Re: [Digital BW] Digital B&W to Traditional B&W
2010-07-05 by Ender100@aol.com
There are still many people who value hand made prints and love the beautiful prints that result from the the many alternative processes or historic processes.
Messages
Browse messages
Page 180 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] Digital B&W to Traditional B&W
2010-07-05 by C D Tobie
... The answer I have always gotten when I ask this is because I want to still play around with my enlarger and chemical process . Its not an argument that
Re: [Digital BW] Digital B&W to Traditional B&W
2010-07-05 by Mark Savoia
It will look like crap. The dot pattern of the inkjet process will be enlarged. You really can only do the contact process at size of neg you make. Unless you
Re: [Digital BW] Digital B&W to Traditional B&W
2010-07-05 by C D Tobie
... Yes, inkjet resolution is not sufficient to print 35mm negs with sufficient resolution, but if you put the neg at the other end of the process (in contact
Re: [Digital BW] Digital B&W to Traditional B&W
2010-07-05 by Ender100@aol.com
In addition to Dan Burkholder s fine book, I have a book and system for doing this. See: www.PrecisionDigitalNegatives.com I personally use the PDN system
Re: [Digital BW] Digital B&W to Traditional B&W
2010-07-05 by Alan
Ok, I see, you need to print to a transparency sheet at full 8x10 and then use your contact print setup. I would like to make a 35MM or even a 6x9 size image
RE: [Digital BW] Digital B&W to Traditional B&W
2010-07-05 by Phil Radlick
Dan Burkholder s book is very helpful on this topic. Making Digital Negatives for Contact Printing is the title. Best, Phil WoW, never heard of this, can
[Digital BW] Re: Scanning b&w negs, revisited
2010-07-05 by hflockwood
... The link actually does work - but without the period. Sorry about that. Harry
[Digital BW] Re: Scanning b&w negs, revisited
2010-07-05 by hflockwood
... SNIP ... ANOTHER BIG SNIP. ... Thanks for all that, Ernst; clearly a lot of work has been done on the subject. Harry
Re: [Digital BW] Digital B&W to Traditional B&W
2010-07-05 by Alan
WoW, never heard of this, can you give me more information, source, experience and such? Alan
Re: [Digital BW] Digital B&W to Traditional B&W
2010-07-05 by Alan
Well I do have a copy stand and an 6x9 medium format camera along with the negative carrier I would need for the enlarger, not really what I had in mind
Andre, yes there are still group moderators. Re: Spam Posts Invasion
2010-07-05 by martin_wesley1
Andre, Yes the group still has moderators. We just have not been very active in recent times. The way the group is set up is that all new members automatically
Re: [Digital BW] Digital B&W to Traditional B&W
2010-07-05 by Mark Nelson
Sure, with digital negatives made on your inkjet printer that you then contact print. Works incredibly well ! Mark Nelson www.PrecisionDigitalNegatives.com
Re: Links
2010-07-05 by martin_wesley1
Russ, Links can only be added by the group moderators. The links are primarily devoted to technical resources for digital B&W printing. The artist links are to
Re: Digital B&W to Traditional B&W
2010-07-05 by martin_wesley1
Alan, What you are looking for is a film recorder that transfers digital files/images onto film. Been around for quite awhile. I gave it a try back in the
Re: [Digital BW] Digital B&W to Traditional B&W
2010-07-05 by jvee
David, There are several ways to do this, including using a film recorder to make a negative. I find that printing the digital image at, say, 11 X 14 and
Digital B&W to Traditional B&W
2010-07-05 by Alan
Hello, I know this will sound strange but it is out of artistic curiosity I would like to try this. Is there any method of getting a scanned in B&W negative
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning b&w negs, revisited
2010-07-05 by Ernst Dinkla
... Make it aliased grain. Compare what a scanner with a true higher optical resolution resolves and one with a lower resolution. Both will make aliased
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning b&w negs, revisited
2010-07-05 by Ernst Dinkla
... www.photoscientia.co.uk and then to the subject. There are better sites in my opinion. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst Try:
[Digital BW] Re: Scanning b&w negs, revisited
2010-07-05 by Alan
Just delete the /grain.htm and the article is there Alan
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning b&w negs, revisited
2010-07-05 by Mark Savoia
That link is not working. Mark http://www.stillrivereditions.com ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: Scanning b&w negs, revisited
2010-07-05 by hflockwood
... My workflow, from scanning (Nikon 4000ED) to printing (Cone K7 inks in an R2400), has been radically altered based on two articles I recently discovered.
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning b&w negs, revisited
2010-07-05 by pdesmidt tds.net
The interaction between grain, light source, lens, sensor... is complicated. Certain combinations can lead to surprising results. Thus, it is certainly
Re: Scanning b&w negs, revisited
2010-07-05 by outdoornm
... Harry, You are not reading what Michael has said. He said that a higher resolution scan created a file that showed more grain and was softer. We all know
Re: [Digital BW] Re:Canon i9900 Printer
2010-07-04 by Robert Johnston
Thanks for the info... Ye Ol Codger Bob, & Nadine Over 3000 Photos of our Travels. http://rjohnston.zenfolio.com/ ________________________________ From:
RE: [Digital BW] Scanning b&w negs, revisited
2010-07-04 by E.Neilsen
Keep a log of the workflow and make prints and include the mundane; printer, version of software, etc. Change a setting, make a test print. However, the
Re: Scanning b&w negs, revisited
2010-07-04 by hflockwood
... Scan at max resolution and keep that as a master for future prints. Lower resolution will be fine for small prints, but when you want to go larger, you
Links
2010-07-04 by russ.dupont
How do I go about adding to the Links list my website -- www.russdupontphotos.com?
Re: Help deciding on a BW printer
2010-07-04 by russ.dupont
I ve been using the Epson R2880 for more than a year now and love it. The prints are museum/gallery quality. Russ duPont www.russdupontphotos.com
Re: Scanning b&w negs, revisited
2010-07-04 by andre1moreau
In the words of Dave Etchells, the Publisher of the Imaging Resource: Testing hundreds of digital cameras, we ve found that you can only tell just so much
Re: [Digital BW] Scanning b&w negs, revisited
2010-07-03 by Bruce Watson
... Make prints. It s difficult to impossible to make any meaningful evaluation of sharpness on a monitor. The monitor dot pitch is too dissimilar from
Scanning b&w negs, revisited
2010-07-03 by Michael
I m back to scanning for a 2nd round of learning and could use some additional perspectives. I m scanning old 35mm Plus-X negs. and would like them to be as
Re: Help deciding on a BW printer
2010-07-02 by bobkeefer@ymail.com
Thanks again, Paul. My initial impression was the 9000 was more difficult than I wanted to tangle with, on a number of levels. There are other deals out
Re: Help deciding on a BW printer
2010-07-02 by Paul
... The 9000, like the 7500 I had, can print Eboni/Carbon-6 on coated inkjet paper quite well. However, I was never able to get a very smooth image on
Need Source for Older Mediastreet Generations (G4) Ink
2010-07-02 by K
Hello, I know this is a B&W forum, but many members also print in color, so trying to ask this question to as wide an audience as possible. I have been using
Re: Help deciding on a BW printer
2010-07-02 by horstenj
... I own both the Epson 3800 and the 4800. The 3800 is my general purpose/color printer (as it holds both matte and photo black) and the 4800 is to become a
Re: {Disarmed} [Digital BW] Re: QTR - strange tonal transitions along contrasty edges
2010-07-02 by Richard Smallfield
Hi Duane, thanks very much for that - very interesting. I ve checked a print I made last year and the inks have changed since then and I can see that the
Re: Help deciding on a BW printer
2010-07-02 by bobkeefer@ymail.com
Thanks, Paul. There s an Epson 9000 available nearby for not too much money -- a few hundred $$. Do you think that printer is a reasonable option? Or is it too
Re: Help deciding on a BW printer
2010-07-02 by Paul
... No 17 or 24 printer will be as easy as the C88, if for no other reason than you ll have more ink positions to fill. ... It sounds like you d be a good fit
Re: [Digital BW] Help deciding on a BW printer
2010-07-01 by bobkeefer@ymail.com
Yes, you re right about starting with paper, and I have. I ve been doing some preliminary hand-coloring work on Arches hot-pressed watercolor paper (printed
{Disarmed} [Digital BW] Re: QTR - strange tonal transitions along contrasty edges
2010-07-01 by dlruckus
Hi Richard, I had a similar problem once when a cartridge of UTPKN went bad somehow. I still don t know exactly what happened to it but replacing it solved the
Re: [Digital BW] Help deciding on a BW printer
2010-07-01 by Mark Savoia
Check the papers out there to see what will work for you first. It is a very different animal to hand color (with color pencils or Marshals oils) on non-silver
Help deciding on a BW printer
2010-07-01 by bobkeefer@ymail.com
Hello all: First post here, though I ve been reading the list for a while. I m a long-time darkroom guy making the transition to digital BW. I have an Epson
Re: [Digital BW] Re: More about the Ukranian Spammer
2010-07-01 by John K Stacy
Goodbye From: Bob Frost Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 8:38 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: More about the
Re: [Digital BW] Re: More about the Ukranian Spammer
2010-07-01 by Bob Frost
... Stats from same organisation - http://www.spamhaus.org/statistics/countries.lasso As at 01 July 2010 the world s worst Spam Haven countries for production
Re: More about the Ukranian Spammer
2010-07-01 by andre1moreau
HI Bob, Don t know where you got your starts from, but that Ukrainian spammer and his organization sends out tens of millions spams per day. He s at the top of
Re: [Digital BW] Re: More about the Ukranian Spammer
2010-07-01 by Bob Frost
... It s also a bit unfair to Ukraine, since most spam (according to the stats) comes from the USA. Bob Frost ... From: Richard Sintchak
Re: [Digital BW] Re: More about the Ukranian Spammer
2010-07-01 by Richard Sintchak
True! Let s change the subject line to NO More about the Ukranian Spammer Richard S. Albany, CA (San Francisco bay area) My Photography Website
Re: [Digital BW] Re: More about the Ukranian Spammer
2010-06-30 by John K Stacy
So far, posts ABOUT the spammers are running 10 to one over ACTUAL posts from the spammers....seems like they are having US do their work for them...pretty
Re: More about the Ukranian Spammer
2010-06-30 by andre1moreau
Hello Paul, Welcome back. Hope you had a nice time up there in the mountains. ... I do not have this information and can not tell at this time. All I ve seen