Re: HP inkjet ink Patent
2012-03-11 by Paul
Bill, Thanks for the link. HP clearly found a characteristic in the latex that I thought should exist in something, but I never stumbled onto the latex. To
Messages
Browse messages
Page 111 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-11 by Bert
All of the comments about the megapixel issue are appreciated. I am going to contact a friend of mine who owns a D700 and has a D800 on order. I will test out
Re: [Digital BW] Re: The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-11 by mrjimbo
Eric Probably very good advice.. I think we are reaching a threshold where our level of expectations and an understanding of what s possible might be getting
Re: Home brew ink base
2012-03-11 by Paul
... Sounds like my approach. ... Note that Edwal LFN is itself a blend. With respect to the detergent action, the first hint I had as to how good Edwal was
Re: Home brew ink base
2012-03-11 by Paul
... Often the use of even less than 1% of one of these strong surfactants is optimal. Edwal LFN really helps the blend. I based much of what I recommended
Re: Trouble using custom print profiles within CS5 64-bit on Win7
2012-03-11 by Paul
... Let me know which profile and I ll check it out. There could be several problems. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Re: [Digital BW] Re: The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-11 by David Hays
If your e looking size and usable MP you should check out the Pentax K5. With some of the prime pancake lenses it is quite compact if not pocketable and has
RE: [Digital BW] Re: The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-11 by E.Neilsen
Maybe these newer bigger MP cameras will be a standard rental item. And perhaps, while you own the slightly less robust version in the same camera line. Eric
UT14 magenta cast (was: Will UT14 work in a 3.5 picoliter printer?)
2012-03-11 by mccarvill
Paul wrote: ... No, this printer has never had color inks in it. Yesterday I refilled four of the carts (all but M and LM), and the fresh inks made an
Visually decernable resolution increase
2012-03-11 by Bill Lewis
While it has been a while since I was in a lab with optical equipment and then it was having to do with Lasers and fiber optic transmission. But the number
Re: [Digital BW] Re: The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-11 by mrjimbo
Good points CD.. What is good about this thread is that everybody has their thinking cap on.. and many seem a bit nervous about a jump of this size.. So a few
Re: Home brew vs MIS ESC-BASEPT-UC
2012-03-11 by Seth Rossman
Justin- Thank you for your tip. I ll stay away from that. What brought it up is MIS website shows that as the base for Ultrachrome. There is no warning not
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Home brew ink base
2012-03-11 by Seth Rossman
I ve been darkroom mixing since the mid-60 s, so I applaud what everybody is doing. I wasn t arguing the use of LFN. Just asking if that minute addition was
Re: The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-11 by Mel
To get back to my original issue where size matters and James reply, I am comming to the conclusion that maybe I m get too hung up about pushing the Mp issue
Re: The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-11 by Seth Rossman
Throwing away pixels has been in there since day one. It is part of the engineering algorithm when when sensors are designed. It s kind of like if you have to
HP inkjet ink Patent
2012-03-11 by Bill Lewis
I have pasted this to MS Word and then clicked and was taken to the synopsis page from there you can download the patent application document.
Re: The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-11 by Seth Rossman
There IS a point of diminishing returns in the MP game. MUCH of xxxMP is marketing. Seth
[Digital BW] Re: The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-11 by Mel
David Yes, perhaps that s another point to consider, although that s a different issue to cropping the larger image and keeping the same ppi with the cropped
Re: [Digital BW] Re: The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-11 by Cdtobie
... That misses one of the point:; putting in more pixels, then throwing away some of them loses the dynamic range that not increasing the pixel count, and
Re: Home brew ink base
2012-03-11 by Bill
There is a reason I call my blend a generic base. These things have a lot in common. The surfactant mix is a major area where there is variability and
Re: Home brew ink base
2012-03-11 by Seth Rossman
I m glad you posted that. I was looking at the msds for the components last week. I was going to ask the question about the Edwal LFN. It just seems to me
Trouble using custom print profiles within CS5 64-bit on Win7
2012-03-10 by togeorge626
I m having trouble assigning Paul Roark s UT3D icc files to a picture file for printing via CS5 64-bit under Win7. I have placed the files in the appropriate
Re: [Digital BW] Printer Resolution redux
2012-03-10 by Sam McCandless
... Thanks, Harry. -- Sam
Printer Resolution redux
2012-03-10 by hlockwood
For my message, lost in the ether, on printer resolution, see Post #104282, Re: Thanks, Antonis . Harry
Re: Home brew ink base
2012-03-10 by Paul
Bill, ... That URL is not working for me. ... There is a reason I call my blend a generic base. These things have a lot in common. The surfactant mix is a
Re: The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-10 by Don
... I haven t examined all of the specs of this camera, but perhaps it s possible to capture in smaller RAW modes and using the full RAW size when needed. Don
Re: Home brew vs MIS ESC-BASEPT-UC
2012-03-10 by Paul
Justin ( mis_inksupply ), It s good to see that MIS is getting more involved with B&W. ... I agree. We ll need to be sure we re coordinated with the current
Re: Will UT14 work in a 3.5 picoliter printer?
2012-03-10 by Paul
Mark wrote: ... I m not sure where that would be coming from. I used UT14 LC to make an EZ type of inkset for the 1100. (See
Home brew ink base
2012-03-10 by Bill Lewis
This is an ink patent by HP and is an interesting read it seems to mostly concern Magenta ink in the testing perhaps because it it works for Magenta then the
Re: The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-10 by ben
Bert, A 12mp D700 will make a better image then the 16mp D5100. I had a D5100 for a couple of days and compared the two. The difference is easy to see in
Re: Thanks, Antonis
2012-03-10 by hlockwood
... thanks to the moderator, Antonis. I greatly appreciate his effort. ... this in the future. ... I ll repost the message to Pierre on printing resolution.
Re: [Digital BW] Re: The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-10 by mrjimbo
You might want to consider the D700 ..that a budget version of the D3.. I have one and am very very happy with it. jimbo ... From: richardeskin To:
Re: The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-10 by richardeskin
I haven t pre-ordered yet, but was waiting for the next round of new Nikons. D4 is just too expensive to justify. D800 seemed attractive at first, but now I
Re: [Digital BW] Re: The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-10 by Ernst Dinkla
... Maybe the method to save and archive as PSD instead of a RAW + edit file is outdated with MP numbers like that and improved RAW processing. Not that I am
Thanks, Antonis
2012-03-10 by hlockwood
It appears that my membership in this group has been reestablished, thanks to the moderator, Antonis. I greatly appreciate his effort. Yahoo certainly needs
Re: The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-10 by jacquescrn
The race is on but do we need it? I moved to digital in 2005 with a D70 (6MP) and made some 24x30 (printed on an Epson 7900) out of it; I know that if you look
Re: The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-10 by Bert
Jimbo, I am struggling with this issue also. I have pre-ordered the 36MP Nikon but am re-considering the need. Generally speaking it is a straight line
Re: Home brew vs MIS ESC-BASEPT-UC
2012-03-09 by mis_inksupply
Seth, The ESC-BASEPT-UC amber base is not recommended for use with the Eboni inks as it can cause poor ink performance. We are looking into offering the base
Re: Will UT14 work in a 3.5 picoliter printer?
2012-03-09 by mccarvill
Thanks, Paul. The one issue I m still trying to resolve with the 1400 is a magenta cast (Lab A = 3 to 4 between 40%K and 95%K) on Canson Baryta Photographique.
Re: The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-09 by ClaytonJ
Hello Mel, ... Before you make a final decision please check out the new Olympus OM-D model, the E-M5
Re: Will UT14 work in a 3.5 picoliter printer?
2012-03-09 by Paul
... The inks are certainly compatible with 3.5 pl printers. I ve use UT14 LC in an 1100 EZ type of single-midtone-density system. However, a hextone needs 3
Re: [Digital BW] The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-08 by Mel
Thanks Mark, sounds ecouraging for the NEX-7 Mel
RE: [Digital BW] Waste ink tube diameter
2012-03-08 by Globe Trotteur
Sorry..www.octoink.co.uk Pierre To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com From: mark@stillrivereditions.com Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 08:37:58 -0500
Re: [Digital BW] The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-08 by Mark Savoia
I have a friend who has a point and shoot Canon with this feature with very severe shaky hands due to his age. His hand is moving like you were trying to shake
Re: [Digital BW] The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-08 by Mel
Thanks for the advice James Perhaps one of the reasons I get good (sharp) results from the P7000 is to do with its Vibration Reduction technology and the fact
Re: [Digital BW] Waste ink tube diameter
2012-03-08 by Mark Savoia
Link don t work. Mark http://www.stillrivereditions.com ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
RE: [Digital BW] Waste ink tube diameter
2012-03-08 by Globe Trotteur
For my 2200, i bought a kit from octojet.co.uk. I highly recommend it. Very professional design. It came with a plastic fitting to go from the printer to the
Re: 2200 Question--update
2012-03-08 by sethrus
Having just gone through similar issues witth a 2400, I found a solution. My LLK just would not check. Power on and nozzle cleanings wouldn t clear. A WIndex
Re: [Digital BW] Waste ink tube diameter
2012-03-08 by sethrus
Not only that, but using a barb fitting to splice them could create the same flow restriction or allow a clog. A little silicon around the tubing over
Re: [Digital BW] The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-08 by mrjimbo
Mel, Well that is certainly one of the more interesting new camera s.. They are pretty impressive.. I m sure that you d be quite happy with it.. Plus have some