Bc2000 (for the BCF2000 & BCR2000) group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Bc2000 (for the BCF2000 & BCR2000)

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:16 UTC

Thread

Introduction

Introduction

2011-09-08 by Edward Cosla

Hello,
My name is Edward and I am hoping to sound design a live theatrical production using the BCR2000 controlling a dedicated audio laptop and Ableton Live configured as a live mixer with effects and including the ability to playback sound clips. The emphasis will be on using the BCR2000 to mix live mics on stage.

I am hoping to get support from this forum in the form of answers to questions as they come up. My professional experience is in the realm of live sound, but regarding MIDI my experience is really only as an intermediate beginner- I have used MIDI keyboards to control virtual instruments, but nothing as deep as configuring a BCR/BCF2000.

I have to set this all up within a week to take the piece on tour.

Am I in the right place to try to get some sympathetic help?

Edward


Re: Introduction

2011-09-09 by Royce

Welcome Edward,
feel free to ask your questions.
Try to make them detailed as yuou can 
It is a good idea to say what Midi messages you want the BC to output etc.

All the best
Royce

--- In bc2000@yahoogroups.com, Edward Cosla <edco2003@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Hello,
> My name is Edward and I am hoping to sound design a live theatrical production using the BCR2000 controlling a dedicated audio laptop and Ableton Live configured as a live mixer with effects and including the ability to playback sound clips.   The emphasis will be on using the BCR2000 to mix live mics on stage.  
> 
> I am hoping to get support from this forum in the form of answers to questions as they come up.  My professional experience is in the realm of live sound, but regarding MIDI my experience is really only as an intermediate beginner- I have used MIDI keyboards to control virtual instruments, but nothing as deep as configuring a BCR/BCF2000.
> 
> I have to set this all up within a week to take the piece on tour.  
> 
> Am I in the right place to try to get some sympathetic help?
> 
> Edward
>

Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction

2011-09-10 by edco2003@yahoo.com

I have decided it might be easier at this point to build a static mapping for the bcr rather than to try a Mackie emulation or some control surface. In the midi prefs of Ableton I just have the remotes on for the rme digiface input and output midi ports, and have no control surface selected. 

Is there some way to program an encoder to scroll through and select each track along it's travel?

To clarify: in the session view of Ableton, if I have 16 tracks and each is a mic input. I would like to be able to select any one of the 16 tracks by turning one encoder on the lower row of the bcr. So when the encoder is all the way counter clockwise track 1 is selected. When the encoder is all the way clockwise, track 16 would be selected, and each track in between would be selected as the encoder is turned.  

This would make navigating to see the inserted processing on each track very easy. 

Thanks for your consideration,
Edward

On Sep 8, 2011, at 11:02 PM, "Royce" <rpcfender@...> wrote:

Welcome Edward,
feel free to ask your questions.
Try to make them detailed as yuou can 
It is a good idea to say what Midi messages you want the BC to output etc.

All the best
Royce

--- In bc2000@yahoogroups.com, Edward Cosla <edco2003@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Hello,
> My name is Edward and I am hoping to sound design a live theatrical production using the BCR2000 controlling a dedicated audio laptop and Ableton Live configured as a live mixer with effects and including the ability to playback sound clips.   The emphasis will be on using the BCR2000 to mix live mics on stage.  
> 
> I am hoping to get support from this forum in the form of answers to questions as they come up.  My professional experience is in the realm of live sound, but regarding MIDI my experience is really only as an intermediate beginner- I have used MIDI keyboards to control virtual instruments, but nothing as deep as configuring a BCR/BCF2000.
> 
> I have to set this all up within a week to take the piece on tour.  
> 
> Am I in the right place to try to get some sympathetic help?
> 
> Edward
>

Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction

2011-09-11 by Edward Cosla

Hi Royce,
Thanks for your friendly reply earlier.

I sent out a question regarding using an encoder to scroll through selecting tracks in Ableton, but have not gotten a single reply yes or no back.  Did you get that message?  I think I sent it out to the forum group so everyone should have gotten it I imagine.

This is the first yahoo forum group I have been in so I am not sure exactly how it works. Am I not doing something right?

Thanks for your attention,
Edward

--- On Thu, 9/8/11, Royce <rpcfender@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

From: Royce <rpcfender@...>
Subject: [bc2000] Re: Introduction
To: bc2000@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, September 8, 2011, 11:02 PM















 
 



  


    
      
      
      Welcome Edward,

feel free to ask your questions.

Try to make them detailed as yuou can 

It is a good idea to say what Midi messages you want the BC to output etc.



All the best

Royce



--- In bc2000@yahoogroups.com, Edward Cosla <edco2003@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>

> Hello,

> My name is Edward and I am hoping to sound design a live theatrical production using the BCR2000 controlling a dedicated audio laptop and Ableton Live configured as a live mixer with effects and including the ability to playback sound clips.   The emphasis will be on using the BCR2000 to mix live mics on stage.  

> 

> I am hoping to get support from this forum in the form of answers to questions as they come up.  My professional experience is in the realm of live sound, but regarding MIDI my experience is really only as an intermediate beginner- I have used MIDI keyboards to control virtual instruments, but nothing as deep as configuring a BCR/BCF2000.

> 

> I have to set this all up within a week to take the piece on tour.  

> 

> Am I in the right place to try to get some sympathetic help?

> 

> Edward

>

Re: Introduction

2011-09-12 by Royce

Hi Edward
I was hoping some of the expert Live users here would be better able to
help.

> I have decided it might be easier at this point to build a static
mapping for the bcr rather than to try a Mackie emulation or some
control surface. In the midi prefs of Ableton I just have the remotes on
for the rme digiface input and output midi ports, and have no control
surface selected.

If you have selected any one of the BCR USB modes then this turns the BC
into a Midi interface and you will need to select it in the Controller
section of Live.
Send the 'dump' to the BCR and then the tracks will correspond to the 8
columns of the BC (called Instant mapping see the tutorial help under
Control surfaces to see the mapping)
I am unaware of how you get to channel 9 to 16. In Sonar you simply
press the <> switches to move by 8 tracks.
I can see that the Novation has a next/previous 8 tracks so perhaps you 
could search out what Midi messages it sends to achieve this and program
the BC in the same way.

>
> Is there some way to program an encoder to scroll through and select
each track along it's travel?

Not that I am aware of.  Anyone else know???
>
> To clarify: in the session view of Ableton, if I have 16 tracks and
each is a mic input. I would like to be able to select any one of the 16
tracks by turning one encoder on the lower row of the bcr. So when the
encoder is all the way counter clockwise track 1 is selected. When the
encoder is all the way clockwise, track 16 would be selected, and each
track in between would be selected as the encoder is turned.
>
> This would make navigating to see the inserted processing on each
track very easy.

So, I guess you would like to have a single 'strip' on the BC and select
the track that it would apply to?
Perhaps blocks of 8 might be easier.


Royce

Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction

2011-09-12 by karel skakal

Hi Ed,
I would assign each of the 16 tracks/mics to 16 buttons. You can "see" where you are and it is accurate to switch between tracks.
Then all the pots would be assigned to (common) functions/controls...Each (pot) would have its MIDI channel, corresponding to track, (button)...
So you can assign top 8 pots to 8 functions =  16 x 8 = 128 assignments per row!....(16 x Volume, ch.1-16, pot #1 for example)
I don't know what you want to do, I imagine you want to control FX, volume, pan, etc..?



________________________________
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Royce <rpcfender@...>
To: bc2000@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, 12 September 2011, 4:31
Subject: [bc2000] Re: Introduction


  
Hi Edward
I was hoping some of the expert Live users here would be better able to
help.

> I have decided it might be easier at this point to build a static
mapping for the bcr rather than to try a Mackie emulation or some
control surface. In the midi prefs of Ableton I just have the remotes on
for the rme digiface input and output midi ports, and have no control
surface selected.

If you have selected any one of the BCR USB modes then this turns the BC
into a Midi interface and you will need to select it in the Controller
section of Live.
Send the 'dump' to the BCR and then the tracks will correspond to the 8
columns of the BC (called Instant mapping see the tutorial help under
Control surfaces to see the mapping)
I am unaware of how you get to channel 9 to 16. In Sonar you simply
press the <> switches to move by 8 tracks.
I can see that the Novation has a next/previous 8 tracks so perhaps you 
could search out what Midi messages it sends to achieve this and program
the BC in the same way.

>
> Is there some way to program an encoder to scroll through and select
each track along it's travel?

Not that I am aware of.  Anyone else know???
>
> To clarify: in the session view of Ableton, if I have 16 tracks and
each is a mic input. I would like to be able to select any one of the 16
tracks by turning one encoder on the lower row of the bcr. So when the
encoder is all the way counter clockwise track 1 is selected. When the
encoder is all the way clockwise, track 16 would be selected, and each
track in between would be selected as the encoder is turned.
>
> This would make navigating to see the inserted processing on each
track very easy.

So, I guess you would like to have a single 'strip' on the BC and select
the track that it would apply to?
Perhaps blocks of 8 might be easier.

Royce

Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction

2011-09-13 by Edward Cosla

Hi Karel,
Thanks for giving me some good ideas on how common functions can be mapped.  Was not clear on using different midi channels before. I think I am understanding what you wrote, have to read and re-read again..

For this project, I think I would need to have constant access to all track volumes all the time (top 16 encoders mapped to 16 track volumes).  This will be a live theater production and I forsee needing to adjust more than one encoder at the same time. I think I understand in the way you are describing that I would have to choose each track by pushing a button before I could adjust any parameters on that track.

It still would be nice to be able to map an encoder to scroll through choosing/highlighting each channel as I turn one encoder.  I think something like this is possible because I remember reading about someone's template where they used one push encoder to scroll up and down through clips, and another to scroll left and right through clips, and then a push on one of the encoders to fire the clip.  

Thanks for your attention,
Edward

--- On Mon, 9/12/11, karel skakal <s_y_nagual@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: karel skakal <s_y_nagual@....uk>
Subject: Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction
To: "bc2000@yahoogroups.com" <bc2000@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Monday, September 12, 2011, 2:42 AM















 
 



  


    
      
      
      Hi Ed,I would assign each of the 16 tracks/mics to 16 buttons. You can "see" where you are and it is accurate to switch between tracks.Then all the pots would be assigned to (common) functions/controls...Each (pot) would have its MIDI channel, corresponding to track, (button)...So you can assign top 8 pots to 8 functions =  16 x 8 = 128 assignments per row!....(16 x Volume, ch.1-16, pot #1 for
 example)I don't know what you want to do, I imagine you want to control FX, volume, pan, etc..?

From: Royce <rpcfender@...>
To:
 bc2000@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, 12 September 2011, 4:31
Subject: [bc2000] Re: Introduction















 
 



    
      
      
      Hi Edward

I was hoping some of the expert Live users here would be better able to

help.



> I have decided it might be easier at this point to build a static

mapping for the bcr rather than to try a Mackie emulation or some

control surface. In the midi prefs of Ableton I just have the remotes on

for the rme digiface input and output midi ports, and have no control

surface selected.



If you have selected any one of the BCR USB modes then this turns the BC

into a Midi interface and you will need to select it in the Controller

section of Live.

Send the 'dump' to the BCR and then the tracks will correspond to the 8

columns of the BC (called Instant mapping see the tutorial help under

Control surfaces to see the mapping)

I am unaware of how you get to channel 9 to 16. In Sonar you simply

press the <> switches to move by 8 tracks.

I can see that the Novation has a next/previous 8 tracks so perhaps you 

could search out what Midi messages it sends to achieve this and program

the BC in the same way.



>

> Is there some way to program an encoder to scroll through and select

each track along it's travel?



Not that I am aware of.  Anyone else know???

>

> To clarify: in the session view of Ableton, if I have 16 tracks and

each is a mic input. I would like to be able to select any one of the 16

tracks by turning one encoder on the lower row of the bcr. So when the

encoder is all the way counter clockwise track 1 is selected. When the

encoder is all the way clockwise, track 16 would be selected, and each

track in between would be selected as the encoder is turned.

>

> This would make navigating to see the inserted processing on each

track very easy.



So, I guess you would like to have a single 'strip' on the BC and select

the track that it would apply to?

Perhaps blocks of 8 might be easier.



Royce

Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction

2011-09-13 by karel skakal

Hi  Ed,
Thanks to Mark and Royce, BC Manager is probably the best editor to work with, so when you assign volume to 16 pots, you can assign also the display, to 'see' the volume.
In your case, if you need access to all 16 mics,  assign 2 rows of 8 for Volume. Then for stuff other then volume have the 16 buttons to access the16 channels for tweaking and specific stuff: pan, fx, etc, common to all 16
Top row of pots has also push on/off feature: mute/solo etc...
There are so many possibilities...

What I do when I make a template is I load  template # X,  in the buffer(#0) and in the buffer , you can do anything and immediately send it to BCR, MIDI icon is green, (if it is grey, you're not there) to see how it works...But you must stay on X, and then when done, save it (button store 2 x)
So basically, send the template (to buffer) that you want to use for your assignment, because you will overwrite that template...
Be careful not to send all midi, (you can save your template, but don't send it unless you know what you're doing, I don't), because it has happen to me, that I over-wrote and erased all of my templates with factory template or something else. This is the only feature that I don't like on BC manager (and wish it wasn't possible).  
cheers
PS. look at the editing features in BC manager, you assign "groups" with one click...


________________________________
From: Edward Cosla <edco2003@...>
To: bc2000@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, 13 September 2011, 2:30
Subject: Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction


  
Hi Karel,
Thanks for giving me some good ideas on how common functions can be mapped.  Was not clear on using different midi channels before. I think I am understanding what you wrote, have to read and re-read again..

For this project, I think I would need to have constant access to all track volumes all the time (top 16 encoders mapped to 16 track volumes).  This will be a live theater production and I forsee needing to adjust more than one encoder at the same time. I think I understand in the way you are describing that I would have to choose each track by pushing a button before I could adjust any parameters on that track.

It still would be nice to be able to map an encoder to scroll through choosing/highlighting each channel as I turn one encoder.  I think something like this is possible because I remember reading about
 someone's template where they used one push encoder to scroll up and down through clips, and another to scroll left and right through clips, and then a push on one of the encoders to fire the clip.  

Thanks for your attention,
Edward

--- On Mon, 9/12/11, karel skakal <s_y_nagual@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>From: karel skakal <s_y_nagual@...>
>Subject: Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction
>To: "bc2000@yahoogroups.com" <bc2000@yahoogroups.com>
>Date: Monday, September 12, 2011, 2:42 AM
>
>
>  
>Hi Ed,
>I would assign each of the 16 tracks/mics to 16 buttons. You can "see" where you are and it is accurate to switch between tracks.
>Then all the pots would be assigned to (common) functions/controls...Each (pot) would have its MIDI channel, corresponding to track, (button)...
>So you can assign top 8 pots to 8 functions =  16 x 8 = 128 assignments per row!....(16 x Volume, ch.1-16, pot #1 for example)
>I don't know what you want to do, I imagine you want to control FX, volume, pan, etc..?
>
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
>From: Royce <rpcfender@...>
>To: bc2000@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Monday, 12 September 2011, 4:31
>Subject: [bc2000] Re: Introduction
>
>
>  
>Hi Edward
>I was hoping some of the expert Live users here would be better able to
>help.
>
>> I have decided it might be easier at this point to build a static
>mapping for the bcr rather than to try a Mackie emulation or some
>control surface. In the midi prefs of Ableton I just have the remotes on
>for the rme digiface input and output midi ports, and have no control
>surface selected.
>
>If you have selected any one of the BCR USB modes then this turns the BC
>into a Midi interface and you will need to select it in the Controller
>section of Live.
>Send the 'dump' to the BCR and then the tracks will correspond to the 8
>columns of the BC (called Instant mapping see the tutorial help under
>Control surfaces to see the mapping)
>I am unaware of how you get to channel 9 to 16. In Sonar you simply
>press the <> switches to move by 8 tracks.
>I can see that the Novation has a next/previous 8 tracks so perhaps you 
>could search out what Midi messages it sends to achieve this and program
>the BC in the same way.
>
>>
>> Is there some way to program an encoder to scroll through and select
>each track along it's travel?
>
>Not that I am aware of.  Anyone else know???
>>
>> To clarify: in the session view of Ableton, if I have 16 tracks and
>each is a mic input. I would like to be able to select any one of the 16
>tracks by turning one encoder on the lower row of the bcr. So when the
>encoder is all the way counter clockwise track 1 is selected. When the
>encoder is all the way clockwise, track 16 would be selected, and each
>track in between would be selected as the encoder is turned.
>>
>> This would make navigating to see the inserted processing on each
>track very easy.
>
>So, I guess you would like to have a single 'strip' on the BC and select
>the track that it would apply to?
>Perhaps blocks of 8 might be easier.
>
>Royce
>
>
>
>

Re: Introduction

2011-09-13 by -

Edward,

You could combine the mackie clip fires with your mapped fader controls as long as your mapped fader controls do not have the same values as those in the mackie preset.
Otherwise you might get a one of your controls controlling pan or some other function.

Kip
--- In bc2000@yahoogroups.com, Edward Cosla <edco2003@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Hi Karel,
> Thanks for giving me some good ideas on how common functions can be mapped.  Was not clear on using different midi channels before. I think I am understanding what you wrote, have to read and re-read again..
> 
> For this project, I think I would need to have constant access to all track volumes all the time (top 16 encoders mapped to 16 track volumes).  This will be a live theater production and I forsee needing to adjust more than one encoder at the same time. I think I understand in the way you are describing that I would have to choose each track by pushing a button before I could adjust any parameters on that track.
> 
> It still would be nice to be able to map an encoder to scroll through choosing/highlighting each channel as I turn one encoder.  I think something like this is possible because I remember reading about someone's template where they used one push encoder to scroll up and down through clips, and another to scroll left and right through clips, and then a push on one of the encoders to fire the clip.  
> 
> Thanks for your attention,
> Edward
> 
> --- On Mon, 9/12/11, karel skakal <s_y_nagual@...> wrote:
> 
> From: karel skakal <s_y_nagual@...>
> Subject: Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction
> To: "bc2000@yahoogroups.com" <bc2000@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Monday, September 12, 2011, 2:42 AM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Â 
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
>     
>       
>       
>       Hi Ed,I would assign each of the 16 tracks/mics to 16 buttons. You can "see" where you are and it is accurate to switch between tracks.Then all the pots would be assigned to (common) functions/controls...Each (pot) would have its MIDI channel, corresponding to track, (button)...So you can assign top 8 pots to 8 functions =  16 x 8 = 128 assignments per row!....(16 x Volume, ch.1-16, pot #1 for
>  example)I don't know what you want to do, I imagine you want to control FX, volume, pan, etc..?
> 
> From: Royce <rpcfender@...>
> To:
>  bc2000@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, 12 September 2011, 4:31
> Subject: [bc2000] Re: Introduction
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Â 
> 
> 
> 
>     
>       
>       
>       Hi Edward
> 
> I was hoping some of the expert Live users here would be better able to
> 
> help.
> 
> 
> 
> > I have decided it might be easier at this point to build a static
> 
> mapping for the bcr rather than to try a Mackie emulation or some
> 
> control surface. In the midi prefs of Ableton I just have the remotes on
> 
> for the rme digiface input and output midi ports, and have no control
> 
> surface selected.
> 
> 
> 
> If you have selected any one of the BCR USB modes then this turns the BC
> 
> into a Midi interface and you will need to select it in the Controller
> 
> section of Live.
> 
> Send the 'dump' to the BCR and then the tracks will correspond to the 8
> 
> columns of the BC (called Instant mapping see the tutorial help under
> 
> Control surfaces to see the mapping)
> 
> I am unaware of how you get to channel 9 to 16. In Sonar you simply
> 
> press the <> switches to move by 8 tracks.
> 
> I can see that the Novation has a next/previous 8 tracks so perhaps you 
> 
> could search out what Midi messages it sends to achieve this and program
> 
> the BC in the same way.
> 
> 
> 
> >
> 
> > Is there some way to program an encoder to scroll through and select
> 
> each track along it's travel?
> 
> 
> 
> Not that I am aware of.  Anyone else know???
> 
> >
> 
> > To clarify: in the session view of Ableton, if I have 16 tracks and
> 
> each is a mic input. I would like to be able to select any one of the 16
> 
> tracks by turning one encoder on the lower row of the bcr. So when the
> 
> encoder is all the way counter clockwise track 1 is selected. When the
> 
> encoder is all the way clockwise, track 16 would be selected, and each
> 
> track in between would be selected as the encoder is turned.
> 
> >
> 
> > This would make navigating to see the inserted processing on each
> 
> track very easy.
> 
> 
> 
> So, I guess you would like to have a single 'strip' on the BC and select
> 
> the track that it would apply to?
> 
> Perhaps blocks of 8 might be easier.
> 
> 
> 
> Royce
>

Re: Introduction

2011-09-13 by Mark v.d. Berg

--- In bc2000@yahoogroups.com, karel skakal <s_y_nagual@...> wrote:
> Be careful not to send all midi, (you can save your template, but don't send it unless you know what you're doing, I don't), because it has happen to me, that I over-wrote and erased all of my templates with factory template or something else. This is the only feature that I don't like on BC manager (and wish it wasn't possible).

Thanks for pointing this out.
You mean "MIDI" -> "Send all data" in the "B-Controls" window?
Maybe I could add a dialog box saying "This will overwrite all presets (etc.)... Are you sure you want to do this?", if that will help.

Mark.

Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction

2011-09-13 by edco2003@yahoo.com

Hi Kip,
For this project I am not using the Mackie emulation. 

Actually Ableton tech support recommended I just use a static mapping with no control surface for this project. Their reasoning was that for a live mixing environment I would not really need to have tactile control of that many parameters. Once it would be set up in rehearsals, I would basically mostly need tactile control of track volumes, cue function, and maybe a couple of other things. The chance of moving the wrong control in the heat of a live theater mix would be less. 
Thanks,
Edward

On Sep 13, 2011, at 12:49 PM, "-" <k5kip_1999@...> wrote:


Edward,

You could combine the mackie clip fires with your mapped fader controls as long as your mapped fader controls do not have the same values as those in the mackie preset.
Otherwise you might get a one of your controls controlling pan or some other function.

Kip
--- In bc2000@yahoogroups.com, Edward Cosla <edco2003@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Hi Karel,
> Thanks for giving me some good ideas on how common functions can be mapped.  Was not clear on using different midi channels before. I think I am understanding what you wrote, have to read and re-read again..
> 
> For this project, I think I would need to have constant access to all track volumes all the time (top 16 encoders mapped to 16 track volumes).  This will be a live theater production and I forsee needing to adjust more than one encoder at the same time. I think I understand in the way you are describing that I would have to choose each track by pushing a button before I could adjust any parameters on that track.
> 
> It still would be nice to be able to map an encoder to scroll through choosing/highlighting each channel as I turn one encoder.  I think something like this is possible because I remember reading about someone's template where they used one push encoder to scroll up and down through clips, and another to scroll left and right through clips, and then a push on one of the encoders to fire the clip.  
> 
> Thanks for your attention,
> Edward
> 
> --- On Mon, 9/12/11, karel skakal <s_y_nagual@...> wrote:
> 
> From: karel skakal <s_y_nagual@...>
> Subject: Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction
> To: "bc2000@yahoogroups.com" <bc2000@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Monday, September 12, 2011, 2:42 AM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Â 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Ed,I would assign each of the 16 tracks/mics to 16 buttons. You can "see" where you are and it is accurate to switch between tracks.Then all the pots would be assigned to (common) functions/controls...Each (pot) would have its MIDI channel, corresponding to track, (button)...So you can assign top 8 pots to 8 functions =  16 x 8 = 128 assignments per row!....(16 x Volume, ch.1-16, pot #1 for
> example)I don't know what you want to do, I imagine you want to control FX, volume, pan, etc..?
> 
> From: Royce <rpcfender@...>
> To:
> bc2000@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, 12 September 2011, 4:31
> Subject: [bc2000] Re: Introduction
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Â 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Edward
> 
> I was hoping some of the expert Live users here would be better able to
> 
> help.
> 
> 
> 
> > I have decided it might be easier at this point to build a static
> 
> mapping for the bcr rather than to try a Mackie emulation or some
> 
> control surface. In the midi prefs of Ableton I just have the remotes on
> 
> for the rme digiface input and output midi ports, and have no control
> 
> surface selected.
> 
> 
> 
> If you have selected any one of the BCR USB modes then this turns the BC
> 
> into a Midi interface and you will need to select it in the Controller
> 
> section of Live.
> 
> Send the 'dump' to the BCR and then the tracks will correspond to the 8
> 
> columns of the BC (called Instant mapping see the tutorial help under
> 
> Control surfaces to see the mapping)
> 
> I am unaware of how you get to channel 9 to 16. In Sonar you simply
> 
> press the <> switches to move by 8 tracks.
> 
> I can see that the Novation has a next/previous 8 tracks so perhaps you 
> 
> could search out what Midi messages it sends to achieve this and program
> 
> the BC in the same way.
> 
> 
> 
> >
> 
> > Is there some way to program an encoder to scroll through and select
> 
> each track along it's travel?
> 
> 
> 
> Not that I am aware of. Anyone else know???
> 
> >
> 
> > To clarify: in the session view of Ableton, if I have 16 tracks and
> 
> each is a mic input. I would like to be able to select any one of the 16
> 
> tracks by turning one encoder on the lower row of the bcr. So when the
> 
> encoder is all the way counter clockwise track 1 is selected. When the
> 
> encoder is all the way clockwise, track 16 would be selected, and each
> 
> track in between would be selected as the encoder is turned.
> 
> >
> 
> > This would make navigating to see the inserted processing on each
> 
> track very easy.
> 
> 
> 
> So, I guess you would like to have a single 'strip' on the BC and select
> 
> the track that it would apply to?
> 
> Perhaps blocks of 8 might be easier.
> 
> 
> 
> Royce
>

Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction

2011-09-13 by Martin Klang

On 13 Sep 2011, at 21:54, edco2003@... wrote:

> Actually Ableton tech support recommended I just use a static mapping with no control surface for this project. Their reasoning was that for a live mixing environment I would not really need to have tactile control of that many parameters. Once it would be set up in rehearsals, I would basically mostly need tactile control of track volumes, cue function, and maybe a couple of other things. The chance of moving the wrong control in the heat of a live theater mix would be less. 
> Thanks,
> Edward

Sounds like good advice - one function per control can be a good thing. Simple is good.
Another tip for live stuff is to have something like a panic button, or a simple, failsafe method of taking everything back to a known state.
And be aware that Ableton Live is, unfortunately, not totally reliable. Having a backup laptop setup may be important if you can't afford to reboot on stage every few shows.

/m

Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction

2011-09-14 by edco2003@yahoo.com

Hi Martin,
Aargh, cough, ack! Ableton crashing would be a nightmare! 

Of course you are right, for a proper professional show using computers, redundancy is a must. For this "little" show I was not planning to use two computers. After this sort of workshop public performance, I will have to think of redundancy when the show really starts to tour this summer. It's all still in the developmental stage which is why I can afford to experiment with the bcr2000 and midi control of Ableton.  

But tell me, have you had Ableton crash on you? What version of the software were you using?

When I worked at a large European art festival, a lot of companies came in running Ableton on laptops. I asked every one of them that I met if Ableton was stable in their experience. All of them said it never crashed, and if there were problems it was always operator error. Please share your experiences. 

Finally, your idea of a single button to a default general setting seems lime a good idea. Have to think what a good default setting would be..

Thanks,
Edward 

On Sep 13, 2011, at 6:34 PM, Martin Klang <mars@...> wrote:


On 13 Sep 2011, at 21:54, edco2003@... wrote:

> Actually Ableton tech support recommended I just use a static mapping with no control surface for this project. Their reasoning was that for a live mixing environment I would not really need to have tactile control of that many parameters. Once it would be set up in rehearsals, I would basically mostly need tactile control of track volumes, cue function, and maybe a couple of other things. The chance of moving the wrong control in the heat of a live theater mix would be less. 
> Thanks,
> Edward

Sounds like good advice - one function per control can be a good thing. Simple is good.
Another tip for live stuff is to have something like a panic button, or a simple, failsafe method of taking everything back to a known state.
And be aware that Ableton Live is, unfortunately, not totally reliable. Having a backup laptop setup may be important if you can't afford to reboot on stage every few shows.

/m

Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction

2011-09-14 by edco2003@yahoo.com

Hi Karel,

Tell me if I understand correctly:
I could build a workflow in which I  push one of the buttons to go to a bcr preset. In that preset, I could assign 16 encoders to control the 16 track volumes, all on midi channel one. 

I could then press another button to go to a second bcr preset. On that preset, for example, I could have the same 16 encoders control the frequency of the high pass filter of the EQ8 inserted on every track. And all these encoders would transmit on midi channel 2. 

And so on for up to 16 bcr presets transmitting on 16 different midi channels. Is my understanding correct? And Ableton will "midi learn" each midi command in the correct midi channel. 

Regarding bc manager, I downloaded it but have not tried it yet.  Seems like another mountain to climb, so I am trying to see how far I can get with manually programming the bcr and using the midi learn function in Ableton. Not actually sure what bcr manager is good for other than archiving or loading presets. Will have to look more into it. 

Thanks for sharing your knowledge. 
Edward 
   
N
On Sep 13, 2011, at 3:03 AM, karel skakal <s_y_nagual@...>nn wrote:

Hi  Ed,
Thanks to Mark and Royce, BC Manager is probably the best editor to work with, so when you assign volume to 16 pots, you can assign also the display, to 'see' the volume.
In your case, if you need access to all 16 mics,  assign 2 rows of 8 for Volume. Then for stuff other then volume have the 16 buttons to access the16 channels for tweaking and specific stuff: pan, fx, etc, common to all 16
Top row of pots has also push on/off feature: mute/solo etc...
There are so many possibilities...

What I do when I make a template is I load  template # X,  in the buffer(#0) and in the buffer , you can do anything and immediately send it to BCR, MIDI icon is green, (if it is grey, you're not there) to see how it works...But you must stay on X, and then when done, save it (button store 2 x)
So basically, send the template (to buffer) that you want to use for your assignment, because you will overwrite that template...
Be careful not to send all midi, (you can save your template, but don't send it unless you know what you're doing, I don't), because it has happen to me, that I over-wrote and erased all of my templates with factory template or something else. This is the only feature that I don't like on BC manager (and wish it wasn't possible).  
cheers
PS. look at the editing features in BC manager, you assign "groups" with one click...
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Edward Cosla <edco2003@yahoo.com>
To: bc2000@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, 13 September 2011, 2:30
Subject: Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction

 
Hi Karel,
Thanks for giving me some good ideas on how common functions can be mapped.  Was not clear on using different midi channels before. I think I am understanding what you wrote, have to read and re-read again..

For this project, I think I would need to have constant access to all track volumes all the time (top 16 encoders mapped to 16 track volumes).  This will be a live theater production and I forsee needing to adjust more than one encoder at the same time. I think I understand in the way you are describing that I would have to choose each track by pushing a button before I could adjust any parameters on that track.

It still would be nice to be able to map an encoder to scroll through choosing/highlighting each channel as I turn one encoder.  I think something like this is possible because I remember reading about someone's template where they used one push encoder to scroll up and down through clips, and another to scroll left and right through clips, and then a push on one of the encoders to fire the clip.  

Thanks for your attention,
Edward

--- On Mon, 9/12/11, karel skakal <s_y_nagual@...> wrote:

From: karel skakal <s_y_nagual@...>
Subject: Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction
To: "bc2000@yahoogroups.com" <bc2000@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Monday, September 12, 2011, 2:42 AM

 
Hi Ed,
I would assign each of the 16 tracks/mics to 16 buttons. You can "see" where you are and it is accurate to switch between tracks.
Then all the pots would be assigned to (common) functions/controls...Each (pot) would have its MIDI channel, corresponding to track, (button)...
So you can assign top 8 pots to 8 functions =  16 x 8 = 128 assignments per row!....(16 x Volume, ch.1-16, pot #1 for example)
I don't know what you want to do, I imagine you want to control FX, volume, pan, etc..?


From: Royce <rpcfender@...>
To: bc2000@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, 12 September 2011, 4:31
Subject: [bc2000] Re: Introduction

 
Hi Edward
I was hoping some of the expert Live users here would be better able to
help.

> I have decided it might be easier at this point to build a static
mapping for the bcr rather than to try a Mackie emulation or some
control surface. In the midi prefs of Ableton I just have the remotes on
for the rme digiface input and output midi ports, and have no control
surface selected.

If you have selected any one of the BCR USB modes then this turns the BC
into a Midi interface and you will need to select it in the Controller
section of Live.
Send the 'dump' to the BCR and then the tracks will correspond to the 8
columns of the BC (called Instant mapping see the tutorial help under
Control surfaces to see the mapping)
I am unaware of how you get to channel 9 to 16. In Sonar you simply
press the <> switches to move by 8 tracks.
I can see that the Novation has a next/previous 8 tracks so perhaps you 
could search out what Midi messages it sends to achieve this and program
the BC in the same way.

>
> Is there some way to program an encoder to scroll through and select
each track along it's travel?

Not that I am aware of. Anyone else know???
>
> To clarify: in the session view of Ableton, if I have 16 tracks and
each is a mic input. I would like to be able to select any one of the 16
tracks by turning one encoder on the lower row of the bcr. So when the
encoder is all the way counter clockwise track 1 is selected. When the
encoder is all the way clockwise, track 16 would be selected, and each
track in between would be selected as the encoder is turned.
>
> This would make navigating to see the inserted processing on each
track very easy.

So, I guess you would like to have a single 'strip' on the BC and select
the track that it would apply to?
Perhaps blocks of 8 might be easier.

Royce

Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction

2011-09-14 by Martin Klang

On 14 Sep 2011, at 04:07, edco2003@... wrote:

> 
> 
> Hi Martin,
> Aargh, cough, ack! Ableton crashing would be a nightmare! 
> 
> Of course you are right, for a proper professional show using computers, redundancy is a must. For this "little" show I was not planning to use two computers. After this sort of workshop public performance, I will have to think of redundancy when the show really starts to tour this summer. It's all still in the developmental stage which is why I can afford to experiment with the bcr2000 and midi control of Ableton.  
> 
> But tell me, have you had Ableton crash on you? What version of the software were you using?

oh yes. Twice in one show. Another time both mine and another band member's crashed simultaneously, mid set! Good thing we've got some old fashioned instruments too. That's v8.
But to be fair I think a lot of it has to do with what plugins you use. VST is a poor standard implemented in different ways by different vendors, and some of the plugins out there are definitely a bit dodgy.

hth,

/m

Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction

2011-09-14 by karel skakal

Hi Mark,
yes, it pops up when you want to close/exit the editor, (after making changes), the end always threw me off and (like few others) didn't quite catch what it will do, and I managed to erase/rewrite ALL templates that I worked on....and replace them with a modified factory?? default...

You see my problem is, that I overlook if I am saving/sending one or all, and in past, I happened to save all, (thinking i am saving one), re-writing the factory default with some modified templates, then making a new template, saving/sending to find out, I erased what I worked on and sent partially modified ALL templates, instead of just one template, because if I saved "one" template, or all templates under the name of a single template, that I worked on, creating a mess....I know it sounds confusing...Three Stooges sound familiar?...

Maybe the dialog:  "This will overwrite all presets (etc.)... Are you sure you want to do this?" will help, but why does it offer to rewrite everything?

Like I said, I edit by instant upload of bits out of buffer #00, to a selected template #XX, then saving on BCR, which works fine.

I personally would prefer one template at a time: saving/sending

Thank you
Karel

________________________________
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Mark v.d. Berg <markwinvdb@...>
To: bc2000@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, 13 September 2011, 20:52
Subject: [bc2000] Re: Introduction


  
--- In bc2000@yahoogroups.com, karel skakal <s_y_nagual@...> wrote:
> Be careful not to send all midi, (you can save your template, but don't send it unless you know what you're doing, I don't), because it has happen to me, that I over-wrote and erased all of my templates with factory template or something else. This is the only feature that I don't like on BC manager (and wish it wasn't possible).

Thanks for pointing this out.
You mean "MIDI" -> "Send all data" in the "B-Controls" window?
Maybe I could add a dialog box saying "This will overwrite all presets (etc.)... Are you sure you want to do this?", if that will help.

Mark.

Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction

2011-09-14 by karel skakal

Hi Ed,

 BC editor makes it possible to quickly EDIT big chunks of info with details and functionality that without BC Manager I wonder if it would be possible at all (for me anyway), but only how BCRs' buttons and pots will behave. That is: how slow/fast the pot turns, its value 0-???, LED display.
What if a button needs to be in increments of 10, value 0-60? Or a pot needs to be 0-60-0, like pan with corresponding LEDs?

Thank Mark we got BCManager

As far as your assignment goes, you can assign Volume to 16 pots and Pan to other 16 pots, and on/off, to 16 buttons (mute or firing tracks) , on 16 midi channel on ONE template, all 16 mics instantly accessible for Volume, Pan, on/off. (In BCR the 16 encoders would have same CC number but different midi channel, same for Pan and on/off) You'll use 3 CCs and 3x16 channels, which will prevent you from accidentally moving other pots in conflict of same CC number...simple and basic (correction for my first post)

cheers


________________________________
From: "edco2003@..." <edco2003@...>
To: bc2000@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, 14 September 2011, 5:31
Subject: Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction


  
Hi Karel,

Tell me if I understand correctly:
I could build a workflow in which I  push one of the buttons to go to a bcr preset. In that preset, I could assign 16 encoders to control the 16 track volumes, all on midi channel one. 

I could then press another button to go to a second bcr preset. On that preset, for example, I could have the same 16 encoders control the frequency of the high pass filter of the EQ8 inserted on every track. And all these encoders would transmit on midi channel 2. 

And so on for up to 16 bcr presets transmitting on 16 different midi channels. Is my understanding correct? And Ableton will "midi learn" each midi command in the correct midi channel. 

Regarding bc manager, I downloaded it but have not tried it yet.  Seems like another mountain to climb, so I am trying to see how far I can get with manually programming the bcr and using the midi learn function in Ableton. Not actually sure what bcr manager is good for other than archiving or loading presets. Will have to look more into it. 

Thanks for sharing your knowledge. 
Edward 
   
N
On Sep 13, 2011, at 3:03 AM, karel skakal <s_y_nagual@...>nn wrote:


  
>Hi  Ed,
>Thanks to Mark and Royce, BC Manager is probably the best editor to work with, so when you assign volume to 16 pots, you can assign also the display, to 'see' the volume.
>In your case, if you need access to all 16 mics,  assign 2 rows of 8 for Volume. Then for stuff other then volume have the 16 buttons to access the16 channels for tweaking and specific stuff: pan, fx, etc, common to all 16
>Top row of pots has also push on/off feature: mute/solo etc...
>There are so many possibilities...
>
>
>What I do when I make a template is I load  template # X,  in the buffer(#0) and in the buffer , you can do anything and immediately send it to BCR, MIDI icon is green, (if it is grey, you're not there) to see how it works...But you must stay on X, and then when done, save it (button store 2 x)
>So basically, send the template (to buffer) that you want to use for your assignment, because you will overwrite that template...
>Be careful not to send all midi, (you can save your template, but don't send it unless you know what you're doing, I don't), because it has happen to me, that I over-wrote and erased all of my templates with factory template or something else. This is the only feature that I don't like on BC manager (and wish it wasn't possible).  
>cheers
>PS. look at the editing features in BC manager, you assign "groups" with one click...
>
>
>
>________________________________
>From: Edward Cosla <edco2003@...>
>To: bc2000@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Tuesday, 13 September 2011, 2:30
>Subject: Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction
>
>
>  
>Hi Karel,
>Thanks for giving me some good ideas on how common functions can be mapped.  Was not clear on using different midi channels before. I think I am understanding what you wrote, have to read and re-read again..
>
>For this project, I think I would need to have constant access to all track volumes all the time (top 16 encoders mapped to 16 track volumes).  This will be a live theater production and I forsee needing to adjust more than one encoder at the same time. I think I understand in the way you are describing that I would have to choose each track by pushing a button before I could adjust any parameters on that track.
>
>It still would be nice to be able to map an encoder to scroll through choosing/highlighting each channel as I turn one encoder.  I think something like this is possible because I
 remember reading about
 someone's template where they used one push encoder to scroll up and down through clips, and another to scroll left and right through clips, and then a push on one of the encoders to fire the clip.  
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
>Thanks for your attention,
>Edward
>
>--- On Mon, 9/12/11, karel skakal <s_y_nagual@...> wrote:
>
>
>>From: karel skakal <s_y_nagual@...>
>>Subject: Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction
>>To: "bc2000@yahoogroups.com" <bc2000@yahoogroups.com>
>>Date: Monday, September 12, 2011, 2:42 AM
>>
>>
>>  
>>Hi Ed,
>>I would assign each of the 16 tracks/mics to 16 buttons. You can "see" where you are and it is accurate to switch between tracks.
>>Then all the pots would be assigned to (common) functions/controls...Each (pot) would have its MIDI channel, corresponding to track, (button)...
>>So you can assign top 8 pots to 8 functions =  16 x 8 = 128 assignments per row!....(16 x Volume, ch.1-16, pot #1 for example)
>>I don't know what you want to do, I imagine you want to control FX, volume, pan, etc..?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>>From: Royce <rpcfender@...>
>>To: bc2000@yahoogroups.com
>>Sent: Monday, 12 September 2011, 4:31
>>Subject: [bc2000] Re: Introduction
>>
>>
>>  
>>Hi Edward
>>I was hoping some of the expert Live users here would be better able to
>>help.
>>
>>> I have decided it might be easier at this point to build a static
>>mapping for the bcr rather than to try a Mackie emulation or some
>>control surface. In the midi prefs of Ableton I just have the remotes on
>>for the rme digiface input and output midi ports, and have no control
>>surface selected.
>>
>>If you have selected any one of the BCR USB modes then this turns the BC
>>into a Midi interface and you will need to select it in the Controller
>>section of Live.
>>Send the 'dump' to the BCR and then the tracks will correspond to the 8
>>columns of the BC (called Instant mapping see the tutorial help under
>>Control surfaces to see the mapping)
>>I am unaware of how you get to channel 9 to 16. In Sonar you simply
>>press the <> switches to move by 8 tracks.
>>I can see that the Novation has a next/previous 8 tracks so perhaps you 
>>could search out what Midi messages it sends to achieve this and program
>>the BC in the same way.
>>
>>>
>>> Is there some way to program an encoder to scroll through and select
>>each track along it's travel?
>>
>>Not that I am aware of.  Anyone else know???
>>>
>>> To clarify: in the session view of Ableton, if I have 16 tracks and
>>each is a mic input. I would like to be able to select any one of the 16
>>tracks by turning one encoder on the lower row of the bcr. So when the
>>encoder is all the way counter clockwise track 1 is selected. When the
>>encoder is all the way clockwise, track 16 would be selected, and each
>>track in between would be selected as the encoder is turned.
>>>
>>> This would make navigating to see the inserted processing on each
>>track very easy.
>>
>>So, I guess you would like to have a single 'strip' on the BC and select
>>the track that it would apply to?
>>Perhaps blocks of 8 might be easier.
>>
>>Royce
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>
>

Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction

2011-09-14 by edco2003@yahoo.com

Hi Karel,
Thanks for your reply and now for your patience because I am a few concepts away from being able to wrap my brain around this. 
- I understand that bc manager can also work through a midi cable connection to bcr2000, not only through USB connection, is this correct?

- You use the word "template" in your email, I use the word "preset" on the bcr. That is about the two buttons that go up and down in the preset numbers. Are we talking about the same thing?

- if we are talking about the same thing, and on ONE PRESET it is possible to assign buttons that can make the same encoder transmit midi messages on different midi channels depending on what button is pushed first, then what would be the midi command on each button to change the midi channels on which the encoders are sending?

By the way, regarding this forum, I am just hitting "reply" in my email account. Would it be better to hit "reply to sender", "reply to group", or "reply via a web post" at the bottom of the email?

Edward  

On Sep 14, 2011, at 6:22 AM, karel skakal <s_y_nagual@...> wrote:

Hi Ed,

 BC editor makes it possible to quickly EDIT big chunks of info with details and functionality that without BC Manager I wonder if it would be possible at all (for me anyway), but only how BCRs' buttons and pots will behave. That is: how slow/fast the pot turns, its value 0-???, LED display.
What if a button needs to be in increments of 10, value 0-60? Or a pot needs to be 0-60-0, like pan with corresponding LEDs?
Thank Mark we got BCManager

As far as your assignment goes, you can assign Volume to 16 pots and Pan to other 16 pots, and on/off, to 16 buttons (mute or firing tracks) , on 16 midi channel on ONE template, all 16 mics instantly accessible for Volume, Pan, on/off. (In BCR the 16 encoders would have same CC number but different midi channel, same for Pan and on/off) You'll use 3 CCs and 3x16 channels, which will prevent you from accidentally moving other pots in conflict of same CC number...simple and basic (correction for my first post)

cheers
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "edco2003@..." <edco2003@yahoo.com>
To: bc2000@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, 14 September 2011, 5:31
Subject: Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction

 
Hi Karel,

Tell me if I understand correctly:
I could build a workflow in which I  push one of the buttons to go to a bcr preset. In that preset, I could assign 16 encoders to control the 16 track volumes, all on midi channel one. 

I could then press another button to go to a second bcr preset. On that preset, for example, I could have the same 16 encoders control the frequency of the high pass filter of the EQ8 inserted on every track. And all these encoders would transmit on midi channel 2. 

And so on for up to 16 bcr presets transmitting on 16 different midi channels. Is my understanding correct? And Ableton will "midi learn" each midi command in the correct midi channel. 

Regarding bc manager, I downloaded it but have not tried it yet.  Seems like another mountain to climb, so I am trying to see how far I can get with manually programming the bcr and using the midi learn function in Ableton. Not actually sure what bcr manager is good for other than archiving or loading presets. Will have to look more into it. 

Thanks for sharing your knowledge. 
Edward 
   
N
On Sep 13, 2011, at 3:03 AM, karel skakal <s_y_nagual@...>nn wrote:

 
Hi  Ed,
Thanks to Mark and Royce, BC Manager is probably the best editor to work with, so when you assign volume to 16 pots, you can assign also the display, to 'see' the volume.
In your case, if you need access to all 16 mics,  assign 2 rows of 8 for Volume. Then for stuff other then volume have the 16 buttons to access the16 channels for tweaking and specific stuff: pan, fx, etc, common to all 16
Top row of pots has also push on/off feature: mute/solo etc...
There are so many possibilities...

What I do when I make a template is I load  template # X,  in the buffer(#0) and in the buffer , you can do anything and immediately send it to BCR, MIDI icon is green, (if it is grey, you're not there) to see how it works...But you must stay on X, and then when done, save it (button store 2 x)
So basically, send the template (to buffer) that you want to use for your assignment, because you will overwrite that template...
Be careful not to send all midi, (you can save your template, but don't send it unless you know what you're doing, I don't), because it has happen to me, that I over-wrote and erased all of my templates with factory template or something else. This is the only feature that I don't like on BC manager (and wish it wasn't possible).  
cheers
PS. look at the editing features in BC manager, you assign "groups" with one click...

From: Edward Cosla <edco2003@...>
To: bc2000@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, 13 September 2011, 2:30
Subject: Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction

 
Hi Karel,
Thanks for giving me some good ideas on how common functions can be mapped.  Was not clear on using different midi channels before. I think I am understanding what you wrote, have to read and re-read again..

For this project, I think I would need to have constant access to all track volumes all the time (top 16 encoders mapped to 16 track volumes).  This will be a live theater production and I forsee needing to adjust more than one encoder at the same time. I think I understand in the way you are describing that I would have to choose each track by pushing a button before I could adjust any parameters on that track.

It still would be nice to be able to map an encoder to scroll through choosing/highlighting each channel as I turn one encoder.  I think something like this is possible because I remember reading about someone's template where they used one push encoder to scroll up and down through clips, and another to scroll left and right through clips, and then a push on one of the encoders to fire the clip.  

Thanks for your attention,
Edward

--- On Mon, 9/12/11, karel skakal <s_y_nagual@...> wrote:

From: karel skakal <s_y_nagual@...>
Subject: Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction
To: "bc2000@yahoogroups.com" <bc2000@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Monday, September 12, 2011, 2:42 AM

 
Hi Ed,
I would assign each of the 16 tracks/mics to 16 buttons. You can "see" where you are and it is accurate to switch between tracks.
Then all the pots would be assigned to (common) functions/controls...Each (pot) would have its MIDI channel, corresponding to track, (button)...
So you can assign top 8 pots to 8 functions =  16 x 8 = 128 assignments per row!....(16 x Volume, ch.1-16, pot #1 for example)
I don't know what you want to do, I imagine you want to control FX, volume, pan, etc..?


From: Royce <rpcfender@...>
To: bc2000@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, 12 September 2011, 4:31
Subject: [bc2000] Re: Introduction

 
Hi Edward
I was hoping some of the expert Live users here would be better able to
help.

> I have decided it might be easier at this point to build a static
mapping for the bcr rather than to try a Mackie emulation or some
control surface. In the midi prefs of Ableton I just have the remotes on
for the rme digiface input and output midi ports, and have no control
surface selected.

If you have selected any one of the BCR USB modes then this turns the BC
into a Midi interface and you will need to select it in the Controller
section of Live.
Send the 'dump' to the BCR and then the tracks will correspond to the 8
columns of the BC (called Instant mapping see the tutorial help under
Control surfaces to see the mapping)
I am unaware of how you get to channel 9 to 16. In Sonar you simply
press the <> switches to move by 8 tracks.
I can see that the Novation has a next/previous 8 tracks so perhaps you 
could search out what Midi messages it sends to achieve this and program
the BC in the same way.

>
> Is there some way to program an encoder to scroll through and select
each track along it's travel?

Not that I am aware of. Anyone else know???
>
> To clarify: in the session view of Ableton, if I have 16 tracks and
each is a mic input. I would like to be able to select any one of the 16
tracks by turning one encoder on the lower row of the bcr. So when the
encoder is all the way counter clockwise track 1 is selected. When the
encoder is all the way clockwise, track 16 would be selected, and each
track in between would be selected as the encoder is turned.
>
> This would make navigating to see the inserted processing on each
track very easy.

So, I guess you would like to have a single 'strip' on the BC and select
the track that it would apply to?
Perhaps blocks of 8 might be easier.

Royce

Re: Introduction

2011-09-14 by -

Right, I figured you weren't using the mackie emulation.

I was suggesting a hybrid.

Use the clipfires that ARE part of the mackie emu, I helped assemble,
because you said you wanted something like that.
And that is it, make the rest of your preset the static map.

Just make sure that the cc's you assign for your static map don't send values the mackie control surface python script in Live will translate.

I am just suggesting you use the parts of the mcu that you want and need and don't have another way to do.

Cheers.


--- In bc2000@yahoogroups.com, edco2003@... wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Hi Kip,
> For this project I am not using the Mackie emulation. 
> 
> Actually Ableton tech support recommended I just use a static mapping with no control surface for this project. Their reasoning was that for a live mixing environment I would not really need to have tactile control of that many parameters. Once it would be set up in rehearsals, I would basically mostly need tactile control of track volumes, cue function, and maybe a couple of other things. The chance of moving the wrong control in the heat of a live theater mix would be less. 
> Thanks,
> Edward
> 
> On Sep 13, 2011, at 12:49 PM, "-" <k5kip_1999@...> wrote:
> 
> 
> Edward,
> 
> You could combine the mackie clip fires with your mapped fader controls as long as your mapped fader controls do not have the same values as those in the mackie preset.
> Otherwise you might get a one of your controls controlling pan or some other function.
> 
> Kip
> --- In bc2000@yahoogroups.com, Edward Cosla <edco2003@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Karel,
> > Thanks for giving me some good ideas on how common functions can be mapped.  Was not clear on using different midi channels before. I think I am understanding what you wrote, have to read and re-read again..
> > 
> > For this project, I think I would need to have constant access to all track volumes all the time (top 16 encoders mapped to 16 track volumes).  This will be a live theater production and I forsee needing to adjust more than one encoder at the same time. I think I understand in the way you are describing that I would have to choose each track by pushing a button before I could adjust any parameters on that track.
> > 
> > It still would be nice to be able to map an encoder to scroll through choosing/highlighting each channel as I turn one encoder.  I think something like this is possible because I remember reading about someone's template where they used one push encoder to scroll up and down through clips, and another to scroll left and right through clips, and then a push on one of the encoders to fire the clip.  
> > 
> > Thanks for your attention,
> > Edward
> > 
> > --- On Mon, 9/12/11, karel skakal <s_y_nagual@> wrote:
> > 
> > From: karel skakal <s_y_nagual@>
> > Subject: Re: [bc2000] Re: Introduction
> > To: "bc2000@yahoogroups.com" <bc2000@yahoogroups.com>
> > Date: Monday, September 12, 2011, 2:42 AM
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Â 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Ed,I would assign each of the 16 tracks/mics to 16 buttons. You can "see" where you are and it is accurate to switch between tracks.Then all the pots would be assigned to (common) functions/controls...Each (pot) would have its MIDI channel, corresponding to track, (button)...So you can assign top 8 pots to 8 functions =  16 x 8 = 128 assignments per row!....(16 x Volume, ch.1-16, pot #1 for
> > example)I don't know what you want to do, I imagine you want to control FX, volume, pan, etc..?
> > 
> > From: Royce <rpcfender@>
> > To:
> > bc2000@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Monday, 12 September 2011, 4:31
> > Subject: [bc2000] Re: Introduction
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Â 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Edward
> > 
> > I was hoping some of the expert Live users here would be better able to
> > 
> > help.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > I have decided it might be easier at this point to build a static
> > 
> > mapping for the bcr rather than to try a Mackie emulation or some
> > 
> > control surface. In the midi prefs of Ableton I just have the remotes on
> > 
> > for the rme digiface input and output midi ports, and have no control
> > 
> > surface selected.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > If you have selected any one of the BCR USB modes then this turns the BC
> > 
> > into a Midi interface and you will need to select it in the Controller
> > 
> > section of Live.
> > 
> > Send the 'dump' to the BCR and then the tracks will correspond to the 8
> > 
> > columns of the BC (called Instant mapping see the tutorial help under
> > 
> > Control surfaces to see the mapping)
> > 
> > I am unaware of how you get to channel 9 to 16. In Sonar you simply
> > 
> > press the <> switches to move by 8 tracks.
> > 
> > I can see that the Novation has a next/previous 8 tracks so perhaps you 
> > 
> > could search out what Midi messages it sends to achieve this and program
> > 
> > the BC in the same way.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > > Is there some way to program an encoder to scroll through and select
> > 
> > each track along it's travel?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Not that I am aware of. Anyone else know???
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > > To clarify: in the session view of Ableton, if I have 16 tracks and
> > 
> > each is a mic input. I would like to be able to select any one of the 16
> > 
> > tracks by turning one encoder on the lower row of the bcr. So when the
> > 
> > encoder is all the way counter clockwise track 1 is selected. When the
> > 
> > encoder is all the way clockwise, track 16 would be selected, and each
> > 
> > track in between would be selected as the encoder is turned.
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > > This would make navigating to see the inserted processing on each
> > 
> > track very easy.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > So, I guess you would like to have a single 'strip' on the BC and select
> > 
> > the track that it would apply to?
> > 
> > Perhaps blocks of 8 might be easier.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Royce
> >
>

Re: Introduction

2011-09-15 by Mark v.d. Berg

--- In bc2000@yahoogroups.com, karel skakal <s_y_nagual@...> wrote:
> yes, it pops up when you want to close/exit the editor, (after making changes), the end always threw me off and didn't quite catch what it will do, and I managed to erase/rewrite ALL templates that I worked on....and replace them with a modified factory?? default...

Ah, but then you are talking about a different feature of the program than what I thought.
These "do you want to save changes?" dialog boxes are related to the asterisks in the preset and control lists, which indicate which items have changed.
The idea of these questions is to prevent users from forgetting to save their changes, but (as so many aspects of any program) they can be annoying or confusing as well.
I can't immediately think of a way to improve this behavior, but I'll think about it.

> You see my problem is, that I overlook if I am saving/sending one or all, and in past, I happened to save all, (thinking i am saving one)

Hm, yes, this suggests that BC Manager should at least make the distinction clearer. I'll see what I can do.

> Maybe the dialog:Â Â "This will overwrite all presets (etc.)... Are you sure you want to do this?" will help, but why does it offer to rewrite everything?

Personally I use the "send/save all" routine a lot.
So if it did NOT exist, I would have to perform up to 32 individual send operations, and perhaps some people would then complain "why can't I send many/all presets in one go?".

This just demonstrates how hard it is to make a program please everyone.
Unavoidably, if a program has more features, it is more complicated and potentially confusing.
So that may sometimes be a price to pay - which doesn't mean that I can't try to make certain aspects clearer.

Mark.

Re: Introduction

2011-09-15 by Mark v.d. Berg

--- In bc2000@yahoogroups.com, edco2003@... wrote:
> - I understand that bc manager can also work through a midi cable connection to bcr2000, not only through USB connection, is this correct?

Yes, BC Manager can control the BCR via standard MIDI as well.
In fact, this capability is no particular accomplishment by BC Manager: to ANY computer program, the BCR's USB connection presents itself as standard MIDI input/output "devices".

By the way, connecting the BCR to BC Manager via standard MIDI normally requires TWO MIDI cables, since BC Manager works best in a bidirectional setup.
Whether you should connect to the BCR's MIDI OUT A or OUT B/THRU depends on the BCR's Operating Mode you choose (via Global Setup): if you use S-4 (the preferred setting) you should connect to OUT A, if you use S-3 to OUT B/THRU.

Hope this helps,
Mark.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.