Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 508 of 564 · 28179 messages matched
2002-11-17 by bakis Sirros
hi coleman, i don't exactly understand your question,but:if you just want to run a two vco patch from one cv cable,just split the cv signal with the a180(but you will rather need an a185 bus access module for cv buffering/better tuning!).if you want to run a two vco patch with sy
2002-11-17 by bakis Sirros
hi list, check out the updated a107 link!!it containes the pic of the a107!!and some additional features,too! bakis. ===== synthfreak(parallel worlds) athens-greece [Doepfer_a100] group owner-moderator __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web H
2002-11-16 by :::M 3 D I U M:::
I have a system with the following modules: A110 A1102 118 114 115 116 117 130 119 136 145 160 161 180 138 (x2) 171 140 (x2) I have a a Clarity midi-CV Unit, I usually run one channel of midi to the midi-CV Unit, with a output of pair of gate/cv. Since I have 2 osc. I like to fat
2002-11-15 by bakis Sirros
hi ringmod, in fact,i think i know why it was implemented:the moded,newer a155's can work with imperfect pulse clock signals now.they can now use even triangle or saw waves as clock signals and work totaly normal(not in the random way that the older a155's work).also,if you use t
2002-11-15 by ringmod45
hi Bakis, could you ask Mr.Doepfer for more details as to why the mod was implemented? thanks. regards, RM i'm telling you this because newer > a155's CANNOT run in audio frequencies(because of a > mod from doepfer,in their control boards).
2002-11-15 by bakis Sirros
hi joe, i'm thinking about the same questions!i,too ,would want the integrated vc clock to run on audio frequencies!also,even if the vc clock doesn't reach the audio spectrum,i WOULD WANT the control section of the a154(and of the a155)to be able to run on audio freqs and ,theref
2002-11-15 by Joe Buechler
> Without a clock, you cannot have > a sequence. Ethan (my friend from the Oberheim Matrix group), what you say is true. However, I already have several clocks: some A110s, an A111, some A145s, an A147 (right next to the A155 to use as a clock source), an A190 and an A191. Why sh
2002-11-13 by unknown freak
As long as it's a VC clock with versatile range. Otherwise, you're really better off with a VCO or VCLFO. > -----Original Message----- > From: bakis Sirros [mailto:synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 5:58 PM > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > Subjec
2002-11-13 by bakis Sirros
i agree. bakis. --- ethanzer0 wrote: > > Given that philosophy, I think the > > clock generator function should be > > removed from the A154. I don't quite > > see how its different than adding > > an envelope function to this module. > > At the risk of being drawn into a > lengt
2002-11-13 by phaedra@t-online.de
The one and only skipper is CV: 1 2 x 4 5 x 7 8, that means 6 steps => 1 2 4 5 7 8 This is an old feature of the ARP and Moog Sequencers or by the newer Analogue Systems RS 200 all the best Axel Am 13.11.02 09:28:45, schrieb Florian Anwander : >Hi Eric > >> in one of my earlier p
2002-11-13 by ethanzer0
> Given that philosophy, I think the > clock generator function should be > removed from the A154. I don't quite > see how its different than adding > an envelope function to this module. At the risk of being drawn into a lengthy argument, I would like to my point of view on this
2002-11-13 by Joe Buechler
--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., David Salter wrote: > Kevin & list, > > I tend to agree. Other users on the list have stated that a more > modular approach to future modules would be a better approach. > > These could then be put together to perform the most obvious > functions that ha
2002-11-13 by Joe Buechler
--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "code_pig" wrote: > What about the A191's MIDI clock sync'ed LFO? My A191 doesn't have a CV input jack. Where on the A191 shall I patch the Pre Out jack of the A155 to, in order to control step length? The same applies to the MCV24 and A190. > > > --- In
2002-11-13 by David Salter
Very useful indeed David Salter Reuters Consulting Tel: +44 20 7542 2402 Mob: +44 7990562402 Fax: +44 20 7542 2699 -----Original Message----- From: bakis Sirros [mailto:synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com] Sent: 12 November 2002 22:53 To: Doepfer_a100 group Subject: [Doepfer_a100] manual
2002-11-13 by Florian Anwander
Hi Eric > this feature it gives the real 'TD-Franke' sequence feel.... This is maybe my problem: I hate TD... ;-) I prefer 8step Sequences but would like to have sequences with notes over two steps or two steps with two different notes played legato (without new attackphase of th
2002-11-13 by Quantum Productions
florian, thanks for the question what I would like the most is to just skip a step, if it is 'off' then immediately the next step is taken, so the number of actual steps will be reduced I don't think this option can be made with a reset, because the reset will always give a resta
2002-11-13 by bakis Sirros
hi ringmod, "Yes, Yes, and Yes again." that,i guess,means........YES? ;-) bakis. --- ringmod45 wrote: > > Yes, Yes, and Yes again. > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., bakis Sirros > wrote: > > hi list, > > another possible feature,that dieter told me that > it > > could be included,i
2002-11-13 by Florian Anwander
Hi Eric > in one of my earlier postings I asked for the step skipping (on/off) > feature, I still think it > is one of the most important extra features (well in my case it is...) What do you mean with step skipping exactly: 1.) The address counter should skip one step, reducing
2002-11-12 by ringmod45
Yes, Yes, and Yes again. --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., bakis Sirros wrote: > hi list, > another possible feature,that dieter told me that it > could be included,is manual and voltage controlled > selection of the first and the last step in the > sequence. > this would be very useful,
2002-11-12 by ringmod45
hi Bakis, thanks for the clarification. regards, RM --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., bakis Sirros wrote: > hi ringmod, > the skip feature IS included in the a154.it is > included in the vc step adressing mode,where if the > input voltage exceeds a certain level,a very short > pulse is p
2002-11-12 by bakis Sirros
hi list, another possible feature,that dieter told me that it could be included,is manual and voltage controlled selection of the first and the last step in the sequence. this would be very useful,right?? bakis. ===== synthfreak(parallel worlds) athens-greece [Doepfer_a100] group
2002-11-12 by bakis Sirros
hi list, there are updated pages for the a154 and the a107.in the a154 page,the SKIP feature is explained in detail.check it out. bakis. ===== synthfreak(parallel worlds) athens-greece [Doepfer_a100] group owner-moderator __________________________________________________ Do you
2002-11-12 by bakis Sirros
well,this could be added.i don't thing that it will be difficult to be included in the a154.am i right,dieter??? bakis. --- ringmod45 wrote: > i think someone implied that you would be able to > that. i think they > misinterpreted some of the facts. > > if you had skip in functio
2002-11-12 by bakis Sirros
hi ringmod, the skip feature IS included in the a154.it is included in the vc step adressing mode,where if the input voltage exceeds a certain level,a very short pulse is produced from the a154,and that means skiping steps. bakis. --- ringmod45 wrote: > > hi Ethan, i also suscrib
2002-11-12 by Quantum Productions
in one of my earlier postings I asked for the step skipping (on/off) feature, I still think it is one of the most important extra features (well in my case it is...) eric > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "unknown freak" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 6:23 PM > Sub
2002-11-12 by unknown freak
Well, be it said, step-skipping is a vanilla function compared with some of the more advanced (and wonderful) things, and one that by one means or another it would be important to incorporate into an upgrade of the A-155 of this scale. > -----Original Message----- > From: ringmod
2002-11-12 by unknown freak
I thought someone had said in this discussion that step-skipping would be available for clock signals exceeding a certain threshold. > -----Original Message----- > From: ringmod45 [mailto:ringmod45@yahoo.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:42 AM > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogro
2002-11-12 by ringmod45
i think someone implied that you would be able to that. i think they misinterpreted some of the facts. if you had skip in function, the A154 would interpret the trigger at the skip in input and send the skip message to the counter to the selected stage of the A155 and perform the
2002-11-12 by ringmod45
hi Ethan, i also suscribe to the synth.com group, and in one of the last posts, someone asked if you could skip notes a la Moog 960. the answer is obviously No. but, someone did mention that you could have a skip input jack like the one on the Analogue Systems RS 200. check the u
2002-11-12 by ringmod45
hi Ethan, i tend to agree with you, i like the fact that A154 will be feature rich. i, too, would rather see a more modular approach to the sequencer concept. but, with the current modules available in the Doepfer format, it would be unneccessary to make the A154 less feature int
2002-11-12 by bakis Sirros
--- bakis sirros wrote: > From: "bakis sirros" > To: > Subject: Fw: [Doepfer_a100] Re: forward:more info > from dieter doepfer on many things!!! > Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 16:31:07 +0200 > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dieter Doepfer" > To: "Bakis Sirros" > Sent: Tuesda
2002-11-12 by bakis Sirros
--- bakis sirros wrote: > From: "bakis sirros" > To: > Subject: Fw: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A163 as a clock > divider > Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 16:30:39 +0200 > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dieter Doepfer" > To: "Bakis Sirros" > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:35 PM > S
2002-11-12 by Florian Anwander
Hi Tim > > I tend to agree. Other users on the list have stated that a more > > modular approach to future modules would be a better approach. > Me too, since I'm one of those favouring a more modular approach! Though I was the one who initiated the idea of a modular sequencer, w
2002-11-12 by David Salter
Hi Tim, I think that link sums it up nicely. a lot of the components are already available in the A100 range, I.e. the 8 note sequencers(A155) Sequencer range switch(A155) Pattern generator (A155) Quantizers (A156) Quantizer Scale Switches (A156) Binery Divider (A115) Divide by N
2002-11-12 by Paul Schulz
>It appears doepfer users are not the only modular users excited about the A-154. >Check out the stiring over at the synthesizers.com group: Yes, Mr. Arrick is a member of our group, too... ________________________________________________________________ Viren? Wir wissen nicht w
2002-11-12 by ethanzer0
I, for one, am very excited about the current proposed A-154. I like a good mix of features without too many in one module. IMHO, the A-154 as it is currently proposed is as feature rich as I would like for any one module. It appears doepfer users are not the only modular users e
2002-11-12 by Tim Stinchcombe
Hi David, > I tend to agree. Other users on the list have stated that a more modular > approach to future modules would be a better approach. Me too, since I'm one of those favouring a more modular approach! This link appeared in the Synth-DIY list a few days back: http://www.tec
2002-11-12 by David Salter
Kevin & list, I tend to agree. Other users on the list have stated that a more modular approach to future modules would be a better approach. These could then be put together to perform the most obvious functions that have been discussed recently re: the A154 but it would also al
2002-11-12 by Florian Anwander
Hi > I will be taking my 220 volt A-100 to the USA soon, does anybody have > recommendations for power transformers? Ideally light and compact, but > reliable. Do you want to staxy for a longer time or for a short trip? If you go for longer time, I would change the transformer an
2002-11-12 by Tim Stinchcombe
Hi Joe, I can see better now what's going on with the 163. The capacitor 'getting in the way' of step changes to the CV is part of a low-pass filter: thus lowering its value shouldn't cause any stability problems in itself. However, presumably there is a reason for the filtering,
2002-11-12 by code_pig
What about the A191's MIDI clock sync'ed LFO? --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "ringmod45" wrote: > hi Joe, i think you just solved the problem, hypothethically speaking. > the A190 does have a software LFO in it. now, the only snag is that > it is only free running. > > a couple of que
2002-11-12 by code_pig
Question: Will the A154 also include a Phlogiston Inducer? I'd REALLY like to know whether to wait for Doepfer to supply such a feature on the A154 (which, for the way I work, is essential to my creativity), or just go out and purchase another "off the shelf" CIGARETTE LIGHTER. C
2002-11-12 by ringmod45
--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., bakis Sirros wrote: > email discussion between bakis(me...) and dieter > doepfer: > > > hi dieter, OF THE TOUCH KEYBOARD SEQUENCER????? > > due to the many different, partially > contradictory/conflicting suggestions (not > only from your group) we have
2002-11-12 by ringmod45
hi Joe, i think you just solved the problem, hypothethically speaking. the A190 does have a software LFO in it. now, the only snag is that it is only free running. a couple of questions to Mr.Doepfer. would it be possible to have the software LFO sync to midi clock? would the sof
2002-11-12 by ringmod45
> I don't think that an envelope generator should be > integrated into the A-154. Hi Mr.Doepfer, since the A154 on its own will generate a variable pulse width from the clock. you could use the pulse duty cycle to determine the length of the envelope. you would only have to add a
2002-11-11 by bakis Sirros
see the a154 link! bakis. ===== synthfreak(parallel worlds) athens-greece [Doepfer_a100] group owner-moderator __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos http://launch.yahoo.com/u2
2002-11-11 by bakis Sirros
email discussion between bakis(me...) and dieter doepfer: > hi dieter, > so,that means that if i accidentally connect two cv outputs,will i destroy > the modules????(i have done this mistake, some times...) no, please refer to my last message: " ..... As there are short circuit p
2002-11-11 by bakis Sirros
sorry dieter, but for obvious reasons attachments are not allowed in the group.so,if you want, you can send me the file and i'll upload it in the files section of the doepfer_a100 group. bakis. --- Dieter Doepfer wrote: > Sorry - I forgot the attachment in the first > message. >
2002-11-11 by Joe Buechler
Hi Timothy > I had an idea that nearly worked with respect to this: > The idea was to hold the 163 at 'divide by 1' whilst in a 'reset' > state, then let it jump back to the required 'divide by n' when the > reset is removed (and which by assumption also re-starts the main > cloc
2002-11-11 by Tim Stinchcombe
Hi Joe, I had an idea that nearly worked with respect to this: > thinking. The A163 doesn't have a reset input like the A160 clock > divider does. Won't it end up in an indeterminate state when you reset > the master clock? That would mean the clock pulses from the A163 could > b