Yahoo Groups archive

AVR-Chat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:41 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 23 of 307 · 15341 messages matched

Re: [AVR-Chat] measure time

2011-07-07 by hamidreza maddah

kheili koon goshadi --- On Tue, 7/5/11, Ahmed Mostafa wrote: From: Ahmed Mostafa Subject: [AVR-Chat] measure time To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Date: Tuesday, July 5, 2011, 5:49 AM I use two microcontrollers , each one with RF module I knew how to send data from one microcontrolle

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Comments or thoughts required please

2011-07-07 by Xiaofan Chen

On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:28 PM, John Samperi wrote: > At 10:54 AM 4/07/2011, you wrote: >>Why not touch Studio 5 yet? > > Far too many bugs still, maybe ok in a year or so. > ..and then there is the 600+MB download with about 1.2GB > worth of stuff. > > If however one doesn't ne

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Comments or thoughts required please

2011-07-07 by Jeff Blaine

Very interesting Dave. The propeller is a very cool gadget. I think the Ardunio has a big following as well but I’ve not played with that as getting an AVR to talk is pretty easy now. The Mikroe dev board + compiler is not perfect – but it’s pretty simple to get working. And for

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Delay functions and "__builtin_avr_delay_cycles".

2011-07-05 by M W

I've never seen a Watchdog Timer prevent a lock up, they do let you recover from one :) --- On Tue, 7/5/11, STEVEN HOLDER wrote: > ... Loops can get stuck and there should > always be a "supervisor" module to help the software out if > it does i.e a watchdog timer, often used and

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Delay functions and "__builtin_avr_delay_cycles".

2011-07-05 by David Kelly

On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 09:35:19AM -0600, Cat C wrote: > > Thank you all for input,There is sooth in what you all say and I tend > to agree. However, where does it stop?If it takes longer to write > something because I don't trust any libraries I waste time writing my > own. Didn

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Delay functions and "__builtin_avr_delay_cycles".

2011-07-05 by STEVEN HOLDER

It is usually a good idea to following some sort of programming template as well, i tend (not always) to follow the MISRA C programming guidelines as to structure and technique, it enforces good programming techniques amd just as importantly design methodology and documentation.

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Delay functions and "__builtin_avr_delay_cycles".

2011-07-05 by Cat C

And just in case any "library maintainers" read this, Thank you for all your work; life would be much harder without you :-) Cat > You have to trust that the library maintainers will, in fact, look out for > you and me and all the other users. ... [Non-text portions of this messa

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Delay functions and "__builtin_avr_delay_cycles".

2011-07-05 by Cat C

Well said Jim, I wish I had the resources (time/people) to check everything or write my own.I don't. Cat > > Hello, Cat - > > What you say is quite important, and it is something that I have struggled > over, finally yielding to the Great Dice Thrower In The Sky. Any time you ...

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Delay functions and "__builtin_avr_delay_cycles".

2011-07-05 by wagnerj@proaxis.com

> > Thank you all for input,There is sooth in what you all say and I tend to > agree. > However, where does it stop?If it takes longer to write something because > I don't trust any libraries I waste time writing my own. > If I trust them, I may need to spend time fixing IF they

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Delay functions and "__builtin_avr_delay_cycles".

2011-07-05 by Cat C

Thank you all for input,There is sooth in what you all say and I tend to agree. However, where does it stop?If it takes longer to write something because I don't trust any libraries I waste time writing my own. If I trust them, I may need to spend time fixing IF they break (and I

Thread view Attachments: 0

measure time

2011-07-05 by Ahmed Mostafa

I use two microcontrollers , each one with RF module I knew how to send data from one microcontroller through RF module to the other one through RF module and display this data on LCD connected to the other one I want to know how to calculate time to send data from one microcontr

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Comments or thoughts required please

2011-07-05 by Darryl

Gidday Jeff, Thanks very much for the reply and your comments they are greatly appreciated. I like your setup, it’s along the lines that I want to go. I’ve book marked your site as I think it warrants further investigation. Cheers Darryl From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AVR

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Comments or thoughts required please

2011-07-05 by John Samperi

At 06:21 PM 5/07/2011, you wrote: >I was under the impression that I could use >Codevision, AVRStudio v4.18 and a Jtagice mk2 to program these boards >without the need to make any hardware changes. Perhaps I need to ask >MikroElektronika that question before purchasing. Yesterday

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Comments or thoughts required please

2011-07-05 by Darryl

Gidday, John I was under the impression that I could use Codevision, AVRStudio v4.18 and a Jtagice mk2 to program these boards without the need to make any hardware changes. Perhaps I need to ask MikroElektronika that question before purchasing. Thanks very much for your input it

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Comments or thoughts required please

2011-07-05 by Darryl

Gidday Cat Thanks for the reply. I did look at this board, but deemed it at bit to advanced for me at the moment. I have only done a six month course on microcontrollers at uni, and that was three years ago. Darryl From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com]

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Delay functions and "__builtin_avr_delay_cycles".

2011-07-05 by David Kelly

On Jul 4, 2011, at 7:36 PM, Jim Hatley wrote: > I agree with David ... don't use "built-in delay codes" ... roll your own if absolutely required. > > Software timing loops are not a good idea but sometimes the only way to make something work. It is easy to get in to trouble ... b

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Delay functions and "__builtin_avr_delay_cycles".

2011-07-05 by Jim Hatley

I agree with David ... don't use "built-in delay codes" ... roll your own if absolutely required. Software timing loops are not a good idea but sometimes the only way to make something work. It is easy to get in to trouble ... been there done that. I use them but very carefully w

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Delay functions and "__builtin_avr_delay_cycles".

2011-07-05 by Dave Hylands

Hi Cat, On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Cat C wrote: > > Hi there, > Looking at the delay functions, I see that: void _delay_us > ( > double > __us )has a maximal possible delay is 768 us / F_CPU in MHz. > But:If the avr-gcc toolchain has __builtin_avr_delay_cycles(unsigned long

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Delay functions and "__builtin_avr_delay_cycles".

2011-07-04 by Cat C

Thanks David, You'd think there should be a way to tell, if it's mentioned in the documentation like that... Regarding empty loops... we're not all as professional as you are :-) Cat > To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com > From: dkelly@hiwaay.net > Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 17:05:09 -0500 >

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Delay functions and "__builtin_avr_delay_cycles".

2011-07-04 by David Kelly

On Jul 4, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Cat C wrote: > Hi there, > Looking at the delay functions, I see that: void _delay_us > ( > double > __us )has a maximal possible delay is 768 us / F_CPU in MHz. > But:If the avr-gcc toolchain has __builtin_avr_delay_cycles(unsigned long) > support, ma

Thread view Attachments: 0

Delay functions and "__builtin_avr_delay_cycles".

2011-07-04 by Cat C

Hi there, Looking at the delay functions, I see that: void _delay_us ( double __us )has a maximal possible delay is 768 us / F_CPU in MHz. But:If the avr-gcc toolchain has __builtin_avr_delay_cycles(unsigned long) support, maximal possible delay is 4294967.295 us/ F_CPU in MHz. H

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Comments or thoughts required please

2011-07-04 by John Samperi

At 10:54 AM 4/07/2011, you wrote: >Why not touch Studio 5 yet? Far too many bugs still, maybe ok in a year or so. ..and then there is the 600+MB download with about 1.2GB worth of stuff. If however one doesn't need reliable tools like Studio ie a hobbyist then it may be OK, but I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Comments or thoughts required please

2011-07-04 by Cat

Why not touch Studio 5 yet? From: John Samperi Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 3:24 PM To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] Comments or thoughts required please ... use standard tools like AVR Studio V4.18 (DON'T TOUCH Version 5 yet) ... John Samperi [Non-text portion

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Comments or thoughts required please

2011-07-03 by John Samperi

At 04:51 AM 4/07/2011, you wrote: >The companion compilers are quite good The companion compilers are in fact quite bad. :-) The C compiler I tried at least. The programming interface of those board do no follow standard pin-out IIRC so they try to suck people in by having to use

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Comments or thoughts required please

2011-07-03 by Dave Scanlan

Hi Jeff, At one time, I belonged to a robotics club in Roseville. The AVR and the Propeller were the two most popular chips. The Propeller with 8 cores was a dream for robotics. I was one of 26 folks around the world to be on the beta test team for the Propeller. I did these prog

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Comments or thoughts required please

2011-07-03 by Dave Scanlan

Hi Jeff, I did a lot of development work in the 90’s when these chips were first introduced. I loved their assembly instructions. Dave From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Blaine Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 11:51 AM To: AVR-Chat@yahoo

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Comments or thoughts required please

2011-07-03 by Jeff Blaine

I have the EasyAVR6. Works great. Very good quality build as well. A friend of mine has the same board – same opinion. The companion compilers are quite good as well for the hobbyist especially because a lot of generic hardware is supported by the compiler functions. After having

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Comments or thoughts required please

2011-07-03 by Cat

Why not just buy an EVK1104? Some learning to move to 32 bit AVR but what a board! Cat From: darrylmunns Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 2:59 AM To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Subject: [AVR-Chat] Comments or thoughts required please Gidday, I was going to upgrade my STK500 to a STK600.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Comments or thoughts required please

2011-07-03 by darrylmunns

Gidday, I was going to upgrade my STK500 to a STK600. But I then became aware of the development boards from "Mikroe Electronics". Specifically the "EasyAVR6" and the "BigAVR6" development systems, they seem to be ideal for a home hobbyist who wants to concentrate on the software

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Help with AT32 part

2011-06-20 by Tim Mitchell

----Original Message---- From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of David Kelly Sent: 18 June 2011 04:41 To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] Help with AT32 part > On Jun 16, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Tim Mitchell wrote: > > > Haven't d

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Help with AT32 part

2011-06-18 by Saundby

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Saundby" wrote: > > > You use the GPIO Controller to assign the pins to a function then you use them. For this application, if you have a USART available, you'll want to find the pins for that function, enable that function for those pins with th

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Help with AT32 part

2011-06-18 by Saundby

You use the GPIO Controller to assign the pins to a function then you use them. For this application, if you have a USART available, you'll want to find the pins for that function, enable that function for those pins with the GPIO Controller, then use the USART normally in softwa

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Help with AT32 part

2011-06-18 by David Kelly

On Jun 16, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Tim Mitchell wrote: > Haven't done this on AVR32 but on ARM you just use bitwise anding and oring to change the port bits you are interested in, leaving the others unaffected. Others are not exactly unaffected. Its still a read-modify-write and if th

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Help with AT32 part

2011-06-16 by Tim Mitchell

Haven't done this on AVR32 but on ARM you just use bitwise anding and oring to change the port bits you are interested in, leaving the others unaffected. -- Tim Mitchell

Thread view Attachments: 0

Help with AT32 part

2011-06-16 by Philippe Habib

I'm looking at a project using the AT32 for the first time and trying to work through pin assignments. The part I'm looking at is the 144 pin AT32U3A0512. I have a parallel interface serial display to talk to. On an 8 bit processor, I'd just assign an entire port to it and write

Thread view Attachments: 0

Some AVR items for sale

2011-06-14 by Dean Claxton

Hi everyone, I thought I'd try here before eBay. I have a couple of items that I purchased for a project that never eventuated : JTAGICE MkII EVK-1104 AVR32 eval board (http://www.element14.com/community/docs/DOC-18076) I havent use the JTAGICE at all. The EVK has the original fi

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Spam from unknown posters......

2011-06-09 by Zack Widup

A lot of this stuff is done unbeknownst to the senders. Someone gets an e-mail and accidentally clicks on the link, or maybe all they have to do is download it, and it takes on a life of its own and sends the spam out to a person's address book. One reason I like gmail is that, f

Thread view Attachments: 0

Spam from unknown posters......

2011-06-09 by Andrew Mathison (Alice)

This may be a really bad type of spam, you should stop posting in this manner...Please stop. Regards Andy [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Thread view Attachments: 0

Message 14199

2011-06-09 by Mehdi Ghassemi

http://pedalsdeboira.com/supersurprise.html [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Thread view Attachments: 0

Message 14198

2011-06-08 by Mehdi Ghassemi

http://dienstnet.com/enterin.html [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Thread view Attachments: 0

High Quality 2 layer PCB boards

2011-06-01 by Hakon Gudmundsson

Hi. You can get 5 pcs of your 2 layer PCB boards. 5 indentical boards. Any size less than 100x100mm only 54.95$ with shipping > Any size less than 50x50mm only 29.95 $ with free shipping See www.h-instruments.ecrater.com

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Instruments and accessories good price?

2011-05-30 by Dave McLaughlin

I would be very sceptical about this company as the only contact details are a Yahoo email address. Real companies don't use Yahoo. If companies really want to be accepted, they have to have some real address or phone number that people can call to verify who they are. I personal

Thread view Attachments: 0

Instruments and accessories good price?

2011-05-30 by Electroniclab66

Hi, I have bought instruments and accessories from www.h-instruments.ecrater.com (www.h-instruments.ecrater.co.uk) the price is fair and the quality is fine too. Free shipping is includet in the price, some thing I like. Where do you normaly buy when you need instruments, cables

Thread view Attachments: 0

Flexible PCB sources

2011-05-29 by M W

Hey all. A (very frugal) friend wants me to make a replacement flex PC board for a device he has where a flex connector was destroyed; I don't know where to get 1-side or 2-side clad DuPont "Pyralux" or the like Kapton / polyimides in one-off quantities any more, last time I work

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Re: Cheap 2 layer prototype PCB boards - custom made

2011-05-27 by Dave McLaughlin

Try dropping one on the floor and you will wish you had more than 1 in your stock!! J Dave... --- Very funny Scotty, now beam down my clothes!!! --- From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tim Mitchell Sent: 27 May 2011 22:56 To: AVR-Chat@yah

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Re: Cheap 2 layer prototype PCB boards - custom made

2011-05-27 by Tim Mitchell

> > I don't know what is your project for. If it's a > > serious product, the board must be soldered with > > machine if there're 0402 on it. For DIY projects, we > > don't suggest 0402 because it's not reliable when > > soldered manually. I don't think you'll like to make a > >

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Cheap 2 layer prototype PCB boards - custom made

2011-05-27 by Mike Payson

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 5:28 AM, ecros_technology wrote: > --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, Mike Payson wrote: > > > > ... the CEO ... [of EzPCB] gave me > > some ... technical advice regarding > > the use of 0402 components ... (put > > succinctly, don't do it unless you > > kno

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Cheap 2 layer prototype PCB boards - custom made

2011-05-27 by Zack Widup

Whoops, guess I was thinking of three-layer boards. :-) On most of my AVR projects I try to keep most of the traces on one side and mostly a ground plane on the other. I can't do plated-through holes. Microcontrollers haven't gotten fast enough yet where you need to use microwave

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Cheap 2 layer prototype PCB boards - custom made

2011-05-27 by Leon Heller

On 27/05/2011 14:07, Dave McLaughlin wrote: > Hi Leon, > > You in here too!! That was me on the Pulsonix forum. > > I came across an Altium user in here today to! > > Small world isn't it? I'm quite ubiquitous, you'll find me all over the place. 8-) Leon -- Leon Heller G1HSM

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Cheap 2 layer prototype PCB boards - custom made

2011-05-27 by Leon Heller

On 27/05/2011 13:28, ecros_technology wrote: > --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, Mike Payson wrote: >> >> ... the CEO ... [of EzPCB] gave me >> some ... technical advice regarding >> the use of 0402 components ... (put >> succinctly, don't do it unless you >> know what you are doi

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.