Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 23 of 27 · 1314 messages matched
2004-11-22 by meic1965
Sorry Jay, now i reactivated my account. Please try again. Thanxx Meic-- - In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Oliver Abplanalp wrote: > i made the graphics for my panel with adobe photoshop. > if you are interested in the file let me know - but > you must have some patience. i am s
2004-11-22 by Larry Hendry
Someone sent me an e-mail to jlarryh@iquest.net concerning cables. Due to a computer crash, I lost all my Outlook e-mail If it was you, please e-amil me back ASAP. Larry Hendry __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the be
2004-11-21 by meic1965
i forgot to tell you that you can see the modules in the photo-area!! Greetz Meic
2004-11-21 by meic1965
-Hi Folks, > > there is another very interesting projekt here in germany. Its > named > Forummodular and a product from www.anyware-instruments.de. I just > received my 3 VCOs in Dotcom-format. And they are unbeliveble good. > They have a 10-turn-pod for fine-tuning!! Like EMS ha
2004-11-19 by Dana Countryman
Hi All, I've created a folder over in the "Files" section of Roger's "synthesizersdotcom" newsgroup, named "Module Conversions". One photo shows the Moogerfooger MF-101 converted to the MOTM panel. (I posted this photo from my site yesterday) Also, there's a permanent photo of my
2004-11-18 by larry@unicode.com
Dana I'd love to see your 'Dotcom'-ish solution. I currently have 4 rack panels of DotCom and 1 of MOTM. I'll be adding another of each in the near future. Larry T. > Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 05:55:02 -0000 > From: "Dana Countryman" > Subject: Moogerfoogers in a Dotcom/MOTM world..
2004-11-18 by john mahoney
> >looks like you have a mix of Moog knobs and 2 non-Moog knobs... > > Good eye! ... Well, thanks, I looked closely at the knobs. It's not too hard to tell the difference between the expensive Moog/Dotcom knobs and the virtually-identical-except-there-is-a-white-line-instead-of-t
2004-11-18 by Dana Countryman
---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Hi John, ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "john mahoney" Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:50:31 -0500 >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Dana Countryman" >> >> Regard
2004-11-18 by john mahoney
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dana Countryman" > > Regarding Moogerfoogers in a MOTM/Dotcom world... > http://www.danacountryman.com/misc/MF-101a.jpg > I'll admit that I haven't tweaked the electronics yet... Dana, I'm expecting delivery of a MF-101 Stooge panel, too. Can y
2004-11-18 by Dana Countryman
I'm assuming that anyone on this list is already on the Dotcom newsgroup, but just in case, I'll post this note here also:
2004-11-18 by Jay
I'm replying here because your email address isn't working. on 11/17/04 7:30 PM, meic1965 at meic1965@yahoo.com wrote: > With which programm did you made the graphics on the Panel. I am > really interested in knowing it!!--- Corel Draw.
2004-11-17 by Jay
on 11/16/04 11:07 PM, guidotoons at guido@guidotoons.com wrote: > Has anyone done panels and mounted Moogerfooger fx for their Dotcoms? And to those who have, how have you gotten around the bypass switch issue?
2004-11-17 by guidotoons
Has anyone done panels and mounted Moogerfooger fx for their Dotcoms? Lemme know if ya have, thanks. Guido c vc vcv cv v c vcvc
2004-11-16 by Jay
on 11/16/04 4:17 PM, gerryrdahl at gerryrdahl@yahoo.com wrote: > > > Yes Yes!! > > How did you make the panel, its looks very good! > > GD If I'm not mistaken, it looks like a piece of paper printed out on a laser printer then applied to a panel. Works great for trying out layout
2004-11-16 by gerryrdahl
Yes Yes!! How did you make the panel, its looks very good! GD --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Morbius wrote: > What did you do about silkscreening the dotcom panel? > > ~Morb~ > > --- Oliver wrote: > > > > > hi morbius > > > > a picture... and my wife has the new digital cam
2004-11-13 by Michael
Ahh very cool, that's what I figured for the PS ground connections but I really wanted to make sure (can never be too careful with voltage like that). Great to know the .100 MTA is .1" space, of course it makes sense to me now .100 = .1" :). That's great that I can make it on Per
2004-11-13 by Larry Hendry
--- Michael wrote: > .... as long as it's possible to add that extra 5v PS with no > grounding issues. There is no problem with adding the 5 volt supply to a +/-15 supply. You could make your own MOTM-like distribution PCB for the dot com connectors if you did not want to use the
2004-11-13 by Morbius
What did you do about silkscreening the dotcom panel? ~Morb~ --- Oliver wrote: > > hi morbius > > a picture... and my wife has the new digital camera > and is in > asia... > but ok, if you want a picture: i uploaded one in a > new folder on > the group site photos-folder (album i
2004-11-12 by Morbius
Besides the standard dotcom power supply, there is the QPS2 Power Supply @ $85 (comes with cables). --- Michael wrote: > > I have a MOTM based setup currently but would like > to get some dotcom > modules. My problem is that the dotcom power supply > is way to > expensive to just
2004-11-12 by Michael
That one I did see also but it only powers 8 modules - for about the same $ I can power 22 give or take as long as it's possible to add that extra 5v PS with no grounding issues. I suppose the other solution would be to get a PowerOne HCBB-75W-A which is the same spec as the dotc
2004-11-12 by Oliver
hi morbius a picture... and my wife has the new digital camera and is in asia... but ok, if you want a picture: i uploaded one in a new folder on the group site photos-folder (album is named oliver). it is not the best quality because i had taken it with the photo option of my di
2004-11-12 by Michael
I have a MOTM based setup currently but would like to get some dotcom modules. My problem is that the dotcom power supply is way to expensive to justify when I already have power minus the 5v. I know there is the $12 power adaptor that arrick sells for converion but that's $12 a
2004-11-11 by Morbius
How about some pics, Ollie? hey, and some sound samples, too. ~Morbius~ --- Oliver wrote: > > hello guys > > I just finished my first module in dotcom format: a > oakley vc > phaser (equinoxe). i ordered a prepopulated board > from oakley, > 4 dotcom pots and a single blank panel
2004-11-11 by spfeifer
Oliver, I've had one for a while and I'm very happy with it. In fact I purchased another board to make a stereo version of it. Tony's modules are great. I'm waiting for his Gate delay. Scott --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "Oliver" wrote: > > hello guys > > I just finished m
2004-11-11 by Oliver
hello guys I just finished my first module in dotcom format: a oakley vc phaser (equinoxe). i ordered a prepopulated board from oakley, 4 dotcom pots and a single blank panel from roger, added 4 jacks and some wires. it was easy to build and sounds great . The most most work I ha
2004-11-03 by Rafael Cohen
Hi List, At Morbius' recommendation I am asking everyone here if anyone has got an unmade Blacet Time Machine/dotcom conversion project. I am planning on buying the silkscreened panel from Morbius so I would prefer just the basic kit form of the blacet project and/or relevant kno
2004-11-03 by sasami@hotkey.net.au
>Since there is no dedicated >low end LFO in the Arrick line, one of the smaller, non-VC LFOs might >make sense too. Here's a potential non-VC LFO - http://www.cgs.synth.net/modules/cgs58_lfo.html Ken _______________________________________________________________________ Ken Sto
2004-11-02 by Larry Hendry
--- gerryrdahl wrote: > Hi Group, > What is available in dot com format at this time? > Thanks. > GD Well, not much yet Gerry as this is a pretty new concept kicking off here. So far, the only offerings have been DIY conversions behind matching panels. I have sold front panels fo
2004-11-02 by gerryrdahl
Hi Group, What is available in dot com format at this time? Thanks. GD
2004-10-19 by Larry Hendry
About 2 times a year I buy thousands of custom to order cables directly from 2 large cable manufacturers here in the US. These cables are soldered and assembled by hand, here in the USA. I mention this in this forum as an alternative to the bland offering at Synthesizers.com. My
2004-10-19 by Larry Hendry
Poll results were: > Keep this group open and change the topic to conversion of other > modules or DIY circuits into the dot com format. > 20 votes, 100.00% You have spoken clearly. The group stays open. The description of the group has been changed somewhat to reflect the intent
2004-10-19 by Bernd-Michael
a Moog /Bode # 1630 Frequency Shifter, in good condition: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? ViewItem&category=38071&item=3754946182&rd=1
2004-10-19 by dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com
The following dotcomformat poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: As you may have noticed, Roger has re- opened the forum. Too bad he did not start by cleaning out the membership since I imagine many there have no intention of ever owning a modular synth.
2004-10-18 by Bill McKinney
> Possible DotHot topics might include: Boobies, Corporal Agarn, the > long awaited Marx reissue of Captain Mattox, Wacky Packages latest > series, Crystal Bernard's restraining order against me and does that > mean I need to take her of my wife candidate list?, the Schwinn Apple
2004-10-18 by Larry Hendry
That list looks off topic for any list except. "Physco-musicians-sound-off-no-music" :-) Larry --- elhardt4320 wrote: > Possible DotHot topics might include: Boobies, Corporal Agarn, the > long awaited Marx reissue of Captain Mattox, Wacky Packages latest > series, Crystal Bernar
2004-10-18 by elhardt4320
>>I have created a poll to decide whet to do with this group since Roger has re-opened his forum. Your wishes are all that count.
2004-10-16 by moog_freak
--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "Larry Hendry" wrote: > > I have created a poll to decide whet to do with this group since > Roger has re-opened his forum. Your wishes are all that count. Your > call. > Larry Hendry Both forums are useful/helpful and both should remain. Harr
2004-10-15 by Larry T.
Larry et. al. I would like to see this forum remain active. It is a good place to discuss issues related to the DocCom systems and integration with other systems and formats. It is also potentially usefull if the subject seems like one that might cause Roger some discomfort. Base
2004-10-14 by Jay
on 10/14/04 4:10 PM, Larry Hendry at hendrysr@yahoo.com wrote: > Good question Jay. I guess since I tend to use the switch for a few > things, the only advantage is only having one type. Also , I have > noticed that you have to shop price each time you buy these. I > usually get
2004-10-14 by Larry Hendry
--- Jay wrote: > Is there any reason to get the 112a instead of the 111 where a n/c > switch isn't required? (hey, 2 cents is 2 cents ;-). Good question Jay. I guess since I tend to use the switch for a few things, the only advantage is only having one type. Also , I have noticed
2004-10-14 by Jay
on 10/14/04 10:24 AM, Dana Countryman at dana@danacountryman.com wrote: > Hang on, Roger's in the process of getting it back up and running > again. Just a glitch or two to deal with, due to Yahoo administration. He may have to erase the original group entirely. When you change t
2004-10-14 by Dana Countryman
--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "Markk W. Roberts" wrote: > can't find it on Yahoo groups yet .........>> Hang on, Roger's in the process of getting it back up and running again. Just a glitch or two to deal with, due to Yahoo administration. More later, - Dana > ----- Origi
2004-10-14 by Markk W. Roberts
can't find it on Yahoo groups yet ......... ----- Original Message ----- From: ~Morbius~ To: dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:21 PM Subject: [dotcomformat] Old dotcom forum reopened!!! It's baaaaack. : ) ~Morb~
2004-10-14 by Markk W. Roberts
hope it stays... more is better... IMHO Markk ----- Original Message ----- From: Larry Hendry To: dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 6:44 PM Subject: [dotcomformat] Please participate in poll I have created a poll to decide whet to do with this group s
2004-10-14 by Jay
on 10/13/04 9:32 PM, Larry Hendry at hendrysr@yahoo.com wrote: > The industry standard quality jack is the Switchcraft 112a. They are > only about $1.25. Is there any reason to get the 112a instead of the 111 where a n/c switch isn't required? (hey, 2 cents is 2 cents ;-). BTW, i
2004-10-14 by Jay
on 10/13/04 9:44 PM, Larry Hendry at hendrysr@yahoo.com wrote: > I have created a poll to decide whet to do with this group since > Roger has re-opened his forum. Your wishes are all that count. Your > call. > Larry Hendry Well, I hope that this group will continue. It's already
2004-10-14 by Larry Hendry
--- NYMOs wrote: > Question is ..I'll get someone to de-solder the two connections... > but do I use a stereo or mono replacement ??..somebody said a > stereo one was more stable ??. No reason to use stereo. Us a standard mono 1/4" jack > Also.. are there different qualities ??..
2004-10-14 by ~Morbius~
It's baaaaack. : ) ~Morb~
2004-10-14 by Jay
------ Forwarded Message From: "Roger Arrick" Reply-To: synthesizerscomgroup-owner@yahoogroups.com Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 01:00:33 -0000 To: synthesizerscomgroup@yahoogroups.com Subject: [synthesizerscomgroup] Forum reopened I'm reopening the forum. Please keep it civil. Roger
2004-10-14 by Jay
on 10/13/04 8:03 PM, NYMOs at nymo@tpg.com.au wrote: > Question is ..I'll get someone to de-solder the two connections... but do I > use a stereo or mono replacement ??..somebody said a stereo one was more > stable ??. Well, either one will work. But it's not necessary to use a s