Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 676 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
2006-03-26 by John Moody
An alternate way to research previously discussed topics can be found here: http://helgaas.com/photo/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/ Best regards, John Moody ...
2006-03-26 by Olivier
... How ... 220? ... love ... without ... be ... I m currently investigating 4800 with MK vs Piezo iQuads Museum K. That s just for the sake of curiosity : my
2006-03-26 by joejx8
Hi Helen, Thank you for your reply :) I wish I ve known about PFP before I bought my old Xrite 880 densitometer. I should try first to use this densitometer,
2006-03-26 by Gary Brown
Eric: The fact is this topic and several others which seem to be on 1-3 month cycles are discussed adnausium each time. It usually starts with I m new to the
2006-03-26 by davidkeasey
Well, I didn t get the DTP32 to do profiles, but just for linearizing my ink curves for Quadtone RIP. And since I won t be doing real profiles, the
2006-03-26 by joshscapes
Erik, I think Gary (like a lot of us are) is tired of the whole digital vs. film debate. Not your recommendation on prefered method. Obviously when someone
2006-03-26 by Eric Neilsen
Sorry for the intrusion Gary. I have only been a member of the Digi B&W group for a little while. But I am curious as to why an inquiry into which method
2006-03-25 by Brian Ellis
He/she only works on Sundays? I ve been praying all week - no wonder my wish didn t come true And people complain about film vs digital discussions. ...
2006-03-25 by johnbroski57
Hello All! Is anyone doing BO with an Epson 4800 and a RIP? (Especially QTR?) How do the results (smoothness, Dmax) compare with BO on a 2200, or a 220? I
2006-03-25 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... THANKS! I would actually sincerely appreciate that. ... Agreed. What I m afraid of Greg, is that without some consolidation, and with M$ effectively
2006-03-25 by Greg
... If you like, I will email the next updates directly to you when/if I get them. The fine details may be lacking, but at least you would have a lead on what
2006-03-25 by dlruckus
It s amazing how EFI sold so many extraordinarily expensive proprietary hardware software systems performing basically the same task and using what? Why,
2006-03-25 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... And you chose not to share, WHY?... ;-) Keith Keith Krebs Just some guy, caretaker of the Multiverse s largest EPSON printer User Community (highly
2006-03-25 by CDTobie@aol.com
... True, but its simpler than that: the data from a densitimeter does not contain the necessary information to build color profiles, end of story. C. David
2006-03-25 by Greg
... No, I heard about the other offer from Xrite first, that s no what.
2006-03-25 by Gary Brown
Enough already, must we go through this topic every other month! Gary www.pbase.com/garyallenbrown ... From: joshscapes To:
2006-03-25 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... No, what? What Ferrara says is wholly irrelevant to anything but the fact that X-Rite is leaving their own offer on the table. It s like saying to a
2006-03-25 by Greg
... it ... do ... As far as I ve found, the DTP32 will not make profiles with any modern software. I have one sitting here. As far as commands, there used to
2006-03-25 by Greg
... No actually Xrite sent me an email Friday: We have recently been informed by Amazys Holding AG, parent company of GretagMacBeth, that their Board of
2006-03-25 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
You heard it here first! http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/1310AP_Eichhof_Amazys.html If this is true, talk about industry synergy! That would merge two
2006-03-25 by joshscapes
I second Eric s recommendation. Filim and scanner is a lovely combination that produces beautiful results. And, if ever a better scanner comes on the market,
2006-03-25 by joshscapes
Anyone who has studied the marketplace today knows that as long as there is a need for a product, someone will make that product. There are hundred of millions
2006-03-25 by Peter Marshall
Film has never quite equalled wet plate in many respects, so perhaps try making that, which I think is a little easier. Regards, Peter Marshall
2006-03-25 by Peter Marshall
I ve used 8x10 and I have to say it was never a match for 35mm for most of the things I wanted to do as a photographer. It depends what you want. There isn t a
2006-03-25 by Peter Marshall
Brian, I think you are taking my reply out of context. I think it was to someone who was considering 35mm film, not large format, and I think it is true for
2006-03-25 by grue1970
i got an answer a couple weeks ago about this. #1 the epson tech said it was the side which is a bit smoother. #2 he said it was the side that faces up, when
2006-03-25 by jlk4410
Thank you to all who have added to my craft and deepened my spirit, lately it has been this group. What I would like to contribute is a quote from a great
2006-03-25 by alanrew42
Some further info - I ve just fired up my old Win 98SE PC, which has PS 6.0 installed, and the PS preferences files etc are stored in C: WINDOWS Application
2006-03-25 by Eric Neilsen Photo 2
Peter, You make a great point. Hardware and software make a hugh difference, but you still need a skilled operator to get the best out of it. I have seen cases
2006-03-25 by CDTobie@aol.com
... I doubt that any of the shops I removed them from could have even found them. The usual life history of a DTP32 in copy shops is that its been unused for
2006-03-25 by Steve and Ann Taylor
Hi, I asked this question over on the QTR group but haven t gotten a reply so I thought I d ask here, too. It seems like there is a lot of overlap of members,
2006-03-25 by alanrew42
... wrote: ... Not exactly true, because you ve installed Adobe Photoshop on it and thereby lost all the settings you made on your old
2006-03-25 by Peter Marshall
Well John, I am certainly right too, because of course drum scanners cover a range, and I didn t and never would suggest it could beat all of them. But I agree
2006-03-25 by Paul Roark
Arlene, It s been a while since I ran UT7 and PS 7. (I actually have but never liked PS 7.) To the extent possible, follow the settings in
2006-03-25 by Eric Neilsen Photo 2
One consideration is digital crashes, cards burn up, data gets corrupted. I would stay with the film and do the scanner route. I just decided to get a Nikon
2006-03-25 by lovelipp
For the last 2 weeks, I ve been unable to solve this problem. A couple of years ago, I made a set of sample prints of the same image loading Paul Roark s
2006-03-25 by davidkeasey
Yeah, but for what I want it for, linearization is all I need... I m doing Quadtone RIP ink curves, and a linear and reasonably precise densitometer is all I
2006-03-25 by Sam McCandless
At 6:39 AM -0500 3/24/06, Brian Ellis wrote: ... I have a 5D and some Canon L lenses due to arrive next week ... . In the meantime, Brian, I m curious to
2006-03-25 by AdventureCam Photo
Don t touch your tongue to the paper! Simply touch your index finger and your thumb to your tongue, then touch a corner of the paper. The print side will
2006-03-25 by CDTobie@aol.com
... This is a densitometer (one we have been routinely replacing and tossing in the trash for several years at all sites that still had them) and cannot be
2006-03-25 by Mark Savoia
Did you acquire it for free? Depends on what you are going to use it for, the $50 for the calibration strip is well worth it. You can do the math way of
2006-03-25 by Brian Ellis
I think you are taking my reply out of context. HI Peter - Sorry, I didn t intend to be argumentative, I really was just wondering whether you throught
2006-03-25 by Olivier
... I know I m not supposed to just post for it : but thanks for your help. So to add something of general interest, I ve just by curiosity tested K3 Dmax vs
2006-03-25 by Steve Kale
Better start learning to make film then....
2006-03-25 by Brian Ellis
I ve ordered two lenses to start with, the 24-105 and the 70-200 (F4, not F2.8) for landscape mostly. I ll be adding the 16-35 or the 17-40. ... From: Sam
2006-03-25 by davidkeasey
Does anyone have some expertise with this densitometer? I just manage to acquire one, and though the operation manual was provided, it is obvious that this
2006-03-25 by Ernst Dinkla
... Up to half the review Vincent was on the wrong path in my opinion. Either he started to understand our comments that the height adjustment was important or
2006-03-25 by ginnylady33
Gone.
2006-03-25 by Nick H. Nugent
Hello Art, My main D-SLR is a 6 MP Nikon D70 but for images that require more details and substantial enlargement I have to resort to my old trusty Canon A-1.
2006-03-25 by gguhangunaratnam
Thanks Tina, I think I ll skip the tongue test. I m pretty sure I ve got the it printing on the proper side, just want to make sure its the brighter side I