Re: [Digital BW] Thoughts about Imaging
2002-04-04 by gulstenek
Aack, breaking my vow of silence to say oops, sorry Roy. I follow your logic. I can t think of anything to say that hasn t been said though.
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 1940 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
2002-04-04 by gulstenek
Aack, breaking my vow of silence to say oops, sorry Roy. I follow your logic. I can t think of anything to say that hasn t been said though.
2002-04-04 by royvharrington
... I believe you are referring to me. Thanks for reading it. BTW, just eliminate confusion its Roy not Richard. ... Absolutely, true. Imaging is certainly
2002-04-04 by Andrew Biggs
Let s not start another long, worthless thread, Austin. I beg of you. Please. ... From: Austin Franklin [mailto:darkroom@ix.netcom.com] Sent: Wednesday, April
2002-04-04 by Austin Franklin
... He he...kind of like Grape Nuts , eh? I know you re going to love this one, but it depends on what definition of cream you use! Cream doesn t only mean
2002-04-04 by Austin Franklin
Hi Todd, ... But in fact it DOES. He clearly states the first USEFUL value , which is exactly the same as discernable signal . Also, he is clearly
2002-04-04 by gulstenek
Austin- I don t know. There is no cream in my Ice Cream either but I can use the term outside the dairy industry and most people know
2002-04-04 by Austin Franklin
Hi Mike, ... I didn t say these things weren t discussed, these things WERE discussed, but by less people and the discussions had much less exposure (sorry
2002-04-04 by Austin Franklin
... Hi Kevin, thanks for your post. My question is, if density range and dynamic range are the same, and we have defined density range as (dMax - dMin), than
2002-04-04 by gulstenek
Richard- I really enjoyed your previous post on the subject. It was a well reasoned discussion and broadened the perspective of the discussion. Thanks for
2002-04-04 by byronbulb
My media setting is Photo Quality Ink Jet
2002-04-04 by Michael Kravit
Thank you Roy, You make excellent points. Being neither an electrical engineer nor an expert in sensitometry I am heistant to debate the issues with Austin. I
2002-04-04 by John Brownlow
... sounds very good to me I hope I can contribute -- John Brownlow http://www.pinkheadedbug.com
2002-04-04 by Andrew Biggs
Thank you, Roy. ... From: royvharrington [mailto:roy@harrington.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 5:14 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
2002-04-04 by gulstenek
... Richard, Good suggestion. That keeps the noise on the list to a minimum and if I removed the requirement for official reviewers and let the list respond,
2002-04-04 by royvharrington
... Austin, You ve pushed you idea on dynamic range for imaging, time and time again. Many people have argued with you. I personally have gone to the library
2002-04-04 by Richard Wolfson
Kevin, I think the quadtone faq project is a great idea. Maybe you could simplify your workflow a little and get more help at the same time. You wrote ...
2002-04-04 by Jerry Olson
What is your media setting?
2002-04-03 by royvharrington
Hi Martin, Thanks for replying, I was feeling a little like my post went into a black-hole :). I think you bring up some very interesting comments about tones,
2002-04-03 by Michael Kravit
Austin, Yes, perhaps in the camera clubs and high school phot classes. But there was a whole class of photographer that were deeply involved in developing and
2002-04-03 by Todd Flashner
... But Mike quoted you Ansel s definition of dynamic range from The Print , which was: There are three important scales within the total range of exposures
2002-04-03 by byronbulb
Oh - more info: I m using a 1280 on a Mac - Photoshop 6 running under classic mode in OSX I am using the NC curve I am printing on EAM I am using Adobe RGB
2002-04-03 by byronbulb
So I ve been running a lot of tests today, and here s what I ve found - It seems that I can print a true black, and excellent midtones, but that I can t
2002-04-03 by Peter Marquis-Kyle
Kevin Gulstene has volunteered to assemble a quadtone FAQ! Thank you Kevin, I support the method you suggest. Peter Marquis-Kyle
2002-04-03 by Austin Franklin
... Because you weren t there, doesn t mean it wasn t discussed. ... I defer to Todd for that ;-) ... Pedestrians don t care about MTF and a host of other very
2002-04-03 by Austin Franklin
Mike, ... I agree, but this is vastly different than technical discussions about what dynamic range really is! Most photographers don t even understand what
2002-04-03 by Austin Franklin
... Name them. ... I wasn t referring to AA at all, exactly the opposite. We have, in the group here, what, hundreds of people, very few whom are
2002-04-03 by Jerry Olson
Sergio: Printer: 1280 Continuous Inking System: The Niagra CIS from media street. Inks: Generations 4 from Media Street for archival color inks, at
2002-04-03 by Kevin Gulstene
A few weeks back the issue of a Quadtone FAQ was raised as a way of reducing some of the burden born by a few of the generous members of the list. I didn t
2002-04-03 by Todd Flashner
... What about books, magazines and journals? BTW, this is the first time I ve heard Ansel Adams and his ilk referred to as pedestrian photo technicians... If
2002-04-03 by mkravit
Austin, If this is true, then how did people learn and develop techniques of all kinds. Back in the 60 s and 70 s we could not wait for the monthly Photography
2002-04-03 by Martin Wesley
... From: Austin Franklin To: Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 7:58 AM Subject: RE:
2002-04-03 by Andrew Biggs
Also try Calypso Imaging in Santa Clara. ... From: Andrew Eschbacher [mailto:photolists@sc.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:35 AM To:
2002-04-03 by Alan Zinn
... Bill, The reason for technical refinement is to make work easier and more predictable rather than a goal in itself. Production workers can t afford to
2002-04-03 by Andrew Eschbacher
Try Bob Cornelis at ColorFolio. The website is www.colorfolio.com. Drew ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2002-04-03 by Alan Zinn
... Andy, It s FS Quad-K - same as Archival black AZ Maker of Lookaround panoramic camera. http://lookaroundcam.com/ or keyword.com lookaround
2002-04-03 by johnoppenheimer
I am looking for a functional lab in the Bay Area to scan my 2 1/4 negatives.....
2002-04-03 by silasnine@mindspring.com
Calumet Photo @ 18th and Bryant also has a full selection of papers including the larger sizes... -david ... [Non-text portions of this message have been
2002-04-03 by Bill Agee
... Alan, I wouldn t disagree with anything you ve said. I have constantly strived for technical refinement in the 22 years I have worked as a professional
2002-04-03 by Austin Franklin
... Martin, There WAS life before mailing lists and Internet web sites you know! That s just so untrue. I believe it wasn t discussed by pedestrians , and
2002-04-03 by Bill Agee
... Kevin, While I probably would have used slightly different words, I don t know if I could have explained what I meant any better than you did. Bill -- b i
2002-04-03 by mkravit
Great, thanks so much! Mike ... bags. ...
2002-04-03 by TigerShark
I searched my Outlook archive and this came up: http://clearbags.com TigerShark ... From: mkravit
2002-04-03 by mkravit
Several months ago, someone listed a wholsale source for print bags. I have misplaced the website for that comapny. Does anyone know an excellent source for
2002-04-03 by dickbo
I have been offered an 1160 printer new for £220.00. Is that considered to be a good price.
2002-04-03 by mkravit
Butch, Thanks for the compliment. I spoke with the Colorbyte folks yesterday. They say that the profiles I requested are just about done. They should be able
2002-04-03 by mkravit
Bill, Yes, all of the Cone and MIS FS ink sets are quadtone inksets. there is no reason to use 6 shades as smooth continuous tone prints can be made quite
2002-04-03 by James Klebau
I m thinking about guaranteeing my prints for 3000 years --- full refund, no questions asked.
2002-04-03 by byronbulb
Just wanted to publicly thank the folks at MIS - I called them to say that I thought I was having a problem with their cartridges, and just a couple days later
2002-04-03 by Martin Wesley
Roy, Thank you for your well thought out post on Imaging. I refrained from responding earlier in hopes that someone new would add to your thoughts. As you
2002-04-03 by Martin Wesley
Todd, Thanks for the link, I did put it in the Bookmarks section. Lots of good stuff especially about scanning (although it is a little dated and I doubt many