Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 18 of 27 · 1314 messages matched
2006-01-18 by Markk Roberts
YIPEE-CAY-YAAAAAAAAAAAAY !!!! --- mate_stubb wrote: > Folks, I'm proud to announce the new Stooge > Industries website: > > http://www.stoogeindustries.com > > We have been working hard over the last few months > to take the little > hobby that Larry and I started with, and turn
2006-01-18 by mate_stubb
Folks, I'm proud to announce the new Stooge Industries website: http://www.stoogeindustries.com We have been working hard over the last few months to take the little hobby that Larry and I started with, and turn it into a real business. By bringing Paul Haneberg on board, we have
2006-01-02 by Dana Countryman
Hi All, I just finished the Blacet Filthy Filtre yesterday, and incorporated it into my (mostly) Dotcom system. I LOVE IT. I have 6 other filters -- all the Dotcom's, plus others from various companies, and I can already say that next to the Q-150 Ladder Filter, the Filthy will b
2005-12-31 by mate_stubb
Everyone, I'm getting ready to go party with a bunch of musician friends and I expect to spend an evening filled with fun and music making. May you all have a great 2006! Moe
2005-12-18 by Dana Countryman
Hi Everyone -- Thanks bunches for your recommendations. I finally decided to wait until Paul at MOTM releases his emulation of the ARP 4075 filter - hopefully in 2006. Until then, I've got plenty of filters to play with... Cheers, - Dana --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "John
2005-12-17 by John Loffink
The Emulator Archive site has recommendations on parts substitutions. Everything in the circuit could be procured or replaced. http://www.emulatorarchive.com/AM/AM4000/AM4012/am4012.html John Loffink The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com The Wavema
2005-12-16 by Andrew Sanchez
Hi Dana, I was going to suggest building EFM's ARP clone filter, but it appears that EFM PCBs are not available anymore: http://www.ele4music.com/ Another possibility is emailing the person/s building the Analog Metropolis modular. It looks like they're planning on building four
2005-12-16 by Markk Roberts
I dunno guys, between the Q150 qnd the Q107, I am really getting ALOT of tone out of them both... I'm all for more modules... but I need some other things first... Master Clock w/a Clock divider built in... Quantizer... these are high on my priority list right now.... needed for
2005-12-16 by jeff brown
ARP specified the 2N5249 as an alternate for the TZ81. They likewise specified 2N5367 as an alternate for the TZ581 2N3904 would be a modern sub for the TZ81, and 2N3906 for the TZ581. I have some ARP stuff on my website (http://www.guitarfool.com/ARP2500.html), including the ori
2005-12-15 by Larry T.
--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "Dana Countryman" wrote: > Has anyone here tried to build the ARP filter?: > http://www.arptech.synth.net/pdf/4012.pdf > > I guess my questions are: > > 1) Has anyone done a side by side comparison of the Arp filter vs. > the Dotcom Filter...?
2005-12-15 by Terje Winther
Hi Dana, >>> Has anyone here tried to build the ARP filter?: >>> http://www.arptech.synth.net/pdf/4012.pdf No, but I have used some ARP synths and some moog synths. > Yes, it is a copy of the Moog filter, but with slightly different > circuitry. I also have an early Roland synth
2005-12-15 by Dana Countryman
--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Terje Winther wrote: > > Hi Dana, > >>> Has anyone here tried to build the ARP filter?: > >>> http://www.arptech.synth.net/pdf/4012.pdf > > No, but I have used some ARP synths and some moog synths. > > > Yes, it is a copy of the Moog filter, b
2005-12-15 by Dana Countryman
--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Jay wrote: > > Dana Countryman wrote: > > > Has anyone here tried to build the ARP filter?: > > http://www.arptech.synth.net/pdf/4012.pdf > > Isn't the 4012 the copy of the Moog ladder? Not much difference between > that and the Q150 I guess.>
2005-12-15 by Jay
Dana Countryman wrote: > Has anyone here tried to build the ARP filter?: > http://www.arptech.synth.net/pdf/4012.pdf Isn't the 4012 the copy of the Moog ladder? Not much difference between that and the Q150 I guess.
2005-12-15 by Dana Countryman
--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Jay wrote: > > Dana Countryman wrote: > > > Thanks Moe, for keeping this group classy. > > You know what's funny? There's been more messages complaining about the > spam than the total amount of spam posted on this list! > > ;-) > Oh yeah? Wel
2005-12-15 by Jay
Dana Countryman wrote: > Thanks Moe, for keeping this group classy. You know what's funny? There's been more messages complaining about the spam than the total amount of spam posted on this list! ;-)
2005-12-14 by Dana Countryman
Thanks Moe, for keeping this group classy. - Dana
2005-12-14 by mate_stubb
Larry, Paul Haneberg is the guy to order all things stooge from. Right now we have 4 pot brackets but are out of 3 pot brackets. We have hopefully found a metal fabricator who is making up a mess of the 3 pot brackets (a lot of them are going to Paul S though). phaneber@one.net T
2005-12-14 by Larry T.
Moe Thanks for taking on the spammers! I know it's extra work, but everyone will appreciate it! BTW: What is the status for ordering Stooge barckets? Are they currently available? Who do we contact to order them? Should I just go away till after the holidays? Larry T.
2005-12-13 by James Ghivizzani
Thanks Moe! Jim -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.13/198 - Release Date: 12/12/2005 --------------------------------------------------- Letter content was scanned by WinAntiVirus 2005. No threat dete
2005-12-13 by mate_stubb
All, I think I have successfully reset the options so that all posts from new members are modded by me. That should end most spam problems. Moe http://www.hotrodmotm.com http://www.wiseguysynth.com
2005-12-13 by Rod Swanson
Thanks, I really appreciate your efforts. Rod On 12/12/05 5:13 PM, "mate_stubb" wrote: > That's two spammers I've banned in the last two days. If this > continues, I may have to monitor each request to join. > > Moe > > --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "Dana Countryman" wrote
2005-12-13 by mate_stubb
That's two spammers I've banned in the last two days. If this continues, I may have to monitor each request to join. Moe --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "Dana Countryman" wrote: > Larry, > We really need you now..... > > -dc >
2005-12-12 by Dana Countryman
--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "ignatia.kirkland8626@w..." wrote: > > Thought I should pass on my knowledge to all you guys (and gals) on here. I know like heaps of men I am pretty shy when it comes to going up to someone. I've tried a few different places (clubs, bars, etc
2005-12-04 by mate_stubb
Folks, Jim and Marcus Hendry have asked me to handle the sale of Larry's modular projects. These are things that were not mounted in his synth at the time of his passing. They range from completed modules to unbuilt MOTM kits to bare pcbs, and everything in between. Read the desc
2005-12-03 by mate_stubb
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/motm You'll probably have to join before you can post, although you can read it as a nonmember. Moe --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Dennis Verschoor wrote: > > What is the name of that list? > Sorry i dunno how to find it at all! > If i s
2005-12-03 by Dennis Verschoor
What is the name of that list? Sorry i dunno how to find it at all! If i search for MOTM on yahoo i get only other groups (i guess). Regards, Dennis On 12/3/05, mate_stubb mate_stubb@yahoo.com > wrote: All, I posted my wild idea on the MOTM list yesterday and started a poll. If y
2005-12-03 by mate_stubb
All, I posted my wild idea on the MOTM list yesterday and started a poll. If you haven't visited and voted yet, please do so if you can! Moe
2005-11-22 by Rafael Cohen
I think it's great, I would definitely use that service. I am already thinking up panels I wouild have made. R
2005-11-20 by Rod Swanson
I am working on some on-off stuff for myself, and I would be very interested in laser engraving. Rod On 11/20/05 1:05 PM, "Markk Roberts" wrote: > just to add my .02 I'd be a buyer... :-) > > Let me know your plans... > > Markk > > --- mate_stubb wrote: > >> > The laser wouldn't
2005-11-20 by Markk Roberts
just to add my .02 I'd be a buyer... :-) Let me know your plans... Markk --- mate_stubb wrote: > The laser wouldn't engrave the finish, just the > graphics. You would > anodize the panel black first, then burn away the > black to expose the > silver aluminum underneath for the le
2005-11-20 by Jay
mate_stubb wrote: > Black anodizing would not match the motm polane spatter finish paint > exactly. From a few feet away, it would not look much different. The > graphics would be aluminum in color though, not white. Like the > original modcans. Or Moog modules.
2005-11-20 by mate_stubb
The laser wouldn't engrave the finish, just the graphics. You would anodize the panel black first, then burn away the black to expose the silver aluminum underneath for the legends. Black anodizing would not match the motm polane spatter finish paint exactly. From a few feet away
2005-11-20 by Clive
Hi All, I have just downloaded the 'Front Panel Designer' software with a view to designing some of my own Dotcom panels. To be truthful, I'm struggling with it. I wondered if anyone had a Dotcom panel layout in the 'FPD' format that I could edit, to try and learn the ropes, so t
2005-11-19 by john mahoney
> However, MOTM folk DO like their panels to match. That's > one thing that worries me about this whole scheme. Would it be feasible to laser engrave the MOTM-style black finish, too? That would provide a look that's closer to MOTM, for those who are so inclined. In fact, I might
2005-11-19 by billbigrig
Howdy, Sorry. What I meant was, I'll take three Dark Star Chaos panels in whatever you come up with that is "similar" to .com. Or Jut 3 panals. Thanx Rig
2005-11-19 by Larry T.
--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "mate_stubb" wrote: > > That's true. You have the additional problem of panel mounted pots > eith MOTM. I don't know about dotcom - aren't all pots offboard on > plugin headers? > Yes, the DotCom system uses 100% off board mount controls. The
2005-11-19 by Andrew Sanchez
Sounds like an interesting idea, Moe. I like the idea you have for new panel layouts, but I wonder how much more real estate would that take up? I'd imagine block diagram graphics, different size knobs, and relocation of the jacks would mean having much larger panels in many inst
2005-11-19 by mate_stubb
That's true. You have the additional problem of panel mounted pots eith MOTM. I don't know about dotcom - aren't all pots offboard on plugin headers? I think I could maybe pull off something CMS like, but you might have to go taller. E-MU is the largest format I've ever personall
2005-11-19 by peng3002
You might want to change the groups name. "Moe Better Panels" ? peng
2005-11-19 by peng3002
That would be a dream come true. I have some module designs that I'd love to sell in small batches. The only barrier has been getting panels done. $20 - $25 is a do-able price for me. There is someone over seas who engraves for a reasonable price, but it would be great (not to me
2005-11-19 by Larry T.
YES!! If you are up for it, you could do the engraved panels in 'close to' MOTM and DotCom formats, them maybe do one panel run per year of the 'real thing' for those purists that are willing to pay for the materials and work involved, and to wait for 'batch' runs of panels. Fran
2005-11-18 by seven_arts112
this sounds like a great idea to me. i for one don't care at all if things match, as long as it all fits physically in the synth without fuss. as soon as the next panel run comes around, i've been planning for a while on picking up 2-3 MOTM modules for my dot-com, so i'd definite
2005-11-18 by ~Morbius~
So, you're looking at buying a laser engraver? If so... you really should get some decent engraving/signmaking software. Corel is much more for printing/publishing, and can't do many of the things that you're gonna need to do, and is not well suited for this. Decent sign-making s
2005-11-18 by Scott Stites
>Paul H has showed me a laser model that handles panels up to 20" x >12", and looks to a computer just like a printer. So I could use the >design tool I'm familiar with (CorelDraw), and people who like to >design their own could potentially just send files. Hmmm... just curious -
2005-11-18 by john mahoney
I love the "crazy" idea of quick, custom panels at fixed prices. No price penalty for "one offs"? Fantastic! I would not, however, be inclined to re-skin my whole synth -- and I have fewer than 20 modules. As long as it physically fits in with dotcom or MOTM, I'm happy. -- john
2005-11-18 by mate_stubb
Yes, indeed. There is a smaller model too, but the main reason to consider buying the large one would be the ability to do rack panels, or a 10U Milton panel, for instance. Moe --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Scott Stites wrote: > Hmmm... just curious - would 5U X 17 inches
2005-11-18 by mate_stubb
FWIW, from my standpoint there aren't many MOTM purists, in the sense that they only want modules produced by SynthTech. After all, the slow trickle of new SynthTech modules was what fueled demand for stooge panels in the first place. If MOTM had sprung full blown into the world
2005-11-18 by mate_stubb
The thought is to use a laser engraver. You anodize (or paint, I suppose) the panel, then the laser burns the graphics. It will engrave wherever there is color, but once it gets down to the reflective metal it stops working. At least that's how it was explained to me. I think tha
2005-11-18 by ~Morbius~
Speaking only for myself.... I used to do laser and standard engraving (20 + years worth), and know exactly what is possible. I don't really care that the dotcom font and graphic(s) being a precise match... close, is good enough for me. And I rather like the idea of being able to