Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 521 of 564 · 28179 messages matched
2002-07-24 by p. hendricks
On 7/23/02 8:28 PM, "duffnuff" wrote: > this is pretty easy already.. > cv-to-midi is all you need (that's all it would end up being > anyway). i use it all the time. note: a virtual modular is pretty easy also, I think most on this list recognize the difference. midi? i don't us
2002-07-24 by p. hendricks
agreed, we need something really messed up! perhaps, a wacked digital delay with CV control over bit/sample rate/playback speed/length/LF/HF/loop/reverse/degrade... ++++ everything! we need a fully CV'able messed up digital thing! btw: for a VCO look to the AS RS-95 or new Blacet
2002-07-24 by duffnuff
--- "p. hendricks" wrote: > agreed, we need something really messed up! perhaps, a wacked digital delay > with CV control over bit/sample rate/playback > speed/length/LF/HF/loop/reverse/degrade... ++++ everything! we need a fully > CV'able messed up digital thing! this is pretty
2002-07-24 by ringmod45
not necessarily, different production methods. but they might or will be a little more expensive. the point is doepfer has designed and produced the basic modules here already, so let the creative and esoteric modules fly. that what i am jonesing for because i already have them a
2002-07-23 by ethanzer0
> > OK, lemme have it. > > P I can offer a deep resounding aye-aye in response to your Buchla comments and enthusiasm. However, would such modules by virtue of design, be forced into a price bracket similar to Serge? Ethan
2002-07-23 by bakis Sirros
hi list, o.k., as you seem to have so many new ideas for new modules(i agree with a high end discrete component VCO,too!!!!!!!!),please,feel free to make your own polls!come on,what are you waiting for? :-) bakis. --- unknown freak wrote: > I definitely agree that places to look
2002-07-23 by unknown freak
No problem, Peter, it's just that you're off to the left of my actual main point about Buchla and Serge stuff as a source of inspiration, which is that some of the stuff is really nicely done and would be great to use. As for the prices, they're so lunatic they beggar belief. And
2002-07-23 by code_pig
Dare I say, Digisound had a great VC-DCO, and a tuning module. Neither were too expensive (and part of that was down to low cost panels and pots), but the circuits were solid. Count me in on that one. Also, count me in on any vactrol stuff. Regards, Kevin
2002-07-23 by petergrenader
--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "unknown freak" wrote: > I definitely agree that places to look for inspirations for expansions > to the line would include Buchla and Serge. I agree...I would love to see vactrol based instruments and something along the lines of the Mult Arbitrary Func
2002-07-23 by mdimmm
--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., Stinchcombe Timothy wrote: > Hi M. > > > Actually, when I send a sawtooth signal to my software > > oscilloscope, it shows up mirrored on the screen. When I patch > > the signal through the A-119 (Asym. In) before sending it to the > > computer, the wave
2002-07-23 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 7/23/2002 7:15:39 AM Eastern Daylight Time, david.salter@reuters.com writes: > > Maybe Bakis (are you there Bakis?) could could have a quite word with > Dieter - I like the idea of a limited edition or small production run for > those of us who either don't pla
2002-07-23 by unknown freak
I definitely agree that places to look for inspirations for expansions to the line would include Buchla and Serge. Those who haven't done so really owe it to themselves to check out: www.buchla.com and http://www.scampers.com/EGRES/ As for a DCO, though ... hmm. I just don't see
2002-07-23 by Paul Schulz
I have to say, yes. I'd love a good VCO. In fact I actully think a modular DCO would be a very neat module. That would give us a simple soultion for tuning problems and also enable ever illusive graphic oscillator. Integrating that with the rest of the A100 would be massive. And
2002-07-23 by David Salter
I confess that an A-200 range is an interesting idea, maybe some of the ideas that Dieter has proposed in the past but would not be of commercial enough interest could also fall into that category. I know that even a short production run costs money to set-up, PCB's, front panels
2002-07-23 by Andreas Lindholm
Reading this... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Schulz" > But what would you all think about a higher priced module line (A-200 for example) with added functions? What about modules like a new discrete-circuit hi-end VCO with more than two CV inputs, please! ; or a filte
2002-07-23 by Paul Schulz
Hi list! David wrote: >I like the idea of a limited edition or small production run for those of us who either don't play keys or are more experimentally orientated (I fall into both categories). You have to remember that a small production run will always cost a manufacturer lot
2002-07-23 by ethanzer0
>or a filterbank with separate outs; Definately! If you've ever played with one of these, you know just how cool this can be: http://www.buchla.com/historical/b200/images/295-large.jpeg Ethan
2002-07-23 by David Salter
Hi Dave, I hope it does make it to production. Very exciting idea. I'm not sure what Doepfers take on releasing intellectual property is but this thing would be of interest to modular users regardless of the origin of the modules. Maybe Bakis (are you there Bakis?) could could ha
2002-07-23 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 7/23/2002 6:01:28 AM Eastern Daylight Time, david.salter@reuters.com writes: > > The n-64 controller is a superb idea. I love that fact the not only do you > get a couple of continuous controllers but the ability to trigger events, > envelopes, sequencers or re
2002-07-23 by David Salter
Firstly, sorry for delay in responding but I was away for a long weekend. The n-64 controller is a superb idea. I love that fact the not only do you get a couple of continuous controllers but the ability to trigger events, envelopes, sequencers or resetting lfo's, all from one co
2002-07-23 by Arnauld Michelizza
On Fri, 19 Jul 2002, petergrenader wrote: > PLEASE include a quasi-random advance function to the > sequencer engine!!! Assuming it's going to be picro p > based....it'll be a snap! It should be done with patching the S&H unit to the sequencer isn't it ? Arnauld
2002-07-23 by unknown freak
Jesus, that Elhardt/Schreiber exchange is hilarious and just piquantly deranged and nasty. Paul just goes off the deep end on the thing. And all his talk about his perfect analog electronics ... Indeed, what a perfectionist. Elhardt needs a poorly-designed Moog envelope to kick t
2002-07-23 by its_peake
Or even some nifty, inexpensive, CV'd DOEPFER ENVELOPES! :-D Easier, -Mike --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., unknown freak wrote: > Jesus, that Elhardt/Schreiber exchange is hilarious and just piquantly > deranged and nasty. Paul just goes off the deep end on the thing. And > all his tal
2002-07-23 by buechlerjoe
> Since I don't have any space left in my rack, is there an easy way > to construct a little outboard CV inverter? I remember having a similar dilemma last year after my frames were full, when I realized that I needed an A185 to buffer the pitch CV from my A155/156. After spendin
2002-07-22 by Andreas Lindholm
Indeed a serious discussion about problems and seems like synt...com take their pr seriously. Perhaps this has a bit to do with the fact that users sometimes also build their modular from kits. It is more of an indepth relation with their machine. I asked mr D about some help rep
2002-07-22 by ringmod45
hi mike, i concurrently agree with you on almost all of the points you mention. the plus side to the motm is the way modules, functions and layouts are discussed with its customers before they go to production. that's what i was referring to and not the other stuff. i read the po
2002-07-22 by Stinchcombe Timothy
Hi M. Another idea, which is rather 'thinking out loud', so perhaps a little tricky in practice (and assumes CV to be inverted is always positive!): if you have an A-132 and a source of negative CV (perhaps an A-174 joystick: max neg X or Y is about -4.5V from memory), you could
2002-07-22 by Stinchcombe Timothy
Hi M. > Actually, when I send a sawtooth signal to my software > oscilloscope, it shows up mirrored on the screen. When I patch > the signal through the A-119 (Asym. In) before sending it to the > computer, the waveform looks the way it does on the front of the > module. So it se
2002-07-22 by buechlerjoe
Okay, a triangle wave from an LFO thru the A119 does indeed get inverted, but with a definite time lag. Suspecting a cap, I tried patching in the CV source instead. The DC was indeed blocked by the A119. Although the A136 will indeed work as a voltage inverter, I forget to mentio
2002-07-22 by its_peake
--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "ringmod45" wrote: > i want to enlighten a few of you as to how a company should react and > use its group members for input on its new and upcoming designs. > > THE GROUP IN QUESTION IS MOTM. please go to the group and read how > the designers and custo
2002-07-22 by Andreas Lindholm
Ahh, damn... I am not awake yet, I see th elight now, but I think numbers would be easier and take less space than typing out what goes where. Ignore the following remark =) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andreas Lindholm" To: Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:53 AM Subject: Re
2002-07-22 by Andreas Lindholm
Looks ok, looking forward to seeing you solution for the cabling... Numbers could be one easy way to go... colors perhaps... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" To: Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 11:58 PM Subject: RE: [Doepfer_a100] PatchML > Here's a roug
2002-07-22 by Andreas Lindholm
Interesting... I am looking forward to see how it works out. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" To: Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 5:48 PM Subject: RE: [Doepfer_a100] PatchML > Andreas, > > I'd do this sort-of without backend. Just pages in > PatchML and
2002-07-22 by mdimmm
--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "buechlerjoe" wrote: > > Are there any other modules besides the A-175 that do voltage > > inversion of CV? (A-119, A-116, A-136?). The A-119 doesn't > > seem to handle CV signals very well, seems more suitable for > > inverting audio signals. > > The A1
2002-07-21 by Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
Here's a rough sketch of a PatchML document, it might only work in WinIE6: http://webaccess.mozquito.com/a100/firstpatch.xml - Sebastian -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Andreas Lindholm Gesendet: So 21.07.2002 09:30 An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com Cc: Betreff: [Doepfer_a1
2002-07-21 by Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
Joe, don't worry, I'm not trying to avoid my personal in-depth trial-and-error odyssee with this machine .-). What strikes me though is that I've already had some really cool patches going and then I naturally, being the scatter-brained human I am, forgot to remember the patch. A
2002-07-21 by Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
:-) I hope it doesn't hit me that hard... I've spent a lot of time in front of the computer already and sort-of tried to get a life too. It worked so far... I hope to build on that expertise with my Doepfer obsession... (OK, calm down, turn this thing off, go outside, breathe, in
2002-07-21 by Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
Andreas, I'd do this sort-of without backend. Just pages in PatchML and styling them with CSS. You can view such pages natively in IE6 and Netscape 7. The search functionality would be real search engine like google specialized on that format... - Sebastian -----Ursprüngliche Nac
2002-07-21 by buechlerjoe
> Are there any other modules besides the A-175 that do voltage > inversion of CV? (A-119, A-116, A-136?). The A-119 doesn't > seem to handle CV signals very well, seems more suitable for > inverting audio signals. The A136 works fine as a voltage inverter. The A116 might possibl
2002-07-21 by buechlerjoe
> I'd love to spend more time finding out more about patches on > the web. I have only found: http://www.modular-planet.de so > far. Unfortunately the patches are not grouped by module set. So it > is hard to indentify patches that I can do with just the A-100 M > set. This would
2002-07-21 by mdimmm
Are there any other modules besides the A-175 that do voltage inversion of CV? (A-119, A-116, A-136?). The A-119 doesn't seem to handle CV signals very well, seems more suitable for inverting audio signals. Since I don't have any space left in my rack, is there an easy way to con
2002-07-21 by Andreas Lindholm
I'd like to add to the list. * Constant hunt for a sound that stays in tune with the rest of your studio caused by individuality of VCOs (a110). ----- Original Message ----- From: "code_pig" To: Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 9:59 AM Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Now that I've got my
2002-07-21 by Andreas Lindholm
Hi, I am a webbie too, but I don't think I fully see the point of your patchML... But I like XMl anyway so I might lend a little hand. What language did you plan on using in the backend? php, asp, java? /Andreas > I'd love to spend more time finding out more about patches on > th
2002-07-21 by code_pig
Sebastian, In case no one has warned you, or if you haven't figured it out by now, be prepared for the following issues. 1. Sensory deprivation. This will generally manifest itself in the form of sleeplessness, which will be a direct result of searching for The Perfect Patch. Dev
2002-07-20 by Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
Since I've really appreciated it how you guys have helped me out finding the right module set, I thought I'd let you know what happened in the meanwhile, I've got my new A-100M now. I actually picked it up myself by car from the Doepfer headquarters near Munich, I got it right fr
2002-07-20 by code_pig
Peter, It sound very much like the old EMS-AKS (touch key and sequencer equiped Synthi) random sequencer functions... only with metal contacts and individual CV outputs. Yes please. By all means. I'll have one. Hey Dieter: Indeed, Peter's (and the EMS of bygone years) idea is wei
2002-07-19 by ringmod45
--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "unknown freak" wrote: > If someone wants to do something unique, what I actually really miss is > the continuously-variable LFO-able ramp-to-narrow-pulse oscillator in my > Micromoog. The problem with the variable saw in the AS VCO is the > harmonics dr
2002-07-19 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 7/18/2002 11:20:42 PM Eastern Daylight Time, petergrenader@hotmail.com writes: > PLEASE include a quasi-random advance function to the > sequencer engine!!! peter, absolutely yes !!!! best, dave [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2002-07-19 by petergrenader
Dieter, If you're lurking... PLEASE include a quasi-random advance function to the sequencer engine!!! Assuming it's going to be picro p based....it'll be a snap!
2002-07-18 by buechlerjoe
--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "synth_freak_2000" wrote: > hi list, > nobody told me to create a last minute poll about the sensor keyboard! > i was mistaken to think that dieter was thinking to release a > mechanical keyboard instead of the sensor keyb. > so,i was WRONG!dieter latter