Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 212 of 329 · 16407 messages matched

Re: Banchmarking different ARMs

2005-02-26 by lpc2100_fan

May be I missed something but the program compiled with GCC and the one with ADS seem to have nothing in common. Is it correct that these are totally different

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Banchmarking different ARMs

2005-02-26 by tsvetanusunov

... pretty interesting to see that GCC make shorter code than ADS :) All benchmarks I ve seen on ARM, Keil etc web site show that GCC usually produces twice

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: UART0 vs UART1

2005-02-25 by dimaissaev

... library ( ... polled ... I can t use this interrupt by many reason. The main is Ineed a nested interrupts. And I think that I have a problem with them.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: UART TX FIFO SIZE

2005-02-25 by peterburdine

... a FIFO ... than you ... transmission ... switch ... not ... Well thats what I meant to get at, there is no way to tell if it is full.

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [lpc2000] SPI on LPC2106

2005-02-25 by Ronnie Leighty

Hi Mark, I am having similar issue with the 2119 part where I noticed your PINSEL0 setting of 0x00000050 is misaligned with p78 or P127 of the 2119 user

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] Re: UART TX FIFO SIZE

2005-02-25 by Robert Adsett

... Why? If you are doing a polled transmission I could see the use for a FIFO full flag but for interrupt driven you can stuff the FIFO faster than you can

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: UART TX FIFO SIZE

2005-02-25 by peterburdine

... calculate the ... with the ... words ... FIFOs. ... I just wish they gave you a way to know how many bytes are in the FIFO (at least the tx fifo). In my

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: UART0 vs UART1

2005-02-25 by peterburdine

I ve been having a terrible time with getting the interrupts working on the LPC2294 using the Keils tools. The code being created seems fine, but if I try and

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] ARM7 with on-board ethernet

2005-02-25 by Jens Hildebrandt

... Oops, forgot one... The Winbond W90N740 is an ARM7 based MCU with I- and D-cache running at 80MHz, featuring two 10/100-Ethernet-MACs, NAT-module, USB 1.1

Thread view Attachments: 0

Banchmarking different ARMs

2005-02-25 by tsvetanusunov

Hello All, For a while I m thinking to make a benchmark code which to run on all boards with ARMs we already have: Philips LPC2xxx, OKI ML67Q5xxx, TI TMS470,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Philips datasheet department...

2005-02-25 by Richard

No, he is refering to a publication put out by ARM themselves. See: http://www.arm.com/documentation/books/1183.html Richard ... ARM ... explaning ... manual

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: ARM7 with on-board ethernet

2005-02-25 by Gus

... year (Q3 according to Rober s last post) with on-board ethernet. Will this chip have PHY built in? If not, I really don t want to see that chip! If yes, I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: ARM7 with on-board ethernet

2005-02-25 by radoslaw_mitura

... (Q3 ... know of an ... is all a ... There is one from ATMEL (AT91C140) with dual 10/100 MAC (but without PHY) and SDRAM controller. It is quite big BGA256.

Thread view Attachments: 0

ARM7 with on-board ethernet

2005-02-25 by Stephen Pelc

... See Sharp www.sharpsma.com We haven t written the Ethernet drivers for these yet. See Samsung The S3C4510B is used by most of the low cost 10/100 4 port

Thread view Attachments: 0

LPC2138 open drain for I2C

2005-02-25 by Gus

Hello, It seems like the LPC2138 has 2 I2C built in. Does this mean that now we have 4 open drain pins on this chip? Thanks, Gus

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] UART0 vs UART1

2005-02-25 by Robert Adsett

... There are examples in the files download area. The newlib-lpc library ( http://www.aeolusdevelopment.com ) has drivers for both UARTS both polled and

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] UART TX FIFO SIZE

2005-02-25 by Robert Adsett

... The top of page 140 of the user manual 16 byte Receive and Transmit FIFOs. Robert Freedom has no meaning of itself. There are always restrictions,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Reset time

2005-02-25 by charlesgrenz

Hi Danilo, There you have me. When I initially talked with Philips Apps about this, they gave me the wrong information the first time and the second time the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] Re: Reset time

2005-02-25 by Danilo Franco

Hi Charles, Thanks for your prompt reply. So once POR is activated, what is the RST rise time? I have been designing reset control circuit taking into account

Thread view Attachments: 0

ARM7 with on-board ethernet

2005-02-25 by Hugh O'Keeffe

Hi Group, I know that Philips are releasing an LPC2000 part later this year (Q3 according to Rober s last post) with on-board ethernet. Anyone know of an ARM7

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Reset time

2005-02-25 by charlesgrenz

Morning Danilo, 80ms if you need to use one. Since the 2138 has a POR circuit, you do not need any external reset control. regards, Charles ... be pulled down

Thread view Attachments: 0

Reset time

2005-02-25 by Danilo Franco

Does anyone know how much time (or instruction cycle) RST line must be pulled down to reset LPC2138? Regards, Danilo [Non-text portions of this message have

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] UART0 vs UART1

2005-02-25 by Srinivasa Reddy Mannem

Hi, Could you please send me the code for UART0. Here i am facing some problem with UART0. I am unable to send any charector to Hyper Terminal.. Thanks in

Thread view Attachments: 0

UART0 vs UART1

2005-02-25 by dimaissaev

Hi all. Could anyone explane me what different between UART1 and UART0 (except modem control register in UART1). I can t understant NOTHING! Two equal

Thread view Attachments: 0

UART TX FIFO SIZE

2005-02-25 by Hong Jiang

Hi all members: I can get a Rx FIFO depth through FCR register,but how can I calculate the Tx FIFO size. According to the LPC2119 document,this CPU s UART is

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.