Yahoo Groups archive

AVR-Chat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:41 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 281 of 307 · 15341 messages matched

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: futaba S3003 servo

2004-06-20 by David VanHorn

At 05:20 PM 6/19/2004 -0700, jay marante wrote: >ok... assuming phil's data, this is what i sofar understand: > >i should send a signal to the servo with 2ms (5V) to rotate it at maximum position and 1ms (5V) for minimum position. > >should i send this signal once (just sigle pul

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: futaba S3003 servo

2004-06-20 by jay marante

ok... assuming phil's data, this is what i sofar understand: i should send a signal to the servo with 2ms (5V) to rotate it at maximum position and 1ms (5V) for minimum position. should i send this signal once (just sigle pulse) for the servo to rotate, say for maximum position?

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: futaba S3003 servo

2004-06-19 by David VanHorn

> >Interesting, which servos did you see this in? I know that futaba, >gws and several others use 1-2 mS. I thought it was a standard. ;For Futaba Servos .equ Futaba_Min = 1000 ;Microseconds for minimum position .equ Futaba_Max = 2000 ;Microseconds for maximum position .equ Futab

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: futaba S3003 servo

2004-06-19 by David VanHorn

At 07:12 PM 6/19/2004 +0000, Phil wrote: >Servos can be modified to make them rotate 360. I've done it for a >number of GWS servos. If the FS3003 uses plastic gears (and I think >it does) then its pretty easy. you will have to remove the "nub" >that prevents rotation and disconne

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: futaba S3003 servo

2004-06-19 by Phil

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, David VanHorn wrote: > At 07:12 PM 6/19/2004 +0000, Phil wrote: > ... > > Modified, yes. Stock, no. agreed, but he asked how... > > The ones I've seen, have been 500 - 1500uS Interesting, which servos did you see this in? I know that futaba, gws a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: futaba S3003 servo

2004-06-19 by Phil

Servos can be modified to make them rotate 360. I've done it for a number of GWS servos. If the FS3003 uses plastic gears (and I think it does) then its pretty easy. you will have to remove the "nub" that prevents rotation and disconnect the feed-back pot. google for servo modifi

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] futaba S3003 servo

2004-06-19 by David VanHorn

At 09:27 AM 6/19/2004 -0700, jay marante wrote: >i don't know much bout the servo motor except that i have to use PWM to make it rotate. i need some basic info bout it. can i rotate it back-and-forth? also, what should i do to make it rotate more than 360 degree? thanks... Most R

Thread view Attachments: 0

futaba S3003 servo

2004-06-19 by jay marante

i don't know much bout the servo motor except that i have to use PWM to make it rotate. i need some basic info bout it. can i rotate it back-and-forth? also, what should i do to make it rotate more than 360 degree? thanks... -jay Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - C

Thread view Attachments: 0

HS-300 servo motor

2004-06-19 by Ridho Alpha

helllo i'm a bit confused with HS-300 servo motor... how long the length of the pulse for clokwise and counter clockwise???? the neutral is 1500 uS, isn't it?? please help me thank yaou ________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger - Co

Thread view Attachments: 0

serial real time clock

2004-06-19 by Amir Rahafrooz

Dear everybody! I'd like to know do we have any serial real time clock compatible with PCF8563,PCF8583,DS1302 or DS1307?(for working with codevisionAVR)

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Exclusive or

2004-06-19 by David VanHorn

> > > clr sum > sbrc tmp,0 > inc sum > sbrc tmp,1 > inc sum > sbrc tmp,2 > inc sum > sbrc tmp,3 > inc sum That's one cycle longer (but smaller code) than the lookup table. > Another way: > > clr sum > lsr tmp > adc sum, tmp > lsr tmp > lsr tmp > adc sum, tmp Ok, that is better, 6

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Exclusive or

2004-06-19 by Mark Jordan

On 18 Jun 2004 at 22:47, David VanHorn wrote: > > What's the fastest way to get the exclusive or, of four bits in a register? > > 0000 = 0 > 0001 = 1 > 0010 = 1 > 0011 = 0 > 0100 = 1 > 0101 = 0 > 0110 = 0 > 0111 = 0 > and so on... > > Not for a parity generator, but I think it en

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Exclusive or

2004-06-19 by David VanHorn

At 09:01 PM 6/18/2004 -0700, Dave Hylands wrote: >I think that the fastest way is to have a sixteen entry lookup table, >where the answer is precomputed and stored. > >You could also store a 16 bit value, where each bit position holds the >answer and use something like (in C): >

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Exclusive or

2004-06-19 by David VanHorn

At 11:59 AM 6/19/2004 +0800, Bernd Felsche wrote: >On Saturday 19 June 2004 11:47, David VanHorn wrote: >> What's the fastest way to get the exclusive or, of four bits in a >> register? > >Hardware. :-) Yeah, well.. In a 2343 to be precise. >I hate to be pedantic but are these an

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Exclusive or

2004-06-19 by Dave Hylands

I think that the fastest way is to have a sixteen entry lookup table, where the answer is precomputed and stored. You could also store a 16 bit value, where each bit position holds the answer and use something like (in C): Lookup & ( 1 -----Original Message----- > From: David Van

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Exclusive or

2004-06-19 by Bernd Felsche

On Saturday 19 June 2004 11:47, David VanHorn wrote: > What's the fastest way to get the exclusive or, of four bits in a > register? Hardware. :-) > 0000 = 0 > 0001 = 1 > 0010 = 1 > 0011 = 0 > 0100 = 1 > 0101 = 0 > 0110 = 0 > 0111 = 0 > and so on... I hate to be pedantic but are

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Exclusive or

2004-06-19 by Russell Shaw

David VanHorn wrote: > What's the fastest way to get the exclusive or, of four bits in a register? > > 0000 = 0 > 0001 = 1 > 0010 = 1 > 0011 = 0 > 0100 = 1 > 0101 = 0 > 0110 = 0 > 0111 = 0 > and so on... > > Not for a parity generator, but I think it ends up as the same problem.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Exclusive or

2004-06-19 by David VanHorn

What's the fastest way to get the exclusive or, of four bits in a register? 0000 = 0 0001 = 1 0010 = 1 0011 = 0 0100 = 1 0101 = 0 0110 = 0 0111 = 0 and so on... Not for a parity generator, but I think it ends up as the same problem.

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Re: Olimex, roll-your own (was ... JTAG-ICE ...)

2004-06-18 by Paul Curtis

Graham, > But WinAVR supports the JTAG-ICE, which is great. > > > ... to make it really useful, shove an > > FTDI USB RS232 chip on the end ... > > Shhhhhhhhhh! (That's the plan.) The downside is that you for convenience you pay in performace: code download plummets from 5K/secon

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Re: Olimex, roll-your own (was ... JTAG-ICE ...)

2004-06-18 by Paul Curtis

Graham, > > I never intimated that you were stealing. > > Well, whatever word you use instead of stealing, it amounts to the > same thing. I'm either doing something Atmel can justifiably object > to or I'm not. I was only making you aware of what I've been told by Atmel. If you

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Olimex, roll-your own (was ... JTAG-ICE ...)

2004-06-18 by Graham Davies

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Curtis" wrote: > I was only making you aware ... Let's just forget the "stealing" thing. > > > ... I have heard from people within Atmel... > > Well, this could be from the horse's mouth > > or from some other orifice. > > Hmm, it's from the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Olimex, roll-your own (was ... JTAG-ICE ...)

2004-06-18 by Graham Davies

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Curtis" wrote: > I never intimated that you were stealing. Well, whatever word you use instead of stealing, it amounts to the same thing. I'm either doing something Atmel can justifiably object to or I'm not. > If, however, you ship the devi

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Olimex, roll-your own (was ... JTAG-ICE ...)

2004-06-18 by Kathy Quinlan

David VanHorn wrote: >>I only recount what I have heard from people within Atmel: the Mk II >>isn't compatible with the Mk I because of 3P cloning. > > > Ok, what's "3P cloning"? 3rd Party ?? Kat. -- --------------------------------------------------------------- K.A.Q. Electroni

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Re: Olimex, roll-your own (was ... JTAG-ICE ...)

2004-06-18 by Paul Curtis

> >I only recount what I have heard from people within Atmel: the Mk II > >isn't compatible with the Mk I because of 3P cloning. > > Ok, what's "3P cloning"? 3RD Party Cloning. -- Paul Curtis, Rowley Associates Ltd http://www.rowley.co.uk CrossWorks for MSP430, ARM, and (soon) At

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Re: Olimex, roll-your own (was ... JTAG-ICE ...)

2004-06-18 by Paul Curtis

Graham, > > You might come a cropper with Atmel ... > > I think they're wanting to protect their IP > > Do you have Atmel's permission ... > > No, I don't have Atmel's permission, but I can't quite see what IP > I'm stealing. I never intimated that you were stealing. If, however,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] IAR free trial version

2004-06-18 by Cobb, Quentin

Your first step is to look at the code and see what compiler it was written for. Atmel follow good practice and specify the target device and compiler in a comment block at the start of the code. If it's for the IAR then you're OK. If not your're going to have to port the code, w

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Olimex, roll-your own (was ... JTAG-ICE ...)

2004-06-18 by Cosmin Buhu

----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Davies" To: Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 4:56 PM Subject: [AVR-Chat] Re: Olimex, roll-your own (was ... JTAG-ICE ...) > --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Cosmin Buhu" wrote: > > > My Olimex JTAG updated in a minute > > without that proced

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] IAR free trial version

2004-06-18 by David VanHorn

At 03:10 AM 6/18/2004 -0700, Kiran Mysore Ramaprasad wrote: >HI, > >Thanks for the tip. > >Please let me know if i can compile the Sealed Lead Acid Battery Charger Code given in AVR-450 reference design by Atmel by using the free trial version of the IAR C Compiler. Watch out for

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Re: Olimex, roll-your own (was ... JTAG-ICE ...)

2004-06-18 by Paul Curtis

Graham, > What do you mean when you say "updated"? The Olimex document I was > referring to is about how to get the software loaded into the > JTAG- ICE in the first place from AVR Studio (using AVR > prog). You have to > make an adapter cable from the JTAG socket to an ISP devic

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: $100 coupon @ seminar

2004-06-18 by Huze

Just a heads up on the $100 coupon option... I attended the Atmel seminar in Toronto yesterday. I had chosen the $100 coupon when I registered, with the intent of buying an STK-500. Unfortunately I was told the $100 coupon is only good on items worth US$100 or more. In fact, it's

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Olimex, roll-your own (was ... JTAG-ICE ...)

2004-06-18 by Graham Davies

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Cosmin Buhu" wrote: > Look what can be read on Olimex site: > " AVR-JTAG firmware upgrade for the > very first lot of AVR-JTAG (no -L > suffix), all JTAGs shipped after > 01.01.2004 are with fixed bootloader > and will upgrade automatically via >

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] IAR free trial version

2004-06-18 by Dave Hylands

Why don't you try it yourself and see? -----Original Message----- From: Kiran Mysore Ramaprasad [mailto:kiran_mr@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 3:10 AM To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] IAR free trial version HI, Thanks for the tip. Please let me know i

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Olimex, roll-your own (was ... JTAG-ICE ...)

2004-06-18 by Graham Davies

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Cosmin Buhu" wrote: > My Olimex JTAG updated in a minute > without that procedure ??? Bought > in May. Cosmin, Thanks for this information. What do you mean when you say "updated"? The Olimex document I was referring to is about how to get the so

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] IAR free trial version

2004-06-18 by Kiran Mysore Ramaprasad

HI, Thanks for the tip. Please let me know if i can compile the Sealed Lead Acid Battery Charger Code given in AVR-450 reference design by Atmel by using the free trial version of the IAR C Compiler. Regards, Kiran Jim McGinn wrote: Hi Quentin, > I am t an Atmel seminar today an

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Olimex, roll-your own (was ... JTAG-ICE ...)

2004-06-18 by Cosmin Buhu

----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Davies" To: Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 8:38 PM Subject: [AVR-Chat] Olimex, roll-your own (was ... JTAG-ICE ...) > --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Larry Barello" wrote: > > > Doesn't Olemex already sell > > the clone, in a nice packa

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] IAR free trial version

2004-06-18 by Jim McGinn

Hi Quentin, > I am t an Atmel seminar today an d just learned that IAR now has a free eval > version. Thanks for this tip! Regards, Jim McGinn ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cobb, Quentin" To: Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 9:03 AM Subject: [AVR-Chat] IAR free trial version

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] PIC and JTAG-ICE (was Re: ATmega88 ???)

2004-06-17 by Cobb, Quentin

>> it sounds, just like Microchip, they are abandoning >> their first-model for the MkII. Must not be enough money in supporting >> cheap entry-level tools. I believe the MkII has the same MSRP as the MkI i.e, $299. They'll find it difficult to sell the Mk1's now so you can expec

Thread view Attachments: 0

Olimex, roll-your own (was ... JTAG-ICE ...)

2004-06-17 by Graham Davies

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Larry Barello" wrote: > Doesn't Olemex already sell > the clone, in a nice package > for $40 dollars or so? Well, it depends what you mean by "nice". Have you read the Olimex document describing how to load the ICE software from AVR Studio? It to

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] PIC and JTAG-ICE (was Re: ATmega88 ???)

2004-06-17 by Larry Barello

Doesn't Olemex already sell the clone, in a nice package for $40 dollars or so? http://www.olimex.com/dev/avr-jtag.html More information: http://www.egnite.de/pipermail/en-nut-discussion/2003-December/001643.html -----Original Message----- From: David VanHorn > >That still makes

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] PIC and JTAG-ICE (was Re: ATmega88 ???)

2004-06-17 by Cobb, Quentin

The JTAG ICE Mk1 is free to seminar attendees, because they want to unload the Mk1's to make way for the new and improved MkII's If you didn't want one, you could get a $100 discount certificate instead. -----Original Message----- From: scott5342000 [mailto:scottxs@comcast.net] S

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] PIC and JTAG-ICE (was Re: ATmega88 ???)

2004-06-17 by David VanHorn

> >It sounded to me like it was free. Probably because they came out with >an mkII version that handles more of their chips. It's not free, at least not according to arrow or digikey. The MkII is interesting. What I'd like to see fixed, is STUDIO! Some days, I have no problems at

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] PIC and JTAG-ICE (was Re: ATmega88 ???)

2004-06-17 by Paul Curtis

Hi, > > If you have a PIC that is roughly equivalent to the ATmega64, would > > you consider running my Dhrystone benchmark and telling us > the result? > > If I ever have the opportunity, I don't now. > > > > JTAGICE coupon with their seminars ... > > > > That still makes it $20

Thread view Attachments: 0

PIC and JTAG-ICE (was Re: ATmega88 ???)

2004-06-17 by scott5342000

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, David VanHorn wrote: > > > > >It sounded to me like it was free. Probably because they came out with > >an mkII version that handles more of their chips. > > It's not free, at least not according to arrow or digikey. Atmel is giving seminars acros

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] PIC and JTAG-ICE (was Re: ATmega88 ???)

2004-06-17 by David VanHorn

> >That still makes it $200, right? I have developed a "clone" of the >JTAG-ICE which I would like to sell in the $40 to $50 range. It takes >its power from the target system, 3 to 5.5 V, and cuts some other >corners to keep the cost down, but it runs the code loaded from AVR >St

Thread view Attachments: 0

PIC and JTAG-ICE (was Re: ATmega88 ???)

2004-06-17 by scott5342000

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Graham Davies" wrote: > --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "scott5342000" wrote: > If you have a PIC that is roughly equivalent to the ATmega64, would > you consider running my Dhrystone benchmark and telling us the result? If I ever have the oppor

Thread view Attachments: 0

PIC and JTAG-ICE (was Re: ATmega88 ???)

2004-06-17 by Graham Davies

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "scott5342000" wrote: > The PIC's are ... what I'm familiar with. > AVR'appear to have more bang for the buck ... If you have a PIC that is roughly equivalent to the ATmega64, would you consider running my Dhrystone benchmark and telling us the re

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Hi all

2004-06-17 by Al Welchaxxiom

Kat, Wishing you the best! Hope you can get well soon. Al -----Original Message----- From: Kathy Quinlan [mailto:kat-yahoo@kaqelectronics.dyndns.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 12:58 AM To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Subject: [AVR-Chat] Hi all Hi all, Sorry I have been quiet la

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Hi all

2004-06-17 by David VanHorn

Eddie Izzard: http://www.ajhakari.com/e/eddieizzarddresstokill.html You saw him in The Avengers, if you saw it.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Hi all

2004-06-17 by jay marante

Man, its realy hard when someone leaves... My gf left for singapore last weekend! I dont really know when shes comin back. After 10 years maybe... -jay --- kat-yahoo@kaqelectronics.dyndns.org wrote: > David VanHorn wrote: > > > At 08:10 PM 6/16/2004 +0800, Kathy Quinlan wrote: >

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.