Re: [Digital BW] HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-24 by Sue Tallon
... What do you mean by rubbing them down? Sue Sue Tallon Photography [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1650 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-24 by Jerry Olson
Now THAT s Funny! (I have no kids). Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] The New PiezographyBW system at PMA
2003-02-24 by Julian Thomas
ah Jon - you tease! BTW I like the inexpensive part! Julian ... From: Jon Cone To: Sent:
The New PiezographyBW system at PMA
2003-02-24 by Jon Cone
Here¹s another hint about what we¹re announcing at and debuting at PMA. This is what it¹s not: It¹s not like the old PiezographyBW system. It doesn t
Re: Yahoo! appears to be Experiencing a meltdown...
2003-02-24 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Harald s Digital Fine-Art list is one of the missing groups.. Keith Just some guy, and caretaker of the Multiverse s largest EPSON printer User Community
Yahoo! appears to be Experiencing a meltdown...
2003-02-24 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Apparently their groups are progressively disappearing without explanation... I run several groups, one of which has disappeared in the manner described by the
Re: Septone inks and PixelPixasso RIP
2003-02-24 by Steven Karafyllakis <stevek@evcom.net>
Hi Martin; This all sounds very interesting-is there a URL for Sundance, and do you have any idea if the PixelPixasso rip will support other (not seven ink)
RE: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-24 by Seth Rossman
If you have your house all done in plastic, use the excess duct tape (the baby sitter s friend) . =Austin Franklin wrote: = = But, I can t very well
RE: [Digital BW] OT...New Canon 10D! !!
2003-02-24 by Seth Rossman
Yeh, why not make it a D60A? Boy, not like Canon at all, outdating (re-numbering) their equipment so quickly. Must be some Nikon rumor driving them.
RE: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-24 by Seth Rossman
Geez. See? So many variables. Beyond everyone seeing things a little differently, if we take Roark s densitometer readings into account, the papers would
Re: [Digital BW] Reusable cartridges and the environment -- Canon and Lexmark lawsuits may box OEMs in..
2003-02-24 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Congressmen Rick Boucher (D.-Va.) , Joe Barton ( R-Tx) Spencer Bachus (R-AL), William Janklow (R-SD), Robert Andrews
RE: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-24 by Seth Rossman
Richard- I guess that s why I hesitate to respond to some of these things. I think my original intent was that the Digital B&W stuff was becoming Darkroom
Re: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-24 by Julian Thomas
The other thing about this is when doing an initial levels move to always use the alt key so that you can see exactly what goes to black Julian ... From:
RE: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-24 by Alessandro Pardi
Hi Bob, one reason might be that the image hasn t 100% blacks. You can verify it in Photoshop: if the darkest parts of the picture, those that should be pure
Epson 3200 scans (was: best scanner for b&w)
2003-02-24 by Alessandro Pardi
Simon, I reply to the list as other people may be interested in the 3200. I only have played with my new scanners for a few hours (I just moved and the new
Re: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-24 by Simon Lamb
Sorry, should have been simon@sclamb.com ... From: Simon Lamb To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 9:12 AM Subject:
Re: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-24 by Simon Lamb
Alessandro I agree with your post, although I tend to use the LAB mode and select to use only the lightness channel. On an off topic issue, could you email me
RE: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-24 by Alessandro Pardi
I get better results with 48bit RGB scanning, picking only one of the three channels, for the following two reasons: 1) Channel noise. 2) Channel disalignment.
Re: [Digital BW] Do MIS inks go bad?
2003-02-24 by Barry Kelsall
I had some Generations Beta Black (same as Enhanced) curdle & the lumps clogged the hell out of my printer. Wasn t fatal, though. That ink was two years old.
Septone inks and PixelPixasso RIP
2003-02-24 by Martin Wesley
A week ago I received a set of five ~6x9 prints, printed on the same long strip of Photo Rag by a 7600 using a new set of inks from Sundance and software by
EpsonRIP More Experimenting
2003-02-24 by Thomas Fors
After all the settings for the Epson RIP that were flying around this list last week, I tried it again on the 2200 and somehow screwed it up to the point that
Re: Inkjetgoodies refillable carts, MIS & 1280... (shilesh)
2003-02-24 by Shilesh Jani <shilesh.jani@smith-nephew.
I should have said vacuum fill kit which contains a septum. On MIS site go to accesories, and you will find the kit (VVF-KIT) there. You will also need one
RE: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-24 by Austin Franklin
... Hum. In that order? ;-)
Re: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-24 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... Freeze-drying and stuffing them always worked well for me.. Keith Just some guy, and caretaker of the Multiverse s largest EPSON printer User Community
Re: [Digital BW] OT...New Canon 10D! !!
2003-02-24 by Christopher Williams
Jerry, From a Canon rep: D10 -- 6mp, focus is much improved, as is software. Complaints on the D60 was focus with longer lenses was not the best. Possible 8mp
Re[2]: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-24 by Richard Sintchak
Sunday, February 23, 2003, 6:34:54 PM, Jerry Olson wrote: JO There was an article not long ago in Design Graphics, an Australian JO Graphics design magazine.
RE: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-24 by Austin Franklin
... Jerry, That was a scanning back, and as such, gives FAR superior results than a one shot back. I have a 7k scanning back for my Hasselblad. It produces
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Inkjetgoodies refillable carts, MIS & 1280... (shilesh)
2003-02-24 by Jerry Olson
The cartilage divider that separates one nostril from the other? Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-24 by Jerry Olson
There was an article not long ago in Design Graphics, an Australian Graphics design magazine. They compared a 4x5 digital back on a Sinar and 4x5 velvia. The
My experiments printing on artist's medisa
2003-02-24 by Peter Nelson <peter@studio-nelson.com>
This is only marginally related to black and white printing but it seemed close enough to be of interest to people here. As many people here know, I m an
Re: [Digital BW] Do MIS inks go bad?
2003-02-24 by Jerry Olson
I know they ll last 18 months at least. I got pint bottles once, and it took that long to use it all up. Jerry (I assume you are talking about MIS inks?)
Re: [Digital BW] OT...New Canon 10D! !!
2003-02-24 by Jerry Olson
Thank you for the quick reply, Chris! There would be no reason to upgrade if it were still a 6 megapixel camera. I ll not switch unless its 12 megapixels or
Re: Inkjetgoodies refillable carts, MIS & 1280...
2003-02-24 by Bob_Michaels <bob@bobmichaels.org>
The MIS CFS system for a 1280 is only $137 and that s complete including the chip resetter. I have one for my 1280 and recommend them. I know you said a CFS
Re: Inkjetgoodies refillable carts, MIS & 1280... (shilesh)
2003-02-24 by treadwinkle <VOLveeta@bellsouth.net>
Shilesh Jani, thank you!!! One question... what are septums? Thanks, treadwinkle ... all ... sell ... tries ... of ... compare ... it.
Re: Inkjetgoodies refillable carts, MIS & 1280...
2003-02-24 by Shilesh Jani <shilesh.jani@smith-nephew.
Treadwinkle, I use virgin cartridges to fill FS (and other) inks for my 1280 all the time. I buy the T009 and T007 carts from MIS because they sell them
Inkjetgoodies refillable carts, MIS & 1280...
2003-02-23 by treadwinkle <VOLveeta@bellsouth.net>
Inkjetgoodies refillable carts, MIS & 1280... is anyone here using or has used that combo? I ve been using Piezotone Seleniums (prefilled carts), but they are
Re: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-23 by Bob_Michaels <bob@bobmichaels.org>
Mine was viewed originally under bright flourescent but one of those with the color of incadescent. But, I just took them outside to view them in late
Re[4]: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-23 by Richard Sintchak
Sunday, February 23, 2003, 2:21:12 PM, Seth wrote: S =Just curious as to what your thinking is in that if we scan S =the negatives we should just do digital
RE: Re[2]: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-23 by Austin Franklin
... It s not a LOT of extra work, especially since the results are far superior. ... I don t do dust removal, I do no work in PS except to resize the image
Re: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-23 by Truman Prevatt
I normally shoot 4x5 Tmax 400 and scan 2400 dpi. There is no way that the current digital cameras can compare. First I have much more control on your contract
RE: Re[2]: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-23 by Seth
=Just curious as to what your thinking is in that if we scan =the negatives we should just do digital images in the first place? = Once you scan, you ARE
RE: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-23 by Seth Rossman
Thanks, Truman. Bob, what about your viewing? Thanks, Seth =-----Original Message----- =From: Truman Prevatt [mailto:tprevatt@mindspring.com] =Sent: Sunday,
RE: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-23 by Seth Rossman
PLI is the Photo-Lab-Index. The bible of chemical developing, etc. Seth =-----Original Message----- =From: Austin Franklin [mailto:darkroom@ix.netcom.com]
Re: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-23 by Truman Prevatt
Diffused daylight. Truman
RE: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-23 by Seth Rossman
But, neither of you gentlemen has said in EXACTLY what light you are looking at them. Brightness and type could play a significant role in eyeballing papers
Re: [Digital BW] EpsonRIP More Experimenting
2003-02-23 by Peter Palmieri
Tom--I have been a hellava time with the RIP. Since it was printing so slow I uninstalled everything and hooked up a firewire connection to the computer in
Reusable cartridges and the environment -- Canon and Lexmark lawsuits may box OEMs in..
2003-02-23 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
I ll apologize upfront for the cross-posting on this one, but IMHO this topic is important enough in multiple fora to be passed on.. In view of earlier
Do MIS inks go bad?
2003-02-23 by flabes23 <peter.bongard@t-online.de>
Hi! Does anybody know how long the ink from the MIS CFS can be used once the bottle is opened? I m thinking about purchasing the 1 pint bottles, so it can be
Re[2]: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-23 by Richard Sintchak
Sunday, February 23, 2003, 12:00:22 PM, Seth Rossman wrote: SR If SR you re making it digital, why not shoot it digital? For so many reasons I do not know
RE: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-23 by Austin Franklin
Seth, ... I not clear what you are saying, but I do know that you can t get the same results shooting digital that you can scanning film for B&W. I shoot