Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 117 of 168 · 8362 messages matched
2004-10-18 by Paul Nagle
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 19:14:21 -0000, "Renegade Rhythms Corporation" wrote: > If you mean that you need to clear up some space on your >webserver, I'd gladly host your videos for you, so as to give >us all the benefit of these videos. Hit me up offline >at dave@renegaderhythms.com
2004-10-18 by Renegade Rhythms Corporation
--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, Paul Nagle wrote: > > P.S. Hope to get some video uploaded of the P3 in action but it may > take me a few weeks to free disk space, find some cunning video > software and work out how to do it all. Now I have my little camera, I > do int
2004-10-16 by colinfraser_com
> My vote for all the creative ways of entering /editing notes but in this > mode ,how would you select the note lenght? > > My way of pressing the buttons for 8,16,etc is never being to be implemted? Tbase wont ever be settable per step without using an aux, but I'm warming to t
2004-10-16 by Hans Greuber
Hi; My vote for all the creative ways of entering /editing notes but in this mode ,how would you select the note lenght? My way of pressing the buttons for 8,16,etc is never being to be implemted? I thing is the best one. Regards everyone and cheers to Richie! Hans > >On Fri, 15
2004-10-15 by Paul Maddox (Mail LIsts)
Colin, > Have you tried arpeggio capture with the 'rong' (reset on new group) > option off ? > That's what it does ;-) Ahhh, is that in the user guide? Paul
2004-10-15 by colinfraser_com
> > Have you tried arpeggio capture with the 'rong' (reset on new group) > > option off ? > > That's what it does ;-) > > Ahhh, is that in the user guide? Yep.
2004-10-15 by colinfraser_com
> > a function for each pattern to set the note scale > > e.g. C1-C2; C1-C3; C1-C5; C2-C3 or so...(if I use a > > sampler with various samples on each channel, its hard > > > > to find the right one in scale between C1-C5..) > > COLIN, PLEASE!!! > This is the one factor that driv
2004-10-15 by colinfraser_com
> How about a single step mode? > So you can 'play' a sequence in, one note at a time, ie, press a note on > midi in and it records it, advances a step, and waits for the next.. > > This would make programming drum parts so much easier! Have you tried arpeggio capture with the 'r
2004-10-15 by bleep
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Paul Maddox (Mail LIsts) wrote: > How about a single step mode? > So you can 'play' a sequence in, one note at a time, ie, press a note on > midi in and it records it, advances a step, and waits for the next.. ooh, yeah, that would be great... bleep. out. ---
2004-10-15 by implode7@comcast.net
I like this idea! -------------- Original message -------------- > > Colin, > > How about a single step mode? > So you can 'play' a sequence in, one note at a time, ie, press a note on > midi in and it records it, advances a step, and waits for the next.. > > This would make prog
2004-10-15 by Paul Maddox (Mail LIsts)
Colin, you could always use a PolyDAC, or two :-) Just a thought :-) Paul (yeah yeah, blatant self promotion)
2004-10-15 by Paul Maddox (Mail LIsts)
Colin, How about a single step mode? So you can 'play' a sequence in, one note at a time, ie, press a note on midi in and it records it, advances a step, and waits for the next.. This would make programming drum parts so much easier! Paul
2004-10-15 by Paul Maddox (Mail LIsts)
Bleep, > i don't know if anyone else has this issue, but i'm finding that the p3's > global midi channel assignment is a problem for me. Yep, anothong feature that¹s been on my wish list for ages. At minimum it should be per bank.. Paul
2004-10-15 by Paul Maddox (Mail LIsts)
Hi, > a function for each pattern to set the note scale > e.g. C1-C2; C1-C3; C1-C5; C2-C3 or so...(if I use a > sampler with various samples on each channel, its hard > > to find the right one in scale between C1-C5..) COLIN, PLEASE!!! This is the one factor that drives me nuts u
2004-10-15 by implode7@comcast.net
These are excellent points. You've definitely hit on what I have in mind for this setup. I still may wimp out and get something else instead, but having a real analog modular controlled by a P3 (and also, from time to time, by Numerology), sounds too good to be true. By the way,
2004-10-15 by Colin f
> hmmm - interesting. Still inclined to go with the mcv24, but > that is something to think about. Probably not a bad idea... > > Only 4 of its outputs are of good (12bit) resolution. The > others are 8bit, so, > > although they all have things like software lfos and the > like,
2004-10-15 by implode7@comcast.net
hmmm - interesting. Still inclined to go with the mcv24, but that is something to think about. -------------- Original message -------------- > > I have all three ofthe things that you mentioned (lucky me ; ) - the a100, the > p3, and the mcv24. > > The p3 and the a100 are obviou
2004-10-15 by Julian
I have all three ofthe things that you mentioned (lucky me ; ) - the a100, the p3, and the mcv24. The p3 and the a100 are obviously nice. The mcv24 is good, but... Only 4 of its outputs are of good (12bit) resolution. The others are 8bit, so, although they all have things like so
2004-10-15 by ch.³l
> Per bank midi channels is still on the TBI list, but no-one has > moaned about it for a while ;-) ..i was patiently waiting and trying not to be annoying.
2004-10-15 by ch.³l
> By the way, can you save patches on a Doepfer Modular? (smiley > deliberately omitted) sure...by (digital) camera. ;)
2004-10-15 by Paul Nagle
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 16:03:06 +0100, "Colin f" wrote: >Per bank midi channels is still on the TBI list, but no-one has moaned about >it for a while ;-) >That only needs 48 bytes, so it's not a problem. 8-) I have got used to the way it is. If it were configurable from bank to bank
2004-10-15 by implode7@comcast.net
Great - thanks.. Gene -------------- Original message -------------- > > On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 implode7@comcast.net wrote: > > > I'm sure that someone here probably has an opinion on this...anyone with > > experience using the p3 in a similar setup have opinions as to which > > mig
2004-10-15 by bleep
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 implode7@comcast.net wrote: > I'm sure that someone here probably has an opinion on this...anyone with > experience using the p3 in a similar setup have opinions as to which > might be better in practice as a midi to cv interface - the Encore > Expressionist,
2004-10-15 by implode7@comcast.net
I am contemplating the purchase of a Doepfer modular system... I'm sure that someone here probably has an opinion on this...anyone with experience using the p3 in a similar setup have opinions as to which might be better in practice as a midi to cv interface - the Encore Expressi
2004-10-15 by bleep
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Colin f wrote: > Per bank midi channels is still on the TBI list, but no-one has moaned about > it for a while ;-) MOAN! WHINE! MORE MOANING!!!! > I think it would need a user config option to enable though. sounds cool... so what about mute modes, track volu
2004-10-15 by Colin f
> if midi channel assignments were per part, that would be > ideal. per bank > would also be good, and i could see arguments for having that > be the case > rather than per pattern. With up to 12 banks of 8 parts by 8 midi channels, that would need 384 bytes to hold the channel s
2004-10-15 by bleep
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Paul Nagle wrote: > >diff color caps are cool too... on my next p3, i'd get them in the 4 white > >4 black 4 white 4 black pattern... > > Mmm, nice idea. I must say I like my 8 white, 8 black setup. If the > track legending was green the first 8 could be gree
2004-10-15 by bleep
hi all... i don't know if anyone else has this issue, but i'm finding that the p3's global midi channel assignment is a problem for me. i've got parts and banks that use different parts of my setup, and it's rather difficult to go through and re-assign midi channels each time i w
2004-10-15 by Paul Nagle
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 09:30:00 -0500 (CDT), bleep wrote: >definitely prefer the numbers on the keys... the dual number lines are >really confusing looking... also, i *highly* agree with robert that the >track/part numbers should be smaller... maybe even different colors... >step ke
2004-10-15 by bleep
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Colin f wrote: > Have a look at this - > http://www.colinfraser.com/p3/gallery/p3-069-label-compare.jpg definitely prefer the numbers on the keys... the dual number lines are really confusing looking... also, i *highly* agree with robert that the track/part n
2004-10-15 by MAG
just some ideas: alps encoder in the under pot row for an easyer tone adjustment. a function for each pattern to set the note scale e.g. C1-C2; C1-C3; C1-C5; C2-C3 or so...(if I use a sampler with various samples on each channel, its hard to find the right one in scale between C1
2004-10-15 by Colin f
> > recall, but certain tolerances don't aloow for a clean > > front panle, they had said something about "visable" > > bumps......... on the front side of the panel when using > > certain thickness's of panel grade..... also check on > > that before I'd order a few 100 panels...
2004-10-15 by Robert van der Kamp
On Friday 15 October 2004 07:10, Markk W. Roberts wrote: > I was just on Schaffer's panel site the other day, they > have a stipulation about that..... that I don't exactly > recall, but certain tolerances don't aloow for a clean > front panle, they had said something about "visa
2004-10-15 by Markk W. Roberts
I was just on Schaffer's panel site the other day, they have a stipulation about that..... that I don't exactly recall, but certain tolerances don't aloow for a clean front panle, they had said something about "visable" bumps......... on the front side of the panel when using cer
2004-10-15 by Robert van der Kamp
On Friday 15 October 2004 06:58, Markk W. Roberts wrote: > If I catch what Robert is saying here, he wants the > "threaded post's" to be part of the panel so the screws > and standoffs are not visable... I agree with this 100% Yes, that's exactly what I mean, thanks (it's way too
2004-10-15 by Markk W. Roberts
If I catch what Robert is saying here, he wants the "threaded post's" to be part of the panel so the screws and standoffs are not visable... I agree with this 100% I too really like the Aluminum raw panel look... clean lines... for those of us who intend on "dark stages" and live
2004-10-15 by Robert van der Kamp
On Thursday 14 October 2004 19:32, Colin f wrote: > > 1. The P3 has a number of key combinations (press key > > X+Y to do Z) built into the user interface that I > > optionally liked to be replaced with a dedicated key. > > > > 2. Afaik, the P3 has room for additional keys in the
2004-10-15 by Robert van der Kamp
On Friday 15 October 2004 00:15, Colin f wrote: > Have a look at this - > http://www.colinfraser.com/p3/gallery/p3-069-label-compar >e.jpg I absolutely prefer the numbers engraved on the keys. I'd also like to suggest to use a smaller font for the track/bank numbers printed on th
2004-10-15 by Markk W. Roberts
I have to say I like the numbers directly on the keys myself.... just my opinion. Markk ----- Original Message ----- From: Colin f To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 3:15 PM Subject: RE: [analogue-sequencer] Aesthetic question > nope, i just h
2004-10-14 by Colin f
> Off the top of my head, I can only think the Electribes... ...and the KPR77 occured to me too - maybe it's a Korg preference... Colin f
2004-10-14 by Colin f
> nope, i just have an opinion... i guess none of anything i've > worked with > has numbers on the keys... Off the top of my head, I can only think the Electribes... > but given the option, i'd alwyas > choose numbers > on the key. i'm a usability/human factors guy, so i'm unreas
2004-10-14 by bleep
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Colin f wrote: > Have you played with a TR-808 or 909 ? > They have the step numbers directly below the keys, and it doesn't cause me > a problem. > I'll fake up a photo of what the Hawtin P3 would look like with blank keys > and numbers on the panel to compa
2004-10-14 by Colin f
> engraved #s on > case? not so good... i want to press the number, not have to line up a > number with a key and then press key... Have you played with a TR-808 or 909 ? They have the step numbers directly below the keys, and it doesn't cause me a problem. I'll fake up a photo o
2004-10-14 by bleep
white keys w/black lettering = good. very visible on stage. engraved #s on case? not so good... i want to press the number, not have to line up a number with a key and then press key... On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, colinfraser_com wrote: > > > Good Afternoon... > > You may remember I men
2004-10-14 by Colin f
> 1. The P3 has a number of key combinations (press key X+Y to > do Z) built into the user interface that I optionally liked > to be replaced with a dedicated key. > > 2. Afaik, the P3 has room for additional keys in the key > scanner hardware. Yep, but only five. > 4. As keycomb
2004-10-14 by Robert van der Kamp
Is it my breath? ;)
2004-10-14 by Robert van der Kamp
I've asked this before, iirc, but I want to give it another shot. 1. The P3 has a number of key combinations (press key X+Y to do Z) built into the user interface that I optionally liked to be replaced with a dedicated key. 2. Afaik, the P3 has room for additional keys in the key
2004-10-14 by Colin f
> I'd second that - to be honest the "beginners guide" stuff is all well > and good but 'creating that first pattern' is fairly simple anyway > with a few glances at the manual. What would be nice is a few more > things along the lines of Paul's "I got stoned, grabbed this note f
2004-10-14 by scd
on 14-10-2004 11:03, Colin f at colin@colinfraser.com wrote: > >> Do you have a newer version of the manual then the one that >> is online on >> yahoo.com? > > Not really. > The current version has been converted to boring fonts, and has a few extra > page breaks in it so that it
2004-10-14 by Andy Wilson
Guys, > > > http://www.colinfraser.com/p3/p3-getting-started.txt > > This is loosely based on Paul's mp3 tutorial. > > I think Paul and you *could* do a fantastic job in creating a user > manual/video/mp3 whatever... But I understand it is a lot of work too... A couple of days ag