Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 547 of 564 · 28179 messages matched
2002-02-14 by stinchcombe_t
Hi Florian, Thanks for that: > I don't have the schemoe of the CEM-Filter-Modules here, but at > http://www.synthtech.com/cem/cemdata.html you might find the Datasheet of > the CEM 3320. There you see four caps with 300pF called Cp; decreasing > their value will affect the tuning
2002-02-14 by Florian Anwander
Hi Tim > have different frequencies! Resistor R52/capacitor C9 used in this > process don't affect the signals frequency. They don't affect the frequency, but the waveform converter might get too slow to follow the feeded triangle wave. > I haven't spent much time looking at the
2002-02-14 by andrewdalio
Man, I really wish Marvin Jones and John Simonton would publish this again! I know Paia is still in business, so... Oh, well, at least we have the internet! Anyway, The flanger article Dr. Doepfer refers to (I think) is from the April/May 1978 issue - To Phase or to Flange, by Ga
2002-02-14 by stinchcombe_t
Hi everyone, I can offer some comments on the above: 1. The sine wave from the A-110 is generated from the triangle wave (through a voltage divider, then taken across a diode, and the exponential type curve produced is then scaled up, which is why the sine wave is not very sine-l
2002-02-14 by david.salter@reuters.com
Hi all, I tend to think that it is just as easy to patch an effects box into modular (not just at the end) and spending time and development cost on this would be a distraction from more unique or at least different modules. Looking at the polls there are some really interesting
2002-02-14 by Florian Anwander
Hi Dave > state-variable type vcfs. i liked using them in parallel as a phaser ( > comb filter ). i felt it had a different, "stronger" ( for lack of a > better word ) sound than the same synths v.c. phaser module. This we should not forget: Take a VCF, mix the filtered signal wi
2002-02-14 by Florian Anwander
Hi Bakis > so...what do you think?? > my opinion is that a FLANGER TYPE COMB FILTER would be > nice to have(of course,not in a very high > price...),ideas??? I don't have a A-112, but I thought, you can do cv controlled delay effects with this. btw: A voltage controlled delay is
2002-02-14 by Florian Anwander
Hi > sorry for asking a rather stupid question...but what equipment do you > need in order to measure the frequency of an osc.?? Three porssibilities: - use a frequency counter (the coolest looking are with with nixie tubes ;) ) - use an oszilloscope: you can calculate the freque
2002-02-14 by Florian Anwander
Hi Dave > ( [...]nixie tubes for the display ! ) oh Goooood... let me rub my knees sliding to you. Nixie tubes !!!! ;-) Florian -- Florian Anwander |ConSol* HP-Support Tel. +49.89.45841-133 |Consulting&Solutions Software GmbH Fax +49.89.45841-139 |Franziskanerstr. 38, D-81669 Mün
2002-02-14 by duffnuff
> conventional comb filter effects beyond any companies v.c. phaser module > requires going to something using analog delay chips. analogue systems makes > such a module ( i have one and it works well for short delay times ) and > blacet ( i`ve never used theirs but it is reputed
2002-02-14 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 2/13/2002 4:28:39 PM Eastern Standard Time, synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com writes: > I think > it is the better solution to use the filters of your > system. to all, for what it is worth, i have had good luck in the past using this sort of technique. on a previous
2002-02-14 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 2/13/2002 4:09:31 PM Eastern Standard Time, synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com writes: > ...but what equipment do you > need in order to measure the frequency of an osc.?? > bakis, a frequency counter best, dave ( mine is 70's vintage surplus that uses nixie tubes for
2002-02-14 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 2/13/2002 8:09:05 AM Eastern Standard Time, synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com writes: > ...so...anyone??florian?? > bakis, i don`t have the capability to scan anything but i have the all the issues of "polyphony" that were published. they did print articles on both ph
2002-02-13 by bakis Sirros
hi list, what's your opinion on these???: synthfreak: "thanks for the info about the comb. filter,but you still didn't answer my question...should i make a poll about it??i think it would make sense to have a single module combining several notch filters to make a comb.filter,don
2002-02-13 by synth_freak_2000
hi josef, sorry for asking a rather stupid question...but what equipment do you need in order to measure the frequency of an osc.?? synthfreak -- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "modularplanet" wrote: > Hi MD, > > > It seems that the highest frequency of the A-110 lies around > > 1200 Hert
2002-02-13 by synth_freak_2000
thanks florian!! synthfreak --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., Florian Anwander wrote: > Hi Bakis > > > dieter doepfer: "[...]Maybe someone > > of the newsgroup knows detailes too (Florian ?).[...] > > The "comb filter" thing I already mentioned in the mail from 4th of > February. I wrote
2002-02-13 by Florian Anwander
Hi Josef > source. The measurement shows 21000 Hz at A-110-Triangle (only 10500 > Hz at Sine, but I don`t know the cause!). A look at the schematic http://www.doepfer.de/a110_tec.htm shows a lowpass functionality by R52 and C9; I am to lazy to get the frequency, that is determine
2002-02-13 by Florian Anwander
Hi Bakis > dieter doepfer: "[...]Maybe someone > of the newsgroup knows detailes too (Florian ?).[...] The "comb filter" thing I already mentioned in the mail from 4th of February. I wrote "[...]by an allpass filter (which is used also for phaser) or by a delay. Both do similar b
2002-02-13 by modularplanet
Hi MD, > It seems that the highest frequency of the A-110 lies around > 1200 Hertz supply the A-110 (CV 1) with a high voltage. The Tambourine-Patch on the Modular-Planet.de requires a high voltage source. The measurement shows 21000 Hz at A-110-Triangle (only 10500 Hz at Sine, b
2002-02-13 by Florian Anwander
Hi MD (or what your name ever may be...) > It seems that the highest frequency of the A-110 lies around > 1200 Hertz, No, that is surely not the upper limit. As far as I remember the multimode filter has a capacitor which damps the self-oscillation in higher regions, because the
2002-02-13 by bakis Sirros
hello MD, welcome to the list!!sorry but,i can't help you in your questions...i hope other members may be able to help...by the way,as you seem to have the a199 spring reverb,can you tell me some things about the sound of this reverb unit??i am thinking about buing one in the nea
2002-02-13 by synth_freak_2000
HI LIST, some info on the subject from dieter: bakis: "do you think that it would make sense to make a new poll about a comb. filter module??or it is similar to the phase shifter module??" dieter doepfer: "There exists not only one "comb filter" module type. A comb filter may be
2002-02-13 by mdimmm
Hello It seems that the highest frequency of the A-110 lies around 1200 Hertz, while the A-121 set to self-oscillation can produce frequencies up to 14000 Hertz. Is this correct? Is it possible to produce sine waves of approximately 18000 Hertz with the A-100? I've tried patching
2002-02-12 by thepeak
Hello all, The SCHALTWERK is perfectly capable of performing the individual division of track-based timing and with the addition of delayed gate signals. It is to my knowledge (and I would appreciate any feedback regarding this issue) not possible to write multiple patterns witho
2002-02-12 by duffnuff
thanks florian and synthfreak for your thoughts on lining up these odd stepped rhythms. a PLL makes sense, i'm not sure it would help me directly with this polyrhythm issue but now that i have a better understanding of PLL i can see that it would be very useful in similar applica
2002-02-12 by bakis Sirros
--- duffnuff wrote: > also, now that i think about it, i guess what i'm > really wishing for > is a clock divider that can deal with divisions > beyond the straight > 2, 4, 8, 16, etc. > > if regelwerk or schaltwerk can do this, i want one! hi duff, i think that this division can
2002-02-12 by david.salter@reuters.com
Florian, I do like the AS sequencers, simple and cheap. I have the CV/Gate one next to my two A155's and they all have their uses. David Florian Anwander cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Triggersequencer Florian.Anwander@c Header: Internal Use Only onsol.de 12/02/2002 09:
2002-02-12 by Florian Anwander
Hi David > Unless it must be a Doepfer module, have a look at the trigger sequencer > from Analogue Solutions, even more simple than Florian ver 1. > http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~concuss/concussor/gt8.htm The AS Sequencer has a nice feature: the switches have three positions
2002-02-12 by david.salter@reuters.com
Hi all, Unless it must be a Doepfer module, have a look at the trigger sequencer from Analogue Solutions, even more simple than Florian ver 1. http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~concuss/concussor/gt8.htm Cost is about 80 GBP Regards David Florian Anwander consol.de> cc: Sent by: S
2002-02-12 by Florian Anwander
Hi, a guy in Berlin is selling his Schaltwerk for 780 EUR (I am not related to the seller, I think the price is ok). http://cgi.ebay.de/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1511957696 Florian
2002-02-12 by Florian Anwander
Hi duffnuff > say, for a trig seq w 2 or more rows.. can one row be, for lack of a > better word, 'slaved' to another so the loop cycle time of each > row is the same length despite each row having different > numbers of steps? There are two possibilities: 1.) The digital one nee
2002-02-11 by duffnuff
speaking of trig seq's...(florian's ideas look great, btw) there's something i've been trying to work out how to do lately and i wonder if any existing sequencers or groups of modules are capable of doing it. say, for a trig seq w 2 or more rows.. can one row be, for lack of a be
2002-02-11 by thepeak
Hello' Yes there is an element of interest in a simple gate sequencer, simple being the operative. I have not in deed used a sequencer in finality through progression, ever as a gate based instrument, my post fundamental is to incorporate 'step by step' (non-pertaining sequence t
2002-02-11 by bakis Sirros
hi floria, your ideas are very,very interesting!! i would go for version 2,but i think both versions would be nice to have,also...very nice ideas for a new module...do you think it's time to create a new poll about it?? i always wanted a shaltwerk kind of module integrated in the
2002-02-11 by thepeak
Hello' Yes there is an element of interest in a simple gate sequencer, simple being the operative. I have not in deed used a sequencer in finality through progression, ever as a gate based instrument, my post fundamental is to incorporate 'step by step' (non-pertaining sequence t
2002-02-11 by synth_freak_2000
hello list and jossef, i just checked the mp3s of the new voices pro page.nice !keep up the good work on the planet!!i'll keep on posting patches to you when i have the time... support the modular-planet!!! synthfreak
2002-02-11 by synth_freak_2000
hi list, that goes to all new members. please vote for our polls!!!don't you realise that we are shaping the future of analog modular synthesis???(!!!,that was good,right??) DIETER DOEPFER is counting in these polls for deciding if he will produce a particular module or not!!! th
2002-02-11 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the Doepfer_a100 group: Would you like DOEPFER to release a SHALTWERK-LIKE trigger sequencer module (see message 641)?? o yes,and i would prefer version1 ! o yes,and i would prefer version2 ! o maybe... o no. To vote, please
2002-02-11 by Florian Anwander
Hi, talking about new modules: Long time ago I built a very simple trigger sequencer for the Formant system of a friend. It consisted only of four rows of 16 switches four outputs and a clock in and a reset input. The clock counted through the switches. If a switch was on, a gate
2002-02-11 by david.salter@reuters.com
Florian, I agree that the CS80 is a beautiful machine and has probably the lushest most organic sound out of all the polysynth ever produced. My only criticism is that it was designed for someone who could actually play a keyboard (hence the criticism is not directed at the CS80
2002-02-11 by david.salter@reuters.com
It is also worth mentioning that although the ExpressionMate is midi device (therefore some kind of midi to cv convertor would be required) it also has three arppegiators and the ability to be split into three zones. Very sophisticated, probably more than I need. Tristrum (The Pe
2002-02-11 by Florian Anwander
Hi David > Have used an old Yamaha CS80 for several month (I was sad when I had to > give it back) But not only because of the ribbon controller ;-) (The CS80 is the most wonderful synth I ever played) > I did build a crude ribbon controller once using magnetic tape and > graphit
2002-02-11 by Florian Anwander
Hi bakis > i don't think so,if this controller costs about 800 > euros(!!!!) i will not buy it for sure!!!!!!! > i am sure it will be much,much cheaper... Lets hope so I wrote > > nearly in the same price range :-( Nearly means tending to 400EUR to 500EUR. So, the controller hard
2002-02-11 by david.salter@reuters.com
Fair enough. Do you agree that this sounds like a ribbon controller or am I missing the point? David bakis Sirros cc: Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] some info on the trautonium-like 11/02/2002 11:23 controller fromdieter... Please respond to Header: Internal Use Only Doepfer_a100 ri
2002-02-11 by bakis Sirros
right now...no,i don't!! i just know that dieter wouldn't release such an expensive item!!! synthfreak --- david.salter@reuters.com wrote: > > Bakis, > > Do you know something we don't ; ) > > David > > > > > > bakis Sirros > > > Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > > yahoo.com> cc: >
2002-02-11 by david.salter@reuters.com
Bakis, Do you know something we don't ; ) David bakis Sirros cc: Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] some info on the trautonium-like 11/02/2002 11:17 controller fromdieter... Please respond to Header: Internal Use Only Doepfer_a100 hey florian, i don't think so,if this controller costs
2002-02-11 by bakis Sirros
hey florian, i don't think so,if this controller costs about 800 euros(!!!!) i will not buy it for sure!!!!!!! i am sure it will be much,much cheaper... synthfreak --- Florian Anwander wrote: > Hi david > > > Because an old Moog unit will set me back anything > between 450 - 800
2002-02-11 by david.salter@reuters.com
Hi Florian, Your probably right about the cost. Have used an old Yamaha CS80 for several month (I was sad when I had to give it back) the pleasure in using a ribbon controller for performance is something that needs to be experienced, hence my desire to obtain one. I did build a
2002-02-11 by Florian Anwander
Hi david > Because an old Moog unit will set me back anything between 450 - 800 > euros, I would not be adverse to paying a fair price for a modern > equivalent. If I read the message from Dieter correct, then the new controller will be nearly in the same price range :-( Florian
2002-02-11 by david.salter@reuters.com
Hi all, OK, I may be reading this wrong but it sounds like a standard ribbon controller. This is great as I refuse to spend money on an old Moog one that is expensive and possibly worn out. The only key thing I would like to see is a range switch, i.e. 1V, 5V & 10V to make it mor