Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 1583 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched

Re Kodalith question

2003-05-20 by pwdloge

Hi: My name is Phil Wayner, I am the one who wrote the Kodalith film question. I am sorry that I did not sign my name , this was my first post to this forum.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Retouching help in Photoshop 7.0

2003-05-20 by Mark Sharfman

I am still in the early stages of learning to use Photoshop to correct the mistakes I make with intial exposures. I shoot a lot of figure studies in high

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Digital

2003-05-20 by Anthony Atkielski

... Because math removes the element of subjectivity that clouds the judgement of many photographers. The math says that Leica lenses do not produce a glow,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Techies -vs- Artists

2003-05-20 by Peter Nelson

... Look, Doug, try to keep up, OK? There is no Cliff Notes summary for this forum - you have to actually read the postings. **I m** the one here who said

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: B&W Film

2003-05-20 by HPA

I wonder if the author of the post about Kodalith (who did not sign their name to it) has ever used the film. Try shooting the film at ASA 12 (in flat light)

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Portra B&W

2003-05-20 by Daniel Staver

... I regurlarly shoot XP2 at anything from 80 to 1600 on the same roll of film without any problems. It s rated by Ilford for as low as 50, but I found that

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Portra 400BW second example

2003-05-20 by sceptre12345

... conceivable ... Well, that s a debate I m not getting into. I ll leave that one for others. And ... frame, so ... PC is ... with ... Well Anthony,

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: B&W Film

2003-05-20 by pwdloge

The intent of this letter is twofold, first to present my viewpoint and the other to stimulate a response, either pro or con. Concerning B&W film Scene range

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Techies -vs- Artists

2003-05-20 by Doug I.

... You can also tell by who gives a flip about their photographs. An artistically great but technically so-so photograph (HCB, etc., etc.) will still be

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1514

2003-05-20 by claudej1@aol.com

In a message dated 5/20/2003 7:57:43 AM Pacific Daylight Time, ... Rather than just theorize with math, how about you invest in a digital camera and see for

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1514

2003-05-20 by claudej1@aol.com

In a message dated 5/20/2003 7:57:43 AM Pacific Daylight Time, ... All negative films, color or Black and White can handle more linear information than can be

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Techies -vs- Artists

2003-05-20 by Ernst Dinkla

I should have added IMHO but maybe I should have added in their humble opinion They use the digital backs and cameras. And yes their comparing is very

Thread view Attachments: 0

MIS Ink Experience/Warning

2003-05-20 by Doug Fisher

When I bought my first set of inks (the original VM inks) with the MIS CFS for my 1160 about this time last year, I didn t have any serious clogging issues for

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Epson 220 for B&W?

2003-05-20 by Peter Nelson

... some ... is ... there, ... Out of the box, with the stock drivers, the 2200 sucks for B+W. Using the full inkset it gives you metamerism. Using black-only

Thread view Attachments: 0

Epson 220 for B&W?

2003-05-20 by ny_story2000

I am looking to do inkjet black and white and I would appreciate some help regarding the best approach. I hear the Epson 2200 for B&W is very good. How does

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Portra B&W

2003-05-20 by Anthony Atkielski

I shoot Portra at its rated speed. I don t remember how XP2 works; does it have the orange mask or does it look like B&W film? That may influence the results

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Techies -vs- Artists

2003-05-20 by Truman Prevatt

Peter, You are absolutely correct. All the I did this with film and digital and compared them and found.......... suffer the same fundamental flaw. There is

Thread view Attachments: 0

Portra B&W

2003-05-20 by Stephen Kobrin

I have shot a few rolls of Portra after using Super XP2 regularly. It seems to scan very nicely, but I have two questions and an observation. First, I shoot

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.