Re: [L-OT] Re: why?
2002-10-25 by TazmnianDv@aol.com
... So personal attacks are no longer allowed? Since when has there been this change in policy? Man, this list is going to lose a lot of its excitement without
Messages
Browse messages
Page 45 of 140 · 6965 messages matched
Re: This whole Jeremy moderation thing
2002-10-25 by kumpy105
... of anything I have ... the spirit of ... card. ... I didn t want to answer any more posts about this, but you singled me out. My most recent (and most
This whole Jeremy moderation thing
2002-10-25 by Tony Perretta
I joined the L-OT list only a few days ago. By some strange coincidence it gratingly coincided with this edifying debate on the nature of censorship. An oft
moderation quagmire
2002-10-25 by kumpy105
Hello all OT people, After this email I am officially quitting this conversation. I value being able to use the LUG and all it s accosiated lists and don t
Re: [L-OT] a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-25 by Alexis Aiosa
... Jeremy and teddybut, LOL...sorry I couldn t help but laugh as soon as I read this. Jeremy...LOL...teddybut has got point man. Sorry. But truth be known,
Re: [L-OT] Re: a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-25 by Paul Wheeler&Kerry Higgs
Shouldn t it be possible for all the people outraged concerning some of our opinions to still be able to censor their received mails by carefully deciding who
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-25 by Dennis Gunn
Orren writes ... Orren you are a big computer literate boy. You know how to use the delete button. You know how to use filters. Right? ... Am I hateful
How Many Polls Does It Take To Change A Lightbulb?
2002-10-24 by Adrian Gill
... Ah, silly is moderated now, is it? Yet it was sensible enough for you to append your own option, without consultation or notification. Was it not
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-24 by mercutio
... I think we should agree to disagree
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-24 by Orren Merton
... Ideally, there would be a Logic-OT Rules document available and automatically posted at some interval which outlines explicitly what the guidelines and
[L-OT] Who moderates the moderators? [was Re: why?]
2002-10-24 by kumpy105
... voted YES... ... Teddy? LOL! Just ... some cookies ... that s not my poll that you voted in. Mine was deleted immediately before anyone had the chance to
Re: [L-OT] Who moderates the moderators? [was Re: why?]
2002-10-24 by Obliviän | Bacteria AS
From: kumpy105 ... I think it was very funny! However, I am the only one that has voted YES... I hope it was a joke?!? How is it
Who moderates the moderators? [was Re: why?]
2002-10-24 by kumpy105
... good ... am ... privately ... you ... were ... a ... all true. I did not mean to offend you or attack you personally with my poll. it was meant as a
[L-OT] Re: a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-24 by Jeremy Martin
... Big difference between at the whim of a moderator , and because they do not follow the policy the majority of active users vote for
Who moderates the moderators? [was Re: why?]
2002-10-24 by Jeremy Martin
... What you implied with your poll was silly, and you gave no option for people to disagree. Any time a poll is edited all the votes are reset, but since no
Re: why?
2002-10-24 by kumpy105
... was ok , ... theme and ... Do ... at ... not worth my time anymore to go back and help you unmoderate me, sorry. It was a test. I didn t think you d
Who moderates the moderators? [was Re: why?]
2002-10-24 by kumpy105
... polls ... evidently ... tampered with - ... guess which ... sure). ... through ... Yes, it is very entertaining isn t it? I wasn t talking about that poll
Re: why?
2002-10-24 by Jeremy Martin
... Hmm, I know you mentioned before you thought the last one was ok , but they all seemed like very close variations on the same theme and it didn t seem
Re: [L-OT] Re: a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-24 by mercutio
... Speaking for myself - I have already stated in a previous post that the moderators do a fine job on spam patrol. But of course this discussion is not
Who moderates the moderators? [was Re: why?]
2002-10-24 by Adrian Gill
... If you mean the poll entitled - Should we just keep on having polls until the moderators get the result they want? at
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-24 by mercutio
... I am not interested in such diatribes either. But I find it strange, even disturbing that you would feel competent to prevent me from making my own
Re: a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-24 by Jeremy Martin
... I agree with the first one, but if they don t care, or don t even read the list and thus don t count, why not let the majority of active list members who
Re: why?
2002-10-24 by teddybut
... thanks for the warning. I appreciate you not banning me without one. I will cease and desist with my attacks on you and others. teddybut
Re: why?
2002-10-24 by teddybut
... thank you, thank you, oh great one. see it s a lot of work for you to moderate this insanity. why bother? those personal attacks were only meant to make to
Re: [L-OT] a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-24 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... Not very. It is however extremely redundant in my view. The L-OT is very low traffic, WOT-arguments come up only once or twice a year, and moderating
Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-24 by Orren Merton
I m back for more punishment. ;) ... I am also proud Jeremy is the censor. If he was not the censor, I probably wouldn t be back here. I have total faith in
Re: [L-OT] Digest Number 719
2002-10-24 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... 70? Uh... is that more than 64? -- Hendrik Jan Veenstra Omega Art: http://www.ision.nl/users/h/index.html
[L-OT] Re: a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-24 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... A bit of elementary logic applied to your above quote: If they like the status quo: keep the LOT unmoderated. If they don t care: keep the LOT unmoderated.
Re: [L-OT] why?
2002-10-24 by Obliviän | Bacteria AS
From: teddybut ... We are not being moderated anymore. Case closed.
Re: [L-OT] Re: a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-24 by Obliviän | Bacteria AS
From: teddybut ... are ... and ... Teddy, don t get so personal, Jeremy was only doing what he thought was right, a mistake in my
Re: why?
2002-10-24 by Jeremy Martin
... This is only one of the 5 Emagic lists I am the head admin of, and I would like to remind you that I have no obligation to let you continue your
Re: [L-OT] Digest Number 722
2002-10-24 by Jeremy Martin
... I m sorry, but you are wrong. I did not moderate the list until 10/17. I only counted people who unsubscribed while the political thread was still very
Re: why?
2002-10-24 by Jeremy Martin
... That s a good point. I ll unmoderate the list now. However you personally will remain moderated as less than 24 hours ago you posted more than 7 direct
why?
2002-10-24 by teddybut
Why are we still being moderated if we are not continuing the Israel/Palestine topic? wasn t that the reason for the moderation? teddybut PS. there some new
Re: a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-24 by teddybut
... oh ya, that s what I like... the real OT. that comment is so right on it s scary. best, teddybut
Re: [L-OT] Digest Number 722
2002-10-24 by teddybut
... you didn t read what Dennis wrote apparently. you response is inadequate. please try again. thank you teddybut
Re: a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-24 by teddybut
... right.... sure Jeremy. and now that you ve stepped in you think it s more focused? on what? We are now focused on YOU man.... this list sucks now because
Re: [L-OT] Re: a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-24 by Obliviän | Bacteria AS
... From: Obliviän | Bacteria AS ... prophet! ... I d just like to point out that I meant this humorously... I don t think he see
Re: [L-OT] Re: a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-24 by Obliviän | Bacteria AS
From: Dennis Gunn ... Further more, according to his Yahoo profile, Jeremy claims to be a prophet! Now, that disqualifies any hint of
Re: [L-OT] Re: a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-24 by mercutio
... Because it will inevitably arise that some thread will be moved over there - sparking again the debate. Because this list serves as an safety valve
[L-OT] Re: a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-24 by Bob Lowen
Hi all, What a waste of time having to argue concerning the OT list. My personal views on this are the following: 1. I often rather enjoy reading people s
Re: [L-OT] Digest Number 721
2002-10-24 by Alexis Aiosa
... ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Now that s a great site. Peace, Alexis
Re: [L-OT] a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-24 by Obliviän | Bacteria AS
... From: Hector ... posts ... list ... related ... noise ... to ... I can only speak for myself, but I have signed up and signed off
Re: [L-OT] Re: a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-24 by Dennis Gunn
... I am constantly amazed at how people make so much of undramatic statements. I made a straight one line observation that did not contain a single adjective
Re: [L-OT] Digest Number 719
2002-10-24 by Tobias Seyb
... Great, your deep understanding of the aussie shirt wearers! But then the japanese translators should have written: Ich spanne gerne . We don´t say that
Re: [L-OT] newsgroups
2002-10-24 by mercutio
... Seems irrelevant to me whether you delete an email message without reading or mark as read a newsgroup line. The only difference is the few moments
Re: [L-OT] Digest Number 719
2002-10-24 by Tobias Seyb
... Am I not great??? in fact it should have been: I like to watch over others would be Ich mag es, andere zu überwachen For all readers with an IQ lower
Re: [L-OT] Re: a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-24 by Hector
... Nobody is suggesting complete censorship, just moving some posts to an L-WOT list. Hector.
Re: [L-OT] a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-24 by Hector
... From: Hendrik Jan Veenstra ... Again, what drama! Why can you not accept that the worst that can happen to a thread is it gets moved to a
Re: [L-OT] a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-24 by Dennis Gunn
... So you do at least grasp the concept of masturbation (if not your own tool) and advocate the practice.