Yahoo Groups archive

Dotcomformat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:20 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 25 of 27 · 1314 messages matched

Panel metal - Was: Hello again

2004-09-26 by Larry Hendry

--- Jay wrote: > > And what about front panels? Stooge to the rescue, I guess... > > If Stooge has a supply for the metal. Larry? So far, we have only used metal purchased from Roger for the supply. That is because the number has been so small. To make it feasable to run metal pa

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] I'm here now

2004-09-26 by Jay

on 9/23/04 7:39 AM, Larry Hendry at hendrysr@yahoo.com wrote: > I guess he was sick of the bickering and rudeness like many of us. > But, like you, I do not understand. Perhaps he was tired of reading "Where's the new modules?"

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] Re: Hello again

2004-09-26 by Jay

on 9/23/04 4:38 AM, Terje Winther at terjewi@notam02.no wrote: > Are you taking about the #901 standalone (originally triple-width > front), or the > #901A and #901B driver/oscillator (each on single-width fronts) pair? No, A/B sets. Theres no real point in doing a 901 because it

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Joystick Control

2004-09-26 by Larry T.

You asked for it, you got it. Check out the photos section. Larry T. --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Larry Hendry wrote: > > --- "Larry T." wrote: > > I would be happy to post a couple of pictures if anyone asks. > > I'm askin' > Larry H

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] re: Joystick Control

2004-09-25 by Larry Hendry

--- "Larry T." wrote: > that it would be worth the effort.) They can be switched between > auto centering or not, they have a nice feel and a nice case to sit > where ever you want, about a 6 foot cord ending in an 8 pin > connector that is conpatible with .1" spacing headers, us

Thread view Attachments: 0

re: Joystick Control

2004-09-25 by Larry T.

(The subject that wouldn't die...) If you are looking for a free-standing joystick to use, search for the old IBM PCjr joysticks! They are exactly what the doctor ordered. (With some work you could panel mount one of these, but I'm not sure that it would be worth the effort.) The

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Joystick Control

2004-09-24 by Larry T.

Hey All Sorry I'm so late adding this to the thread, but... Here is a nifty joystic controller that I believe does everything requested. Check it out: http://www.cgs.synth.net/modules/joystick.html Larry T.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] Re: Hello again

2004-09-23 by Terje Winther

> Someone suggested that the "coarseness/richness" I hear on some > classic Moog recordings may come from the Moog's ladder filter or > distortion within the Moog VCA. Yes, that is a very good point. I use dotcom and moog ttogether, and since the dotcom VCO signal is so hot (10 v

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Hello again

2004-09-23 by Dana Countryman

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Terje Winther Guido > > suggested running the dotcom osc into my Moogerfooger Lo-Pass filter > > and then into a VCA for distortion and into the mixer.... > > I am sure you will hear a difference if you set this up. > I see many people transfe

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Hello again

2004-09-23 by Dana Countryman

Hi Terje, --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Terje Winther wrote:>I'm looking for a harsher, richer sound in an oscillator, and >remember the Moog sounding more that way. >Of course, I only played a real Moog once about 32 years ago, so >I'd be curious to hear your comparison.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] I'm here now

2004-09-23 by Larry Hendry

--- elhardt4320 wrote: > After going here: > http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/dotcomusers/ First off, welcome. :-) I started this list first as I thought someone should do something to fill the void so all the old friends could take right up where they left off. Somewhere nea

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] Re: Hello again

2004-09-23 by Terje Winther

>Is there any interest in "901 clones" in DotCom format? I am planning to >have PCB's made soon. Are you taking about the #901 standalone (originally triple-width front), or the #901A and #901B driver/oscillator (each on single-width fronts) pair? Will you update the old parts (t

Thread view Attachments: 0

[dotcomformat] Re: Hello again

2004-09-23 by Terje Winther

Hello Dana, Quite delayed this time due to the concert I just did last weekend: http://www.notam02.no/~terjewi/synthesizer/concerts/20040919/20040919.html (The s.com/moog is featured in the second sound clip). It was quite a lot a labour to do the concert (not to mention all the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] Re: Joystick schematic uploaded

2004-09-23 by Scott Stites

Hi Larry, > I bought 5 or so of these for my own upcoming DIY joystick project > that will be integrated into my modular. However, they are not > spring loaded to return to center like Dana wanted. Yeah, that was the one thing about these joysticks that I really wanted - return t

Thread view Attachments: 0

I'm here now

2004-09-23 by elhardt4320

After going here: http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/dotcomusers/ I was told to come here. I hope this is the correct and final place. I still can't understand Roger rudely shutting down the original list with no preliminary warning that it was going to be shut down. He didn't

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] Re: Joystick schematic uploaded

2004-09-23 by Larry Hendry

--- Scott Stites wrote: > A long, long time ago, MECI used to offer a 150K joystick, made by > Noble. I bought some, and they were sweet indeed. In fact, they > were the one's used by Grant Richter for his Joyrider modules, I > believe. I bought 5 or so of these for my own upcomi

Thread view Attachments: 0

[dotcomformat] Re: Joystick schematic uploaded

2004-09-22 by Steven O'Connor

glad to be of help Dana - although Scott's joystick looks much, much cooler - and nicer to use. Maybe the 'bat' can fit on the doepfer... I wish we (UK) had places like meci.com etc - that big ol' country of yours does everything bigger, better and cheaper than over here... steve

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] Re: Joystick schematic uploaded

2004-09-22 by Scott Stites

Hi List, A long, long time ago, MECI used to offer a 150K joystick, made by Noble. I bought some, and they were sweet indeed. In fact, they were the one's used by Grant Richter for his Joyrider modules, I believe. Then, they disappeared, only to reappear at Alltronics. They're st

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Joystick schematic uploaded

2004-09-22 by Dana Countryman

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Steven O'Connor wrote: > Hi all > > Check the doepfer $60 joystick set up: > > http://www.doepfer.de/a174.htm > > I have a couple and the joystick itself is of a decent quality (used a > lot for over a year now) - the rest of the module is usu

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] Re: Joystick schematic uploaded

2004-09-22 by Steven O'Connor

Hi all Check the doepfer $60 joystick set up: http://www.doepfer.de/a174.htm I have a couple and the joystick itself is of a decent quality (used a lot for over a year now) - the rest of the module is usual 'doepfer' quality...they mention a company called ALPS that makes the act

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Joystick schematic uploaded

2004-09-22 by spfeifer

Larry, thanks for the circuit. Dana I tried about six months ago emailing Korg and various synth mfgs. for purchasing a joystick and never received an answer. The only thing that I find is the gaming joysticks. I'm looking for a compact one also. I'll starting looking again for o

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Joystick schematic uploaded

2004-09-22 by Dana Countryman

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Larry Hendry wrote: > I uploaded a schematic that does what Dana described.> Thanks, Larry! it out by hand as that is all the time I had right at the moment. > > I did not put the component values on there. But, that is easy > enough.>> Yeah,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Joystick schematic uploaded

2004-09-22 by Larry Hendry

I uploaded a schematic that does what Dana described. I just hacked it out by hand as that is all the time I had right at the moment. I did not put the component values on there. But, that is easy enough. They can vary some depending on the size of the pots in the joystick you fi

Thread view Attachments: 0

New file uploaded to dotcomformat

2004-09-21 by dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com

Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the dotcomformat group. File : /schematics/simple-joystick.pdf Uploaded by : hendrysr Description : Simple Joystick Dana desribed You can access this file at the URL: ht

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] Joystick Control & Wiard's Axis Generator

2004-09-21 by Larry Hendry

--- jkn@johei.com wrote: > Somewhat off topic... > http://www.wiard.com/1200/JAG/jag.html > > Wiard's Joystick Axis Generator - all the joystick posts reminded > me of this module which I thought looked fairly nifty the first > time I read about it... > > John K-N John, I have se

Thread view Attachments: 0

Joystick Control

2004-09-21 by spfeifer

I have been thinking of adding a joystick control also, the way that Dana explained but never knew how to design the circuit. I'm in the midst of redesigning the front panel of my QKB15S. I'm adding a few pushbuttons and switches to use as manual gates. I'm great at soldering but

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Picture for the main page > MS 2000

2004-09-21 by Dana Countryman

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Larry Hendry wrote: > Joystick circuits are dirt simple. What makes the difference is just > what feature set you want. You can build one as simple as one dual > op amp and a few resistors. > > But, if you're going to all the trouble, why not

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] Re: Picture for the main page > MS 2000

2004-09-21 by Larry Hendry

Joystick circuits are dirt simple. What makes the difference is just what feature set you want. You can build one as simple as one dual op amp and a few resistors. But, if you're going to all the trouble, why not make something with some control so you do not have to do external

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Picture for the main page > MS 2000

2004-09-20 by Tom

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "Dana Countryman" wrote: >> > Question: Has anyone come up with a joystick for their modular setup?? > I have an old Korg Poly-800, and the joystick is one of the best > things about it. > > I'd be curious to find a way to rig one up for the d

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Picture for the main page > MS 2000

2004-09-20 by Bernd-Michael

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "Dana Countryman" wrote: > > Question: Has anyone come up with a joystick for their modular setup?? > I have an old Korg Poly-800, and the joystick is one of the best > things about it. > > I'd be curious to find a way to rig one up for the do

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Picture for the main page > MS 2000

2004-09-20 by Dana Countryman

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "analogue_ip3" wrote: > Hi Morb, > > Thanks for the glowing report, thanks too, Dana. > > Morb, I know you sent a post in to the old forum, regarding the > MS2000, many moons ago. >> You bet, Clive. If I had the $$, I'd cave in for the new Kor

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] Re: Call for photos

2004-09-20 by Larry Hendry

--- Rich wrote: > Ok Larry... I've added a few more. Come on guys... don't make me > add more. :o Thank Rich. I snagged 'em up for the rotation. I am assuming anyoine that has posted photos in the public folders has no objection to them being used in rotation of the home page. If

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Picture for the main page > MS 2000

2004-09-20 by analogue_ip3

Hi Morb, Thanks for the glowing report, thanks too, Dana. Morb, I know you sent a post in to the old forum, regarding the MS2000, many moons ago. When I went back I couldn't find it, sorry if I made you repeat yourself. There are a fair few available, here in England, so I'm in n

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Call for photos

2004-09-20 by Rich

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "Larry Hendry" wrote: > So far, I have two photos for the group home page that I am > alternating between. This is YOUR group. I'd be happy to use more > our your photos. Only qualification is that a significant amount of > the synth photo mus

Thread view Attachments: 0

Call for photos

2004-09-20 by Larry Hendry

So far, I have two photos for the group home page that I am alternating between. This is YOUR group. I'd be happy to use more our your photos. Only qualification is that a significant amount of the synth photo must be dot com. :-) Larry

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Hello again

2004-09-19 by Dana Countryman

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Tentochi wrote: > 90% of the sound comes from the filter, not the oscillator. This is why we always see people > cloning filters and not oscillators. Of more interest to most keyboard players are stability and > tracking. > > Poorly designed o

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] Re: Hello again

2004-09-19 by Tentochi

90% of the sound comes from the filter, not the oscillator. This is why we always see people cloning filters and not oscillators. Of more interest to most keyboard players are stability and tracking. Poorly designed or poorly calibrated oscillators will create artifacts that are

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] Re: Hello again

2004-09-19 by Jay

on 9/18/04 10:12 PM, Dana Countryman at dana@danacountryman.com wrote: > Hi Terje, > > I noticed you have both the dotcom and Moog oscillators. > I'm eternally asking people this, so bear with me: > > How do the Moog and dotcom oscillators compare? > I'm looking for a harsher, ri

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Picture for the main page > MS 2000

2004-09-19 by Dana Countryman

Hear, hear! I'll second that vote of confidence in the Korg MS2000 -- I have the rack-mounted version and it's a cool little synth. Great analog modeling, and best of all you can save your custom patches. I especially use this synth for comping and other chord work, but also for

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Hello again

2004-09-19 by Dana Countryman

Hi Terje, I noticed you have both the dotcom and Moog oscillators. I'm eternally asking people this, so bear with me: How do the Moog and dotcom oscillators compare? I'm looking for a harsher, richer sound in an oscillator, and remember the Moog sounding more that way. Of course,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Picture for the main page > MS 2000

2004-09-18 by Rich

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "analogue_ip3" wrote: > Hi Morb, > > Thats a nice pic. > > Have you used the sequencer in the MS2000 with the Dotcom (via midi)? > > I have had my eye on the MS2000 for some time, it would be nice to > know if its horizons could be expanded. >

Thread view Attachments: 0

[dotcomformat] Re: Hello again

2004-09-18 by Terje Winther

> > Thank you! I have a CD out, see: >> http://www.notam02.no/~terjewi/synthesizer/music/trespasser.html > >I listend to the excerpts recently and I like them!! >How about contemporary music (you call that "serious" on your website) > - you don't compose for electronics? Yes, I d

Thread view Attachments: 0

New file uploaded to dotcomformat

2004-09-17 by dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com

Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the dotcomformat group. File : /Panel Layouts/blacetvcadsr.cdr Uploaded by : synthbaron Description : Blacet VCEG You can access this file at the URL: http://groups.yaho

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Custom .Com Panels

2004-09-17 by Jay

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Larry Hendry wrote: > Jay participated in a > just for fun discussion like this on TGS and as I remember had a > pretty well thought out layout for the Blacet VCEG. BTW, I've uploaded the layout to the Files section. Its in CorelDraw 8 format.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] Re: Custom .Com Panels

2004-09-17 by Larry Hendry

A couple of thoughts on the subject: There is certainly a standard dot com font, tick mark set and general layout feel that can be followed. However, there is no standard for dot com component spacing. That stuff is all over the map depending on which module is being used. So, a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] Custom .Com Panels

2004-09-17 by Terje Winther

Hi Scott, Are you talking about making s.com front panels for these modules that dublicates the s.com form format - spacing, graphics and all? If so, that would be interesting. >Well I would like to start everyone thinking about custom panels for >their .Com system. I have Blacet

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Custom .Com Panels

2004-09-17 by spfeifer

Yes I'am. The one panel that Larry did for a few of us, the Blacet TM duplicates the .Com format. --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Terje Winther wrote: > Hi Scott, > Are you talking about making s.com front panels for these modules > that dublicates the s.com form format - sp

Thread view Attachments: 0

Image of a synth, who's the owner?

2004-09-17 by tontaub

Hi All, recently I came across a picture showing an interesting modular synth. I want to now more about it, but can't find the link anymore so that I simply could post it here and just ask. I'll describe what I can remember what I saw: The synthesizer is about 15U wide and contai

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.