Re: [L-OT] Re: which drive should be?
2002-10-28 by Murray McDowall
... Standard setup on a PC these days: system = primary master Audio = secondary master Older versions of MS operating systems would only boot from the
Messages
Browse messages
Page 44 of 140 · 6965 messages matched
Re: which drive should be?
2002-10-28 by Mikael Adle
... Aaa, my bad. I´m on win xp pro and it´s a desktop with 2 IDE busses. Mikael Adle
Re: which drive should be?
2002-10-28 by plaarg
... since i don t have a desktop computer and I don t know if you re on a Mac or Windows machine I can only speculate. Probably you re saying that there s 2
Re: which drive should be?
2002-10-28 by plaarg
... since i don t have a desktop computer and I don t know if you re on a Mac or Windows machine I can only speculate. Probably you re saying that there s 2
Re: which drive should be?
2002-10-27 by Mikael Adle
... Anyone care to confirm? Audio drive = Primary master OS drive = Secondary master Or should it be vice/versa? regards Mikael Adle
Re: [L-OT] Bowling for Columbine
2002-10-27 by Paul Wheeler&Kerry Higgs
Sorry , I didn t read this one closely other than to put it on the list of things to catch up with some time . Is it right that it is a documentary [?] and it
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-27 by Alexis Aiosa
... Well there is a lot that I could effectively complain about...really. But at certain point one has to say, this: Are you going to stop the AU/VST
which drive should be?
2002-10-27 by Mikael Adle
Hello! OK. heres an old one... 2 H drives one for apps and the other for audio. How should I set them up? Which one should be master and what IDE cha? regards
Re: [L-OT] Bowling for Columbine
2002-10-27 by plaarg
... just a question, not loaded with sarcasm. I m glad you don t think he s an alarmist, there s hope for me in your world. ... cool. ... ya, but then you
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-27 by Tony Perretta
Hello Alexis Your thrust seems to be that you think my views and those of Orren cannot coexist. I find them wholly congruent but have no desire to reiterate
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-27 by plaarg
... Hey AA, are you secretly in love with Henrik? hahahaha I really think the admins should have just taken the ball in their able hands and made a DAW-OT list
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-27 by Alexis Aiosa
... I was giving praise to your implied decision and congratulating you for being a bigger man to do so. ... Great. I was never asked. How do you like
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-27 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... Maybe some people have given arguments as to why a poll is bound to be inconclusive or why the validity of the outcome might still be debatable. On the one
Re: [L-OT] Bowling for Columbine
2002-10-27 by Colin Miller
... I have seen the movie before your posts asking me to. I don t know why you would think I would think Micheal is an alarmist, I follow most everything he
Re: [L-OT] Bowling for Columbine
2002-10-27 by plaarg
... is ... free shotgun ... Oh... Hi Colin what did you think of the rest of the movie? Is Michael Moore an alarmist or is there really something messed up
Re: [L-OT] I think I can ... I think I can ....
2002-10-26 by Paul Wheeler&Kerry Higgs
five questions for jeremy . How did you get to be moderator on this list ? Do you get paid for being a moderator ? To whom are you responsible in an official
Re: [L-OT] Bowling for Columbine
2002-10-26 by Colin Miller
... I especially liked in the beginning with the bank that gives a free shotgun when you open an account. Colin Miller
Bowling for Columbine
2002-10-26 by plaarg
Go see this movie Bowling for Columbine by Michael Moore. It is a great documentary. I especially enjoyed the Charlton Heston interview and the Marilyn Manson
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-26 by Jeremy Martin
... Yes, that definitely came to my attention, as well as the attention to the other admins. Which is why we created the poll, instead of specifically focusing
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-26 by Tony Perretta
... Sorry? I am one of the admin team simply because at a time when the LUG was messy very few answered Jeremy s initial email asking for assitance. Jeremy
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-26 by Alexis Aiosa
... Perhaps, Tony...If that is how you feel. I can t argue a man, with a level head that just made sense in their dialogue. If without reasonable doubt, that
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-26 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... I m sorry Jeremy, but some people here are trying to do exactly that: bring something to your attention, namely the fact that they don t like the prospect
Re: [L-OT] A remark...
2002-10-26 by Alexis Aiosa
Here is the best thing that was ever written by anybody on this list...are you ready for this, cause it makes absolute sense. Yet, I believe HK implied this
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-26 by Alexis Aiosa
... Right...uh huh...sure Hector, and you make perfect sense your self. Yeah, I am sure we agree on everything you said. Whew, the belief forward motion while
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-26 by Jeremy Martin
... Ahh, sorry about that. There has been so much debating going on here lately I m a little desensitized to silly/funny arguments vs real ones. ;-) Best
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-26 by plaarg
... as moderators. If you don t like what we re doing, or don t think we should be moderators, feel free to bring it to our attention (we are all very open
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-26 by Jeremy Martin
... Moderator = simply the term Yahoo happens to use for list administrators . Main Entry: ad·min·is·tra·tor Pronunciation: &d- mi-n&- strA-t&r,
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-26 by Jeremy Martin
... I m simply making the point that all of our lists are private lists, owned by the admins. We are free to have whoever we want as moderators. If you don t
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-26 by plaarg
moderator = moderate = in moderation = in the middle = not opinionated or biased = non extreme point of view.... etc. teddybut
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-26 by plaarg
... Are you making a value judgment on whether it s good to argue or not? I d like to argue about that, if you don t mind. Your argument that arguing is bad,
Re: [L-OT] A remark...
2002-10-26 by plaarg
... that s a pretty inflexible point of view, and certainly a valid one. But you could be a little more comapassionate about it. I m not telling here, I m
Re: [L-OT] A remark...
2002-10-26 by Dennis Gunn
... The best solution is the delete button. I don t need other people figuring out what I want to read. I have for example deleted long long threads of
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-26 by Jeremy Martin
... Naaa, you guys are both excellent moderators. I think it s a shame everyone enjoys arguing so much over here that it has come to this. I wonder if there s
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-26 by Tony Perretta
... My views align entirely with his - so maybe we should both resign. Tony Perretta
Re: [L-OT] Re:Talk About Music !!!!!!
2002-10-26 by Tony Perretta
... great ... I too first heard it there. It s a good movie - the Angelina Jolie/Ryan Philippe scenes are fantastic. Keeping this kinda on the topic of Logic I
Re: [L-OT] A remark...
2002-10-25 by plaarg
A person wrote ... . related topic restrictions on the L-OT. If that person is not ... . makes no difference to them, their only argument is that it is ... Hi
Re: [L-OT] A remark...
2002-10-25 by Hector
... LUG ... Wrong. Most topics on the L-OT are not banter and are of interest to musicians. Somebody who likes the Logic only topic restrictions of the LUG
Re: [L-OT] A remark...
2002-10-25 by TazmnianDv@aol.com
... Thats why this list should be unmoderated - as a counter balance to the strict censorship on the main list. This allows for a pressure valve for people to
A remark...
2002-10-25 by Tobias Seyb
Hi! Long ago (at least it seems) I asked the members of this list to stop the ongoing discussion and to keep to L- related topics... ...I shouldn´t have done
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-25 by Alexis Aiosa
... I totally agree to this. Delete, Delete, delete...oh something I wish to talk about... Delete, Delete, delete....Oh look, yet something else. ... Point.
Re: [L-OT Talk About Music !!!!!!
2002-10-25 by Orren Merton
... It is a great quote. :) I don t know where it originated, but I first heard it out of Angelina Jolie s mouth in a warm and wonderful film called Playing
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-25 by Hector
... From: Alexis Aiosa ... ... Is this some sort of confusion tactic Alexis? I have never
Re: [L-OT] Re: Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-25 by Alexis Aiosa
... Wow...Now Orren and Dennis agree on anarchy...LOL. Boy this really IS bad. Peace, Alexis
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-25 by Alexis Aiosa
... I am gearing up for it Orren. I stand by HK s words, he seems to be exercising his right to be voiced and sounds as logical and rational as I would like
[L-OT] Re: a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-25 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... Sigh... there s no arguing with you... Sure, fine, have your way. ... [...] ... Jeremy, I m very well aware of how this list is run. And if by now you
Re: [L-OT] Re: why?
2002-10-25 by Jeremy Martin
... This has always been the policy on all of Emagic-ish lists (Logic-users, Logic-TDM, Logic-OT, EXS-users, SoundDiver-users) as far as I know. Best wishes,
Re: [L-OT Talk About Music !!!!!!
2002-10-25 by plaarg
... once said ... Stravinsky said that first. probably Mingus liked it and also said it. plaarg
Re: [L-OT Talk About Music !!!!!!
2002-10-25 by Paul Wheeler&Kerry Higgs
A fairly unreliable friend of mine told me that Charlie Mingus once said that talking about music was like dancing about architecture . I m ready to be
RE: [L-OT] Re: a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-25 by Richmond, James (James) ** CTR **
... Exactly. Here in the UK. If you don t vote then bad luck. If labour are voted out because all the labour voters didn t vote for whatever reason, the govt
Re: [L-OT] Re: a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-25 by TazmnianDv@aol.com
Can we drop this boring moderation thread and get back to the personal insults and hot political talk? Jeremy surely must have more important things to do than