Re: Epson Stylus Photo 1400 help
2009-06-01 by k_ross_44
Hi Paul, I m using the OEM Claria inkset. Would I be better off with a dedicated B&W inkset? Thanks, Kris
Messages
Browse messages
Page 264 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: PercepTool
2009-06-01 by Lynn Lown
... I agree Paul, it is an aesthetic; taste and vision. Perhaps George has distilled his aesthetic to a formula? I checked it out with the demo. It appears to
MIS CFS Install Problem on 1280
2009-05-31 by mbrouphy
To All: I m installing a CFS from MIS on my Epson 1280 but am having a problem. Everything is set up and ready to go; but, when the power is turned on the
Re: Display calibration vs. Print Matching
2009-05-31 by richardeskin
... I agree completely with Lou, and would emphasize that he calibrates to 90 cd/m2 not the recommended 120. I also found the recommended 120 was too bright
QTR RGB ICC profiles don't work in Lightroom?
2009-05-31 by Roger
I ve been doing a search of past posts on the board, so please forgive me if I missed something. What I read seemed to indicate that if you use QTR to create
[Digital BW] Re:PercepTool
2009-05-31 by Debbi
Would be nice to see the before and after. Debbi
Re: [Digital BW] Re:PercepTool
2009-05-31 by Gerald Davey
With my results so far, I ve thought the same thing- even though the site argues that it s not possible to duplicate the result. I have to be convinced far
Re:PercepTool
2009-05-31 by Christer Rosewell
Greetings, I tried it on a Katrina image: http://www.christerart.com/slideshow3/show_1115.jpg and it did exactly what you mentioned - darkened the highlights
Re: [Digital BW] Display calibration vs. Print Matching
2009-05-31 by James Irelan
And off our heads for some of us, and for others some of that aluminum foil used to protect them from space rays sticks out under their hats and can cause
Re: [Digital BW] Re: PercepTool
2009-05-31 by Tina Manley
... The web site says it is still only available for Macs: http://www.georgedewolfe.com/perceptool.html Tina Tina Manley www.tinamanley.com
Re: PercepTool
2009-05-31 by Susan Chapin
PercepTool is available for PC now. They were having a problem getting the script out (script works only in PShop Extended, not PShop Standard, anyway) and it
Re: [Digital BW] Display calibration vs. Print Matching
2009-05-31 by C D Tobie
... They say you can tell a happy motorcyclist by the bugs in his teeth. I would suggest that you can tell a good retoucher by the black shirt, and the trick
Re: [Digital BW] Display calibration vs. Print Matching
2009-05-31 by Mark Savoia
And we have to compensate for reflective backlight off our teeth :)) Mark http://www.stillrivereditions.com ... [Non-text portions of this message have been
Re: [Digital BW] Display calibration vs. Print Matching
2009-05-31 by C D Tobie
... So say all the people who haven t managed a good match. The ones who have just smile... C. David Tobie Global Product Technology Manager Digital Imaging &
Re: [Digital BW] Display calibration vs. Print Matching
2009-05-31 by C D Tobie
... Yes, the Spyder3 and ColorEyes Display is definately a great choice for the Geek who wants lots of features, and doesn t mind waiting for the extra time
Re: Display calibration vs. Print Matching
2009-05-31 by Louis Dina
... Hi Gary. I agree with a previous post that a perfect match is unlikely, since print and digital display are so different. But...you can and should be
Re: [Digital BW] Display calibration vs. Print Matching
2009-05-31 by Alan Scharf
You will never match the projected image in a monitor with the reflected image of a print. They are different animals. -- Alan Scharf_ [Non-text portions of
Re: Display calibration vs. Print Matching
2009-05-31 by mwesley3
Gary, Are you using your printing profiles in your custom soft proof and do you change them for each printer, ink and paper combination? Best, Martin
Display calibration vs. Print Matching
2009-05-31 by photog0946
HELLO GROUP, I ve just been reading a couple of the posts concerning calibration hardware and that spurred me on to start this thread on a subject that has
Re:PercepTool
2009-05-31 by nigelrj53
... I am using the free demo on a Mac Pro. It comes as a plug-in and a script. Both run well but require a lot of processing power. They give a greater
Re: Epson Stylus Photo 1400 help
2009-05-30 by pr_roark
... What inkset are you using? The OEM Claria inkset or a dedicated B&W inkset? Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Re:PercepTool
2009-05-30 by pixelphoto@att.net
Oops, I spoke to soon. It is also for the MAC! Marvin pixelphoto@att.net [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re:PercepTool
2009-05-30 by pixelphoto@att.net
Unfortunately it appears to only be for PC s. But the galleries inspire me. Marvin pixelphoto@att.net [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: PercepTool
2009-05-30 by pr_roark
What this software package seems to do, judging just from it s web page, looks a lot like what good printers have been doing for years. I continue to think
Re: [Digital BW] Re: PercepTool and FocusFixer
2009-05-30 by Gerald Davey
Yes, SLOW is the key word! Another SLOW but definitely worth it program I tried and now bought is FocusFixer. It s a remarkable pre- sharpener program that
[Digital BW] Re: PercepTool
2009-05-30 by Vincent Orlando
I am running it in CS3 using the filter mod not the script, and it takes 6.5 min. to complete. Fro me that is not too long considering the results I have been
Epson Stylus Photo 1400 help
2009-05-30 by k_ross_44
Hi group, I m hoping someone can give me a suggestion or 2 (or perhaps step by step instructions) for printing black & white on an Epson Stylus Photo 1400. The
[Digital BW] Re: PercepTool
2009-05-30 by brouwerkent
I have also found this to be agonizingly slowwwwwwww. What I can see is that it is redistributing tones in a pleasing way. But I am not sold yet. Phil
[Digital BW] Re: PercepTool
2009-05-30 by brouwerkent
I have also found this to be agonizingly slowwwwwwww. What I can see is that it is redistributing tones in a pleasing way. But I am not sold yet. Phil
RE: [Digital BW] Re: PercepTool
2009-05-30 by Debbi
I am also trying it now on CS4 and a Mac 10.5 It is VERY VERY slow. I start it on an image and literally have to walk away for 10 mins while it sets up. I have
RE: [Digital BW] Re: PercepTool
2009-05-30 by Robert W Shearer
I was going to take a look at the software but it is apparently not available for Windows at this point. Probably not a good idea because of the reduced access
Re: [Digital BW] Re: PercepTool
2009-05-30 by Gerald Davey
I m trying it now. I ve only worked with the automatic settings and haven t been able to access the customizable features yet. It can sometimes bring out
Re: PercepTool
2009-05-30 by Vincent Orlando
I am using it now. Unreal, that is all I can say. When I thought a photo was finished I ran the tool and the difference was stunning. Vinny www.wulfsden
PercepTool
2009-05-29 by brouwerkent
Have others looked at this new plugin? http://www.georgedewolfe.com/perceptool.html Phil
Re: 2400 vs 1400 with piezography
2009-05-29 by edrudolpho
Berel, can you tell me what paper(s) you have been printing on?
Re: 2400 vs 1400 with piezography
2009-05-29 by Berel Lutsky
... Berel Lutsky
Re: [Digital BW] MIS UT14-C v. HP-PK
2009-05-28 by pr_roark
Ernst, ... 2% Eboni is lighter than either LK of LLK -- more like an LLLK. I use it as opposed to the other dilutions of Eboni because it s slightly more
Re: [Digital BW] MIS UT14-C v. HP-PK
2009-05-28 by Ernst Dinkla
... Wasn t that discussed before :-) The practical value of the highest Dmax if it relies on the gloss factor. My question about the Eboni 2% was not
SpyderCube Interview URL
2009-05-28 by C D Tobie
The Imaging Insider website has an in-depth interview now available (by Elmo Sapwater, with me) covering the new SpyderCube product, for anyone who is
MIS UT14-C v. HP-PK
2009-05-28 by pr_roark
In the context of comparing the performance of MIS UT14-C (a PKN) with the HP Z3100 neutral PK, I printed identical brochures on Red River UltraPro Gloss 2.0,
Re: 2400 vs 1400 with piezography
2009-05-28 by Jon Cone
Yes. That s the big feature behind Piezography. It just works realy well, and does so at a very high standard. Jon
Re: Custom Targets for Monaco Profiler??
2009-05-28 by meeshieck
thanks for all the advice guys. I am doing some testing now and will get back to you with reports once I have some results. m.
Re: 2400 vs 1400 with piezography
2009-05-28 by edrudolpho
So, you could say it s plug and play?
Re: 2400 vs 1400 with piezography
2009-05-28 by Jon Cone
The user does not have to linearize a Piezography curve to produce very high standard results. It is the complexity (multiple inks in each gradation sep) of
Re: 2400 vs 1400 with piezography
2009-05-28 by edrudolpho
... Jon, a question: you provide QTR profiles for this inkset. Does the individual user then linearize them for their particular printer? If not, do you
Re: Custom Targets for Monaco Profiler??
2009-05-27 by Louis Dina
... Michal, I viewed Monaco and ProfileMaker profiles for a luster paper in ColorThink (built from the exact same measurement file). Paper white measures a
Re: 2400 vs 1400 with piezography
2009-05-27 by Jon Cone
please email dana (at) inkjetmall (dot) com she can send you a small sample print Jon
[Digital BW] Re: "1400 NC2" inkset approach
2009-05-27 by pr_roark
... I have them in the LM and LC spots. See http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/1400-NC3.pdf Having them in these light positions allows the Epson driver to work
7600 eboni: one segment won't clear
2009-05-27 by John Wilton
I m having a problem getting one spot (one 2mm piece of one line of the nozzle check) on one channel (carrying MIS Eboni black) to print. Problem has persisted
Re: [Digital BW] Re: "1400 NC2" inkset approach
2009-05-27 by Ernst Dinkla
... Paul, The Eboni 2%, what spot would it take in a quad setup ? I m interested in a similar A4 B&W printer, in the EU it will be the R285 with 1.5 pl but