more about Walnut cabinets
2002-12-10 by ballendo <ballendo@yahoo.com>
Hello all, As a former professional furniture maker, whose favorite wood has always been walnut: 1/16 outer plys??? Not likely. Typical Walnut ply had face
Messages
Browse messages
Page 336 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
RE: [motm] Now, another topic to vote on
2002-12-10 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)
The *last* thing you need is someone crying My MIDI plug doesn t work-- MOTM sucks! . Get thee to a panel-mounted DIN. (I think they look cooler, anyway.)
Now, another topic to vote on
2002-12-10 by Paul Schreiber
a) OK it s settled! Voices grouped *vertically*, with CV on the bottom. Moe, please mock it up. b) Looking at the MIDI jack: the thick MOTM panel is causing an
Re: [motm] Re: More about Stooge walnut cabinets
2002-12-10 by J. Larry Hendry
... From: Tentochi What about doing a separate cabinet ? It would be 1U (possibly 2 U) high and it could fit two regular 1U units
RE: [motm] Re: More about Stooge walnut cabinets
2002-12-10 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)
This would be an interesting option to me; I like the idea of having the PS sitting on the floor, tucked away someplace unobtrusive. What s a S3RG3 , though?
Re: MOTM-650 button vote
2002-12-10 by gooboworks <andy@goobo.com>
... I vote for Moe s layout also. The channels visually match the LED s and for me the most used jacks go from the bottom up to keep the cable clutter at the
RE: [motm] Re: More about Stooge walnut cabinets
2002-12-10 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)
I say nay, just because we wouldn t all have something to do with the space, and a standard rack unit doesn t properly fit the cabinet widths suggested, so
Re: [motm] MOTM-650 button vote
2002-12-10 by J. Larry Hendry
... From: Scott Juskiw If I vote, does this mean I commit to buying one? No, but your vote is subject to certain calculations: Your vote
Re: [motm] MOTM-650 button vote
2002-12-10 by groovyshaman@snet.net
... on ... you ... Aw, don t listen to him, that part about current age is a bunch of crap - otherwise his own vote wouldn t mean much.
Re: [motm] Re: 650
2002-12-10 by J. Larry Hendry
Oh goodie. That question will then be answered with certainty. :) ... From: Paul Schreiber ... Yep. Paul S.
Re: [motm] Re: More about Stooge walnut cabinets
2002-12-10 by J. Larry Hendry
... From: Scott Gibbons Actually, I meant to type 1U, not 2. Fat fingers. Anyway, I meant that I would love to have an extra U
Re: [motm] Re: 650
2002-12-10 by J. Larry Hendry
NAMM cabinet has a full 1.5 in depth for jack clearance even on the bottom slant row. It will be Stooge goal for this to clear OK. But, I cannot promise. I
Re: 650
2002-12-10 by Mike Marsh <mmarsh@stellcom.com>
Yes it is, but rows rhymes :) ... http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [motm] MOTM-650 button vote
2002-12-10 by Paul Schreiber
... Of course............................not. Paul S.
Re: MOTM-650 button vote
2002-12-10 by paulhaneberg <phaneber@one.net>
I vote for Moe s Rows as well. I ve ordered two. Do I get two votes? :)
Re: [motm] MOTM-650 button vote
2002-12-10 by Scott Juskiw
I agree with Moe on the vertical layout; it makes more sense once you chain several of these units together. Although, I prefer GATE on the bottom. Too bad
Re: [motm] Re: MOTM-650 image
2002-12-10 by Paul Schreiber
... I don t understand the point , there IS THRU on the back. Paul S.
Re: [motm] MOTM-650 button vote
2002-12-10 by Scott Juskiw
I agree with Moe on the vertical layout; it makes more sense if you chain several of these units together. Although, I prefer GATE on the bottom. If I vote,
Re: [motm] Re: 650
2002-12-10 by Paul Schreiber
Err, is that Moe s columns ? I m confused! Paul S. ... From: To: Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 11:17 AM
Re: [motm] Re: 650
2002-12-10 by groovyshaman@snet.net
Ok, I ve reconsidered - I like this column layout better. G. ... From: Paul Schreiber To: ; Tentochi
Re: [motm] Re: More about Stooge walnut cabinets
2002-12-10 by Tentochi
What about doing a separate cabinet ? It would be 1U (possibly 2 U) high and it could fit two regular 1U units side by side. This would allow you to have a
Re: 650
2002-12-10 by Mike Marsh <mmarsh@stellcom.com>
I vote for Moe s rows... ... Start stuffing the ballot box. ... important :) ... buttons. I haven t used the ... converters tend to be set and ... (relative
Re: [motm] Re: More about Stooge walnut cabinets
2002-12-10 by Scott Gibbons
... That s what I m here for ;-) The 650 will address the need for a MIDI-CV converter anyway. But still... When I was drafting a cabinet for myself, I d never
Re: MOTM-650 image
2002-12-10 by Mike Marsh <mmarsh@stellcom.com>
Really good point about THRU... ... distrib ... Midi-Thru ... back) to the
Re: [motm] Re: 650
2002-12-10 by Paul Schreiber
... Yep. Paul S.
Re: [motm] Re: 650
2002-12-10 by Paul Schreiber
... OK folks, it s a *dead heat*. I need to decide by midnight tonite. Start stuffing the ballot box. ... They are not the same style, as fitting on the panel
beautiful thing...
2002-12-10 by Scott Gibbons
... Sometimes I forget that the rest of the world can t actually hear all the voices in my head. And, I forgot to copy & paste the subject header... The 650
Re: [motm] Digest Number 1527
2002-12-10 by Scott Gibbons
THIS IS A BEAUTIFUL THING. Elegant! best, - Scott ____________ http://www.red-noise.com http://www.strawberryplanet.org
Re: [motm] Re: More about Stooge walnut cabinets
2002-12-10 by Scott Gibbons
... Actually, I meant to type 1U, not 2. Fat fingers. Anyway, I meant that I would love to have an extra U height (I m talking standard rack units, not MOTM
Re: [motm] Re: 650
2002-12-10 by Tentochi
Methinks this is better too. ... Also, are the buttons going to be the same style at the 600? They don t look the same at all. Consistancy is very important
Re: [motm] MOTM-650 image
2002-12-10 by John Blacet
Seems like a MIDI Thru would be a good idea. I know that technically it is better to distribute but for a simple setup, a Thru is very handy. -- Regards,
MOTM-650 button vote
2002-12-10 by mate_stubb <mate_stubb@yahoo.com>
Well, I drew it up like Paul wanted it, but this would be my vote: Channels are vertical rows, channel 1 to the left and channel 4 to the right, thus matching
Re: [motm] MOTM-650 image
2002-12-10 by Paul Schreiber
... Yes, the MIDI outs are wired-OR together via open-collectors on the optocouplers. THRU on the back doesn t know where the data came from. ... No, buy
FW: [motm] Remedial soldering 101
2002-12-10 by Tkacs, Ken
You will not regret getting a decent iron! They say only a bad craftsman blames his tools, but lets face it-bad tools suck! When I moved from my Radio Shack
Re: 650 jacks (again)
2002-12-10 by sucrosemusic <sucrosemusic@yahoo.com>
Once again I have sent the message to paul only instead of the list. I said something to the effect of Don t count me as voting either way, I just wanted to
Re: [motm] MOTM-650 image
2002-12-10 by groovyshaman@snet.net
This looks great! A few things... 1) I may have missed this, if I did, my apologies... Since there is no Midi-Thru on the front of either this or the 600, to
Re: [motm] 650 jacks
2002-12-10 by Robert van der Kamp
... If I m allowed to vote (no modules yet), I vote for the horizontal layout, with voice 1 at the bottom row. - Robert
650 jacks
2002-12-10 by Paul Schreiber
If we reverse the voice order (put Voice 1 on the bottom row), keeping horizontal rows, then 99% of the users (1 or 2 voice systems) will fill up the 2 lower
Re: [motm] Re: MOTM-650 image
2002-12-10 by Paul Schreiber
because they are both soldered to the same pc board, and the MIDI jack is taller. Paul S. ... From: To: Sent:
Re: MOTM-650 image
2002-12-10 by edibennardo <endiendi@tin.it>
... Not only it doesn t line up but I think there s a slight scaling error since it seems to me that the MIDI receptacle is too small if compared to the jacks
Re: [motm] Re: 650
2002-12-10 by Scott Evans, Gen Mgr
I agree with all of these comments, particularly Larry s Scott
Re: [motm] Re: 650
2002-12-10 by J. Larry Hendry
... they don t box in the other jacks, so CV, GATE, VEL, AUX is how i d do it.
Re: MOTM-650 image
2002-12-10 by strohs56k <strohs@eskimo.com>
... Hmm - I assume there is some technical reason why the MIDI jack doesn t line up on center with the clock jack?
Re: 650
2002-12-10 by sucrosemusic <sucrosemusic@yahoo.com>
OK, botched my last post, here s my plan. CV and Gate should be next to each other, so they don t box in the other jacks, so CV, GATE, VEL, AUX is how i d do
MOTM-650 image
2002-12-10 by Paul Schreiber
Here is the *proposed* MOTM-650 MIDI-CV panel. If you have comments, now is the time. Yes, it *does* have rear MIDI jacks, you don t have to use the front
Re: [motm] Useless Statistics
2002-12-10 by Paul Schreiber
This is easy. Look in the manual! It says right there how many parts. And you know how many leads (1 solder per lead). Assume about 22 vias/board and you re
Useless Statistics
2002-12-10 by sucrosemusic <sucrosemusic@yahoo.com>
I was reading the previous posts about soldering issues, and noted in particular after you do 1000 of these... or something to that effect. Are there any
RE: [motm] Re: More about Stooge walnut cabinets
2002-12-10 by John Loffink
... 1.5 ... personal ... 10 inches deep is fine. 8.5 inches is not deep enough. My 15U high by 18U wide cabinet is exactly 8.5 inches deep. With the
Re: [motm] Re: More about Stooge walnut cabinets
2002-12-10 by J. Larry Hendry
I realize Paul Br was just having fun with us. But, has brought up a good point by accident. You cannot turn slant cabinets upside down (ala dot com style)
Re: [motm] Re: More about Stooge walnut cabinets
2002-12-10 by Sikorsky
... hello all, you know the funny thing is that i talk in feet & inches, that s from being born in the late 60 s, but i always measure in millimetres