Re: Epson 2200 RIP workflow
2003-02-21 by sanfo2003 <SandyCornelius@cox.net>
The more ... profile, The reason I picked that profile is because its kind of a standard for windows systems for greyscale and resulted in better shadow
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1653 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: Epson 2200 RIP workflow
2003-02-21 by chipcarterdc <chipcarterdc@hotmail.com>
Excellent info, and thanks for posting it. Just one question. One of your steps is Open Photoshop and your image then assign the profile Grey Gamma 2.2 to
Installing Grey Balancer
2003-02-21 by GLewis4457 <glewis4457@yahoo.com>
I have downloaded the english language versions of the 1290 epson drivers AND I hope the grey balancer. What do I do now. I know that some have posted no
WHEN will we get clog-free printing?!
2003-02-21 by Harry Saddler
Hate to bring this up yet again, but I just set up a brand new 1280, MIS CFS with MIS VM inks, and I ve got clogged nozzles. Everything was beautiful for the
Epson 2200 RIP workflow
2003-02-21 by sanfo2003 <SandyCornelius@cox.net>
This is the workflow I use (so far) to get results with the RIP using stock inks that are, in my opinion, very close to if not equal to that of a Pieziography
Re: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-21 by Chris Hargens <ldmr@cruzio.com>
I ve scanned XP2, both as 16-bit image and as 48-bit RGB image -- and have found that it has a proclivity to noise in the shadows. I ve spoken with others who
Disappointed with MIS-VM and Epson 1280
2003-02-21 by Keith Douglas
I just got my brand-new Epson 1280 and MIS-VM inkset yesterday, and I m quite disappointed with the results. I, at risk, decided to just load the MIS carts
Re: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-21 by Eric Maquiling
... [...] ... That s what I do now, with a changing bag. I d like to get one of those changing tents in the future. I don t know if I can be organized nugh
RE: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-21 by Ton Guiking
... Boy hated I the TMAX films, when I tried them years ago. Back to Tri-X 1:1 !! Never change a winning team :-) ... I don t have a permanent dark room
Re: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-21 by danielstaver <daniel@petraflux.com>
... don t do any ... doesn t ... (T400CN), ... developed ... I ve shot several rolls of XP2 lately and they scan very nicely on my CanoScan FS4000US. At
RE: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-21 by Austin Franklin
Hi Eric, ... Why? That s what this list is for, and the discussion is right on topic, IMO. ... I d like to hear what others have to say about this as well. I
Re: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-21 by largeformatfreak <jerryahyman@cox.net>
... scans. Delta ... agitation. ... probably ... for a ... I frequently scan my 4X5 100TMAX negatives with an Epson 2450 and have been pleased with the
Re: Epson RIP - was: UC metamerism, yellow ink & confusion
2003-02-21 by plnelson2003 <peter@studio-nelson.com>
... B&W ... I m a little confused by the above. Are you saying that Geo DeWolf DID use the Epson RIP for those prints? Also, the usual qualifying question:
Re: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-21 by Eric Maquiling
... Sorry to keep this thread going but I ll be moving soon and I probably won t be able to set up even a simple setup for processing film for a while. Any
RE: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-21 by Austin Franklin
And...Chris...you bring up another stellar point, I forgot to mention. CHOICE OF FILM! Different scanners scan the same film differently, mostly because of
Re: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-21 by Chris Hargens <ldmr@cruzio.com>
Okay, a subject that s been debated before but worth revisiting: I ve noticed no difference in quality between my TMY scans (on my Sprintscan 4000) scanned as
Re: Further Adventures w/7600+ImagePrint: B&W Problem
2003-02-21 by cschaible94111 <cschaible@cooley.com>
Mitch: I m still using the Cone driver on a 1280. I ve considered moving to IP5 but find my existing setup still works pretty well. One thing it doesn t
Re: [Digital BW] HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-21 by Jerry Olson
Its thicker and whiter. (EEM that is). J I ve sort of settled on HWM because of price and
RE: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-21 by Austin Franklin
... Hi Mike, It depends on what you mean by best . I believe the Leafscan is the best scanner, as far as image quality, for B&W because it scans B&W using a
Re: best scanner for b&w
2003-02-21 by digikdm <monroekd@healthall.com>
... the ... II, ... Also, I forget to mention that Nikon has a great technical assistance number that seems to always be available day or night . I m not sure
Re: best scanner for b&w
2003-02-21 by digikdm <monroekd@healthall.com>
... the ... II, ... I have been using the Nikon 4000 for about a month. I am generally pleased with the results, although I spend a lot of time cleaning up the
Jim Panzer - where are you?
2003-02-21 by Richard Cooke <rcooke@redmtnengr.com>
Hi All, Please pardon this email but a list member (Jim Panzer) emailed me a qestion about my building a plungercam. When I reply to his message it gets
Re: Epson 2200 RIP: further results?
2003-02-21 by chipcarterdc <chipcarterdc@hotmail.com>
... Did we get a reply as to how this poster (sorry, I lost track of the names) tricked the driver into using 2880dpi? Also, there s some discussion above
Re:Desaturate After Channel Mixer?
2003-02-21 by André Vallejo
It does nothing. Instead,change mode to grayscale,then you ll be cutting the size to 1/3,that makes sense...
CIS Problem - Question
2003-02-21 by httivals <hslavitt@cpdb.com>
I have an original No More Carts, CIS, set up on an office printer (Epson 880) that my wife uses. She didn t tell me that we needed more black ink until it
Predicting the Life of Printed Images
2003-02-21 by Vincent Orlando <orlandovl@hotmail.com>
There is a very good article on Predicting the Life of Printed Images and why it is almost impossible to pin down. The article is in the March/April 2003
Re: Epson 2200 RIP: further results?
2003-02-21 by Dan Honemann <dan_honemann@yahoo.com>
... wrote: [...] ... [...] ... Please do! I m excited to hear some positive news on this RIP. At less than half
Re: Where to find reviews/discussions on Epson RIP?
2003-02-21 by Vincent Orlando <orlandovl@hotmail.com>
Camera Art. Vinny http://www.wulfsden.com ... so ... 12 ... a ... technical ... and
Re: Epson RIP - was: UC metamerism, yellow ink & confusion
2003-02-21 by Vincent Orlando <orlandovl@hotmail.com>
I have NOT used the Epson Rip with the 2200 but looked at several B&W photos that Geo DeWolfe made, at his home last week, for the review he did for Camera Art
Re: [Digital BW] Re: UC metamerism, yellow ink & confusion
2003-02-21 by Steven Schaefer
I thought it was a very good response to your post, Carlis. He explained the metamerism problem very well, which is what you were asking for. Steve
OT Custom Epson Print Size locations
2003-02-21 by colingruk <colin.conway@bstdb.org>
Hi, all Please excuse the off topic post but I shall need to clean re-install Win2k on my PC next week and am saving elsewhere various files. I cannot find the
Re: MIS UC clone inks
2003-02-21 by TerryR <terryr1028@hotmail.com>
... reports of ... how they ... thing ... is much ... test ... Hello Paul, Haven t wrote to you or the list in quite some time. I have been playing with the
best scanner for b&w
2003-02-21 by borismg <mgkless@hotmail.com>
I ve done lots of homework in recent weeks researching what is the best scanner for b&w negs as well as chrome and color neg., with the emphasis on B&W. I
Re: [Digital BW] Image mat borders - golden!
2003-02-21 by colingruk <colin.conway@bstdb.org>
... Thank you Hans,indeed I did. I m very grateful. Enjoy your weekend, Colin
Re: [Digital BW] Epson 2200 RIP: further results?
2003-02-21 by Peter Palmieri
Dan and Sandy--thanks for you suggestions. The USB is 2.0 in my computer but I don t know whether two printers with different names can work from the same
Re: [Digital BW] Epson 2200 RIP: further results?
2003-02-21 by sanfo2003 <SandyCornelius@cox.net>
... Well, my computer has WIN98SE on it with 512 meg ram and 850 MHz, much slower and less capable than yours. I m not that familiar with XP. I have five
Re: [Digital BW] Epson 2200 RIP: further results?
2003-02-21 by danielstaver <daniel@petraflux.com>
It s probably not the RIP s fault, it s your cable. I ve tried all three connection types on my 2100 and LPT was the slowest by far. And by that I mean _much_
Re: HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-21 by Bob_Michaels <Bob@BobMichaels.org>
Paul, actually visually the HWM is slightly brighter than EEM and looks just a bit better to me. Again, that s with MIS FSN inks. Maybe the EEM is supposed to
Re: Further Adventures w/7600+ImagePrint: B&W Problem
2003-02-21 by jim hayes <jimhayes@frii.com>
Oh and P.S.: Don t worry about the IP5 preview ever matching pshop. Just ignore it; you don t need it to match the print here anyway, just in pshop where the
Desaturate After Channel Mixer?
2003-02-21 by Tom Husband <thusband@sbcglobal.net>
I m using the channel mixer to create a grayscale and I ve read where you should desaturate afterwards. I don t see any difference after doing so. What does
Re: Further Adventures w/7600+ImagePrint: B&W Problem
2003-02-21 by jim hayes <jimhayes@frii.com>
... 2.2 to ... Weird huh? I ve learned not to question why anything works in the last 2 1/2 years... I find that I have had to rarely make a minor adjustment,
RE: [Digital BW] HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-21 by Paul Roark
Bob, I m not sure of how EEM and HWM compare visually, but the EEM coating is supposed to be more tailored to pigments. HWM is supposedly designed for dye
Re: [Digital BW] Epson 2200 RIP: further results?
2003-02-21 by Peter Palmieri
Sandy--I started to make a 13X19 print today using the RIP with the 2200 and Hahnemuhle Photo Rag paper. After all the good trial prints that I have been
MIS UC clone inks
2003-02-21 by Paul Roark
Has anyone tried the MIS 7600 color pigs (UC clones)? I m using them in the UC VM 4.3 formula, but I had not heard any reports of full color inkset users until
Re: [Digital BW] HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-21 by Bob_Michaels <Bob@BobMichaels.org>
Paul, as my novice eye cannot discern a difference between HWM and EEM using MIS FSN inks, I ve sort of settled on HWM because of price and availability. But I
Re: [Digital BW] Epson 2200 RIP: further results?
2003-02-21 by sanfo2003 <SandyCornelius@cox.net>
... Yeah, I definitly saw the metamerism before with the standard driver, to the point of being tempted to throw the printer thru the window (of CompUSA, where
Re: [Digital BW] Epson 2200 RIP: further results?
2003-02-21 by plnelson2003 <peter@studio-nelson.com>
... magenta ... can ... be ... Good info! Thanks. One last question: Could you see the metamerism before, i.e., in the default drivers? Before I count
Re: [Digital BW] Epson 2200 RIP: further results?
2003-02-21 by sanfo2003 <SandyCornelius@cox.net>
... Did an eyeball test. Looked at a print under daylight, tungsten and Ott Light fluorescent (daylight fluorescent) and observered negligible metamerism.
Re: UC metamerism, yellow ink & confusion
2003-02-21 by carlislematthew <carlislematthew@hotmail
Good information - thanks. ... and ... you re ... A scientist by nature is someone that questions, wants to know how things work, applies logical thinking to
[Digital BW] Re: Epson 2200/Imageprint/Epson Pro Glossy
2003-02-21 by Dan Honemann <dan_honemann@yahoo.com>
... Robert, It s glossy, and so not what you are looking for, unfortunately. Dan