Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 1587 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched

Re: Sad News

2003-05-16 by cristianbaitg

I really feel very sorry about that. I think he was one of the members that took the new digital printing world very seriously. We will all miss him and his

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Sad News

2003-05-16 by Kip Babington

I ve been on this list for about a year, and have learned that not all contributors provide information or perspective of value to me at my level of

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Sad News

2003-05-16 by Austin Franklin

I agree Martin. I was going to try to send a card to someone, was he married? Any kids? To give my heartfelt sorrow for his untimely passing, and to let

Thread view Attachments: 0

protective spray for ink jet prints

2003-05-16 by arzroland

I m just getting started in digital fine art bw prints using epson factory inks on epson premium lustre w/1280 prntr. What is best protective spray archival

Thread view Attachments: 0

re: Sad news re: Jerry Olson

2003-05-16 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service

One other note... I am going to try my best (even amidst my current active campaign for NJ Assembly) to make it out to North Dakota for several days this

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Jerry's obituary ;-(

2003-05-16 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service

For once Austin, I am gladdened that you beat me to the punch on that announcement.. Please see my post re: Sad news re: Jerry Olson for information anyone

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Sad News

2003-05-16 by Martin Wesley

If anyone has contact information for Jerry I would appreciate it if you would send it to me off list. I would like to let his family know how many friends and

Thread view Attachments: 0

re: Sad news re: Jerry Olson

2003-05-16 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service

OK folks, here it is... Please feel free to forward this post (in it s entirety) to anyone or any list where you might feel it should be appropriately sent.

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Sad News

2003-05-16 by Jason DeFontes

Wow. How strange to be so affected by someone you ve never even met. I had some fun correspondence with Jerry over the print exchange, and he was such a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Jerry's obituary ;-(

2003-05-16 by Austin Franklin

I know at least some of you remember Jerry. http://www.grandforks.com/mld/grandforksherald/news/obituaries/5873144.htm Posted on Fri, May. 16, 2003

Thread view Attachments: 0

Jerry Olson

2003-05-16 by nyebos

I was deeply saddened by the recent news of Jerry s passing..Interestingly, I had been asking myself if he was on vacation having not seen a posting from him

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Sad News

2003-05-16 by Barry Kelsall

I ve never been so moved from a loss of someone I never met in the flesh. He was generous with his information/opinions to a fault. His spirited discussions

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Sad News

2003-05-16 by Austin Franklin

... This is very very sad news. I never personally met Jerry, but he and I have had many a conversation on the Internet, and I ve greatly appreciated his

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: Sad News

2003-05-16 by elgha2001

To have Jerry touched me professionally has helped me grow as an individual. He has gone above and beyond the call of duty when helping me off-line on his

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] digital

2003-05-16 by keith_r_smith2003

sorry to hear about your sight - from what you say you have difficulty in seeing what is in the viewfinder, but can work via a large screen. If that is so, you

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] digital

2003-05-16 by kentho1937

Hi Anthony, I would like to thank you very much for your detailed answer. ... Digital. I am on a blind pension, and I thought digital was the answer to all my

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] digital

2003-05-16 by keith_r_smith2003

... compares ... compare ... got to argue this one. I think that in truth the jury is still out on this when looking at the latest high pixel count sensors.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] digital

2003-05-16 by Anthony Atkielski

... I was referring to the general statement that (35mm) digital compares favorably to 645. Generally speaking, (35mm) digital does NOT compare favorably to

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] digital

2003-05-16 by keith_r_smith2003

... even 35mm ... Carefull here. I suspect the comparison you were refering to was on www.luminous-landscape.com where micheal has abandoned MF for a 1Ds. The

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] digital

2003-05-16 by Anthony Atkielski

... As compared to ... what? As compared to shooting black and white film to begin with ... no, I don t think shooting color slides is a better option. There

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Sad News

2003-05-16 by Julian Thomas

... Me too. I ve argued with Jerry so often over the last three or four years over print colour, Gen 5 black longevity, digital cam sharpness etc it became as

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Sad News

2003-05-16 by Bob Michaels

Jerry will be missed by many but he will live on in many ways. Earlier tonight I swapped out my old black ink for Gen4. It was 100% at Jerry s urging. I was

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Sad News

2003-05-16 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service

Wow, for once I am near speechless... I was just thinking about him yesterday when I spoke with Rob Zeiss... His contributions will be sorely missed if this is

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Sad News

2003-05-16 by Martin Wesley

Very sad and shocking news! Jerry was a founding member of this group and a prolific contributor on this list and others. I see that his last post was on May

Thread view Attachments: 0

Sad News

2003-05-16 by Clayton Jones

Hello All, I received news this evening that Jerry Olson passed away unexpectedly. I got this second hand so I don t have any details. Apparently it was

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] digital

2003-05-16 by kentho1937

Thank you Anthony for your well presented and helpful reply. Now a further question, if I may. Is it better to take colour slides and then convert them to

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Another beginner with questions

2003-05-16 by Bob Michaels

I m very happy printing using only: Minolta Scan Dual II ($250), Epson 1280 ($350 after rebate, but I have added MIS CFS for $120 extra, PS 7 ($300 upgrade to

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] re: film processing

2003-05-16 by Ken Carney

Don t overlook 4x10 -- that is a great format. One of my favorite photographers, Mary Ellen Mark, has made the trek you are on: 35 to 6x6 then to 4x5. For

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] re: film processing

2003-05-16 by Ken Carney

Thanks, Tom, for the excellent information. Up until recently almost everything I ve done has been TriX in D76 1:1, or Bergger or TMax in pyro. But, I really

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] re: film processing

2003-05-16 by Ken Carney

... Yes, I do miss them. But, with the 35mm RF cameras and today s lenses, able to be used wide open, I get pictures that I could not get before. DOF is

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] digital

2003-05-15 by jimj1946

Thanks for the reply. That was kind of what I was expecting. A film only darkroom, doesn t take up that much space any way. I guess that will be the best route

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] digital

2003-05-15 by Anthony Atkielski

... No 35mm digital camera compares favorably to medium-format film; even 35mm film does not compare favorably to medium-format film. ... Digital is a poor

Thread view Attachments: 0

Another beginner with questions

2003-05-15 by Nghi Hoang

Hello everyone, I apologize in advance for posting questions (below) that are not specific to B&W printing. However, I believe that I could get the help I

Thread view Attachments: 0

digital

2003-05-15 by jimj1946

I started a thread, recently, on film processing. I want to thank you all for the thoughtful answers. They will be a big help to me. Now I would like to look

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.