Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 338 of 690 · 34488 messages matched

Re: More about Stooge Walnut Cabinets

2002-12-06 by paulhaneberg

Actually, walnut plywood is cheaper than solid walnut. It does require additional work to put the edges on. It is much more stable dimensionally and finished

Thread view Attachments: 0

FS: three MOTM 300 VCOs

2002-12-06 by Mike Fisher

Hi all, I m re-configuring my modular setup, and need to make some room in the MOTM rack. So up for grabs are three 300 ultra VCO modules. I -believe- that all

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Where is the --- Pulse divider?

2002-12-06 by paulhaneberg

As the owner of a number of businesses past and present I can tell you that businesses must do two things in order to survive long term. They must provide

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [motm] Re: uSeq knob/button placement

2002-12-06 by Paul Wagorn (Worldbid)

why not put it on the front & have a jumper block to take one out the back too? I d rather have it in the back, because it ll basically stay where it is, and

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: More about Stooge Walnut Cabinets

2002-12-06 by paulhaneberg

I also have done some serious woodworking. I would agree with the idea of trying to stay away from using solid walnut (or any other solid wood such as cherry)

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: uSeq knob/button placement

2002-12-06 by etanstudios2000

I second that cry... having to turn my entire cabinet around to plug/unplug a midi cable is a giant pain... they make those nice switchcraft 12BL5M nickel din

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: uSeq knob/button placement

2002-12-06 by paulhaneberg

It is my understanding that the midi in jack will be located on the front and replicated on the back of the module along with a midi thru. Please keep the midi

Thread view Attachments: 0

FW: [motm] Web page trouble

2002-12-06 by Tkacs, Ken

The high 4 versions of Netscape are especially troublesome. Around that time, Netscape made several radical changes to their Document Object Model that

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Fixed HTML?

2002-12-06 by Robert van der Kamp

... I m on linux. The page looks fine with Mozilla, both on Konqueror (KDE s main browser) I still get the black band near the bottom of the page. It has moved

Thread view Attachments: 0

Fixed HTML?

2002-12-06 by Paul Schreiber

If you had weird lines, empty pages, etc on the new_stuff page, please try again. I ran it through 3 hours of HTML cleanup editors/software and I think I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] New proposed uSeq panel

2002-12-06 by Jeffrey Pontius

... Overall I think it is a very nice layout - performance buttons together and near the value knob, and renaming to Clock In and Gate In makes those input

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Try the new page again

2002-12-06 by Adam Schabtach

No trouble here with either the new version or the old, aside from a black horizontal band across the page near the bottom. Looks like the same black band as

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: New proposed uSeq panel

2002-12-06 by mate_stubb

What does the line tying STOP to MIDI signify? Moe ... www.synthtech.com/pix/m600_2.jpg This renames GATE 2 IN as CLOCK IN, as that is what it does 99% of the

Thread view Attachments: 0

New proposed uSeq panel

2002-12-06 by Paul Schreiber

www.synthtech.com/pix/m600_2.jpg This renames GATE 2 IN as CLOCK IN, as that is what it does 99% of the time. And the performance buttons are grouped to the

Thread view Attachments: 0

More about Stooge walnut cabinets

2002-12-06 by J. Larry Hendry

OK, I learned again. There is more interest in this than I had anticipated. I got some great ideas from some of you too. So, please keep those coming. Here

Thread view Attachments: 0

Try the new page again

2002-12-06 by Paul Schreiber

Added HTML code and tweaked the 510 photo. See if this fixes strange loading of the page (on Linux especially). Will add a new PDF spec explaining the MIDI

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Recording software

2002-12-06 by Mike Marsh

Look at Cool Edit Pro: $249 for 128 tracks and a ton of effects built in: www.syntrillium.com. Mike ... recording ... that ... limited

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: uSeq knob/button placement

2002-12-05 by leitner6

Does the MIDI IN have to be on the front panel? Everything I have comes through the back of my rack. It just seems like a big wort to have it on the front. I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Web page trouble

2002-12-05 by Paul Schreiber

Well, I have *no idea*. I flunked HTML 101. Feel free to View---Source, and send me a corrected version. It s all those Table tags I m sure. Paul S. grumble

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Web page trouble

2002-12-05 by Jeffrey Pontius

... Displays ok for me on Netscape 7.x (pc) at home, but I see the same (almost empty) display as Scott does on Netscape 4.X (unix) at work. Jeff

Thread view Attachments: 0

Web page trouble

2002-12-05 by Scott Evans, Gen Mgr

Hello Paul and the group, Anyone else having trouble loading the new stuff page? http://www.synthtech.com/new_stuff.html All I get is the NEWS header, the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Recording software

2002-12-05 by celesteh@casaninja.com

I use protools for all my recording. I don t like it for creating midi, but it will play midifiles, so you can record your synth audio output from playing the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] MIDI Box Thoughts

2002-12-05 by Paul Schreiber

There are rear-mounted 5-pin DINs for IN and THRU so you can daisy-chain inside the cabinet. I will add this to the new PDF spec (should be edited Friday PM).

Thread view Attachments: 0

MIDI Box Thoughts

2002-12-05 by emmaker

Hello one and all, After looking at the uSeq I had some ideas that I though that I would share. Keep in mind these are just opions that maybe good or bad. I m

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Recording software

2002-12-05 by Mike Marsh

*sigh* I have both, and prefer Cool Edit Pro, based on the same criteria. But I use SF all the time, as well. I have Strats and Les Pauls and use them at

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Recording software

2002-12-05 by Mike Marsh

Yes, I m beginning to find that out :( It sure sucks for my Matrix- 1000. Pretty interface, though. Mike ... good ... support ... the ... acquired ... updated

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Recording software (Mac)

2002-12-05 by Eric Frampton

On the Mac, I ve been using Performer (then later, Digital Performer) since version 1.0 back in the day, and would recommend it highly. Logic is also very,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Recording Software

2002-12-05 by paulhaneberg

My choice of recording software would depend on whether you primarily want to record Midi or Audio. I would certainly recomend Pro-Tools, especially if you

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Recording software

2002-12-05 by osthelder

So far, it would seem as though the idea of computer audio recording will present a rather steep learning curve and a good amount of mental anguish. Is there

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Recording software

2002-12-05 by etanstudios2000

As for the Mac, I d go with any of the MOTU audio interfaces and MOTU s Digital Performer 3.11, I ve been using DP3 since last december and switching from a PC

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.