Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 517 of 564 · 28179 messages matched
2002-08-21 by mdimmm@hotmail.com
> Hi M. > >> I've been trying to use my A-114 to double the frequency of a >> waveform (as >> suggested by some articles about modular synthesis), but >> couldn't get it to >> work. >> (After all, a ring modulator gives the sum and the difference >> of its inputs, >> so having th
2002-08-21 by David Barelli
Florian, that is sick and twisted.... i like it but it is still sick. --- Florian Anwander wrote: > Hi duffnuff > > > screech. i assume the filter went into > self-oscillation at an > > inaudible freq when i plugged in the a140. > Yes this may happen. The A121 has a capacitor whi
2002-08-21 by duffnuff
> Yes there are: Have a look at these adapters: > http://www.fiftythree.org/etherkiller/ florian, nice adaptors! speaking of....just loaded an .aif (282k) to file section. -duff
2002-08-21 by studio1dk
either way, anybody know more about possibly > harmful patches? > i'm generally a plug-anything-to-anything experimentor but this > has me wondering if it's possible to abuse a circuit to death. > -duff I once asked Dieter about it and he replied that all modules has a short-circ
2002-08-21 by Florian Anwander
Hi duffnuff > screech. i assume the filter went into self-oscillation at an > inaudible freq when i plugged in the a140. Yes this may happen. The A121 has a capacitor which prevents this selfresonace at inaudible high frequencies. But on the other hand this capacitor causes the H
2002-08-21 by Florian Anwander
Hi Phil > http://home.attbi.com/~ph/combed.mp3 my mp3 player gives a lot of errors on this file. $/opt/mpg123/bin/mpg123 combed.mp3 High Performance MPEG 1.0/2.0/2.5 Audio Player for Layer 1, 2 and 3. Version 0.59r (1999/Jun/15). Written and copyrights by Michael Hipp. Uses code
2002-08-20 by unknown freak
That's interesting. I have a "factory"-assembled Blacet Final Filtre that occasionally gets effed up and quiet and behaves oddly, but returns to normal functioning after being turned off for awhile. Not sure what causes that behavior either. In that case, though, I suspect some k
2002-08-20 by duffnuff
speaking of res loops (rs120).. i was playing around w the res loop on an AS rs110 last night when suddenly a patch i made caused the audio to go away and not come back by undoing the patch. i patched an a140 output to the resonance loop's input (nothing connected to res loop's o
2002-08-20 by Stinchcombe Timothy
Hi M. > I've been trying to use my A-114 to double the frequency of a > waveform (as > suggested by some articles about modular synthesis), but > couldn't get it to > work. > (After all, a ring modulator gives the sum and the difference > of its inputs, > so having the same signa
2002-08-20 by andrewdalio
I tried all my ring modulators last night (both halves of the A114 ring mod and my Analogue solutions VCO-RM module). As with the other tests, I just fed a sine wave from the A110 into a mult and fed both the x and y inputs of the ring mods with that. As it turns out, ALL the rin
2002-08-20 by flamey101
I wonder how it sounds like with the feedback almost fully open and a short noise burst into the audio in (using the gate or something as a envelope). If you could make an MP3 from that, I really wonder how that sounds like... --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "p. hendricks" wrote: > ok,
2002-08-20 by flamey101
Well I still have the feeling the RS-120 would be a better module if it had a open feedback loop, like their multimode filter, then you could do some very simple string-physical modeling with it. I wonder if AS would modify it if I would ask them. Greets, Zameer --- In Doepfer_a1
2002-08-20 by p. hendricks
ok, i know Peter G. has knocked this module quite a bit, and it does have quite a dominating sound, but i still think it's pretty useful and unique. This is a simple mp3 I did with it when I first got it-- it's just a very simple sequence with tweaking (CV and knob) of the Analog
2002-08-19 by bakis Sirros
--- Dieter Doepfer wrote: > From: "Dieter Doepfer" > To: "bakis Sirros" > Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: new doepfer > module!(A109 VC SIGNAL PROCESSOR) > Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:55:42 +0200 > > > -----Urspr'ngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: bakis Sirros > [mailto:synth_freak_20
2002-08-18 by mdimmm
--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "buechlerjoe" wrote: > The A165 Trigger Modifier seems to be working okay as a frequency > doubler in the audio range, but I don't have a scope and can't see > how well it's holding up in the upper frequencies. > > Another possibility would be to try AM
2002-08-18 by buechlerjoe
The funny thing is, I just tried my A114 Ring Modulator for doubling frequency, and it's working just fine. I have the sine wave output from an A110 split with an A118 multiple and patched to both of the A114's inputs. I wonder what's the deal with yours? Joe ---- In Doepfer_a100
2002-08-18 by jmaddocks1975
Not sure if I understand but are you trying to have 2 waveforms from 1 VCO but one an octave higher? If so just use a a-115 (audio divider), or a a-163 (frequency divider). JOhn M --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "mdimmm@h..." wrote: > I've been trying to use my A-114 to double the freq
2002-08-18 by unknown freak
Given that there would be no audible overtones in frequencies above about 10 kHz -- i.e. probably no real difference between the sound of a sine and a sawtooth -- why not assign this job to a self-oscillating filter? "mdimmm@hotmail.com" wrote: > > I've been trying to use my A-11
2002-08-18 by buechlerjoe
The A165 Trigger Modifier seems to be working okay as a frequency doubler in the audio range, but I don't have a scope and can't see how well it's holding up in the upper frequencies. Another possibility would be to try AM using a VCA instead of the Ring Mod. This gives you both
2002-08-18 by Paul Schulz
Hey Mdimm, After reading this, I had to try it too, and experienced the same problem. No difference between the A-110 VCO or the A-111 hi-end-VCO. I tried the A-114 ringmod as well as my Lindhof-ringmod and nothing was audible, not even visible on a oscilloscope. Might be the eff
2002-08-18 by mdimmm
--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., unknown freak wrote: > Given that there would be no audible overtones in frequencies above > about 10 kHz -- i.e. probably no real difference between the sound of a > sine and a sawtooth -- why not assign this job to a self- oscillating > filter? True. I
2002-08-18 by mdimmm@hotmail.com
I've been trying to use my A-114 to double the frequency of a waveform (as suggested by some articles about modular synthesis), but couldn't get it to work. (After all, a ring modulator gives the sum and the difference of its inputs, so having the same signal at both inputs would
2002-08-18 by andrewdalio
If you're using the DIN sync on the 808, it won't really work with MIDI sync. As it turns out, DIN sync cables - although they appear to be MIDI cables - actually use the other 2 pins of the cable. Unfortunately, I found this out the hard way. When I was syncing my Technosaurus s
2002-08-17 by Paul Mennes
I'm having some difficulties in getting my Roland TR808 synced via the A190 Midi-CD/Sync interface. What I want to do is use the A190 to transmit a clock signal (using the Clock midi clock signal) that will allow me to run the TR808 in sync with Cubase VST. Up until now I just co
2002-08-17 by jmaddocks1975
Hi all, With all the talk about VC delay recently I thought some of you might be interested in this. http://www.midwest-analog.com/diy-del.html Its a DIY Delay unit project with CV input. >JOhn M
2002-08-17 by jmaddocks1975
Yeah, I do the same with my digitech studio quad, 4 outs to the VC mixer. have 4 different delays or reverbs fading around using an LFO, makes a very evolving and interesting sound. Or you can have certain notes using a different effect to the others. You ideas using this method
2002-08-16 by Scott Collins
>Scott, your discussion was too cool, it just cost me money. I grabbed >one of the Repeaters on ebay :-) Cool.. The one thing that I found is that if you use the Repeater's function to sync to a pulse you can't do sampling in realtime without getting that pulse in the audio. I go
2002-08-16 by unknown freak
Seems like it should be possible to get the morphing controller and VC mixer to do this for you by sending specific voltages to the morphing controller at the peak of each of its four interpolating zones. With 4 correctly chosen MIDI notes you'd be able to completely automate 4-w
2002-08-16 by Scott Collins
I still want a a CV selectable switch to run the repeater through. My roommate is currently developing a mod to the A155 sequencer to have it' s stages CV selectable. Scott _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share an
2002-08-16 by unknown freak
What great ideas! Food for thought. Gotta try the morphing and sequential switching ideas. It's quite terrific how the Repeater automatically throws off a MIDI clock sync'd to the loop. Ideally suited to zapping into your A-190 to clock sequencer, LFOs, EGs, whatever. > -----Orig
2002-08-16 by Scott Collins
I have a Repeater as well. There are two things that I have found to be very cool with the Electrix and the A100. It has 4 outputs so connecting 4 different loops to a VCMixer and Morphing Controller or a Quad Sequential Switch creates some great effects. It is also possibly, tho
2002-08-16 by buechlerjoe
Scott, your discussion was too cool, it just cost me money. I grabbed one of the Repeaters on ebay :-) Joe --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "Scott Collins" wrote: > > I still want a a CV selectable switch to run the repeater through. My > roommate is currently developing a mod to the A1
2002-08-16 by unknown freak
I have a Repeater and like it a lot -- I'd bet you could find one on eBay, though -- in fact there are two for sale there currently. Not for blowout prices, unfortunately. However it's no more than tangentially related to a delay. > -----Original Message----- > From: buechlerjoe
2002-08-16 by mdimmm@hotmail.com
>> (speed, direction, length, feedback? >> (I'm making these things up as I go along)) that would >> make the module unique from other delay modules currently on the market? > I am sorry, but a delay has only one parameter, that is unique to the > delay: > > The delay time. Nothi
2002-08-16 by buechlerjoe
Yeah, I think the Repeater was more of a looper/recorder, the Echoples does both delay and looping but doesn't have a good way to trigger the loops IIRC, and the Line 6 Delay also does both delay and looping but the looping isn't as nice as the repeater --- In Doepfer_a100@y...,
2002-08-16 by buechlerjoe
Those parameters would also make sense in the context of a digital delay/looper such as the Oberheim/Gibson Echoplex or the Electrix Repeater - now defunct, unfortunately :( I really wanted one of those Electrix thingys to use with my A100! Joe --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "mdimmm@h
2002-08-16 by Stinchcombe Timothy
Hi Florian, In your first post I thought you were suggesting that a PLL could give similar affects to a BBD, but from your second one I don't think you are saying that now (nice lucid description of a PLL by the way!). I also don't see that 'highspeed VCO' necessarily equates to
2002-08-16 by petergrenader
For those who's grain is gone against with the idea of a digitally based delay: Keep an open mind! I mean this with the greatest respect - please don't read any email anger here, there is none. My whole point being however for some things, a digital heart is far superior for both
2002-08-15 by Florian Anwander
Hi Timothy (again!) > Again, what other technologies are you thinking of here? A digital delay > probably goes against the grain with some people, Ok, I think those people will gift me their sequencers, their S&H, their Envelopes, oh, everything that is related to gates or trigge
2002-08-15 by Florian Anwander
Hi Timothy > > So we are there where I always end up: I want a PLL-Module ;-) > I think I missed out on some understanding here - what do you want to do > with a PLL, and what features would it need (I'm intrigued!) A delay (whether BBD or real digital) is controlled by a clock,
2002-08-15 by buechlerjoe
Exactly! Get yourself a digital MultiFX (e.g. Quadraverb) and an A192. Poof! - voltage-controlled delay, plus a bunch of other neat stuff as well :-0 Joe --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., Florian Anwander wrote: > Hi Timothy (again!) > > > Again, what other technologies are you thinking
2002-08-15 by David Salter
There was a lot of talk a while ago on synth-diy about using old CCD's from scanners that seemed interesting. For those interested a intro to CCD's can be found at http://membres.lycos.fr/srondeau/ccd.htm Regards David Salter Reuters Consulting Tel: +44 20 7542 2402 Mob: +44 7990
2002-08-15 by Stinchcombe Timothy
Hi Florian (again!) > > I bet you ONLY reason Doepfer has not produced an analog VC > > delay is the main part needed to do so, the bucket brigade chip, > > is now obsolete and in very short supply worldwide. > This is basically true. But a BBD delay would not be the only > avail
2002-08-15 by Stinchcombe Timothy
Hi Florian, > The rest could be done with HighspeedVCO (or a better a VCO > plus a Phased > Locked Loop Module) and Mixers. > > So we are there where I always end up: I want a PLL-Module ;-) I think I missed out on some understanding here - what do you want to do with a PLL, and
2002-08-15 by Florian Anwander
Hi Peter > I bet you ONLY reason Doepfer has not produced an analog VC > delay is the main part needed to do so, the bucket brigade chip, > is now obsolete and in very short supply worldwide. This is basically true. But a BBD delay would not be the only available technology. Flor
2002-08-15 by Florian Anwander
Hi MD (Real names appreciated...) > (speed, direction, length, feedback? > (I'm making these things up as I go along)) that would > make the module unique from other delay modules currently on the market? I am sorry, but a delay has only one parameter, that is unique to the delay
2002-08-15 by petergrenader
Doepfer has a whole slew of modules available that other manufacturers produce - and just as much as every other maker has! They are in the synth business afterall and because of this I would not find it wise for them to omit products from their offering because other people are
2002-08-14 by mdimmm@hotmail.com
Maybe they (or us) could come up with some VC parameters (speed, direction, length, feedback? (I'm making these things up as I go along)) that would make the module unique from other delay modules currently on the market? Besides, although some modules from other manufacturers mi
2002-08-14 by mdimmm@hotmail.com
Maybe they (or us) could come up with some VC parameters (speed, direction, length, feedback? (I'm making these things up as I go along)) that would make the module unique from other delay modules currently on the market? Besides, although some modules from other manufacturers mi
2002-08-14 by Andreas Lindholm
Since I did discuss a DCO i quite some detail with Dieter D and got the impression that he was all against it I still feel that it was worth the time. I don't know how much it takes to convice him(if it is even possible to do so) into making stuff we wish, but it can't really hur