Re: [Digital BW] Portra 400BW example
2003-05-19 by Anthony Atkielski
... The scanner is a Nikon LS-8000ED, and I just use the standard NikonScan 3.1.2 software that came with it. Although it s a bit OT, I have an example of a
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1586 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] Portra 400BW example
2003-05-19 by Anthony Atkielski
... Thanks. Portra works great for 35mm, too (I m rescanning an example now). The grain is so fine and the resolution so high that you can get beautiful
RE: [Digital BW] Portra 400BW example
2003-05-19 by Ken Brookner
Anthony, what scanner and scanner software are you using to scan your portra 400bw? nice results! kenb
Re: Film
2003-05-18 by Clayton Jones
Hello Truman, ... I m a Tri-X user too, and also live in Florida (WPB). I shoot mostly 6x7, with some 6x6 and 35mm. I keep jars of water in the fridge and
Re: [Digital BW] Portra 400BW example
2003-05-18 by Leroy A. Skalstad
Nice Work Anthony, I have been using PortraB&W for some time now. 35mm My closest Minilab, Walgreen s has just installed a Fuji Frontier 330 system. I really
Portra 400BW second example
2003-05-18 by Anthony Atkielski
Another MF shot on a tripod, cable release, pre-release, as in the previous shot: http://www.mxsmanic.com/street.jpg (entire image)
Diff.? Layers Palette: Fill vs. Opacity
2003-05-18 by Lyons Cox
I read the stock instruction book. Anyone clear on the differences between opacity changes & fill changes on the layers palette. Curiously, Cleavis [Non-text
Portra 400BW example
2003-05-18 by Anthony Atkielski
I was very lukewarm about chromogenic B&W for quite a while, but I ve discovered that Kodak Portra 400BW, at least, isn t bad at all (I haven t tested others
RE: [Digital BW] Arches Infinity (was Ink Jet Art's Museum Digital Art paper)
2003-05-18 by Paul Roark
Chris, ... Yes, 1.59 -- it s further down in the post (previous message). Paul http://www.PaulRoark.com ... Infinity ... be from ... don t ... setting was ...
Re: [Digital BW] Arches Infinity (was Ink Jet Art's Museum Digital Art paper)
2003-05-18 by Chris Hargens
Hello, Paul. Do you have dmax info for Eclipse Satine printing with the UT inkset? Chris Hargens ... Infinity ... be from ... don t ... setting was ... (1.58 -
Re: [Digital BW] digital
2003-05-18 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Blah Blah Blah.. This entire digital vs film issue is essentially ridiculous in many ways... I use both film and digital at ALL steps of my work from initial
Re: [Digital BW] digital
2003-05-18 by Martin Wesley
Alan, I think that it is largely an artistic choice at this point. (Or economic if you are shooting pro!) I have seen excellent prints from digital cameras and
Re: [Digital BW] enlarging meter advice?
2003-05-18 by Kip Babington
I used a Gossen Labosix enlarging meter for 20+ years with moderate success. But they are long obsolete, depend for adjustment on a rheostat (I think) which
Re: [Digital BW] digital
2003-05-18 by Anthony Atkielski
... It will be, if you compared the raw scan to the digital image. Downsample the scan in steps to match the digital image size, and USM at each step. Then
Re: [Digital BW] digital
2003-05-18 by Kevin Gulstene
Alan- When looking at your method it seems to me you should not be comparing them at 100% magnification if they are not the same size image. Shouldn t you have
Re: [Digital BW] digital
2003-05-18 by A. Huntley
Keith/Anthony/et al, I have read over and over, again, these endless posts regarding digital vs. film but have never felt the need to jump into the fray. No
Re: [Digital BW] Sad News
2003-05-18 by A. Huntley
Hi All, Receiving my e-mails from the list today I could not help but notice the Sad News subject line. I knew that this couldn t be a good thing! I was
Re: [Digital BW] Film
2003-05-18 by Ken Carney
Truman, I had the same experience. TMax 100 in TMax RS 1:9 from the bottle, in a rotary processor, gave excellent negs. It is very linear, and due to its
Ink color changes
2003-05-18 by nestlethedog
I recently returned from vacation and fired up my printer (1280). I m using it with the Piezotone Selenium inks. What happened next was a surprise. The inks
Re: [Digital BW] Film
2003-05-18 by Anthony Atkielski
Tri-X has changed somewhat (and has undergone another change very recently, although I m not sure what it was), but it still looks far more like Tri-X than
New EEM???
2003-05-18 by tomoc
I just received a few boxed of letter sized EEM from InkJetGoodies. There is NO WATERMARK on these. Does anyone know if there is any difference in the paper?
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Autoreply
2003-05-18 by Martin Wesley
... From: Loris Medici To: Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2003 3:31 PM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re:
RE: [Digital BW] Arches Infinity (was Ink Jet Art's Museum Digital Art paper)
2003-05-18 by Paul Roark
I just printed MIS UT inks with the Eboni black on the new Arches Infinity paper. (Thanks John E. for sending the samples.) The Arches smooth surface prints
Re: [Digital BW] Film
2003-05-18 by Truman Prevatt
Thanks Kip, It s hard to beat TriX. I used to use PanX in with Zone VI developer in my RB67. The results would rival a 4x5 when printed to the same size print.
Re: [Digital BW] Film
2003-05-18 by Kip Babington
Although I have switched to digital capture in the past year, what proved to be one of my favorite developers in the 30+ years that I did wet darkroom work was
Film
2003-05-18 by Truman Prevatt
I started back in photography after lay off - life got in the way. I primarly shoot 4x5. I used to use Tri-X but was not all that happy with the Tri-X/HC-110
Another stupid newbie question: print resolution
2003-05-17 by Martin Howard
Yeah, I m back... ;) I ve read a lot of different recommendations on the optimum or correct resolution your (photographic) pictures should be for inkjet
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Autoreply
2003-05-17 by Loris Medici
Sorry for the inconvenience, my ISP has changed its domain name *WITHOUT SENDING ME A NOTIFICATION MAIL*. The disturbing autoreply message was set by them *NOT
7600 profiles
2003-05-17 by kerry pittenger
Anyone have any good 7600 profiles for Crane s Museo paper? I m using PS7 in OS X. Thanks. kp
Re: OPM/IJC on 2200
2003-05-17 by Doug Nielsen
Hi Earlier I communicated directly with Carl Schofield about a problem I observed using OPM. His response called attention to this thread and pointed out that
Re: [Digital BW] RE: Jerry's passing
2003-05-17 by shashinka@aol.com
I posted this to Keith s list, but after reading some of the heartfelt posts on this list, I realize that it belongs here too: I, like many others, only knew
Jerry
2003-05-17 by Ken Brookner
I enjoyed Jerry s posts too, and had a few short off list discussions with him. I ll miss reading more from him. I hope someone takes good care of his cats.
Goodbye Jerry
2003-05-17 by tomoc
To say I was shocked when I logged onto the Digital BW Print Exchanges group this morning is an understatement. I ve been travelling the last week and a
RE: [Digital BW] re: Sad news re: Jerry Olson
2003-05-17 by Andy Biggs
Absolutely horrible news. Although I did not ever exchange emails with him personally, forums such as this one let you know people through listening in to
Re: [Digital BW] Jerry's passing
2003-05-17 by sdmey4@aol.com
I ve been thinking about Jerry all day, and reflecting about the last 4 or 5 years I have know about this Guy out in North Dakota. I never met him, but feel I
Re: Printing with the %$#&&* new epson 2200 driver
2003-05-17 by tomoc
Jim- What problems does the 2200 have? thanks, Tom ... and
Re: Printing with the %$#&&* new epson 2200 driver (XP)
2003-05-17 by robert_ardinger
I somewhat inadvertantly installed the new driver (V 5.4 for XP). I was trying to fix a conflict I had when first using the Epson 2200 RIP (conflict turned out
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Sad News
2003-05-17 by wapitiwilla@aol.com
The memory of following Jerry s posts over the past couple years had the flavor of following the Drinking Gourd. Checking in with the North Star never fails to
Re: Sad News
2003-05-17 by Alan
This truly is sad news. I m having a hard time understanding why Jerry s passing has affected me as deeply as it has, to the point where I m having a hard time
RE: Jerry's passing
2003-05-17 by Garcia, William
Although I ve only posted to this list a hand full of times over the last few years, it s time for another short post. Well, actually it s a tad too late. I
Re: Autoreply
2003-05-17 by Martin Wesley
Loris, TURN OFF YOUR AUTO-REPLY!!! Martin Wesley
Re: [Digital BW] Jerry's passing
2003-05-17 by Carl Schofield
I am so sorry to hear of Jerry s passing. He was very helpful to me when I first ventured into digital B&W printing and I will miss his presence on the list.
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Sad News
2003-05-17 by Todd Flashner
Wow, I can t beieve Jerry is gone! I think he more than anybody inspired me to demand and expect a lot from digital output. I found the Epson-Leben list with a
Re: digital
2003-05-17 by HPA
Eyesight problems are tough on photographers, and I am impressed with your persistence despite it. Here are a few suggestions: I had special bi-focals made,
[Digital BW] Jerry's passing
2003-05-17 by Adrian Joyner
Four or so years ago Jerry was the inspiration that convinced me that quality digital printing was achievable. His generous help and comments and insistence on
Jerry's passing
2003-05-16 by borismg
I don t usually contribute, as I enjoy reading and listening to the posts. I will however miss Jerry s contributions to this group. I will especially miss his
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Sad News
2003-05-16 by Roger L Sopher
... From: Martin Wesley [mailto:mwesley250@earthlink.net] Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 1:52 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re:
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Sad News
2003-05-16 by Barbara White
I am so sad about Jerry. Just the other day, I looked at his website for the first time in a couple of years and realized again how gorgeous his photos were.
Re: [Digital BW] digital
2003-05-16 by Anthony Atkielski
... I think that converting from color, whether it be from digital color or film color, is always inferior to shooting directly in black and white (whether it
Re: [Digital BW] digital
2003-05-16 by Anthony Atkielski
... I ve heard similar claims since the Kodak DC50 came out six years ago. Every new camera is better than film, as long as you don t look too closely. ...