Re: [motm] just a picture
2002-12-05 by John Blacet
Hmmm, B&W too! Looks like a Twilight Zone shot. BTW, you can get a similar effect from a lens shade that is too long. Also, Cokin makes a lot of filters and
Messages
Browse messages
Page 339 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
Re: [motm] uSeq knob/button placement
2002-12-05 by Jeffrey Pontius
... Since I am right-hand dominant traditional with a keyboard, so this fits with me. However, I would like to hear from others that are not traditional -
uSeq knob/button placement
2002-12-05 by Paul Schreiber
It has been suggested to mirror image the 2 LED displays with the 2 control knobs. Logic being that right handed folks won t obstruct the display when
FW: [motm] Re: Recording software
2002-12-05 by Tkacs, Ken
I use Sonar XL for MIDI sequencing, and of course it can also parallel audio. When I m working solely with audio, I prefer Innovative Quality Software s SAW
Slightly OT tech question
2002-12-05 by phaeton777
Does anyone know of a simple VCA IC? I need to build an attenuator for 6 channels of balanced audio where I can attenuate them all equally from one pot/fader.
Re: [motm] Re: Recording software
2002-12-05 by Neil Bradley
... It is. Torn from the same cloth. ;-) One thing to keep in mind when buying sequencing/audio software: There is no such thing as a globally good works for
Re: [motm] Rack Recomendations
2002-12-05 by Paul Schreiber
Raxxess and Omni-Racks Paul S. ... From: lotek To: Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 10:55 PM Subject:
Rack Recomendations
2002-12-05 by lotek
Im looking for a decent rack for 4 rows of motm, preferably the slant variety. Sweetwater used to have a bunch of cool ones but I don t see them there
Re: Recording software
2002-12-05 by phaeton777
I was a diehard Cakewalk user since DOS version 1.02 but I recently switched over to Nuendo. I have tried Sonar too-it s ok but still a little clunky. I have
just a picture
2002-12-05 by Nathan Hunsicker
I thought I’d share this picture of my MOTM system with everyone. It’s small and will definitely be growing soon, but I thought this was a really cool
RE: [motm] Request for Knowledge: Powering the MOTM Synthesizer
2002-12-05 by John Loffink
In reality it is a 3.3 V, 2.5 V and 1.8 V world. Synth module design is still fighting off the lower voltage ranges. John Loffink jloffink@austin.rr.com It
Re: [motm] Stooge walnut cabinets ?? Feedback requested
2002-12-05 by ixqy@aol.com
Man Larry, that sounds like a wonderful idea. That would be a great service for people like me who don t have all the tools or the know-how for doing something
Stooge walnut cabinets ?? Feedback requested
2002-12-05 by J. Larry Hendry
I learned something this month about walnut synth cabinets. It is very expensive to have them made far away and have them shipped 100% complete and ready to
Re: Recording software
2002-12-05 by xiphiguy
I got Cubasis VST bundled together with my Audigy sound card, and I have had nothing but trouble with it; when I play back a track, it speeds up and slows down
Re: [motm] Recording software
2002-12-05 by ixqy@aol.com
... I m using Cubasis VST. It s a whopping $70 and sounds top notch. It has all the functions needed for serious audio multitracking and sequencing, if that s
Re: [motm] Re: Recording software
2002-12-05 by Neil Bradley
... Religious fervor aside, I ve used Cool Edit Pro and Sound Forge 6, and for me SF 6 is head and shoulders above Cool Edit Pro in sound quality in the EQ,
Re: [motm] Prepare to drool
2002-12-05 by Paul Schreiber
... Err...sub-$400 unit ..... Paul S.
Re: [motm] Prepare to drool
2002-12-05 by Paul Schreiber
It s a limit of the EEPROM. I wanted a sub $400 until and this is what I came up with. Paul S. ... From: alt-mode To: Paul Schreiber
Re: [motm] Re: Recording software
2002-12-05 by Adam Schabtach
... SoundDiver users were left out in the cold long before Apple acquired Emagic. I use SoundDiver on the Mac. The program hasn t been updated in well over a
Re: Recording software
2002-12-05 by Mike Marsh
This is all PC stuff. On the Mac, I don t know, some Mac guy could chime in. BTW, if you re on a PC don t buy emagic stuff (like Logic). As good as it is,
Re: [motm] Prepare to drool
2002-12-05 by alt-mode
Paul, The uSeq sounds very interesting and I know I will get at least one! The question I have is why the limit of only 9 sequences of up to 99 steps? The 99
Re: Recording software
2002-12-05 by Mike Marsh
Hi Terry - I use Sonar 2.0 XL if I need to sync MIDI and audio. My CD of MOTM stuff was done with that. I also use Syntrillium s Cool Edit Pro, particularly
Re: [motm] Recording software
2002-12-05 by Neil Bradley
... Cubase SX - SL might do it for you. I ve done about 5 songs (from 10-30 tracks) with virtual instruments, MIDI, audio, VST effects, etc... and it all works
Recording software
2002-12-04 by xiphiguy
I m considering the purchase of recording software along the lines of Cubase or Cakewalk Sonar. I don t mind spending serious money if I can get superior
Re: MOTM-600 switch locations
2002-12-04 by drg3orge
this gets my vote... doc ... GATE ... the
MOTM-600 switch locations
2002-12-04 by mate_stubb
My thoughts: Switches likely to be used in performance (in order of importance): PLAY STOP SEQ STEP GATE1 GATE2 Switches used in setting up (in order of
Re: [motm] software sweep gen and plotting?
2002-12-04 by groovyshaman@snet.net
Excellent link Ken! George ... free
re: [motm] FM Synthesis w/ MOTM
2002-12-04 by elhardt@att.net
... to do an FM patch with any complexity. Remember, with FM, as you increase the modulator s levels, you increase the carrier s frequency content. It s a
re: [motm] FM Synthesis w/ MOTM
2002-12-04 by J.D. McEachin
... The Envelope Generators, LFOs, and other mod sources on a DX would require VCAs to perform the same functions on an analog synth. While you don t need a
[motm] software sweep gen and plotting?
2002-12-04 by elhardt@att.net
I m wondering if anybody knows of any PC freeware that will both sweep sinewaves through the audio spectrum and simultaneously record the result back into the
Moe's annual sequencer rant (long!)
2002-12-04 by mate_stubb
Actually, it s been more than a year since my last sequencer rant - and this isn t really going to be a rant. We finally have an announced MOTM sequencer to
Re: [motm] FM Synthesis w/ MOTM
2002-12-04 by J. Larry Hendry
I will agree with that somewhat. But, I am very appreciative that you posted that. What I found is that this method does allow one to do PWM type sounds with
re: [motm] FM Synthesis w/ MOTM
2002-12-04 by elhardt@att.net
... I haven t done much FM with my modular b/c from what I understand, I need a VCA for the modulating signal, and another VCA for the carrier.
Re: uSeq front panel
2002-12-04 by drg3orge
my only thoughts for button rearrangement would be to swap the MIDI/GLOBAL placement with the SEQ/STEP buttons. that way {as i see it} you ve the more tweak
RE: FW: [motm] FM Synthesis w/ MOTM
2002-12-04 by Tkacs, Ken
I thought that was Casio that used Phase Modulation...? ... My understanding is that Yamaha FM synthesis is actually using phase modulation and not frequency
Re: FW: [motm] FM Synthesis w/ MOTM
2002-12-04 by Mike Marsh
My understanding is that Yamaha FM synthesis is actually using phase modulation and not frequency modulation. Am I correct? Mike ... these VCOs ... meaning
Re: [motm] Another MOTM T-Shirt??? + much more....
2002-12-04 by Paul Schreiber
Somnium is non-MOTM. But still nice relaxing background music. 7 straight hours! Paul S.
Another MOTM T-Shirt??? + much more....
2002-12-04 by Tentochi
Robert Rich has a T-shirt available for his great MOTM-based Bestiary album. It has a great picture of a Glurp on it. Check it out:
Re: [motm] uSeq front panel
2002-12-04 by Paul Schreiber
... Correct, other one will not fit. I might find an in between one. ... Call NKK and bitch that they only stock 3 colors in the US and other colors are
Re: [motm] uSeq analog clock in?
2002-12-04 by Paul Schreiber
Gate1 In does that (and more!). Paul S.
uSeq analog clock in?
2002-12-04 by Jeffrey Pontius
One question: the .pdf on the uSeq has a clock in jack which is now missing from the web page front panel. Does one of the input jacks now also serve as an
uSeq front panel
2002-12-04 by Jeffrey Pontius
Overall an interesting sequencer idea. In thinking about real time use: (1) The Assignable Knob looks to be the size of the knobs on, say, Encores UEG. For
Re: uSeq vs older seqs
2002-12-04 by sydilaxe
After reading the PDF, I see that the uSeq can do all that I would like it to do and MORE. Although it is very different from traditional analog sequencers
Re: [motm] Re: Prepare to drool
2002-12-04 by Paul Schreiber
Yes to *everything*. Please read the PDF design document there on the page. It explains all of this. Paul S.
uSeq vs older seqs
2002-12-04 by Paul Schreiber
... Live performance! Leave that laptop at home. ... The uSeq HAS real-time control, as well as 4 CV inputs. What more control could you possibly want? A
Re: Prepare to drool
2002-12-04 by sydilaxe
Several big questions regarding the Useq. 1) Can you use the Gate inputs to reverse the sequence? 2) Can these inputs also be used as a random step function?
RE: FW: [motm] FM Synthesis w/ MOTM
2002-12-04 by Tkacs, Ken
(I may not be the best person to explain this, but I ll tell you what I ve been told, or at least, what I ve been led to understand. ) Yes, the oscillators on
Re: [motm] Q: fixed filter bank misuse?
2002-12-04 by Paul Schreiber
Uses the same bypass fader as in the MOTM-700. Bypass is by a *short to ground* (simply foot bypass switch) or by a low (inverse Gate) of 0.3V or less. Paul
FW: [motm] Prepare to drool
2002-12-04 by Tkacs, Ken
MOTM (and Stooge panel) paint doesn t scratch all that easily. In fact, I don t think I ve put a single scratch in the paint on any module these past years. I
Q: fixed filter bank misuse?
2002-12-04 by Aaron Day
Hello all, Looking at the front panel of the 450 I see a jack labeled bypass . I m assuming that this can be triggered by a footswitch or gate signal, yes? So