Re: [L-OT] Digital Signals & Mating Signals
2001-11-10 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... Yes, he s right (hey GA: see! again I agree! That s already 3 times this week!) ... Not to the point. GA says, rightfully, that most math-heads believe
Messages
Browse messages
Page 93 of 140 · 6965 messages matched
Re: Re: [L-OT] Digital Signals & Mating Signals
2001-11-10 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... Every research recently conducted in this field shows that women still get substantially less paid than men when performing the same kind of jobs or tasks.
Re: [L-OT] music and maths
2001-11-10 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... Wah... A tiny portion of what we call music can be represented by numbers -- much as a colorspace can be represented by numbers. By there s no way the
Re: [L-OT] QUotes
2001-11-10 by Kool Musick
And a VERY nice collection of quotes that is to be sure. You have good taste!! Out of the 40 odd (??) that you sent, there were only four or five, I think,
QUotes
2001-11-10 by GAmoore@aol.com
Here are some other quotes for you: o A collection of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house. - Henri Poincare (1903) o A mathematician,
Re: [L-OT] Convert Hardware Stereo outs to Mono?
2001-11-10 by GAmoore@aol.com
... A y-cable won t work?
Convert Hardware Stereo outs to Mono?
2001-11-10 by Dave Abbott
Howzit All This is OT in the OT list at the moment what with theSept 11 and all that Anyway I wonder if any of the clever people out there would know how to
Re: [L-OT] music and maths
2001-11-10 by LogicBaby
I have a relative who is a mathematician researcher at Brunel University London used to teach at Manchester University at the time , he told me that they
Re: [L-OT] Digital Signals & Mating Signals
2001-11-09 by Kool Musick
... _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Re: [L-OT] Digital Signals & Mating Signals
2001-11-09 by GAmoore@aol.com
By the way, just because i made a comment about the changing attitudes of women in our society doesn t have any reflection on my own love life or ability to
Re: [L-OT] LCD Screens and recording.
2001-11-09 by yoonchinet@yahoo.com
... Cheaper solution: try a cordless keyboard and cordless mouse. Then you don t have to run to the booth, :-). Logitech will do. Yoonchi.
music and maths
2001-11-09 by John Matthews
IMHO a lot of Scientists are also musicians, in fact, in my experience it seems to be the most common art form that Scientist types do for relaxation as a
[L-OT] LCD Screens and recording.
2001-11-09 by Lars Vik
Lars Vik - Signature Does anybody know if there s much interference from LCD monitors? (that guitars etc. picks up) Currently I have two Eizo Flexscan
Re: [L-OT] Digital Signals & Mating Signals
2001-11-09 by GAmoore@aol.com
... Actually most mathematicians believe the beauty of mathematics in and of itself without any regard to real world applications. I remember when I was a
Re: [L-OT] OT (GEN) RE various synthesis methods
2001-11-09 by LogicBaby
The wavestation also featured wave-sequencing, you can trigger different waves after each other, so the sound dynamically changing hehee....
Re: Re: [L-OT] stop dissing Fourier!
2001-11-09 by GAmoore@aol.com
... Keep repeating it until you make us believe.
Re: [L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better
2001-11-09 by Kool Musick
I am sorry for the delay in responding properly but I have been very busy all day. GA Moore wrote: Kool ... wrote a great article, Heaven s sake ... it was
Re: [L-OT] stop dissing Fourier!
2001-11-09 by Kool Musick
I am sorry for the delay in responding but I have been very busy all day. GA Moore wrote: I suspect that you re mistake is the same one of Fourier, of
stop dissing Fourier!
2001-11-08 by GAmoore@aol.com
... I think its right as it was : integral( f_n(x) , x = 0 to x = infinity) = (1/n)*n = 1 for all values of n 0. the limit of a constant (1) is the
Re: MP3.com et al
2001-11-08 by Zeek Duff
Thanks to ALL who responded, and it looks like the unclear winner is www.ampcast.com for being most like the old mp3.com in artist support. We ll see, I
Re: [L-OT] Digital signal
2001-11-08 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... In that case you re always welcome to pass my email address along to every good looking, and young (& desperate) enough looking girl you happen to meet...
Re: [L-OT] Digital signal
2001-11-08 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... I have a horribly under-paid job... ... ... and a 10 year old car (which my girlfriend drives since I don t have a license). ... Well, that s _one_ quality
Re: [L-OT] Digital signal
2001-11-08 by Lars Vik
... Thanks man! With this info I just can t go wrong! I ll bring your e-mail in case I get stuck or too drunk or something...! ;-) Yeah! [Non-text portions of
Re: Analog synth is still better; stop dissing Fourier!
2001-11-08 by yoonchinet@yahoo.com
... You are right! My mistake; the integration should ve been done piece-wise. Thanks for correcting me. Yoonchi.
Re: [L-OT] Digital signal
2001-11-08 by GAmoore@aol.com
... The way you get laid with this info, is that you get a high paying job, drive a nice car, and look like a good catch ... then the girls really get
Re: [L-OT] Digital signal
2001-11-08 by Mark at Enduser
... LOL! I love it... They say that academic tiffs are so vicious because the stakes are so low...... ;-P -- Mark Lennox Consultant ENDUSER Guinness Enterprise
[L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better; stop dissing Fourier!
2001-11-08 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... The graph of the functions Greg describes looks like (in Courier please) ... 1/n -|======================= ...
Re: [L-OT] Digital signal
2001-11-08 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... Let s suppose the speed of light is 3 * 10^8 m/s (it s actually a bit less, but that doesn t matter for the outcome). So in one year light travels 3 * 10^8
[L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better; stop dissing Fourier!
2001-11-08 by yoonchinet@yahoo.com
... I m sorry but wouldn t the result of this be: limit( ((1/n)*x, x = 0 to x = y), y - infinity) which is not equal to 1 for all n? ... This result is
Re: [L-OT] Digital signal
2001-11-08 by Kool Musick
Hendrik Jan Veenstra wrote: Guys, guys, aren t you all getting a little bit overboard in this discussion?? Yes. You are perfectly correct. I apologise.
Re: [L-OT] Digital signal
2001-11-08 by Lars Vik
... But how many decimals do you need? Just interested... You know, nice thing to know when you check up girls or things like that...! It s Wednesday, but
Re: [L-OT] Analog synth is still better + Digital signal
2001-11-08 by Kool Musick
GA Moore wrote: Lotsa stuff!! Hi, Just got your emails. Thanks. Kool Musick Keep Musick Kool _________________________________________________________ Do You
Re: [L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better
2001-11-08 by elkoro10@yahoo.fr
... apologies. ... Could Emagic fix this in LA5 please!!! ;-)
Re: [L-OT] Digital signal
2001-11-08 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... Guys, guys, aren t you all getting a little bit overboard in this discussion?? Having a complete representation of pi is useless, in any sense and in any
Re: Re: Re: [L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better
2001-11-08 by GAmoore@aol.com
ooops sorry - that was meant to be private ....
Re: [L-OT] OT (GEN) RE various synthesis methods
2001-11-08 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... Every synthesis method is capable of producing dynamically changing sounds. As soon as there is e.g. an envelope generator present, or some other time
Re: Re: [L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better
2001-11-08 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... That s why I included the more or less probably , as I was not entirely sure. Thanks for setting things straight. cheers, HJ -- Hendrik Jan Veenstra
Re: Re: [L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better
2001-11-08 by GAmoore@aol.com
Hi Joeri Well I have my degrees in mathematics and even published two papers in math, but I m a bit rusty in the more advanced topics since I haven t dealt
Re: Re: Re: [L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better
2001-11-08 by Dennis Gunn
... Yes it is. But I think it was about nine years ago I bought one the first batch of audio media cards that came out and was using the very first versions on
Re: [L-OT] Digital signal
2001-11-08 by marc lindahl
... What about: Case 3: file generated as case 2. playback digital file --- add some noise and hum *mathematically* --- D/A --- amplifier --- speakers
Re: [L-OT] Digital signal
2001-11-08 by marc lindahl
... With this type of series, you re already aliased! ... Again, aliased already. Stilson and Smith did a nice paper which you should read, it will clear this
Re: [L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better
2001-11-08 by marc lindahl
... It s applicable to Economics, for some of the modelling you might do, but that would be pretty advanced. Or, it might be used in the insurance field.
Re: Re: [L-OT] Digital signal
2001-11-08 by GAmoore@aol.com
... Thats what double precision floating point is for. 64 bits or 128 bits will get you pretty accurate estimate - certainly good enough so no one can hear any
Re: Re: [L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better
2001-11-08 by GAmoore@aol.com
Kool You are obviously a clever guy, and you wrote a great article, but frankly, I don t think you fully know what you are talking about. I mean no disrespect,
Re: [L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better
2001-11-08 by Joeri Vankeirsbilck
Oops, I thought I had sent this mail to Kool privately. My apologies. -- Joeri Vankeirsbilck joeri@belway.com Belway Productions -
Re: [L-OT] Digital signal
2001-11-08 by Kool Musick
GA Moore wrote: In the old IBM PC s and Macs, you used to be able to write a little program that would make the computer generate tones. You could make the
Re: [L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better
2001-11-08 by Kool Musick
Kool Musick wrote: Lagrange, Gauss, Archimedes, Euler, Riemann Joeri Vankeirsbilck wrote: These guys have caused me an awful lot of headaches in the
Digital signal
2001-11-08 by GAmoore@aol.com
In the old IBM PC s and Macs, you used to be able to write a little program that would make the computer generate tones. You could make the pitch change or
Re: [L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better
2001-11-08 by Dennis Gunn
... I am aware of all that but looking at the data gives you an idea of the kind of contortions it takes to get it back into some semblance of the intended
Re: [L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better
2001-11-08 by Joeri Vankeirsbilck
... These guys have caused me an awful lot of headaches in the last couple of years!!! :-)) ... Question: is this the kind of stuff one would have to study