, Jerry. Was there any particular reason you chose the 1280 over the 2450? I ve heard lots of good things about the 2450, been thinking about buying

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] scanners

2002-11-12 by Ton Guiking

... And now the next question is of course: what did you buy (and why)? Really interesting to know!! Best, Ton Guiking

Thread view Attachments: 0

Contact prints redux

2002-11-12 by Stephen Kobrin

I asked the original question about contact prints and with the help of the group and some tinkering have been able to produce more than statisfactory contacts

Thread view Attachments: 0

Dual sided paper for 2200

2002-11-12 by Matthew Born

Lynne, I believe Eclipse Satine is both dual sided and works with dyes and pigs. Pretty good prices at Inkjetgoodies.com right now. Matthew Born ... is

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Latest Epson driver

2002-11-12 by Steven Karafyllakis

That driver is available on the Epson USA site, along with a whole lot of others, for most recent epson equipment. Try looking here:

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] scanners

2002-11-12 by Bob_Michaels

Tim: I suggest you completely read Wayne Fulton s website a few scanning tips www.scantips.com before you plunk down real money on a scanner. There is a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] MIS Fade Data

2002-11-12 by Robert Morrison

... I haven t done the tests myself...I was working off of numbers that Antonis had generated with his 2200. I haven t put matte black into my 2200 yet. The

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] scanners

2002-11-12 by Carolyn Frayn

... As the Canon you first spoke of is, so are the Nikon 4000 and the Polaroid SS4000 (+) 35mm film scanners...the Polaroid is a Microtek Artixscan scanner.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re[2]: [Digital BW] scanners

2002-11-12 by Richard Sintchak

Monday, November 11, 2002, 7:57:43 PM, Christopher Williams wrote: CW I went with the CanoScan FS4000 because it does cost $400-500 less than the CW Nikon

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] scanners

2002-11-12 by Christopher Williams

Check out B&H Photo for Canon 4000 scanners at used(out of box)specials. Last week they had one for $729.00 w/warranty. Don t buy Gray on Canon, they will not

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: scanners

2002-11-12 by Richard Sintchak

Monday, November 11, 2002, 7:01:22 PM, Tim Timmermans wrote: TT Thanks Bob, TT I have been using the Epson 1200UPHOTO flatbed for a couple of years TT and

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] scanners

2002-11-12 by James Downs

I vote for the Canon FS4000. I bought one and am really happy withit. Jim ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] MIS Fade Data

2002-11-12 by Paul Roark

The PiezoTone WN & Selenium test strips that I tested had excellent midtone fade characteristics. I have not tested the Museum black. The UltraChrome matte

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] scanners

2002-11-12 by Christopher Williams

I went with the CanoScan FS4000 because it does cost $400-500 less than the Nikon 4000 scanner. Sure, it s a bit slower, but FARE works much better than ICE.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] scanners

2002-11-12 by Tim Timmermans

... desktop ... wise, ... I like that GF is packaged with nikon but I can get the canon (grey Market) for $700 something on ebay so I can just buy GF. DOes the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] scanners

2002-11-12 by bgs

I m from the NY/NJ area. Whaddya need? Midnight sales daily!!! Hot Buys Whatever----good luck. ... From: Tim Timmermans To:

Thread view Attachments: 0

MIS Fade Data

2002-11-12 by PhotoBike@aol.com

Roark Fade Tests PiezoToneWN 50% MIS-FS 50% 1.56% fade 18.18% fade The above data is from Mr. Roark s test in the files section. I want the most

Thread view Attachments: 0

MIS Fade Data

2002-11-12 by PhotoBike@aol.com

Roark Fade Tests PiezoToneWN 50% MIS-FS 50% 1.56% fade 18.18% fade The above data is from Mr. Roark s test in the files section. I want the most

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: scanners

2002-11-12 by Tim Timmermans

... ordered one yesterday. ... The one thing I like about the one I got at Comp USA is their replacement warranty. I actually bought a used 1270 for $150. Just

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: scanners

2002-11-12 by Jerry Olson

the 1280 is currently $479 at the Stock Solution, and after Epson s rebate it s only $379. They offer free shipping, too. I just ordered one yesterday. Jerry

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] scanners

2002-11-12 by Jerry Olson

Canon s lens on that scanner was rated the sharpest lens of any desktop scanner by one of the pro photo mags about 8 months ago. Quality wise, the nikon 4000

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: little dots through loupe

2002-11-12 by frankg_photo

... out of the ... What is the exact name for this curve ? Looking at the MIS site is confusing enough unless you know precisely what you re looking for. Frank

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: scanners

2002-11-12 by Tim Timmermans

Thanks Bob, I have been using the Epson 1200UPHOTO flatbed for a couple of years and it s not bad for lower end scanner. I suspect the Minolta with not be

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] scanners

2002-11-12 by Tim Timmermans

Thanks Ken, I was using the Canon FS4000 for a while and was pleased with the results but it was slow and seemed to crash a lot. I m guessing the Nikon takes

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: scanners

2002-11-12 by Bob_Michaels

Tim: I jumped in a few weeks ago. I read a lot of the posts here but 99% were way over my head. Try it, it s not too hard at all to quickly get reasonable

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] scanners

2002-11-12 by Ken Carney

Tim, for 35mm I have and can recommend the Nikon Coolscan 4000. I think you can get one for around $1,500-1,600. Since with 35mm you re doing a lot with a

Thread view Attachments: 0

scanners

2002-11-12 by Tim Timmermans

Hi gang, I was on this group for a couple of months and then have been gone for 8 months. I missed the wealth of information here. I m preparing to take the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Photoshop cursor visibility trick

2002-11-12 by Vincent Orlando

Glasses won t help. I wear glasses and it has been driving me mad for 2 years as I do much photoretouching work. I was hoping someone could tell me how to

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.