Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 390 of 564 · 28179 messages matched

AW: [Doepfer_a100] a171 vs a129/3 and a129/4

2005-06-28 by Dieter Doepfer

In principle both A-171 and A-129-3/4 are VC slew limiters. But the working principles and the features are very different. The A-171 uses an operational transconductance amplifier (OTA CA3080) to create the slewed voltage. It has a continuous output (no quantization). For the vo

Thread view Attachments: 0

New poll for Doepfer_a100

2005-06-28 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com

Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the Doepfer_a100 group: Would you like doepfer to release (in the future) a Granulizer module? (this module possibly could/should load samples and give manual and voltage control over: pitch, grain size, grain envelope, grain

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: NIN Doepfer etc

2005-06-28 by selfoscillate

hello bakis, recently i've seen a picture of the nin studio. yes, he also owns doepfer modules. best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros wrote: > hello gino, > ok, so i guess NIN also use the doepfer a100? > if anyone knows for sure, please confirm. > be

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] a171 vs a129/3 and a129/4

2005-06-28 by Bakis Sirros

hello bryan, the a129/3 + a129/4 process(with vc-slew limiting)the DC cv signals that come from the a129/1 analysis section module. these are standard DC cv signals that are used to control the 15 vca's(of the a129/2 synthesis section module) that come after the 15 filters of the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] NIN Doepfer etc

2005-06-28 by Bakis Sirros

hello gino, ok, so i guess NIN also use the doepfer a100? if anyone knows for sure, please confirm. best regards, bakis. --- "Robair, Gino" wrote: > Just downloaded the NIN "Only" tracks for remixing > (the Pro Tools ones, > although there are sets available for Acid, > GarageBan

Thread view Attachments: 0

NIN Doepfer etc

2005-06-27 by Robair, Gino

Just downloaded the NIN "Only" tracks for remixing (the Pro Tools ones, although there are sets available for Acid, GarageBand, and Live as well). Immediately noticed an audio file called Doepfer Andromeda, which I imagine combines Doepfer and Alesis Andy sounds. Can't wait to ch

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Permanently attached patch cords

2005-06-26 by don hassler

Neat thread. Nearly always I find myself reverting/using a fixed configuration, though rarely in the vco/vcf/vca manner. The Synthi presto patch concept would be a great addition to Doepfer family. --- levka0 wrote: > Hi, > Well, I had some thoughts on this before, since a > lot

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Permanently attached patch cords

2005-06-26 by pela_gius

I wish the article on creating normalled connections was complete on the Doepfer DIY page. I would love to learn how to do this as there are several connections in my system that I would like to normalize. Has anyone here successfully done this? The jacks are all switching jacks

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Permanently attached patch cords

2005-06-26 by trebcavxx

The matrix idea (built into the synthi range) attracted me - I used to have a VCS3 - But with the present big modular I've built up, I'd need a matrix panel with around 17,000 sockets ! This would occupy a surface area at least as large as my synthesiser front panel, over 48 inch

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Permanently attached patch cords

2005-06-26 by levka0

Hi, Well, I had some thoughts on this before, since a lot of the connections I make (VCF-VCA-EG) are pretty "standard" in my set-up I have not noticed any jacks wearing out, but I find the clutter of patch cords a little too much now & then, as a basic patch will often take up 5

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Permanently attached patch cords

2005-06-26 by trebcavxx

I experience the same problem all the time - The typical VCO to Filter/VCA and Keyboard to Envelope to VCA are almost a permanent link. Pesonally though, I wouldn't make any permanent links through the front jacks (though by its very nature, a jack link can't be a permanent link

Thread view Attachments: 0

Permanently attached patch cords

2005-06-26 by Keld Sørensen

Inspired by a thread on the synthesizers.com group - have any of you permanent or semi permanent patches set up? - Does having a patch cord connected to an input/output weaken the jack? I have cv connected to my VCO all the time and Gate to the EG´s. No problem - but what about y

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] source for m3 screws in USA?

2005-06-25 by Loren Nerell

>well... ive got a project i would like to finish up, but i need some >of the M3 6mm screws used to mount modules! can anyone point me to a >source, preferably in the USA? thanks! http://www.fastener-express.com should do the trick. ;) -- Take care. - Loren Nerell ---------------

Thread view Attachments: 0

source for m3 screws in USA?

2005-06-25 by denshiblocks

well... ive got a project i would like to finish up, but i need some of the M3 6mm screws used to mount modules! can anyone point me to a source, preferably in the USA? thanks! seth

Thread view Attachments: 0

a171 vs a129/3 and a129/4

2005-06-24 by Bryan E Cornell

Sorry, I got the wrong number in my last post. I meant to say, "Will the a129/3,4 do everything that an a171 will do?" I'm talking about the vocoder submodules. Bryan

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: a171 vs a129/3 and a129/4

2005-06-24 by selfoscillate

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "selfoscillate" wrote: > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Bryan E Cornell" > wrote: > > Will an a149/3,4 do everything that an a171 will do? > > > > > > > > Bryan > > > hello bryan, > > i don't think so, but i cannot be 100% sure, because

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: a171 vs a129/3 and a129/4

2005-06-24 by selfoscillate

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Bryan E Cornell" wrote: > Will an a149/3,4 do everything that an a171 will do? > > > > Bryan hello bryan, i don't think so, but i cannot be 100% sure, because the a149/3 is yet unconfirmed, no exact features have been named yet. but i doubt t

Thread view Attachments: 0

easy example access

2005-06-23 by selfoscillate

hello all, searching the yahoo group for sound examples can be a pain. therefore i've added a new page to my website with direct links to my sound examples, including copies of the postings. best wishes ingo

Thread view Attachments: 0

a-143-1 complex envelope, modification???

2005-06-23 by danv_83

I'm interested in adding some cv ins to the complex envelope module. I'd like to be able to control the attack and decay times through cv. I know real-estate is one of the hardest parts here, so I was wondering if there would be a simple way to install a switch that could switch

Thread view Attachments: 0

Polls on polls on polls

2005-06-21 by Robair, Gino

Hi Bakis and Doepferians, Yeah -- that's pretty much what I was referring to, in terms of keeping the distractions down to a minimum by not polling heavily on features. I must say that I enjoy the user activity on this list quite a bit. Looking forward to the upcoming controllers

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] a poll about polls?

2005-06-21 by Bakis Sirros

hello gino, new polls about future possible modules do not do dieter any harm. potentialy "harmful" polls, are the detailed polls about specific features for Soon To Be Released modules that sometimes confuse dieter, because of the many different results and possible options they

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Creating meaningfull polls (was: Poll thoughts)

2005-06-21 by Bakis Sirros

hello joost, no problem at all. :-) regards, bakis. --- levka0 wrote: > Hey Bakis > I am just re-reading my own post, and I am sorry > that it appears a > little too arrogant in tone. > It was in no way meant to critize you or others, but > I thought that > polls which sketch the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: a poll about polls? (TKS)

2005-06-21 by ilanode

Speaking on the TKS any estimate when it will be released? Regards, Ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros wrote: > hello gino, > new polls about future possible modules do not do > dieter any harm. > > potentialy "harmful" polls, are the detailed polls > about sp

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Any A101-3 phaser samples or thoughts?

2005-06-20 by selfoscillate

hello phil, the vactrol phaser has a smooth and liquid sound, but it can also sound very harsh with patched feedback-loops. please check messages 6166, 6587 and 7239 for sound examples using the a101/3. best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, pH wrote: > > I don't t

Thread view Attachments: 0

a poll about polls?

2005-06-19 by Robair, Gino

Folks, How about having a poll about whether or not we should put a hold on suggesting any more module ideas for a time? I am just as curious as anyone else about potential new modules, but I'd also like to give Dieter some breathing room from the constant user-idea input so he c

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Creating meaningfull polls (was: Poll thoughts)

2005-06-19 by levka0

Hey Bakis I am just re-reading my own post, and I am sorry that it appears a little too arrogant in tone. It was in no way meant to critize you or others, but I thought that polls which sketch the "bigger picture" would be most usefull kind regards Joost --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoo

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Any A101-3 phaser samples or thoughts?

2005-06-19 by Bakis Sirros

hello phil, yes the 101-3 vactrol phaser is a great module and i use it all the time in my tracks. it has amazing creative potential and, yes, it can give you very wild results(with one or more feedback loops). i totaly recommend it! with all it's inputs/ outputs has many creativ

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Creating meaningfull polls (was: Poll thoughts)

2005-06-19 by Bakis Sirros

hello, ok, i saw these polls that you had created, but these refer to a different kind of poll question. many of the polls that i create are about a (only one) future POSSIBLE module. the 3 options that i give are very simple, but i think that, quite roughly, they give dieter an

Thread view Attachments: 0

Creating meaningfull polls (was: Poll thoughts)

2005-06-18 by levka0

Hi all, Some time ago, I thought a lot about making polls to produce outcomes that would be more practical to interpret (especially for Dieter) Based on this, I created the following two (now closed): http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/surveys?id=11810324 http://la

Thread view Attachments: 0

Any A101-3 phaser samples or thoughts?

2005-06-18 by pH

I don't think the 101-3 Vactrol Phaser has been discussed much, but it's always looked like it has a lot of potential. Any thoughts from owners or samples? Can it get extreme or is it pretty smooth and tame? thanks! -phil

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: MS-404 CV/Gate outputs

2005-06-16 by Steve

Dieter, Many thanks for the info - I was wondering what I could buy to fill a few more rack spaces ;-) Steve > > Hi Steve > > > > > The question is, will the the 404 be able to provide a stable > > CV for up to 3 > > > modules (2 VCO & 1 VCF) without getting overloaded? > > To my

Thread view Attachments: 0

AW: [Doepfer_a100] MS-404 CV/Gate outputs

2005-06-16 by Dieter Doepfer

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]Im Auftrag von Florian Anwander > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2005 09:45 > An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > Betreff: Re: [Doepfer_a100] MS-404 CV/Gate outputs > > >

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Poll thoughts

2005-06-16 by Tommy DOG

I think the best way to know the interests is to poll on a group of specific modules that Doepfer feels are closest to being built and one could state the order of personal interest. This way those who want new oscilators and sound generators or filters or bit crunchers can say w

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Poll thoughts

2005-06-16 by Julian

Surely Dieter monitors the correlation between poll results and module sales anyway, and hence it doesn't really matter the thought behind any individuals vote - its the end correlation that matters? If 100 people say every time that they'd love the module and only 10 buy, yeah,

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [spam] Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Poll thoughts

2005-06-16 by David Salter

Brandon, Spot on. If a group member does not vote, no assumption can be made of their interest. I agree with some of the earlier posts that; yes, no and maybe are restrictive. I think that all we need to do is agree a format of responses for future polls, i.e. Yes - Definitely pu

Thread view Attachments: 0

USA: Doepfer modular systems under $1000 new

2005-06-16 by synthtrader

hello, One last friendly spam before I go to bed :) We've decided to lower the price of the Doepfer Mini System to below the $1000 mark. That's a great way to get into modulars on a budget. For more details on this see: http://www.analoguehaven.com/doepfer/a100ms/ Keep in mind th

Thread view Attachments: 0

USA: Doepfer MAQ 16/3s $599 with blue leds

2005-06-16 by synthtrader

hi, I posted this on AH but after a bunch of initial replies got no firm follow-ups. Sorry for those who get the message multiple times. So... We got a shipment of MAQ 16/3s with blue LEDs in but unfortunately they were damaged in transit. The top right hand corner on all three w

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] MS-404 CV/Gate outputs

2005-06-16 by Florian Anwander

Hi Steve > The question is, will the the 404 be able to provide a stable CV for up to 3 > modules (2 VCO & 1 VCF) without getting overloaded? To my experience: yes. Florian

Thread view Attachments: 0

Doepfer A-100 modifications and other modules in Doepfer format

2005-06-16 by synthtrader

hello, Just a quick note to let everyone know that the old mod pages are still up at http://www.abiotic.net/schism/diy.html We are working to get them moved over to the www.analoguehaven.com site soon as well as other content. In the meantime I invite you to check out some wonder

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Poll thoughts

2005-06-15 by Brandon Daniel

sfrules said: > > > Some consideration should also probably be given to those who > voted "NO" by not even voting... > > It's not the % that voted yes out of those who voted, but the > % out of the number of people who are on the list that is more > important. No? Hardly, that wo

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Poll thoughts

2005-06-15 by sfrules

Some consideration should also probably be given to those who voted "NO" by not even voting... It's not the % that voted yes out of those who voted, but the % out of the number of people who are on the list that is more important. No? just ruminating, sfrules

Thread view Attachments: 0

MS-404 CV/Gate outputs

2005-06-15 by tw18steve

I'm planning a (small) modular synth to be built in the next couple of months. It will be a mix of Doepfer and (mainly) Analogue Solutions modules - mainly due to lack of money! As what I have planned will have no Midi module, I was intending to use my MS-404 as combined sound so

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Poll thoughts

2005-06-15 by Tommy DOG

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Florian Anwander wrote: > Hi Bakis > > > option. i vote for "maybe" when i think that i will > > Probably want to buy this module when it will be > > released. > I fear this is what Tommy DOG meant. Many People vote "maybe i will buy > it". I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: karplus strong info

2005-06-14 by isjtarjr

try google, 11000 results ; ) basically it's a delay based method for emulating a plucked string. usually white noise is used with a short delay and a feedback loop. the delay time is analogues to pitch. --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "spleensick" wrote: > Hello, everybody!

Thread view Attachments: 0

AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Digital delay module again

2005-06-14 by Dieter Doepfer

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]Im Auftrag von selfoscillate > Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Juni 2005 11:48 > An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > Betreff: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Digital delay module again > > af

Thread view Attachments: 0

AW: [Doepfer_a100] checked baggage

2005-06-14 by Dieter Doepfer

> Hi Ernst > > > Has anyone checked their Doepfer suitcase as checked baggage when > > travelling by plane? > I assume at least Dieter Doepfer knows this, because they have to ship > their systems for the NAMM-show in Los Angeles. As far most german > exhibitors ship their equipm

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Digital delay module again

2005-06-14 by Florian Anwander

Hi Frederik > Does anybody know how the Blacet Time Machine is constructed? Or the > old Moogerfooger delay? I don't know for the Mooger Fooger. The Blacet is a BBD based device. >I think BOSS has some old half-racked delay > with CV-in as well... As already mentioned. A basic CV

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Poll thoughts

2005-06-14 by Florian Anwander

Hi Bakis > option. i vote for "maybe" when i think that i will > Probably want to buy this module when it will be > released. I fear this is what Tommy DOG meant. Many People vote "maybe i will buy it". I know, that you, Bakis, are one of those who really will buy it; but most pe

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Digital delay module again

2005-06-14 by selfoscillate

hello fredrik, please find my comments below. --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "spleensick" wrote: > Hello, everybody! > > I think it's wonderful that an analog (or digital for that matter) > delay module is being discussed. As I don't know much about > construction of delays

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.