Re: [motm] spider babies :O
2001-08-24 by Paul Schreiber
I use the very thin plywood used on hollow-core doors. It s a 1/16th, I ll guess. Paul S. ... From: To:
Messages
Browse messages
Page 440 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
Re: spider babies :O
2001-08-24 by jpotter@it.rjf.com
I aspire to one day have a case large enough to house a family of fruit bats. ... backed synth enclosure.
spider babies :O
2001-08-24 by josephcasbarian@email.com
Last night I discoverd a nursery of tiny arachnids in my open-backed synth enclosure. I m planning a nice cabinet with the help of Larry s rails, but I m
Fw: [AH] best new modular (for the money)
2001-08-24 by Paul Schreiber
Feel free to email this lost soul :) Paul S. ... From: Jim Windu To: Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:03 AM
RE: [motm] Re: Moog ladder plan - actually, 420 mod?
2001-08-24 by Jeffrey Pontius
Chaining a 420 into a 440 - now that s a neat idea. (Maybe I ll have to rethink my 420 opinion.) Jeff
420 mod
2001-08-24 by Paul Schreiber
There is no HP or LP section in the 420. The panel switch actually re-configures the integrator sections. Paul S.
RE: [motm] Re: Moog ladder plan - actually, 420 mod?
2001-08-24 by Mike B. Fisher
That s a neat idea, although I think that the lack of separate freq and res pots would be a pretty big loss. I have an MS20 and one 420 that I chain with a 440
[motm] Re: Moog ladder plan - actually, 420 mod?
2001-08-24 by Jeffrey Pontius
... As John described, it would be nice to have the functionality of 2 420 s (I opt out here since I don t have a 420 but do have an MS20, and another part of
Re: [motm] Moog ladder plan
2001-08-24 by jhaible@t-online.de
... Are you sure there isn t anything else overdriven when you get that awful sound ? (check input attenuators of modules after the 440 ...) I still think
Re: [motm] VOTE---pedal interface
2001-08-24 by Gert Jalass
I do prefer B. Gert ... From: Paul Schreiber To: MOTM listserv Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:09 PM
Re: [motm] VOTE---pedal interface
2001-08-24 by Joe Pavone
B! ...jp
Re: VOTE---pedal interface
2001-08-24 by phaeton777@yahoo.com
Pedal model 1 for me. Richard :-{
Re: [motm] Moog ladder plan
2001-08-24 by elhardt@aol.com
... a ladder filter when MOTM was only a ping on synth diy -- it s the current MOTM filters that came out of nowhere.
Re: [motm] One in every crowd
2001-08-24 by J. Larry Hendry
I had nothing in it at all. :) Don t worry Ken. I ll make you a good deal on the only version A every to be built (if and when I ever see it again). ...
Re: [motm] Moog ladder plan
2001-08-24 by elhardt@aol.com
... months.
Re: [motm] Moog ladder plan
2001-08-24 by jwbarlow@aol.com
... I m sure I m not the only one out here who remembers Paul planing to offer a ladder filter when MOTM was only a ping on synth diy -- it s the current MOTM
One in every crowd
2001-08-24 by Paul Schreiber
... Stooge Larry put you up to this, no??!? ... Actually, that s planned as one of many $89/$99 kit utility modules next year. Can t ship the whole apple
FW: [motm] VOTE---pedal interface
2001-08-24 by Tkacs, Ken
Okay, just to be a rebel, I ll cast the sole, hopeless vote for A. I may be misunderstanding the extra features on B & C, but they seem like stuff that can be
It's type 'B'
2001-08-24 by Paul Schreiber
OK, Stooge Inc under guidance of PTS will get going on a type B interface. Maybe I can squeeze and LED in there. This is a definite case where it s justified,
Re: [motm] Moog ladder plan
2001-08-24 by Paul Schreiber
... has ... Well, it wasn t exactly out of nowhere . JH has been working on it for months. Although some find it hard to believe, there is constant R&D going
Vote!
2001-08-24 by dfulton@threshold.opb.org
Number B (I will need to buy 2 but way more usefull!) Dave
Re: [motm] VOTE---pedal interface
2001-08-24 by Thomas Hudson
... A question about the trigger. I assume it would fire when the gate threshold was exceeded (same time as gate came on). Just wondering if their would be
Re: [motm] Moog ladder plan
2001-08-23 by elhardt@aol.com
... awful word again!) standpoint it needs to be in the lineup.
Re: [motm] VOTE---pedal interface
2001-08-23 by J. Larry Hendry
Well, as usual, Paul gets all the credit for the MOTM-like extra features. My version was the plain-Jane model A which has yet to accumulate one vote. HA.
Re: [motm] Who wants a Moog ladder filter?
2001-08-23 by elhardt@aol.com
... from cut (notch?) to boost (bandpass?) and VC of Q and frequency would be very interesting. Several of them cascaded could produce some interesting
Re: [motm] VOTE---pedal interface
2001-08-23 by Scott Juskiw
Type C for me. Type B would be okay, but a CV mix can be done with an 830. I d rather see a trigger output on the pedal interface.
Re: [motm] VOTE---pedal interface
2001-08-23 by elhardt@aol.com
I ll also go with Type B. Being able to mix in another CV sounds more useful than a trigger out. And no Breath Control connector on there?
Re: [motm] VOTE---pedal interface
2001-08-23 by thomas white
Type B Right on Larry and Paul, congrats to Larry for making it happen in the bigger picture with the official MOTM module design. True DIY pride Thomas
Re: [motm] VOTE---pedal interface
2001-08-23 by Thomas Hudson
B or C for me. Tomy
RE: [motm] VOTE---pedal interface
2001-08-23 by Tentochi
Type C
Re: VOTE---pedal interface
2001-08-23 by Mike Marsh
Type B, Type C a close second. Mike
Re: [motm] VOTE---pedal interface
2001-08-23 by Jeffrey Pontius
... Jeff P.
Re: VOTE---pedal interface
2001-08-23 by jasret@mindspring.com
Preferably C, but B would be good, too ... -Doug jasret@mindspring.com
FW: [motm] Moog ladder plan
2001-08-23 by Tkacs, Ken
Ahh, I bet I know! It doesn t actually have a ladder it it *at all*! I bet it has an escalator in it! ... From: Paul Schreiber To: MOTM listserv Sent:
Re: [motm] VOTE---pedal interface
2001-08-23 by Dave Hylander
B sounds like a winner to me. dave
RE: [motm] VOTE---pedal interface
2001-08-23 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)
Definately Type B or C. If I want more than one pedal, I ll buy another pedal interface, but it would take more than one more module to get the functionality
VOTE---pedal interface
2001-08-23 by Paul Schreiber
OK, here are your choices Type A 1U wide. 2 pedal INs, 2 CV OUTs. Each channel has range/scale pots. $99 kit, $139 assembled Type B 1U wide. 1 pedal IN, 1 CV
Re: Moog ladder plan
2001-08-23 by jpotter@it.rjf.com
Seconded! The more VC control the better. Something like what is described below would be absolutely sick. The MS-20 is still my current favorite filter,
Re: [motm] Who wants a Moog ladder filter?
2001-08-23 by Thomas Hudson
... I ll throw out an idea. The only digital synth I own is an Emu Ultraproteus with its Z-Plane filters. These are 14-pole parametric filters that allow them
Re: [motm] Moog ladder plan
2001-08-23 by Jeffrey Pontius
... Yes, I recall JH mentioning something about this lately (?). I interpreted Mark s comment as having some explicit voltage control over parameters he
Re: Who wants a completely new filter?
2001-08-23 by doc@trocarrecords.com
h3y all, i d be interested. i like the sound o the R feedback path... have a good one... peace, doc ... LP, BP, HP, and notch, but with a steeper 4 pole
Re: [motm] Who wants a completely new filter?
2001-08-23 by mate_stubb@yahoo.com
... hmm. how about a filter that s completely new? so far, all of the MOTM filters are based on existing vintage designs, which is groovy and all but...
Re: [motm] VOTE---pedal interface
2001-08-23 by The Old Crow
Type B. Crow /**/
Re: [motm] Moog ladder plan
2001-08-23 by Paul Schreiber
Actually, under close mathematical analysis, the Moog IS variable-slope. Hee hee. Paul S.
Re: [motm] Moog ladder plan
2001-08-23 by Paul Schreiber
We re on all this, hee hee hee. Paul S. ... Moog ... Moogs ... slope,
Re: [motm] Moog ladder plan
2001-08-23 by Jeffrey Pontius
... I think Mark has made one of the best suggestions about filters that I ve seen in a while, especially from a user s standpoint. These would all be very
Re: MOTM CD?
2001-08-23 by Jeffrey Pontius
... True, I wasn t thinking of pulling off the .mp3 s and putting them on a cd - more like sending originals on cd for compilation. I also wasn t thinking in
MOTM CD?
2001-08-23 by Paul Schreiber
Yes, it would be WONDERFUL to do this, but remember this isn t like MP3s on the site. The audience is more sophisticated :) This will have to be off list per
Re: [motm] Moog ladder plan
2001-08-23 by mark@indole.net
... It would have to be noticeably different, otherwise you are going to get all of these people complaining that it doesn t sound exactly like the Moog
Re: [motm] NAMM it is
2001-08-23 by Jeffrey Pontius
... Would it be worth making a cd of motm songs, clips, ... to hand out at NAMM? There is quite a bit on the motm news page and several of us (yes, including