Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 1585 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
2003-05-19 by Peter Nelson
... God, I ... On photo.net two weeks ago one of the regular posters linked to a photo industry website with an interview with a senior Nikon R&D manager, who
2003-05-19 by Anthony Atkielski
... Those of us who shoot digital are stuck; not those of us who shoot film. I paid my dues in endless, useless, expensive upgrades for years in computerland.
2003-05-19 by Seth Rossman
I think that was settled yesterday. The blow-up showed the jockey did not have anything else in his hand. It was the glasses of the jockey behind him that
2003-05-19 by Seth Rossman
You are right, but we re stuck! My first hard drive was a 10MB boat anchor that sold for $1300. Since I had a friend in the business, I got it for $900 --back
2003-05-19 by Anthony Atkielski
... Can you point to some further information on this? I had not heard about it.
2003-05-19 by Anthony Atkielski
... They are not adapted to digital; they are adapted to a small frame size. Kind of like ... APS. There s no fixed link between frame size and digital or
2003-05-19 by Truman Prevatt
The depth of field characteristics is a function of the focal length and aperture - independent of the film/sensor format. However, the coverage on the sensor
2003-05-19 by Stan McQueen
... My own experience, in central Utah, is that the one-hour labs have about the same quality of processing as the pro labs, probably due to standardized
2003-05-19 by Martin Wesley
... From: Heechee To: Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 12:25 PM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] 4 vs 6
2003-05-19 by Amal Elaine
Hi, I have the original instructions and CD for the Canon s900 printer. If anyone wants it (free), email me off line. Thanks.
2003-05-19 by Seth Rossman
Take a gander over to the D1 list. WHY spend $4000 on a 300 2.8, when the 80-200 now does the job? Why spend $7000+ on a 400 2.8, when the 300 2.8 works. If
2003-05-19 by Heechee
... When you say software, what kind of software are you talking about? heechee
2003-05-19 by James Klebau
And from those of us that use an Nikon F4 or F5 day in and day out- God, I hope so!
2003-05-19 by Seth Rossman
From those of us that use D1 day in and day out going from ine coverage to another- God, I hope not! Seth =From: Sam A. McCandless [mailto:samcc@vom.com] = =Is
2003-05-19 by sandersm@aol.com
Anthony, thanks for answering my reciprocity failure question. This thread has prompted several other questions, and I hope people will bear with me for
2003-05-19 by Martin Wesley
... From: heechee92 To: Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 10:33 AM Subject: [Digital BW] 4 vs 6
2003-05-19 by Martin Wesley
... From: rasan_rasch To: Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 10:11 AM Subject: Re: [Digital
2003-05-19 by Manuel Toledo Quinones
Hi, I am using the ultratones in the 1280. I just bought a CIS from MIS. Switching to other inks is not an option with a CIS. However, if you use cartridges
2003-05-19 by heechee92
Hello all, I have a general question. I m new to digital BW. I m getting a Canoscan 4000 in a few days and I m just doing this for a hobby. My question is that
2003-05-19 by rasan_rasch
Hi, Do you have a dedicated printer just for B&W? Is it easy to switch from the MIS Quadtone cartridges to color ink cartridges? Or do I need to use some sort
2003-05-19 by Martin Wesley
Here is a site I ran across last night with a lot of digital to scanned film comparision trials to for resolution, detail, etc. Also gives a close up look at
2003-05-19 by jim hayes
... Well said, better than I can express. Jerry was the guy that first clued me into Eclipse paper, which I ve used for all purposes for quite awhile- ironic,
2003-05-19 by jim hayes
True? Goodbye Jerry... Jim H. ... I was
2003-05-19 by HPA
... I agree entirely. Digital is particularly suited for photojournalism and commercial work, but it would be foolish to advise photographers to limit
2003-05-19 by Anthony Atkielski
... It works out to about $0.21 per shot. So after just 38,095 shots, you ve covered the cost of your D1s; course, your D1s hasn t even half the resolution
2003-05-19 by HPA
Enlarging meters must be read in total darkness. Any safelight illumination will give a false reading for highlight values, which is what you most need to
2003-05-19 by HPA
... Better choices for developing Tmax can be made, compared to D-76 or HC110 IMHO, and this is especially true for portraiture. Try Xtol. Full temp charts
2003-05-19 by Diana Park
I never met Jerry but like many others on this list I was really hit hard by the news of his death. For several years now I ve enjoyed reading his wonderfully
2003-05-19 by sceptre12345
... I d love to see a D30 image that has the same detail in a crop, has the ... lifetime.. ... Hi Keith, With all due respects, it seems to me that using a
2003-05-19 by HPA
For night photography, insofar as producing negatives for scanning for digital printing, the main problem is burned out highlights and inadequate shadow
2003-05-19 by Anthony Atkielski
Thanks! ... From: Clayton Jones To: Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 17:34 Subject: Re: [Digital BW]
2003-05-19 by Clayton Jones
... Very nice site! Enjoyed the Paris tour very much. Excellent work. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at
2003-05-19 by donbga
... measured ... The watermark has been excluded from EEH since its introduction. Don Bryant
2003-05-19 by Sam A. McCandless
Is a full-frame digital Nikon rumored or announced to be in the works for release this fall? I expect to stay with Canon, but I m hoping Keith is right and
2003-05-19 by Roger L Sopher
Hi Ken, I have a 4000 rather than a 2000. I noticed a real pick up in scanning speed when I got a machine with a fast processor and a lot of memory. It also
2003-05-19 by Stephen Kobrin
Ken, I have a LS-2000 and virually all of my scans are B&W. I find that scanning as a B&W neg produces poor results. I scan all my negs as RGB and then
2003-05-19 by Anthony Atkielski
... I ve scanned lots of B&W on the LS-2000. Is there some specific problem you are having? Make sure you turn off ICE; the scans will look really bad if it
2003-05-19 by kentho1937
Thank you all for your help. The way I plan going is to buy a Nikon N/F 75 and scan the negatives shot on Tri X into Photoshop. Todays question. I have kept
2003-05-19 by Anthony Atkielski
... There isn t any. According to Kodak, Portra 400BW doesn t require any compensation at all for exposures between 1/10,000 and 120 seconds. I just exposed
2003-05-19 by Anthony Atkielski
... Originally I remember trying Portra 400BW, Kodak Black+White (IIRC), Kodak TCN400 (?), and XP2. I was just getting into the chromogenics and probably
2003-05-19 by Anthony Atkielski
... It s not going to happen with any single-shot digital camera or back any time soon. It might in the future, depending on how much demand there is for that
2003-05-19 by Hans Nohlberg
Hi, Does anyone know if there is any possibillity to use the OPM/IJC on a 1290 or a 2000p? Hans -- Atelier Pictoform Chia N-Löfqvist & Hans Nohlberg
2003-05-19 by Ernst Dinkla
... From: To: Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 6:33 AM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Film ... own
2003-05-19 by PhotoWorkshops Partnership
On 19/5/03 6:22 am, Scott ... I would recommend you have a look at the Analyser Pro from R H Designs
2003-05-19 by sandersm@aol.com
Anthony, or anyone else using Portra b/w 400: What was your experience with reciprocity failure shooting the film at night? If I take a few midtone
2003-05-19 by Richard Sintchak
Sunday, May 18, 2003, 2:08:43 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote: AA I was very lukewarm about chromogenic B W for quite a while, but I ve AA discovered that Kodak
2003-05-19 by Richard Sintchak
Saturday, May 17, 2003, 10:04:33 PM, Paul Roark wrote: PR I just printed MIS UT inks with the Eboni black on the new Arches Infinity PR paper. (Thanks John
2003-05-19 by deandadin@aol.com
Hello Clayton. My name is steve and I am a photographer and I own a pro B&W lab in Santa Monica Ca. I use Tri x and Tmax a lot and I have developer
2003-05-19 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... I d love to see a D30 image that has the same detail in a crop, has the same B&W tonal range, and presents at least as much overall information.. Just
2003-05-19 by Ken Carney
Anthony, I agree 100%; _if_ you are willing to accept the unknowns about image permanence with this film (will it last refrigerated?). As nearly as I can