Re: Epson RIP - was: UC metamerism, yellow ink & confusion
2003-02-22 by Vincent Orlando <orlandovl@hotmail.com>
Didn t look at any non rip prints. He was testing the rip to see if it would in fact print dead neutral-which it did Vinny ... Orlando
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1652 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] OT: Epson spool disc on OSX ( for 1280) ??
2003-02-22 by Ruhrfoto/Bernd L. <ruhrfoto@yahoo.de>
... have you allotted ... problems. Your ... larger ... time ... every ... Jerry, 0SX runs with 1.5 gig, 75% is alloted to PS, that is 1039 MB. I have 4
RE: [Digital BW] MIS GP Archival Inkset
2003-02-22 by Paul Roark
Ernst, What I heard from MIS is that some of the standard Epson desktop printers -- 1280, for example -- pump out too much ink for the standard high load MIS
Re: [Digital BW] OT: Epson spool disc on OSX ( for 1280) ??
2003-02-22 by Jerry Olson
Give the epson monitor more memory. How much memory have you allotted Photoshop? I use about 700,000 K just for photoshop, and have no problems. Your problem
Re: [Digital BW] MIS GP Archival Inkset
2003-02-22 by Ernst Dinkla
... color inkset ... pigment load ... high-load ... have to re- ... replacement ... MIS-FSN ... the MIS 7600 ... paper compatible, ... in the FS ... released
Re: [Digital BW] HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-22 by Jerry Olson
Hi Bob, I ve used a LOT of EAM in the past, now EEM, and the color of the paper was always close, but sometimes a batch was a little creamier color than
OT: Epson spool disc on OSX ( for 1280) ??
2003-02-22 by Ruhrfoto/Bernd L. <ruhrfoto@yahoo.de>
Hi, maybe this is a bit off topic, but I have a problem printing larger files with the 1290 under Mac OSX. It takes an awfull long time because the printer
[Digital BW] MIS GP Archival Inkset
2003-02-22 by Paul Roark
Andre, The new MIS GP Archival inkset is not a B&W inkset. It s a color inkset that takes the UltraChrome-equivalent MIS 7600 inkset to a pigment load that
Vuescan settings for b/w-film?
2003-02-22 by flabes23 <peter.bongard@t-online.de>
Hi! What are the best settings/workflows in Vuescan for scanning B/w Negatives? I have a Minolta DImage Dual III and scan mostly with Agfa APX 400, Ilford FP2
Re: best scanner for b&w
2003-02-22 by Stephen Kobrin <skobrin@hotmail.com>
I agree. I have scanned it for a few years and am always impressed with the results. It is different than other Ilford films (Fp4+, for example,developed in
MIS GP Archival Inkset
2003-02-22 by sceptre12345 <am1000@videotron.ca>
I m presently using MIS-FSN ink with an Epson 1160. I will have to re- order soon and I just come across these new inks from MIS. 1- What are the advantage of
Re: Inkjet Receptive Coatings
2003-02-22 by grdglass@aol.com
Diana, Have you used InkAid with any of the Epson desktop printers with pigment inks? The rollers, pizza wheels, etc. in the desktops supposedly smear the
RE: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-22 by Shire,Stanley
I ve also gone totally to shooting NPS (medium format) and converting to greyscale. I ve been using a plugin from The Imaging Factory - Convert To BW Pro.
Re: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-22 by craig <craygc@yahoo.com>
Firstly, Im trying to scan on a Nikon LS4000 and I can never get consistent scans of true B&W film so I gave up on that approach - this is about digital B&W so
Re: [Digital BW] about scanning B&W
2003-02-22 by Mark Savoia
Try Ilfotec DD film developer. It works great. Made for dip and dunk processors but you can use it in a batch setup also. Mark ... [Non-text portions of this
Re: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-22 by smithj72 <smithj72@yahoo.com>
... comes out ... is damn good. ... I agree completely. Portra 400 B&W is absolutely the best film I have ever scanned. I haven t gone into a wet darkroom in
Re: best scanner for b&w
2003-02-22 by Bruce
on 2/21/2003 2:24 PM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at ... Chris, I ll second this observation. The Kodak chromogenic films have much less
Re:How I stopped getting clogs, was WHEN will we get clog-free printing?!
2003-02-22 by jim hayes <jimhayes@frii.com>
The CFS and CIS tubes are made of different material- that may contribute. Humidity here gets to 20% and I have endless problems. I even humidify to 45%RH but
Re: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-22 by johngeyles <jge@cs.unc.edu>
... tones, etc. Although I agree that XP2 is a nice film and scans well, I am beginning to think Provia 100F is a better choice for me. Of course it s a color
Re: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-22 by Christopher Williams
Kodak s Portra scans better than the XP2 or TC400n. It actually comes out B&W before you adjust anything! XP2 is my favorite for wet darkroom, but I admit the
Re: Keith Kreb's Curves? Found It. Nevermind.
2003-02-22 by Tom Husband <thusband@sbcglobal.net>
Re: best scanner for b&w
2003-02-22 by gaberegalbuto <gaberegalbuto@yahoo.com>
If you can avoid the Epson flatbeds and still pay your rent I would. I have a 2450 (previous to the 3200) and the underside of the glass is not user
Keith Kreb's Curves?
2003-02-22 by Tom Husband <thusband@sbcglobal.net>
Where can I find Keith s curves? I ve looked through the MIS site and the files section here but can t seem to find them. They re probably right under my
Re: [Digital BW] WHEN will we get clog-free printing?!
2003-02-22 by Harry Saddler
I don t think it s air in the tubes; I haven t seen any. The CFS charging seemed perfect, and the tubes haven t been out of the ink since. It has been somewhat
RE: [Digital BW] Inkjet Receptive Coatings
2003-02-22 by Jason DeFontes
http://www.inkaid.com/
Re: [Digital BW] WHEN will we get clog-free printing?!
2003-02-22 by Bob_Michaels <Bob@BobMichaels.org>
Like Jerry, clogs just are not a problem for me either. I ve used MIS VM inks in carts and currently using MIS FSN inks in a MIS CIS. It may be humidity
Re: [Digital BW] Inkjet Receptive Coatings
2003-02-22 by Diana York
It is called InkAid http://www.inkaid.com/ The Ultrachrome inks dry very quickly, even on glossy paper. Never could get G4 ink or Piezo ink to dry on glossy
Re: Further Adventures w/7600+ImagePrint: B&W Problem
2003-02-22 by Mitch Alland
Chuck: [cschaible94111 ] ... But why not? Why work in the dark? The PiezoBW documentation explains how to create a Custom Dot Gain
Re: Disappointed with MIS-VM and Epson 1280
2003-02-22 by Bob_Michaels <Bob@BobMichaels.org>
Keith: at the risk of insulting your intelligence, are you sure you re converting the file to RGB before you apply the curve? And, that the printer is set to
Re: [Digital BW] HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-22 by Bob_Michaels <Bob@BobMichaels.org>
Jerry: So I wonder if it s that my HWM is brighter than your HWM or if my EEM is creamier than your EEM? Maybe the HWM is initially brighter because of added
Re: Further Adventures w/7600+ImagePrint: B&W Problem
2003-02-22 by Mitch Alland
For: Robert Morrison ... I m surprised. I guess I should ask, compressed compared to what? because I find the shadow detail to be quite good, with gradation
RE: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-22 by Austin Franklin
Hi Jerry, ... Not a thing, it s a very nice film/developer combination, though I like the tonality of Plus-X/D-76 1:1 better. ... Agreed, and that is more what
Re: [Digital BW] HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-22 by Jerry Olson
Bob, My EEM is whiter than my HWM. But I got the HWM a long long time ago.... Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-22 by Jerry Olson
XP2 is a great film for scanning, sharp, very fine grain, great tones, etc. Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-22 by Jerry Olson
What was wrong with T Max 100? I found it great! 400 was too grainy though. Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] WHEN will we get clog-free printing?!
2003-02-22 by Jerry Olson
I never had had out of the ordinary clogs with MIS inks. Very rarely do I get one. Are you sure it isn t air in your feed tubes? Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] Disappointed with MIS-VM and Epson 1280
2003-02-22 by Jerry Olson
The problems with the MIS one that I ... Are you using a paul roark curve? You ll get the dots without one. ... They should be identical ... You should be
Re: [Digital BW] Disappointed with MIS-VM and Epson 1280
2003-02-22 by Evelyn Grant
I don t really know what you could be doing wrong, but I just recently purchased the MIS_VMS inkset. I tried it with Roark s curves and got a lot of
Re: [Digital BW] Inkjet Receptive Coatings
2003-02-22 by Jerry Olson
That would be great. get a pint or so of it and use a soft rag to coat a sheet of paper. or a brush? If anyone sees this solution, let us know. Jerry
RE: [Digital BW] about scanning B&W
2003-02-22 by Austin Franklin
Thomas, ... I strongly disagree that much better choices can be made than processing Tri-X and Plus-X in D-76. It depends on the film, and what you want the
about scanning B&W
2003-02-21 by HPA
The grain of scanned B&W is primarily dependent on the film developer. Many labs use stuff like D76 or HC110 because of cost and replenishment. much better
Re: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-21 by THOMAS MOORE
I found CN400 35mm a very friendly film to scan. Great latitude and virtually grainlees on 2/21/03 12:23 PM, Eric Maquiling at eric@maquiling.org wrote: ...
Re: Epson RIP - was: UC metamerism, yellow ink & confusion
2003-02-21 by plnelson2003 <peter@studio-nelson.com>
... And could you see the metamerism in the non-RIP prints?
Re: [Digital BW] HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-21 by Bob_Michaels <Bob@BobMichaels.org>
Jerry: HWM is visibly whiter but EEM is marginally thicker. I have to say the brightness of HWM is more noticeable than the thickness of EEM. Bob Michaels
Re: Epson RIP - was: UC metamerism, yellow ink & confusion
2003-02-21 by Vincent Orlando <orlandovl@hotmail.com>
Geo DeWolfe is the editor at large for Camera Arts mag and has been testing the Epson 2200 with Epson Rip. Those are the prints I looked at. Dead Neutral Vinny
Inkjet Receptive Coatings
2003-02-21 by plnelson2003 <peter@studio-nelson.com>
As most of you know, inkjet inks, especially the pigmented, archival ones, need a porous surface to dry. If you print on a nonporous surface they will stay
Re: Newbie question about Epson 2200 RIP s/w
2003-02-21 by plnelson2003 <peter@studio-nelson.com>
... Depends on who you ask. The score on this forum, so far, is: Thomas Fors says the Epson 2200 is as bad as the default drivers. (he s sending me some
Re: Epson 2200 RIP workflow
2003-02-21 by Dan Honemann <dan_honemann@yahoo.com>
Wonderful! Thanks so much for posting it. Dan
RE: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-21 by Jim Panzer
I have a Nikon 4000 and so far I have no complaints, I have actually switched over to using the c-41 films because of the ICE and the scans I get with it. I
Newbie question about Epson 2200 RIP s/w
2003-02-21 by tfinan1 <tfinan@seanet.com>
Hello: I just purchased the 2200 and will be doing a lot of B&W printing -- in fact I purchased this as a replacement to the Piezography, which had simply