Re: [Digital BW] B&W film
2003-05-20 by Stephen Kobrin
No, I never use ICE with straight B&W films -- as you note, it just does not work. If it is left on by mistake, it is obvious instantly. Steve ... produce
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 1584 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
2003-05-20 by Stephen Kobrin
No, I never use ICE with straight B&W films -- as you note, it just does not work. If it is left on by mistake, it is obvious instantly. Steve ... produce
2003-05-20 by Peter Nelson
... That may be true for the consumer, but it s not true for two other factors in this discussion: 1. Working pros. They take a LOT of shots and their
2003-05-20 by Peter Nelson
... It s MOST of what there is professionally. ... That s like saying that a Toyota Corolla is a better car than a BMW 5- series because it s cheaper. Being
2003-05-20 by Peter Nelson
... Some of us got into photography from the technical side such as science and engineering. (I started off doing astrophotography and eventually graduated to
2003-05-20 by derek_c@cix.co.uk
That is a spectacularly pessimistic view of the situation. You re only affected by the issue if you shoot more wide angle than telephoto. And if you are
2003-05-20 by Ed Mathews
... ... Hi Clayton, I think everyone is forgetting that if a camera is good enough to get good photos from now, that s not going to change when a
2003-05-20 by Peter Nelson
... 60 s as ... These days 99% of all Hammond B3 that you hear in music is simulated digitally. So what s your point?
2003-05-20 by Anthony Atkielski
This example was shot at night, handheld, on 35mm Kodak Portra 400BW: http://www.mxsmanic.com/artists.jpg The real-world scene was very dimly lit, and had a
2003-05-20 by sceptre12345
... recover ... the ... Anthony, Add the cost of an mf scanner and you re there a lot faster. Not to mention time used for scanning that could be used for
2003-05-20 by Anthony Atkielski
... Yeah. Forty years ago, the leading camera for photojournalist was a Nikon SLR. Today, the leading camera for photojournalists is a Nikon SLR. Hmm. ...
2003-05-20 by Anthony Atkielski
... I ll believe that when I see it.
2003-05-20 by Anthony Atkielski
... Fuji regularly comes up with new stuff. They are releasing a Velvia 100F, too! But speaking of B&W, is anyone shooting Fuji Neopan Acros? I ve seen
2003-05-20 by Anthony Atkielski
... Yes. When you look at a scan at 100% ( actual pixels ) in Photoshop, you re looking at the equivalent of a very, very large enlargement of the image. For
2003-05-20 by Anthony Atkielski
... Why do so many people think that photojournalism and a few types of commercial photography are all there is? ... If I want high image quality at a low
2003-05-20 by ellery
Tomoc Thanks for taking that trouble - I really appreciate it !! Drop us the site address where this is ok ? ellery ... From: tomoc [mailto:TomOC@softhome.net]
2003-05-20 by Li Xia and Dale Weedman
The generous help, assistance and encouragement that Jerry has given to me over a number of years, on various Lists, has been outstanding. I sometimes wonder
2003-05-20 by Ernst Dinkla
... something that ... sake and mine. Nikon as a whole is having a hard time. Their division for wave steppers and scanners used in the chip industry has lost
2003-05-20 by Ernst Dinkla
... digital gear if ... that path, ... Anthony, The people that are using digital Canon D1 s, Sinar backs on Sinars and Hasselblads write that few of their old
2003-05-20 by gaberegalbuto
... either the ... developing ... I have an epson 740 (4 color) and I started with the curves uploaded on this site as well as the procedure also in the files
2003-05-20 by Ron Norman
... 1160 printer, I ... me about ... paper. Put it ... can give the ... Tape some thin paper to the bottom edge, it will be pulled in and the fat paper
2003-05-20 by Loris Medici
... A friend in Tokyo (more than 12 millions population with probably the highest digital camera sales figures in the world) also says that C-41 is very
2003-05-20 by Kevin Gulstene
Alan- If I understood the description of your method correctly, the image dimensions of the scanned image is much larger than that of the digital image (19meg
2003-05-20 by tomoc
Hi- I ve now posted scans of all of Jerry s exchange photos for the last year (except the large print one, which will go up tomorrow). I ve also included scans
2003-05-20 by Antonis Ricos
Doug, just a note to say your tests pointed in the right direction. You pretty much answered your question: The Epson driver internally reses up whatever you
2003-05-20 by T
Hi There, I am in agreement with Martin. I have heard this debate about digital and film ad nauseum going on all around me. I am a film guy with a whole
2003-05-20 by bgs
So far you ve referred to sport car enthusiasts in the 50 s and 60 s as geeks and nerds....now fans of vinyl LP s and tube amplifiers are irrelevant. Have you
2003-05-20 by Clayton Jones
... Of course they are. Digital is still young, and development will continue in the direction of bigger, better, faster, cheaper. Do you think Nikon is
2003-05-20 by Martin Wesley
... From: dado_1930 To: Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 8:30 PM Subject: [Digital BW] Fat
2003-05-20 by A. Huntley
Martin, Agreed. That is why I will never sell my LF gear no matter how good or cheap digital gets. As you said, it s an artistic choice! No digital camera,
2003-05-20 by A. Huntley
Anthony, Thanks for your suggestions. Between your response and Kevin s I think I have something to learn with regard to pixel mapping in PS. I will try your
2003-05-20 by dado_1930
When I print on Somerset Enhanced paper with an Epson 1160 printer, I have a terrible time getting the paper to feed into the printer because of its thickness.
2003-05-20 by A. Huntley
Kevin, ... I guess I don t understand your response here...I m always open to learning something more about PS. At actual pixel level in PS, aren t we looking
2003-05-20 by Tyler Boley
... ah Martin... A true brother
2003-05-20 by Tyler Boley
Every list I m on seems to get infected with this endless discussion. Aren t there a myriad of lists just for this topic? Yes it relates to printing...
2003-05-20 by Martin Wesley
Guys, Can you bring this thread back around to the list topic of B&W digital printing. Kind of wandering a bit far field here. Thanks, Martin Wesley
2003-05-20 by Peter Nelson
... millionth time, ... Most of the commercial and PJ and stock photographers I know are using digital. Even the studio MF shooters are now going digital
2003-05-20 by Peter Nelson
... I agree. Nikon has got to make a clear commitment to what direction they re going or they re going to lose a lot of credibility.
2003-05-20 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... yes, they did recover, but not fully... The big help was the Silent_Wave lenses (offering a 300 and 400 with an internal motor)... The point is they sat on
2003-05-20 by Anthony Atkielski
... That is my usual practice. ... And many disadvantages as well. I won t list them for the millionth time, however.
2003-05-20 by Anthony Atkielski
... They must have recovered, because I see pros using mostly Nikons around here these days (digital and film). Also, the F5 has just about the fastest AF
2003-05-20 by Anthony Atkielski
Have you left ICE on while doing straight B&W scans? That will produce very odd results. ... From: Stephen Kobrin To:
2003-05-20 by Anthony Atkielski
... Why not?
2003-05-20 by Christopher Williams
Nikon would not be making new DX lenses if a full-frame was coming. The DX lenses are made just for the D100, D1, D1x, D1h. The first one, the 12-24/f4 is due
2003-05-20 by Peter Nelson
... film. Speak for yourself. Digital has many advantages over film. No film, for one thing. That means no worries about x-rays when traveling, no
2003-05-20 by Truman Prevatt
A Miami Herald photographer blew up one of his shots and published it claiming it showed a electronic prodding device in the hand of the jockey who won the
2003-05-19 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... Try getting a field of view equivalent to a 20mm in 35mm format? You need a 12.5 mm rectilinear... Seen a lot of those around? Suddenly I have people
2003-05-19 by Anthony Atkielski
... No, but I always fill a roll before getting it developed. ... Well, I was calculating with 135 film. That already blows away digital for image quality, so
2003-05-19 by Anthony Atkielski
... That depends entirely on the kind of labs to which you have access in your area. In my area, I find that a pro lab does slightly better work on C-41 in
2003-05-19 by sceptre12345
... you ve ... You ve got a special lab that charges you by the shot ? Average price I ve seen for 120 film + c41 processing is around $7.25 per film. I dont
2003-05-19 by Anthony Atkielski
I have no idea what this is about. What happened? ... From: Seth Rossman To: Sent: