Re: list discussions
2003-05-22 by tomoc
It s really great that we can get all jazzed up like this, isn t it? The list has some provocative contributers and some provocateurs making for a lively
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1580 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] Why is ND B&W scan better -- was Digital, film, scanning compar
2003-05-22 by Roy Harrington
... intensities of ... reason. It s ... lights. ... has different ... three, ... smear. ... basically ... intensity (this is ... one spot ... smear ...
Hahnemuhle paper - printing side
2003-05-22 by interrogtr@aol.com
I ve got some William Turner paper from Hahnemuhle. From what I ve researched, only one side is coated but for the life of me, I can t tell yet which side is
Re: [Digital BW] Why is ND B&W scan better -- was Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-22 by Truman Prevatt
Quantum efficiently has nothing to do with it. Red is at the low end or the visible frequency spectrum. Normally the higher the frequency the wider the
Ink-jet better than wet prints (was Digital stuff)
2003-05-22 by Thomas Keesling
Peter wrote: The impression I get from people here is that clogs and frequent head cleanings, windexing, head removal for cleaning, etc, are par for the course
list discussions
2003-05-22 by James Zall
Lady Elizabeth Eastlake, writing about the members of the London Photographic Society, in 1857: The very talk of these photographic members is unlike that of
Re: [Digital BW] Medium format resolution
2003-05-22 by Peter Nelson
... 35mm ... So while ... for most ... I ve never shot Velvia, but I ve done this with Panatomic-X (back when it existed) using the standard Air Force test
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-22 by Peter Nelson
... explained in a ... Not if you re scanning black and white film. The shape (N.B., the shape, not the translation) of the histogram will be the same in all
RE: [Digital BW] Why is ND B&W scan better -- was Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-22 by Austin Franklin
Hi Truman, ... The light source is a white light, and has all colors, it is filtered with a color filter, and only light of the color of that filter reaches
[Digital BW] Re: Ink-jet better than wet prints (was Digital stuff)
2003-05-22 by Peter Nelson
... straight ... off when ... service to ... But plenty of people here and on the Photo.Net digital darkroom forum use stock Epson inks and I seldom hear THEM
July PRINT EXCHANGE sign up - now
2003-05-22 by tomoc
Hi - Now taking signup committments for the July 03 Print Exchange: * 15 participants * Letter size BW digital prints * Deliver to West Coast USA by July 8 *
Re: [Digital BW] Photoshop 10 ?
2003-05-22 by Ross McLeish
Andre, if you try a search on Google for Photoshop X it brings up numerous references to previous releases of books for Photoshop 5, 6, 7, etc. It sounds
Re: [Digital BW] Why is ND B&W scan better -- was Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-22 by Truman Prevatt
Question, Why do you say red has the highest energy of the three. I would expect that would depend on the spectrum of the light source and the bandwidth of
Re: MIS vs. NoMoreCarts CFS systems
2003-05-22 by sceptre12345
Ken, Are you talking about the new Eboni black and is this a known problem? I need to re-order some MIS-FSN soon. I m using a CIS setup. Cheers, Andre ... part
Re: [Digital BW] MIS vs. NoMoreCarts CFS systems
2003-05-22 by Ken Carney
Mark, the MIS CFS works fine and their support is excellent. As they will tell you, I finally had to give it up and go with pre-filled cartridges for black -
Photoshop 10 ?
2003-05-22 by sceptre12345
Here s an interesting thing. www.chapters.ca is advertising this ! Photoshop X Bible Author: McClelland Trade Paperback Not yet available - PreOrder Today
Re: [Digital BW] Why is ND B&W scan better -- was Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-22 by Kevin Gulstene
Austin- Thanks for that. ... I think I understand this but why is the CCD more sensitive to smear and bloom associated with red in the absence of blue and
Pros and Cons of the different systems
2003-05-22 by Tom Thorp
I ve been following this group for a while and I seen many people saying the system I use is the best (no offense intended). My question, is I m reserecting
RE: [Digital BW] Why is ND B&W scan better -- was Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-21 by Austin Franklin
Hi Kevin, ... Passes through THREE different color filters... One, red, one green and one blue. Resulting in three channels of color information. ... Right
Re: [Digital BW]Epson cartridge MIS black clog won't go away on epson 1280
2003-05-21 by jim hayes
... I m having trouble understanding. Each chamber takes 18cc for an 1280, not 7cc. When I vacuum filled virgin carts I usually could get up to 6 fills from a
Why is ND B&W scan better -- was Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-21 by Kevin Gulstene
Austin (or others)- You seem to be in scanner mode so perhaps you could clarify something for me. For as long as I can remember you have been saying things
Re: the CIS switch
2003-05-21 by jim hayes
... I only used the flush carts twice; once on the 1160. So I m not sure if taping will be okay. I do know that Bill Bergh way back when was a fan of scotch
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Ink-jet better than wet prints (was Digital stuff)
2003-05-21 by Paul Roark
... I was once told the orifice of an inkjet printer is about 25 microns. The particle size of the pigments is about 0.1 to 0.25 microns (I think). I beleive
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Ink-jet better than wet prints (was Digital stuff)
2003-05-21 by Paul Roark
... I consider myself a rather experienced and serious B&W printer, and I think my digital prints are better. Admittedly, it s the digital process, not the
Re: MIS vs. NoMoreCarts CFS systems
2003-05-21 by Bob Michaels
I m thrilled with everything about MIS and my CFS system. It works great, is engineered extremely well, is very well supported both by their website and phone
Re: [Digital BW] MIS vs. NoMoreCarts CFS systems
2003-05-21 by jim hayes
... With dye ink you will have no trouble with either system, even in arid/high altitude conditions- except I have some, even with OEM Epson carts!! It s the
Re: MIS vs. NoMoreCarts CFS systems
2003-05-21 by jim hayes
... The MIS system is more costly, but less rough at the edges . For example, unless either system has changed in the last months, with the CFS you have to
Re: [Digital BW] MIS vs. NoMoreCarts CFS systems
2003-05-21 by Bill Boy
... I see no reason. I have had no trouble with MIS CFS in the two years of use. 1280 with dye ink and a 1270 with VM pigmented ink. There support and warranty
RE: [Digital BW] Bill Atkinson Ultrachrome profiles
2003-05-21 by Tim Atherton
Hi Barbara, So you find the profile works okay on the 2200? How would you describe what it gives for B&W prints? thanks tim
Re: MIS vs. NoMoreCarts CFS systems
2003-05-21 by John Vitollo
... It s sad we can t wait for Jerry s reply! I miss you Jerry!
MIS vs. NoMoreCarts CFS systems
2003-05-21 by Mark Sharfman
As I am tired of filling cartrdiges (and am not that good at it anyway) I am thinking about taking the plunge to a CFS/CIS system for an epson 1280. I saw the
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1521
2003-05-21 by Jon
Hi Anthony, ... Sorry, I didn t mean to imply that they were scans of prints, I realize that they are scans of negatives. I just ran the questions together. I
Re: [Digital BW]Epson cartridge MIS black clog won't go away on epson 1280
2003-05-21 by Phil Morse
Do you mean Clayton Jones? http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm Phil Morse www.DigitaLoft.com. Is there a workflow for Black only, I seem to have seen a
Re: [Digital BW]Epson cartridge MIS black clog won't go away on epson 1280
2003-05-21 by Alan Zimmerman
Johnny, thanks again, The math favoring self filling is convincing to say the least. Since the last emails I have finally gotten a clean nozzle check but still
Re: Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-21 by sceptre12345
... prints. I have ... budget and ... An Epson 1160 with the Piezo plug-in or curves from the MIS site and the MIS FS-N inkset plus EEM paper is about as
RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-21 by Austin Franklin
Anthony, ... 1) you are assuming that a color scanner is three passes. Not many, if any made today, are. Most all current scanners use a tri-linear sensor
Re: Digital vs. film for black and white
2003-05-21 by PhotoWorkshops Partnership
On 21/5/03 7:35 pm, Tom Robinson ... Couldn t agree more - you may also find Newton s ring artefacts where the tranny touches the flatbed glass and
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-21 by Martin Wesley
... From: Austin Franklin To: Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 12:52 PM Subject: RE:
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Ink-jet better than wet prints (was Digital stuff)
2003-05-21 by Anthony Atkielski
What is silver extrusion? ... From: Evelyn Grant To: Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 21:53
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-21 by Anthony Atkielski
... Thanks. These are direct scans from B&W film, not scans of prints. I have yet to acquire a way of making nice B&W prints, for reasons of budget and
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-21 by Anthony Atkielski
... One pass instead of three, less processing of the data, and so on.
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-21 by Anthony Atkielski
... Simulate is the operative word here. You can make something look like Tri-X or Tech Pan, but if you compare it with the same scene actually photographed
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Ink-jet better than wet prints (was Digital stuff)
2003-05-21 by Evelyn Grant
I think it depends on what aspect of photography you re into. 85% to 90% of my work is copy and restoration of old photos. I get much better results from a
RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-21 by Austin Franklin
Hi Martin, ... Light path of a drum scanner: light source - mirror - drum - film - lense - splitter - filter(s) - PMT(s) ... Single color light source,
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Ink-jet better than wet prints (was Digital stuff)
2003-05-21 by Martin Wesley
... From: scott lanes To: Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 12:06 PM Subject: RE: [Digital BW]
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Ink-jet better than wet prints (was Digital stuff)
2003-05-21 by john eckenrode
... hi scott Better is a subjective term to be sure, but I for one can say that in many cases I like ink jet prints better than silver prints. I like the
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-21 by Martin Wesley
... From: Austin Franklin To: Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 12:10 PM Subject: RE:
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Ink-jet better than wet prints (was Digital stuff)
2003-05-21 by Stan McQueen
... Maybe because it is more in accordance with human nature to sound off when there is a problem. Satisfied customers seldom contact customer service to
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Ink-jet better than wet prints (was Digital stuff)
2003-05-21 by Stan McQueen
... The ink that comes with the 1270/1280 is dye-based, but I use third-party pigment inks from Mediastreet (color/1280) and MIS (b&w/1270). I use the 1270 as
Re: Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-21 by Jon
... Anthony, Those are some interesting pictures. What printer(s) and inks are you using? Software? Jon