Re: [lpc2000] Help me find LPC2000 programmers
2004-02-19 by Robert Adsett
At 09:05 PM 2/19/04 +0000, you wrote: Alaric, ... That would be nice. Please do. I agree on making a consistent header. I was thinking the same set as you
Messages
Browse messages
Page 307 of 329 · 16407 messages matched
Re: [lpc2000] Help me find LPC2000 programmers
2004-02-19 by Alaric B Snell
... I m fiddling with some designs for such a thing myself - I can give you my Eagle files if you want; it would be a shame for our header pinouts to be
gnu tools for lpc21XX
2004-02-19 by entell0
I am planning to use either LPC2124 or LPC2129 for a new project. Do the GNU tools need special tweaking to target either of these two processors?
Re: Re[2]: [lpc2000] Help me find LPC2000 programmers
2004-02-19 by Robert Adsett
... It did say device driver programmers but you may be right. If so, Pero please contact me off list. Robert Freedom has no meaning of itself. There are
Re: Re[2]: [lpc2000] Help me find LPC2000 programmers
2004-02-19 by microbit
I think the original post was for SW programmers on LPC2000, as in people ... Not sure though. ... From: entell0 To:
Re[2]: [lpc2000] Help me find LPC2000 programmers
2004-02-19 by entell0
... What software do you use together with the BSL programmer circuit to program the part?
Re[2]: [lpc2000] Help me find LPC2000 programmers
2004-02-19 by Peter Kuhar
... You can use BSL programer for msp430. It works fine for me. http://llg.cubic.org/dmx43/bsl.png lp, Pero
Re: [lpc2000] Help me find LPC2000 programmers
2004-02-19 by Robert Adsett
... It doesn t require anything very special since it programs through the serial port. I was thinking of making a board to connect a PC serial port to a 0.1
Help me find LPC2000 programmers
2004-02-19 by Russ Lindgren
Leon Thanks ! I ve taken good advantage of your www.lpc2100.com site to find development bds. I was first alerted to this ARM7 derivative via CC ink. (PS if
Re: [lpc2000] Code Protection
2004-02-19 by microbit
Hi Brian, I m of the same conviction wrt code protection. My FAE told me late last year that protected parts *supposedly* would be out middle 2004, I m
Re: [lpc2000] Code Protection
2004-02-19 by Bill Knight
Brian It s a bit of a kludge, but you could use an AT91FR40162/4042. They have a piggyback flash in the same package as the CPU and the address & data lines
RE: [lpc2000] Code Protection
2004-02-19 by Hugh O'Keeffe
AFAIK, this will be supported by the LPC2000. I think next mask revisions will have this feature. Hugh @ http://www.ashling.com/support/lpc2100/ ... From:
Re: [lpc2000] Code Protection
2004-02-19 by Peter Kuhar
Maybe it s an OpenSource(OpenCode) chip :))))))) GNU and shit
Code Protection
2004-02-19 by Brian C. Lane
One of the big failings of the LPC series is its lack of protection for the code programmed into it. MSP430 has the jtag fuse that can be blown. I ve seen
Re: [lpc2000] new chips
2004-02-19 by Bill Knight
I was able to get a few samples of the LPC2214 and have it starting to breath on my eval board. Hope to get pictures and schematic up on web site soon. -Bill
RE: [lpc2000] new chips
2004-02-19 by Hugh O'Keeffe
If you mean the LPC2119/2129, then check here
Re: [lpc2000] new chips
2004-02-19 by Leon Heller
... From: martin de lange To: Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 9:51 AM Subject: [lpc2000] new chips
new chips
2004-02-19 by martin de lange
Has anyone seen anything on the new chips that was supposed to have been released this week on the Embedded show? ... From: Alaric B Snell To:
Re: [lpc2000] MCB2100 LPC2114 starter code
2004-02-19 by Alaric B Snell
... The MCB2100 stuff does come with an example, called Blinky. There s two versions - one that reads from the ADC to flash the LEDs at a rate controlled by
Re: [lpc2000] MCB2100 LPC2114 starter code
2004-02-19 by Leon Heller
... From: petermccormick1 To: Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 11:26 PM Subject: [lpc2000] MCB2100 LPC2114
MCB2100 LPC2114 starter code
2004-02-18 by petermccormick1
We have used Keil Uv2 (assemblers & C) and Ceibo emulators & programmers for the 87C554 family of chips for years. The 87C is great but it is becoming an
Re: [lpc2000] UART TX FIFO and INTs problem
2004-02-18 by Bill Knight
I just uploaded a ZIP file containing my UART and elapsed system timer code. It is a simple program which uses some very helpful support routines. The code
New file uploaded to lpc2000
2004-02-18 by lpc2000@yahoogroups.com
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the lpc2000 group. File : /ut040218A.zip
Re: [lpc2000] UART TX FIFO and INTs problem
2004-02-18 by microbit
Thanks Robert, I had downloaded it in the meantime, and had gone through it. Bitmaps etc. seemed identical to LPC2000, so I guess it s a true 16C550
Re: [lpc2000] UART TX FIFO and INTs problem
2004-02-18 by Robert Adsett
... I don t see another way than maintaining a counter. From National s data sheet pg 19 When the XMIT FIFO and transmitter interrupts are enabled (FCR0e1,
Re: [lpc2000] UART TX FIFO and INTs problem
2004-02-18 by Robert Adsett
... That s what I was remembering! Thanks for the refresh. Robert Freedom has no meaning of itself. There are always restrictions, be they legal,
Re: [lpc2000] UART TX FIFO and INTs problem
2004-02-18 by microbit
... How do you then know when the FIFO is full ? There is nothing accessible to tell you. Do you maintain a counter loop that lets you only write up to 16
Re: [lpc2000] UART TX FIFO, INTs problem
2004-02-18 by Robert Adsett
... I gave up on using C directly for interrupts long ago. I ve run into too many compiler failures where they either produced wrong code or were so
Re: [lpc2000] UART TX FIFO, INTs problem
2004-02-18 by microbit
Well, go figure. Is there something wrong with directly writing to UOIER to turn THRE INts on and off ? This is what I sed : Write 0x01 to U0IER (disable
Re: [lpc2000] UART TX FIFO and INTs problem
2004-02-18 by David Willmore
... OT trivia: The 16450 was the simple UART (8250). The 16550 had buffers, but there were bugs that made them unusable. The 16550A was the fixed version. An
Re: [lpc2000] UART TX FIFO and INTs problem
2004-02-18 by Robert Adsett
... I wanted to check the documentation before I commented (to refresh my memory on the FIFO). You get a lot of the same benefits you get from a RX FIFO.
Re: [lpc2000] Where is this group?
2004-02-18 by Leon Heller
... From: To: Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 5:04 PM Subject: [lpc2000] Where is this group? ... Yesterday. 8-)
Where is this group?
2004-02-18 by redsp@yahoo.com
When I do a search in Yahoo Groups on LPC2000 I get Sorry, no matches were found for lpc2000 . I can get a match on LPC2100, but the link is not valid. If I
Re: [lpc2000] UART TX FIFO and INTs problem
2004-02-18 by Robert Adsett
Nice summary Kris, ... the 16550 was a National part if I remember correctly. Hmm, I ll check. Try this http://www.national.com/pf/PC/PC16550D.html If
Re: [lpc2000] UART TX FIFO and INTs problem
2004-02-18 by microbit
Hi Robert, Well you were certainly dean on the money. It s not completely solved yet, and I do know there is a context ... The RF normally runs at 64 kBps, and
Re: [lpc2000] UART TX FIFO, INTs problem
2004-02-18 by microbit
Thanks Musharraf, In the meantime I learnt the hard way :-) Yes, I have run into a problem where the GCC based part screws up the context, reducing
Re: [lpc2000] UART TX FIFO and INTs problem
2004-02-18 by Robert Adsett
At 07:22 PM 2/18/04 +1100, you wrote: ... I knew there had to be a reason :) Half duplex buffering makes a lot of sense. ... OK, I see what you are
RE: [lpc2000] UART TX FIFO, INTs problem
2004-02-18 by Musharraf Hanif
I am just wondering.... are you using GCC compiler? if yes, from what i have heard, it is not very good in context switches.... ie. it can mess up when storing
Re: [lpc2000] UART TX FIFO and INTs problem
2004-02-18 by microbit
Hi Robert, Thanks for the insights, and of course while the group was off the air for a while I m pretty near getting on top of it. It turns out it s not the
Re: [lpc2000] UART TX FIFO and INTs problem
2004-02-18 by Robert Adsett
A couple of questions and observations. Maybe they ll spark something. ... Not really related to your actual problem but since you are using printf why bother
Re: I Fixed My Secondary JTAG problem
2004-02-18 by Jim Beagley
... OOPS! __SORRY__ So, I was playing with my board today, and while laying out a new rev, I decided I would try to see what would happen if I removed the RTCK
I Fixed My Secondary JTAG problem
2004-02-18 by Jim Beagley
UART TX FIFO and INTs problem
2004-02-17 by forum_microbit
Hi all, [I m reposting on the URL, the new lpc2000 address doesn t seem to wor I m a bit stuck with this one, and hope someone has some advice, I must be
UART TX FIFO, INTs problem
2004-02-17 by microbit
Hi all, I m a bit stuck with this one, and hope someone has some advice, I must be overlooking something and I just don t see it....... I m using Two 256 byte
LPC2100 group renamed
2004-02-17 by leon_heller
I ve renamed the group to LPC2000, in line with the Philips change of name for the family. Leon
Group name change
2004-02-17 by leon_heller
I ve just changed the name of the group to LPC2000. 8-) Leon
[lpc2000] lpc2100 group name/addresses have changed
2004-02-17 by notify@yahoogroups.com
Hello, The moderator of the lpc2100 group has changed the group s name. This means that both the group s email address and the group home page location have
Re: [lpc2100] re eCOS
2004-02-17 by Al Snell
... I m now glad I called the Wiki ARMuC rather than LPC21xx - although I did make a page for the LPC21xx on there, and am thus having to make a seperate
Re: Re: System Mode
2004-02-17 by Michael Johnson
System mode is user mode with the ability to modify the status register. As Michael mentions if you want to re-enable interrupts from IRQ mode you should
Re: [lpc2100] re eCOS
2004-02-17 by Leon Heller
... From: Hugh O Keeffe To: Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 2:16 PM Subject: [lpc2100] re eCOS ...