Re: [Digital BW] Newbie with QTR install problem on Fedora
2004-02-19 by romanatybwg
Roger and Stan, it s assme not assume :) I thought I installed cc but it was late last night... The rest of the install went well with the exception of
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1351 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Image Export BW for sale II
2004-02-19 by evanj1969
evanj69@bellsouth.net my e-mail didn t show
Image Export BW for sale
2004-02-19 by evanj1969
i have a copy of R9 s Image Export BW http://www.bwguys.com/software.aspx#imageexportbw that i intend on selling on EBAY. if anyone on this forum is
RE: [Digital BW] Protection measures for exhibition prints
2004-02-19 by Paul Roark
Richard, ... I suspect UV glass may offer some additional protection, probably more for stopping the optical brighteners from burning out and turning yellow
Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?
2004-02-19 by Carl Schofield
It sure sounds like Epson is doing something different with this R800 driver (compared to the 2200) when black ink is specified in the driver setting. It
Re: [Digital BW] Protection measures for exhibition prints
2004-02-19 by hogarth
... I don t use glass - I use OP-3, which is a UV blocking acrylic. The problem with glass, besides its weight, is that if somebody drops your frame, your
Using QuadTone RIP 2.0 on the MAC OS 10.3 question....
2004-02-19 by David R. Spielman
Greetings, Can anyone explain to me what the workflow is for using the profiling/calibration function in QuadTone RIP 2.0? I ve used the profiles that came
Re: [Digital BW] Scanning Tech Pan
2004-02-19 by Anders Jonsson
Hi Richard, I scan a lot of b/w film on both 1640XL Epson and Nikon 8000ED, with great results. I recently worked with the TechPan and did all scans at 16bit
Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?
2004-02-19 by sanfo2003
... for black only printing? The driver window allows two options, Black or Color , if I remember right. I selected Black . I don t think it said Black
Re: [Digital BW] Scanning Tech Pan
2004-02-19 by Lara
... I scanned some TechPan not too long ago, some older stuff and like all my black and white scans I scanned them in colour neg setting. I am sure others are
UT2 & 1290
2004-02-19 by Paul Roark
Unfortunately, I ve concluded the existing 1280 curves are not working right with the 1290. As with the old VM inkset and curves, there do appear to be
Re: Scanning Tech Pan
2004-02-19 by px3n120x
... Pan and was totally blown away by the tones. ... great) - I can t get rid of the contrast and the highlights and/or shadows are severely clipped. No frames
Re: Scanners?
2004-02-19 by px3n120x
... I see the discussion on scanners is now about sharpening and which method is better. I use a CanonScan FS 4000 which does only 35mm at 4000dpi and sells
Protection measures for exhibition prints
2004-02-19 by Richard Smallfield
Hi, I m starting to do prints for galleries. I m using UT on Photorag. Is carbon on cotton all I need to ensure longevity? I was going to get the framer to use
Scanning Tech Pan
2004-02-19 by Richard Smallfield
Hi, a while ago, when I still was using an Epson 1660 for scanning, I got a roll of Tech Pan and was totally blown away by the tones. Then I got a Minolta
Re: [Digital BW] Newbie with QTR install problem on Fedora
2004-02-19 by Roger L Sopher
... Yo soy baboso... Of course. I automatically install the c compiler when I load Linux and assumed that others would as well. The old assume = makes an ass
Re: Adobe Photoshop CS Memory Bug - in Windows AND OS X
2004-02-19 by px3n120x
... I didn t want to be the first to say it but I second the above entirely. I made the effort to hang on to this list despite the fact that the vast majority
Re: Staining on Somerset Velvet
2004-02-19 by Tyler Boley
An example of an ongoing situation we are all learning to deal with. The coatings on these papers yellow when exposed to certain chemicals, even airborne. We
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Problems connecting to Paul Roark's website
2004-02-19 by Paul Roark
Bill, This sounds like a possibility. I m plenty fed up with Verizon. I ll contact you off list later. Thanks. Paul www.PaulRoark.com For UT2 information,
Re: [Digital BW] Scanners?
2004-02-19 by Keith R.
... The artical mentioned above proved a good insight, at the time. It is almost 3 years old now, and since then, Mr. Frasier, along with others have,
Re: [Digital BW] Scanners?
2004-02-19 by jnhugo
... I ... scanning film ... scanner of ... may be ... specific ... Polaroid ... I love Victor Landwebers work-I ve watched your stuff for at least 30
Re: [Digital BW] Newbie with QTR install problem on Fedora
2004-02-19 by romanatybwg
I m on my third Fedora reinstall, this time with no glitches. I also reinstalled QTR (this time beta9 per your suggestion) to no avail. Is there a trace I can
Re: [Digital BW] Newbie with QTR install problem on Fedora
2004-02-19 by Stan McQueen
... It appears that cc , i.e., the C compiler is not installed. When you installed your Linux distribution, did you elect to install the development tools?
Re: [Digital BW] Newbie with QTR install problem on Fedora
2004-02-19 by Roger L Sopher
... Sorry, I went right by the cups-devel part of your message -early morning, old eyes. That is the usual hang up at the stage of installation you are stuck
update: Re: 7660 can't handle grain????
2004-02-19 by Radimus
I ll try some of those tricks on my 7660 and see what happens. I m interested to hear how things go when you get the new cartridges and printer this weekend.
Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?
2004-02-19 by edrudolpho
I very much like Sandy Cornelius description of the Black Only printing on EPG as looking like a celebrity head shot. That s a very accurate description.
Re[2]: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?
2004-02-19 by Richard Sintchak
Wednesday, February 18, 2004, 10:34:59 PM, you wrote: s It blows the 2200 out of the s water.... Sorry for being skeptical but that comment seems fantastic.
Re: [Digital BW] Scanners?
2004-02-19 by randyrancier
Wow, How much RAM do you need for this?? Does my 2.4Mh processor have evough umph to handle it, or will I need to upgrade? Thanks, Randy ... Minolta ...
Re: T400CN, Portra etc.
2004-02-19 by sceptre12345
... be the ... recommend ... than a ... Seems that at PMA, Kodak reps were saying that it s Portra C41 B&W. Cheers, Andre
Re: [Digital BW] Scanners?
2004-02-19 by randyrancier
Victor, thank you so much for the information, so many others get off on tangents. No I am only considering film scanners. From what your saying sounds like
Re: [Digital BW] Newbie with QTR install problem on Fedora
2004-02-19 by romanatybwg
Roger, thank you for responding. As I mentioned in my msg I downloaded and installed cups-devel without a glich. cups-config shows up in /usr/bin/ and when I
Adobe Photoshop CS Memory Bug - in Windows AND OS X
2004-02-19 by Thomas Keesling
Keith wrote:
Re: [Digital BW] Scanners?
2004-02-19 by randyrancier
I m sure what your saying is correct, But I doubt that I will ever go any bigger than 6x7; if I do it will be to 4x5 or 5x7. I ve been watching scanners on
Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?
2004-02-19 by Carl Schofield
When you made the B&W prints with the R800 did you set the driver for black only printing? An earlier post by Ed also indicated that the driver does not
Re: [Digital BW] Newbie with QTR install problem on Fedora
2004-02-19 by Roger L Sopher
... Roger
T400CN, Portra etc.
2004-02-19 by Matthew Born
And, in an effort to keep me confused (a state in which I seem to be the happiest), Kodak has dropped T400CN and Portra B&W. They now recommend BW400CN as a
Re: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Scanners?
2004-02-19 by Ernst Dinkla
... From: Anthony G. Atkielski To: Colin & Linda McKie Sent: Thursday, February 19,
Re: [Digital BW] Problems connecting to Paul Roark's website
2004-02-19 by Paul Murphy
As an experiment I visited three internet cafes today, all use different ISP s, and I could not get onto Paul s site from any of them. I am located in
Re[2]: [Digital BW] Scanners?
2004-02-19 by Anthony G. Atkielski
... No, it cannot. No digital manipulation can increase the amount of information in an image--whatever the scanner produces is all you will ever get.
Re: [Digital BW] Scanners?
2004-02-19 by Colin & Linda McKie
Hi Peter, Bruce is one of the crew behind of Photokit Sharpener (http://www.pixelgenius.com/) and it is a development of these ideas. We previously used the 2
Re: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Problems connecting to Paul Roark's website
2004-02-19 by Bob Frost
No problem from the UK either. Bob Frost. ... From: Anthony G. Atkielski ... For what it s worth, I just tried accessing the site
Re: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Scanners?
2004-02-19 by Peter Marquis-Kyle
... In his piece A two-pass approach to sharpening in Photoshop [ http://www.creativepro.com/story/feature/12189-1.html ] Bruce Fraser acknowledges that
Re[2]: [Digital BW] Scanners?
2004-02-19 by Anthony G. Atkielski
... Sharpening should always be the last step, for two reasons: (1) it degrades image quality; and (2) the degree of sharpening required depends on the exact
Re: [Digital BW] Scanners?
2004-02-19 by Ernst Dinkla
... From: Victor Landweber To: Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 8:46 AM Subject: Re:
Re: [Digital BW] Scanners?
2004-02-19 by Colin & Linda McKie
Hi Victor, Where did this come from? I have certainly never heard of this, and there is no hardware sharpening going on. What the Minolta driver does I neither
Re: [Digital BW] Scanners?
2004-02-19 by Victor Landweber
Randy, Colin, et. al. -- I also looked at the Minolta when deciding about a scanner purchase. I read that the Scan Multi Pro always sharpens a scan, even when
Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?
2004-02-19 by Martin Sluka
At 06:34 +0000 19.2.2004, sanfo2003 wrote: ... Exatly this I did on PaperWorld (Frankfurt) February 3th. See archive from this Monday. I ll scan both pictures
Re: [Digital BW] Scanners?
2004-02-19 by Colin & Linda McKie
Hi Randy, We looked at the same things a few months ago and bought the Minolta Scan Multi Pro. This does MF up to 6x9 at 3200ppi and 35mm at 4800ppi. In a lot
Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?
2004-02-19 by sanfo2003
Was down at the local CompUSA where they were just putting out their first demo R800. Really nice folks there and they gave me total access to the printer thru
Re[2]: [Digital BW] Scanners?
2004-02-19 by Anthony G. Atkielski
... The Nikon is a pro unit as well. Many labs use it. In fact, many labs use less expensive scanners.