Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 97 of 168 · 8362 messages matched
2005-07-06 by Robert van der Kamp
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 16:01, analog1k wrote: > I have followed the FUNC+PAGE then power-on, > then F3 to begin update. > > Then I try the new .syx update, but the P3 > always displays BAD DATA! For what it's worth. I just successfully updated Boele's P3 with the latest .sys f
2005-07-06 by analog1k
--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, Robert van der Kamp wrote: > On Wednesday 06 July 2005 16:01, analog1k wrote: > > I have followed the FUNC+PAGE then power-on, > > then F3 to begin update. > > > > Then I try the new .syx update, but the P3 > > always displays BAD DATA!
2005-07-06 by analog1k
I have followed the FUNC+PAGE then power-on, then F3 to begin update. Then I try the new .syx update, but the P3 always displays BAD DATA! What's wrong? Cheers Analog1k --- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "colinfraser_com" wrote: > Folks, > > The P3 v3.1.005 release build
2005-07-05 by colinfraser_com
Folks, The P3 v3.1.005 release build and an updated user manual are now in the Yahoo files section. Note that if you upgrade to v3.1.005, any patterns with GRAB or SWAP aux events assigned will need to have these events re-assigned for the new implementation of these events. Othe
2005-07-05 by Colin f
> when you introduced the sticky button feature, i wonderes if it's > possible to make the "hold mute" kind of stickky when changing parts, > or some kind of toggle. Seems like you'd prefer this as a permanent option, rather than just a sticky function ? Sticky keys are just ther
2005-07-05 by Gene Schwartz
The closest that I've seen is Numerology on the Mac, and SQ4 for Windows. -----Original Message----- From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com [mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of blixton Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 9:27 PM To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com
2005-07-05 by blixton
Is there any software that can do what the p3 can do? Or would I have to build it in PD or something. Not that I would choose a software version over the hardware as I love knobs. Just curious about the programming.
2005-07-04 by Colin f
> i think you got it just fine. for example, i've now got a pattern on > track 2, with all 4 AUXes set up as "AUX note REL". in track 1 i have > a pattern with AUX A set as "PUSH AUX C to trk 2", AUX B set up as > "PUSH AUX D to trk 2", AUX C set up as "MASK AUX D, Kn>N" and AUX
2005-07-04 by Colin f
> - secondly, the 'PUSH' event pretty much does what i was asking for > before with my suggestion for the 'grab all auxes' event... I think I misunderstood - I thought you wanted the actual events from another track to apply to the current one, not just that you wanted to pull mu
2005-07-04 by ch.³l
> I think I misunderstood - I thought you wanted the actual events > from another track to apply to the current one, not just that you > wanted to pull multiple aux values. i think you got it just fine. for example, i've now got a pattern on track 2, with all 4 AUXes set up as "A
2005-07-04 by ch.³l
hi Colin, i've had a chance to play around with the latest build by now; - firstly, thank you for adding the red LED indicator for the playlist step currently being editted in playlist-edit mode. it clears it up for me a great deal. - secondly, the 'PUSH' event pretty much does w
2005-07-04 by arp1618
Hello all, just to let you know that i have now successfully uploaded v3.1.005 to my P3. The error was in the download. When i downloaded the update again i noticed it was a few kmore than my first download. I like the way the grab/swap events are bundled. I think this type of bu
2005-07-03 by Oakley Sound
Reason 3.0 and my own modular. Works really well for me. A rather long example mp3, called Spiralling can be downloaded or streamed from here: http://music.download.com/taklamakan/3600-8362_32-100710578.html The P3 is used to create all the sequences and these are then edited if
2005-07-03 by Stoffel
Hi Colin, when you introduced the sticky button feature, i wonderes if it's possible to make the "hold mute" kind of stickky when changing parts, or some kind of toggle. Most of the time when I'm changing the parts I'm always pressing F1 for the "mute hold" and then slecting a pa
2005-07-03 by Colin f
> Is the p3 good for drum machines and samplers? Maybe not so good for drum machines because it's designed for mono synth patterns rather than parallel drum patterns, but you can set up a pattern using aux notes and put 4 instruments in a pattern. Samplers should be as much fun a
2005-07-03 by ch.³l
> Maybe not so good for drum machines because it's designed for mono > synth patterns rather than parallel drum patterns, but you can set up > a pattern using aux notes and put 4 instruments in a pattern. > Samplers should be as much fun as synths ;-) i've been using my P3's for
2005-07-03 by ch.³l
hi Jim, i'm using a Quasimidi 309 for drums & percussion, a Nord Modular (classic) for synths and a Yamaha A3000 sampler for pretty much everything else. all versatile machines that respond well to external midi-control, which make them great fun to use in combination with a P3.
2005-07-03 by Paul Nagle
Jim Combs wrote: >Hi! > >I¹m looking at modules to hook up to my P3 and wondering what others find >are good compliments. > >I know Mr. Nagle is using a (Super?) Nova. How about others? > > Actually, my fave collection of sequencing modules is: Novation KS-Rack Vermona PerFourmer
2005-07-03 by darkstr1746@comcast.net
i'm useing a OB-Mx a Micro Q and a Monowave kind regards john duval -------------- Original message -------------- Hi! I'm looking at modules to hook up to my P3 and wondering what others find are good compliments. So far I've used a Roland SH-32, which is not working out for me
2005-07-03 by blixton
Is the p3 good for drum machines and samplers?
2005-07-03 by Gert van Santen
Jim Combs wrote: > Hi! > > I¹m looking at modules to hook up to my P3 and wondering what others > find are good compliments. > > So far I¹ve used a Roland SH-32, which is not working out for me as > the architecture is a bit laborious for modifying things on the fly. > And I¹ve u
2005-07-03 by Jim Combs
Hi! I¹m looking at modules to hook up to my P3 and wondering what others find are good compliments. So far I¹ve used a Roland SH-32, which is not working out for me as the architecture is a bit laborious for modifying things on the fly. And I¹ve used my Kurzweil K2000 which was q
2005-07-02 by Peter Lunnon
--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, Jim Combs wrote: > Hi! > > I¹m looking at modules to hook up to my P3 and wondering what others find > are good compliments. I use my P3 with a Waldorf microQ keyboard and Microwave XT which I find to be a great combination - having the
2005-07-01 by Colin f
> is anybody else having trouble uploading the new v3.1005 Beta to the > P3. I finally got around to it last night and after 3 attempts i gave > up. Everything seemed to be ok right up till the end where i got the > message BAD DATA! It's nothing to do with my connection because
2005-07-01 by ch.³l
--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "arp1618" wrote: > Hello everyone, > > is anybody else having trouble uploading the new v3.1005 Beta to the > P3. I finally got around to it last night and after 3 attempts i gave > up. Everything seemed to be ok right up till the end wh
2005-07-01 by arp1618
Hello everyone, is anybody else having trouble uploading the new v3.1005 Beta to the P3. I finally got around to it last night and after 3 attempts i gave up. Everything seemed to be ok right up till the end where i got the message BAD DATA! It's nothing to do with my connection
2005-06-29 by colinfraser_com
And it feels good ! I've had a partial delivery of enough end-cheeks for the production units shipped so far. They are the right shape, and nicely finished. I'll be in touch with owners shortly to arrange shipment. Photos soon, too. Cheers, Colin f
2005-06-27 by Colin f
> -remote control works fine, although i'd prefer to be able to send > independent part-change messages and not have the 2nd P3 just follow > the 1st... but i realise this is all still in an early trial stage. Indeed. I put the basic framework in for handling remote control messa
2005-06-26 by ch.³l
just installed it and gave it a go; -remote control works fine, although i'd prefer to be able to send independent part-change messages and not have the 2nd P3 just follow the 1st... but i realise this is all still in an early trial stage. - the grab, swap & push events appear to
2005-06-26 by ch.³l
--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "colinfraser_com" wrote: > Folks, > > I've uploaded the current beta build of the P3 firmware to Yahoo > files. > This build .... > Try it out, and you'll see what it does... will do! sounds great Colin. grtz Chiel
2005-06-26 by Colin f
> > There's already the event 'auxes to trk n' - this redirects > (pushes) > > auxes from the current track to a following track. > > aha. i've briefly played around with it before but i'll give it > another go. 'to a following track' you say; does this mean that if > this event
2005-06-26 by colinfraser_com
Folks, I've uploaded the current beta build of the P3 firmware to Yahoo files. This build includes quite a number of additions and some changes to aux events. I'm putting this build up for comments, it's not yet the current release version. The main thing I'd like feedback on is
2005-06-26 by ch.³l
--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "Colin f" wrote: > > in playlist-edit mode.... > Fixed in the next build. cool. > Well the released build only has 6 slots free for events, :-) i'm aware of this, so i try to think twice about the usefullness of potential events before i
2005-06-26 by Colin f
> in playlist-edit mode, with a playlist with a length of 1 step, if i > select a different pattern than the one originally programmed and then > hit "FUNC" to exit playlist-edit mode followed by "F3" to lose the > changes i just made, i return to play-mode, but the changes made
2005-06-25 by ch.³l
hi Colin, i've uncovered a bug in playlist-edit mode. at first i figured it was just me & them herbs again, but i've managed to duplicate the behaviour several times on both P3's so i'm pretty convinced this time. in playlist-edit mode, with a playlist with a length of 1 step, if
2005-06-23 by Richard Scott
dunno what happened there - I sent this email over a week ago and it only just appeared ?? R ----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Scott To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 5:40 PM Subject: Re: [analogue-sequencer] man hours thanks bleep, you
2005-06-20 by Andrew Scheidler
This is why there is so much viagra spam... ;) Andrew (user of *zero* softsynths!) >>> philsmillie@yahoo.com 06/18/05 6:07 AM >>> > > I am a born-again hardware freak > > The best kind. > Reading this months Sound On Sound, I noted with sadness only a single > review of an actual
2005-06-18 by Richard Scott
thanks for all the information guys. FYI I think the amount saved by a numbskull like me doing a self-build will be hardly worth the bother so I think i will have to save my pennies to get a ready-built P3 instead. In the meantime, if anyone happens to have a used one to sell ple
2005-06-18 by philsmillie
> > I am a born-again hardware freak > > The best kind. > Reading this months Sound On Sound, I noted with sadness only a single > review of an actual 'instrument'. > The world is going soft... Don't worry... they'll all go 'hard' again in a few years time after they've sold us a
2005-06-18 by philsmillie
Nice one Dave, P3 tools just keeps on getting better and better... Just like the P3! ;-) Phil
2005-06-16 by jez creek
I should add that is highly unlikely I would have bought both if I had got the P3 first :-) Auxes and accumulators are great once you get your head round them and allow an almost modular approach to sequences FTS is cool, I can only use my MAQ with my Nord Modular as it has Note
2005-06-16 by jez creek
> just as a matter of interest, why did you guys choose the p3 over the Doepfer Maq 16/3? > Are they different in their functionality? Richard, As someone who uses both I feel fairly qualified to answer this with a resounding 'yes'. When I got the P3 I thought I'd be able to sell
2005-06-16 by Richard Scott
just as a matter of interest, why did you guys choose the p3 over the Doepfer Maq 16/3? Are they different in their functionality? Richard [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2005-06-16 by em_dkj
Hi Richard > just as a matter of interest, why did you guys choose the p3 over the Doepfer Maq 16/3? Are they different in their functionality? > I only have a P3, so I can't compare the two in the same manner as Jez. But when I decided to buy an Analogue style sequencer I was co
2005-06-16 by Colin f
> Do I need a computer to use the p3? No. You only need a computer if you want to run P3Tools, which is a sysex librarian and firmware updater, or similar. Cheers, Colin f
2005-06-16 by blixton
Do I need a computer to use the p3?
2005-06-16 by bleep
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Richard Scott wrote: > thanks bleep, you said, "this also assumes you have all the > bits to begin with." > > do you mean there are other bits I need apart from the kit, box and > caps?? I didn't realise that. If so please tell me what else would i > need to
2005-06-16 by Richard Scott
thanks bleep, you said, "this also assumes you have all the bits to begin with." do you mean there are other bits I need apart from the kit, box and caps?? I didn't realise that. If so please tell me what else would i need to sort out you're right btw, the Andromeda really is an
2005-06-16 by bleep
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, funkycholrton wrote: > greetings. newbie here. I am a born-again hardware freak wondering > about building a P3 kit with case. I want to use it mostly to control > an Alesis A6 as the onboard seq is too damned fiddly. *drool* *that's* going to sound *fantasti
2005-06-16 by Colin f
> I am a born-again hardware freak The best kind. Reading this months Sound On Sound, I noted with sadness only a single review of an actual 'instrument'. The world is going soft... > How many hours did it take you guys to build a p3? Assuming a > resaonably good technical knowle