Re: Sequencer and Key GatesSeqOnce question
2010-10-19 by meatballfulton
... Because that s just the way it works. This confused me for a while, too. It is mentioned in the manual, although you need to read between the lines a bit.
Messages
Browse messages
Page 6 of 144 · 7159 messages matched
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-19 by meatballfulton
... What if the shoe was on the other foot and you weren t a power user? There s plenty of synth users in the world who don t even understand that audio is not
Re: [DSI Synths] DSI Evolution?
2010-10-19 by meatballfulton
... Better to ask how Akai feels about the JJOS, a third party OS for existing products not long discontinued ones.
Re: [DSI Synths] You have a 777?
2010-10-18 by James Elliott
Yes, I have a 777, and I use the 777 s sequencer to drive the 777. I sometimes use the evolver s sequencer to drive my modular synth via a midi/cv converter
You have a 777?
2010-10-18 by brian t
Dude, why aren t you using the 777 s sequencer? And most serious musicians will tell you that limitations are the things that truly drive them.
Re: DSI Evolution?
2010-10-18 by lesser_inc
... What ends up happening is I turn the encoder a bunch of times and finally it catches on a value.. so theres stuttering in the values... If I may, an
[DSI Synths] Re: DSI Evolution?
2010-10-18 by lesser_inc
... JE- I clearly don t have anything figured out. Starting off constructively, you could look into buying a Novation Bass Station. They are cheap and have a
Re: [DSI Synths] DSI Evolution?
2010-10-18 by steven pistrich
my issue with DSI a year ago on this forum was about having an optional 4 voice addon upgrade , hooking up an added internal board to chain voices
Re: [DSI Synths] DSI Evolution?
2010-10-18 by Bob S.
We had a similar issue and discussion in another group I am in involved in, the Korg MS2000 group. There are changes and features that we all would have liked
Re: [DSI Synths] Re: DSI Evolution?
2010-10-18 by James Elliott
Wow J. I guess you have my work flow all sorts of figured out don cha? Maybe I really don t want to use my computer in my setup. Maybe I would like to use my
Re: [DSI Synths] Re: DSI Evolution?
2010-10-17 by Scott Lawlor
when you say the encoders jump, what does that mean from a sonic perspective? ... From: lesser_inc To: DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, October 17,
Re: DSI Evolution?
2010-10-17 by lesser_inc
Let s face it. In this day and age its what limits us, not enables us, that creates good music. Seriously, you have NO OTHER WAY to create a sequence to send
Re: [DSI Synths] DSI Evolution?
2010-10-17 by Tom Wiltshire
... You re probably right, Stefan. Customers can be an unreasonable bunch, it seems. Getting upset at X for code written by Y is pretty clearly unfair though.
Re: [DSI Synths] DSI Evolution?
2010-10-16 by James Elliott
I think it would go without saying that if a manufacturer were to open up the code to the public then the company would not support the altered product. I
Re: [DSI Synths] DSI Evolution?
2010-10-16 by Stefan Trippler
... This might indeed bring a few new customers. But most likely not enough to cover the cost of the additional people for the manufacturer s support
Re: [DSI Synths] DSI Evolution?
2010-10-16 by Tom Wiltshire
... This is something I would really love to see. I genuinely believe that people would buy *more* DSI gear not less if it were opened up in this way. If I
DSI Evolution?
2010-10-16 by Dustin D
Yeah I have noticed a few things that leave me scratching my head as to why that feature doesn t work. I have both an Evolver and a Tetra and for example the
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-16 by Ancient Eyeball Recipe
And other synths (like the waldorf series) allow a user to decide whether he wants to save individual patches. I, and certainly a number of other users, want
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-16 by James Elliott
I think that it is kind of funny that people who don t care about features that they don t care about think that people who do care about them is ridiculous. I
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-16 by Markus Hof
Phew, Now that you re gone, there s more DSI synths left for me to buy :) Sorry, but this is getting a little ridiculous, really. Although I must say that I
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-16 by Stefan Trippler
You know what you re talking about? While the Tetra has its own RAM for each Combo part, the PEK had not. Combos in the PEK contained only pointers to single
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-16 by James Elliott
AHAHAAHAHAH! ARE YOU F ING SERIOUS!?! When people asked DSI to incorporate that in the PolyEvolvers he said flat out that he didn t want to incorporate
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-16 by Ravi Ivan Sharma
pek is short for poly evolver keyboard tetra is dave s 4 voice table top synth that came out last year. www.davesmithintstruments.com
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-16 by Scott Lawlor
what s pek and tetro? ... From: Ravi Ivan Sharma To: DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2010 9:41 AM Subject: Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-16 by Ravi Ivan Sharma
the tetra allows this. I love it.
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-16 by Brain
You can t save individual patch when you are in combo mode with PEK ? Really ? This is crazy... The only synth i ve seen doing well with patch and combo is
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-15 by Ravi Ivan Sharma
No. Third school. It is a hardware synth with a set of functions and therefore some limitations. Some functions may be added, some may never be. Clearly not
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-15 by Scott Lawlor
Hi. Why are the encoders on the evolver such a pain? As a blind person who s interested in getting one of these because there aren t very many menus from what
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-15 by steven pistrich
i see two schools of thought here: 1.-- the DSI synth is perfect as is ,and we should be grateful for its existance and be quiet 2.-- the DSI synth is an
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-15 by Rory
Your Evolver is not a sequencer with missing functionality. It s a synthesizer with extra functionality :P
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-15 by bug.out
my point being, I see the midi out from the evo seq as a bonus. you see it as a flaw. if your wishes are to be granted, why stop there? why not add cc
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-15 by Ancient Eyeball Recipe
Dave deliberately dumbed down multimode on the pek so that you would not be able to save individual patches from multimode. It s great spending a bunch of
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-15 by James Elliott
Thanks for the useful tips Bug. Big help. Maybe DSI shouldn t have allowed the evolver s sequencer to send out midi notes if it weren t meant to be used as a
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-15 by locatemodule
Use a real sequencer? Heh. Sequencer 2 has been built with a feature that enables it to sequence external gear, so a rest would be useful. If enough people
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-14 by bug.out
use a real sequencer maybe? one that was designed for such uses? instead of ranting against a small boutique? that would be my suggestion. -- bug
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-14 by Ravi Ivan Sharma
I am glad you don t work for dsi :)
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-14 by Ravi Ivan Sharma
Exactly. I was trying to figure out what you mean by a rest. Also the evolver s sequencers were not really made to be the sequencer for external devices. I
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-14 by Scott Lawlor
Hi Jim. What gear would you use if not the dsi stuff/ I ve heard that the nord wave is a good synth but I ve also heard from some that they wouldn t use it as
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-14 by James Elliott
Practical? Hmmmm.... maybe from a lazy programmer s perspective. They could probably write less than 100 lines of code to disable sequencer s control of the
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-14 by Tom Wiltshire
I m inclined to agree with Rory and DSI on this. Whilst there are many more features that would be nice if , and *could* be added, at some point you have to
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-14 by Rory
As far as I can see the reason for this is practical, not a bug. The Evolver is monophonic. Therefor you can t have two sequencers controlling the amplifier
Re: [DSI Synths] Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-14 by James Elliott
Sad to say but there are lots of bugs /irregularities with the evolvers that will never be fixed. There is a whole list of stuff that has been sent to DSI
Why no rest on sequencer 2?
2010-10-13 by locatemodule
Hi all, I use my desktop evolver to sequence other gear and it sucks that sequencer 2 is not capable of producing rests. Is there a reason this has not been
Re: Transmitting Midi CC messages with MEK?
2010-10-12 by Geoff Hood
I don t have an evolver (or any DSI synths) any more but you could probably get round this by using Bomes midi translator or midi-ox or something assuming
Re: [DSI Synths] Transmitting Midi CC messages with MEK?
2010-10-11 by Rory
Knobs only send sysex messages I m afraid. The MEK is wonderful, but not really ideal as a controller keyboard.
New Evolver owner
2010-10-11 by a33e
Hi, i have played with my MEK few days and i love the sound and possibilities. So many sources and destinations there.. . . Though i have not found way to
Re: [DSI Synths] rotary encoder fix?
2010-10-10 by James Elliott
I recently applied the deoxit that DSI supplied to me (for free). It seems to have done the trick.Three weeks without the jitters. Now, only time will tell if
Re: Moderation!
2010-10-10 by noision1
Moderator here. I do moderate and all new posters are moderated until I approve them. Keeps spammers mainly out. But the recent spam is because one of our
Moderation!
2010-10-09 by Markus Hof
I second that, sorry for spamming myself ;) Isn t there a report button? ;)
Moderation!
2010-10-09 by CasioDemo
This group seems to be getting spammed. I propose the owners of the group either oderate messages and boot spammers, or deputize several members to do so.