Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 391 of 564 · 28179 messages matched
2005-06-14 by Bakis Sirros
hello lforian, indeed, your opinion is the "most correct" one i think. i agree with you, except for the "maybe" option. i vote for "maybe" when i think that i will Probably want to buy this module when it will be released. regards, bakis. --- Florian Anwander wrote: > Hi Tommy >
2005-06-14 by Florian Anwander
Hi Tommy > I try to only say "yes" or "no" and consider what will make the A-100 even more expansive > then any other system. I hope others think about their votes as well. I would hate to see > years on "clone" modules and clappers come out because people said "yes" to any idea.
2005-06-14 by sci700
Hi, I have checked a doepfer suitcase on flights quite often. I'ts a bit scary but it's been ok, with one exception: once a screw on the back came loose so the powersupply came in contact with an A-112 module and burnt it's onboard 5v- regulator. so tighten the screws before you
2005-06-14 by spleensick
Hello, everybody! I think it's wonderful that an analog (or digital for that matter) delay module is being discussed. As I don't know much about construction of delays, I didn't know there were technical issues in constructing a module like this. Does anybody know how the Blacet
2005-06-14 by selfoscillate
hello heinz, i really like that idea. if a poll is created about a cs30 filter, i'd probably say "yes, i want one", but it wouldn't be of any priority, because we have so many filters already. a poll about a delay-module would get the same answer from me, but the delay module wou
2005-06-14 by selfoscillate
--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Guilherme da Luz" wrote: > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "selfoscillate" > wrote: > > > > hello guilherme, > > > > those bbd-chips are not used anymore by the industry, > > there are much better/cheaper solutions available (techn
2005-06-14 by pater lacrymarum
I had similar thoughts already as well. a possible solution would be to ask group members in a separate poll to rank the modules that have received a 'yes' majority according to their preferences. best regards, heinz --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Tommy DOG" wrote: > Just
2005-06-14 by Tommy DOG
Just my opinion.. Often I have the feeling some people vote "yes" for any new module without considering the fact that they may cause a module they wish for more to be delayed. -Perhaps this is only my fear and it is not correct. I try to only say "yes" or "no" and consider what
2005-06-13 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: Would you like doepfer to manufacture a Clap/crack generator module? the features it could have are the following: -Trigger in (starts pulse train) -Trig speed knob (time between pulses in t
2005-06-13 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: Would you like doepfer to manufacture a Dual (or Triple) Twin T osc module, used in creating drum sounds? the features it could have are the following: -Trig in (that has a trig shaper circu
2005-06-13 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: Would you like doepfer to manufacture a yamaha CS-30 filter type module? (On the CS-30 are two filters, both complete with switches LP, HP and BP) CHOICES AND RESULTS - yes!, 17 votes, 73.91
2005-06-13 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: Would you doepfer to manufacture a VCA/ringmod module with a slider from - to + and in the middle position to act like a ringmod?(like in the synthi E) CHOICES AND RESULTS - yes!, 20 votes,
2005-06-13 by Guilherme da Luz
--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "selfoscillate" wrote: > > hello guilherme, > > those bbd-chips are not used anymore by the industry, > there are much better/cheaper solutions available (technically > speaking), so there is not enough demand for them to > keep producion up.
2005-06-13 by Bakis Sirros
hello florian, ok, i deleted the old poll and created a new one with all these options. please, everyone, re-vote. regards, bakis. --- Florian Anwander wrote: > Hi Bakis, > > I think, we should think a little bit about what > exactly is possible and > what we really wish. > > The
2005-06-13 by Florian Anwander
Hi Ernst > Has anyone checked their Doepfer suitcase as checked baggage when > travelling by plane? I assume at least Dieter Doepfer knows this, because they have to ship their systems for the NAMM-show in Los Angeles. As far most german exhibitors ship their equipment at least t
2005-06-13 by ph@comcast.net
and the CA3080 is out of production, so.... best, phil
2005-06-13 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the Doepfer_a100 group: Would you like Doepfer to release a filter module based on standard OTA-Circuits? {you can vote for more than one choice!) o yes, a 12 dB Multimode like in the Oberheim SEM /Fourvoice/Eightvoice o mayb
2005-06-13 by Ernst Karel
Hello -- This is slightly off-topic, but not really, since I've used the Micromoog as a controller for the Doepfer, and vice-versa, and I'm including the cables necessary to completely interface it with the Doepfer: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? ViewItem&category=38071&it
2005-06-13 by Ernst Karel
Hello -- Has anyone checked their Doepfer suitcase as checked baggage when travelling by plane? I think I'm going to have to check two of them on an international flight (with a connection) and I'm wondering how worried I should be. I suppose I should just make a couple of boxes
2005-06-13 by Florian Anwander
Hi Bakis, I think, we should think a little bit about what exactly is possible and what we really wish. The OctaveCat-Style Filter may sound similar to many other already available filters (A105, A107, A109, A122, and also A120/A108). The 12dB multi-mode filter in the Oberheim SE
2005-06-13 by David Salter
Dieter, Your comment " I thought we have enough filters. But who knows ....." is, in my opinion, basically correct. The only reason I could envisage another filter is if it provided something so different from what is already available to make it worth the time and effort of deve
2005-06-13 by Florian Anwander
Hi Dieter > The original Octave Cat filter is nothing but a standard 24dB filter based > on four OTAs (CA3080). I cannot see why it shoud sound so extraordinary. I have/had the Formant VCFs, which are based ont the standard CA3080 schematic. - The 12dB Version is really something
2005-06-13 by Florian Anwander
Hi isjtar > well same here with the software. BUT if doepfer would manage to make a good granular > module that can be integrated in the A-100 and other modulars, this would be a milestone > module. To my experience granular synthesis is something, which is mostly used for mulitv
2005-06-13 by Dieter Doepfer
The original Octave Cat filter is nothing but a standard 24dB filter based on four OTAs (CA3080). I cannot see why it shoud sound so extraordinary. We "designed" such a filter module already in the nineties when be began the A-100 (i.e. before this forum was born). But we never p
2005-06-13 by Bakis Sirros
hello all, could anyone explain in detail what a granulizer module would/could do and what a grain cloud delay module would do(and possible specifications), in order for me to be able to create new polls for these possible modules? regards, :-) bakis. --- isjtarjr wrote: > > Hi,
2005-06-13 by Bakis Sirros
hello, i think this would be easy to acheive. just re-route the filter output back to itself(with the help of an a181 and a138b or c) via an a133 or an a136 or a137 module. too many creative possibilities! regards, bakis. --- eyesleeandrews wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm wondering i
2005-06-13 by Bakis Sirros
hello ingo, i agree with you too. the a100 has a million different filters already. regards, bakis. --- selfoscillate wrote: > > hello bakis, > > for me such a filter has no priority. > there are a dozen other modules i'd like to see > earlier, > mainly because we already have so
2005-06-13 by isjtarjr
for me granular is a more noisy/scape than pad affair, but that doesn't really matter. in any case, the karplus strong module i proposed is indeed more interesting considering resources etc. --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Florian Anwander wrote: > Hi isjtar > > > well same
2005-06-13 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the Doepfer_a100 group: Wokld you like Doepfer to manufacture an Octave Cat filter module? [the very first version filter is a standard 24dB filter based on four OTAs (CA3080)] o yes! o maybe o no. To vote, please visit the f
2005-06-13 by isjtarjr
Hi, well same here with the software. BUT if doepfer would manage to make a good granular module that can be integrated in the A-100 and other modulars, this would be a milestone module. i really often feel the need to get more digital means in the A-100 and real integration can
2005-06-13 by selfoscillate
> forgive me for being blunt, but is doepfer capable of making such a module? > it seems a bit hard due to the complex digital nature. > > cheers > > Isjtar hello isjtar, that is exactly what i see too. i use granular stuff all the time in reaktor and for me a granular device is
2005-06-13 by isjtarjr
hi, a granulizer should load samples (via usb?- please include macs this time : ) my A-112 is practically useless ) and give manual and voltage control over: pitch grain size grain envelope grain distance maximum number of grains at once could it be stereo? built-in jitter genera
2005-06-13 by ilanode
Hi Erik, the PTxy is digital thus lacking the BBDs charm. Regards, Ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Erik" wrote: > Hi, an cheap and good solution is Princeton PT2399 for delay and echo. > only 3.95 US$ from http://www.smallbearelec.com/ see under: > stock list, ICs Dela
2005-06-13 by Erik
Hi, an cheap and good solution is Princeton PT2399 for delay and echo. only 3.95 US$ from http://www.smallbearelec.com/ see under: stock list, ICs Delays and Echo regards Erik --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "selfoscillate" wrote: > > hello guilherme, > > those bbd-chips are
2005-06-13 by Florian Anwander
Hi Guilherme > Sorry if I insist. I completely agree about the bad sound of the > analogue delay. But if we forget the technical exigency and think about > art may be the BBD analog delay is unique in creating psychic, dreaming > and cosmic in the dirty warm sense witch for me is
2005-06-13 by selfoscillate
hello andrew, you need a mixer and a multiple for than. the signal goes into the mixer and from there into the filter input. the filter output goes into the multiple. now take the signal from the multiple back into another input of the mixer. best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@
2005-06-13 by selfoscillate
hello guilherme, those bbd-chips are not used anymore by the industry, there are much better/cheaper solutions available (technically speaking), so there is not enough demand for them to keep producion up. most of the bbd-manufacturers have stopped production because of this. bes
2005-06-13 by selfoscillate
hello bakis, for me such a filter has no priority. there are a dozen other modules i'd like to see earlier, mainly because we already have so many filters. best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros wrote: > hello ingo and all, > so, the bottom line is: sh
2005-06-12 by pH
On 6/12/05 11:32 AM, "n keller" wrote: > Yo. > > the first Cat filter was discrete components, not an SSM/CEM chip. I've > looked many times for the schematics online http://www.overacker.com/cattune.htm check out schemo #4 -pH PS: sorry if this message comes through twice, I rep
2005-06-12 by pH
On 6/12/05 11:32 AM, "n keller" wrote: > Yo. > > the first Cat filter was discrete components, not an SSM/CEM chip. I've > looked many times for the schematics online http://www.overacker.com/cattune.htm check out schemo #4 -pH
2005-06-12 by n keller
Yo. the first Cat filter was discrete components, not an SSM/CEM chip. I've looked many times for the schematics online, but I've only ever found the SRM schems for free. There may have been a site that had them for sale, but I wasn't looking for that at the time. Does anyone els
2005-06-12 by eyesleeandrews
The SSM2040 was used in the Cat SRM - Series Revision Model and is not the original design. I'm trying to find out what filter was used in the original Cat. The 1st Cat sounded very different then the SRM and SRMII. From Blue Synth - "The first revision SRM employed a SSM2040 (RE
2005-06-12 by ben vehorn
Actually I believe the Voyetra 8 uses 2044 filters. The RSF Kobol Expander is another that uses the 2040. On Jun 11, 2005, at 5:55 PM, pH wrote: > The SSM2040 is one of my favorite > filters, but it is used in many things. Probably best known for the > Prophet > 5 or Octave Voyet
2005-06-12 by pela_gius
wrote: > Also we have three different techniques to build an audio delay: > > A.) BBDs (Bucket Bridge Devices). A BBD based delay doesn't seem like a good idea because the chips are scarce and there are already other VC BBD delays. > B.) Digital memory based delay, A/D-converter
2005-06-11 by pH
On 6/11/05 12:25 PM, "eyesleeandrews" wrote: > I vote YES.....!!! But then again, I started the thread, so that's goes with > out saying. > > I've been doing a bit of research. I definitely think the original filter > would be the best. It > is certainly the most unique sound. It
2005-06-11 by eyesleeandrews
Hello all, I'm wondering if anyone has a method of overdriving a filter. I have a Roland SH09. I often route the synth back into itself through the external input by use of an aux send on my mixer or by the headphone output. The filter overdrives in a very pleasant way and makes
2005-06-11 by Guilherme da Luz
Sorry if I insist. I completely agree about the bad sound of the analogue delay. But if we forget the technical exigency and think about art may be the BBD analog delay is unique in creating psychic, dreaming and cosmic in the dirty warm sense witch for me is sometimes more natur
2005-06-11 by eyesleeandrews
I vote YES.....!!! But then again, I started the thread, so that's goes with out saying. I've been doing a bit of research. I definitely think the original filter would be the best. It is certainly the most unique sound. The following is an exerpt from the Blue-Synth Website. "Th
2005-06-11 by ilanode
Not sure wether I get the idea but for the spike one could route the same gate which starts the actual adsr into a vca. A multifeatured module for a special purpose (ripple) should have inputs to break up the normalization eg. one might use a random CV instead of the LFO etc. Thu
2005-06-10 by Bakis Sirros
hello, i do not see the need for such a module(spike and ripple). you cna create the short spike with a standard adsr module switched in the L time range. you can create a delayed vibrato with a vca and an lfo plus an adsr and a gate delay module. please correct me if i am wrong