Re: Wiggler and Keil
2005-12-28 by tsvetanusunov
... the H-JTAG as is will not work with our ARM-JTAG as it doesn t handle the JTAG-ENABLE pin we have on our JTAG Our JTAG have the folowing pin assignments:
Messages
Browse messages
Page 95 of 329 · 16407 messages matched
Re: ARM Cross dev. with LPC2294
2005-12-28 by wzzxo
... Hello Eelco, Thank you for the advice, this was actually the problem. I don t know why, but I was sure the LPC2294 had as much RAM as the LPC2106. Ennio
Re: [lpc2000] Re: Wiggler and Keil
2005-12-28 by Leon Heller
... From: derbaier To: Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 11:53 PM Subject: [lpc2000] Re: Wiggler and Keil ...
Re: [lpc2000] Re: Flash security
2005-12-28 by Michael Rubitschka
PLEASE!!!! Isnt there a list relating to flash security where you could put your asumptions? If not be so kind an found one. Cheers Michael ... LOL!!!!
RE: [lpc2000] Re: Ethernet on ARM chip?
2005-12-28 by Joel Winarske
... 2H 05 for the LPC23xx as stated here: http://www.macro-peterburg.ru/pdf/2005_04_25_PHILIPS_MCUs.pdf Perhaps engineering samples might be available in two
Re: Ethernet on ARM chip?
2005-12-28 by jayasooriah
Let me assure you that the T command not the only hidden method of getting the boot loader to do things using ISP commands that is not documented anywhere. I
Re: [lpc2000] Re: Ethernet on ARM chip?
2005-12-28 by Craig Schlenter
... *yawn* I don t suppose you could keep your insinuations about flash security in the original thread until you have actual proof that there is a problem?
Re: Ethernet on ARM chip?
2005-12-28 by jayasooriah
I would not recommend anyone depend on flash security feature until we have had Philips come back from hols and tell us about the hidden ISP command(s)
Re: Ethernet on ARM chip?
2005-12-28 by nuloson
Maybe LPC23XX 512K/64K, Ethernet MAC, USB/OTG, 3V regulated, Flash security ... cPath=98&products_id=771 ... first quarter
Re: Wiggler and Keil
2005-12-27 by derbaier
... Tsvetan, were you able to get H-JTAG to work in your setup? I followed your link and picked up the software to try out with the Olimex Wiggler clone that I
Re: ARM Cross dev. with LPC2294
2005-12-27 by dvnstn
... pin. ... size ... miss ... delivered ... OK. ... back ... Hello Ennio, I m using same board and (fine) tutorial that helped me on my way. The only thing
RE: [lpc2000] Re: Ethernet on ARM chip?
2005-12-27 by Joel Winarske
... Samsung S3C4510B Dev board: $150 US http://microcontrollershop.com/product_info.php?cPath=98&products_id=771 I m curious if you find something more cost
JTAG
2005-12-27 by sherifkamelzaki
hi i am new to the JTAG cable i am using LPC2138 with the olimex eval board and bought the jtag cable i need some help how to operate it i use crosstalk if
Re: Ethernet on ARM chip?
2005-12-27 by nma550n
Cheers guys. Are there any cheap development boards fro these chips around? When i say cheap ~£70 or less, and as a bonus avaliable in the UK?
Re: [lpc2000] Ethernet on ARM chip?
2005-12-27 by Tom Walsh
... Look at the Sharp LH79524 & LH79525 (ARM720): http://www.sharpsma.com/productgroup.php?ProductGroupID=53&SubProductGroupID=1 Regards, TomW -- Tom Walsh -
RE: [lpc2000] Ethernet on ARM chip?
2005-12-27 by Paul Curtis
Try NetSilicon NS7520 or the AT91SAM7X. -- Paul Curtis, Rowley Associates Ltd http://www.rowley.co.uk CrossWorks for MSP430, ARM, AVR and now MAXQ processors
Re: Ethernet on ARM chip?
2005-12-27 by atmelbr
... Yes, Samsung S3C4510B
Ethernet on ARM chip?
2005-12-27 by nma550n
Is there any company producing ARM7 chips with Ethernet built in? Like the DS80C400? Would be great not having to interface an external Ethernet chip. Cheers
Re: ARM Cross dev. with LPC2294
2005-12-27 by rtstofer
... the ... boards. ... on one ... the ... Good point! I m one of the ones that mentioned the problem re: the LPC2106. The paper schematic is wrong but the
Re: [lpc2000] ARM Cross dev. with LPC2294
2005-12-27 by Tom Walsh
... There has been mention of Olimex documentation not matching the boards. Others have seen the documentation + schematic show that LEDs are on one pin but
ARM Cross dev. with LPC2294
2005-12-27 by wzzxo
Hello, I m having trouble using an LPC2294 with the gnu tools. My board is an LPC-H2294 from Olimex, and I m trying to follow the tutorial ARM Cross
Re: Flash Security Clarification --- some sad facts
2005-12-26 by jayasooriah
I meant LPC 2148 (damn fingers!)
Re: Flash Security Clarification --- some sad facts
2005-12-26 by jayasooriah
Thanks Dominic, This command also exists boot code version 2.1 for LPC 2194. If someone with a CRP enabled can drop me an email, I can give you more
RE: [lpc2000] The right crystal for 70Mhz LPC2103
2005-12-26 by Joel Winarske
... Hi Gus, I posted this tool a while back, it s used to determine the optimal fractional divider values for any given PCLK and baud rate. It applies to all
Re: [lpc2000] Re: Flash Security Clarification --- some sad facts
2005-12-26 by Dominic Rath
... I have a LPC2294 with boot code version 1.63, and it implements the T command. I ve quickly checked through the corresponding code, and it does access a
RE: [lpc2000] Re: Wiggler and Keil
2005-12-26 by Joel Winarske
... Running through Google Translate: http://tinyurl.com/8agcf Merry Christmas & Happy New Year! Joel
Re: [lpc2000] The right crystal for 70Mhz LPC2103
2005-12-26 by Karl Olsen
... From: Gus To: Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 7:30 PM Subject: [lpc2000] The right crystal for 70Mhz
Re: The right crystal for 70Mhz LPC2103
2005-12-26 by lpc2100_fan
Gus, the LPC2103 has a fractional BR-Generator. So you could e.g. take 10 MHz and multiply it with 7 and still get 115200 Baud fairly excactly. If I remember
RE: [lpc2000] The right crystal for 70Mhz LPC2103
2005-12-26 by Paul Curtis
Gus, The PC210x has the fractional division register so I think you ll find there are a number of crystals that are candidates. -- Paul.
The right crystal for 70Mhz LPC2103
2005-12-26 by Gus
What would be the closest crystal to 70 Mhz while keeping the standard UART baud rates? It would be nice if it would work with x6 pll multiplier so we an stop
Re: [lpc2000] Flash File System
2005-12-26 by Tom Walsh
... Hmmm, did you read the whole webpage or just go for the file sources? The core code is in rdcf2.c, this is the FAT16 driver, everything else is supporting
Re: [lpc2000] Question on I2C ACK (With EEPROM)
2005-12-26 by Craig Schlenter
... Well the eeprom s I am familiar with (such as the 24LC515) simply don t ack the address byte at all if they are busy writing (i.e. you ve just written to
Re: Wiggler and Keil
2005-12-26 by tsvetanusunov
... only works with Ulink. ... I found yesterday this web site: http://twentyone.blogchina.com/ this guy with nick twentyone works on this RDI support for
Re: [lpc2000] Wiggler and Keil
2005-12-26 by GedasL
... Yes you can. If you read russian or chinese, there is alot of info about it.
Re: [lpc2000] Wiggler and Keil
2005-12-26 by mucko
keil does no support wiggler.it supports ulink and segger-jlink interfaces. ... __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write
RE: [lpc2000] Flash File System
2005-12-26 by martijnbroens@yahoo.co.uk
Hi Tom, I tried to compile it using keil s uVision3 but i get the error that it can t find reent.h/ neither can i, can you help me out?? Didn t that come in
About CAN in MCB2100
2005-12-26 by cbitsunil
Hai all, I am using MCB2100 evaluation board for my application. I am using both CAN ports in the board.To check the communication iam loopbacking the ports. I
lpc2292 & cs8900
2005-12-26 by angelspelegrin
Hello wooyoop My problem at last was very simple. I have swapped the connection of ethernet, and the delay was in the auto-detection of polarity in the
Re: Flash Security Clarification --- some sad facts
2005-12-26 by jayasooriah
Hi All, If somebody with 2294 and version 1.63 of the boot loader can confirm the T command exists, please do tell me and I am happy to RE the code and to find
Wiggler and Keil
2005-12-26 by vineet jain
Hello everyone, Can i hardware debug my code using Wiggler with Keil, or it only works with Ulink. Regards, Vineet.
Software debugging with Eclipse
2005-12-26 by vineet jain
Hello World!!!! I wanted to know if there was any way we could debug our code with the Eclipse IDE without the OCDRemote, just the way it is done in Keil
Re: Flash Security Clarification --- some sad facts
2005-12-26 by rtstofer
... hope ... discussion ... I would be more interested if the question was related to CRP or Flash Security as the subject reads. Your issue is with a version
Re: Flash Security Clarification --- some sad facts
2005-12-26 by jayasooriah
Richard, Perhaps if I give you a hint of what is in the T command does, I hope you will change your mind as to what this CRP and security discussion is really
Re: Flash Security Clarification --- some sad facts
2005-12-26 by jayasooriah
Richard, Perhaps if I give you a hint of what is in the T command does, I hope you will change your mind as to what this CRP and security discussion is really
Re: Flash Security Clarification --- some sad facts
2005-12-26 by rtstofer
... that would ... worlds. ... I guess so... Everything that a competitor would find useful in upgrading their product will be covered by an NDA. I would
Re: Flash Security Clarification --- some sad facts
2005-12-26 by rtstofer
... sense. I ... boot ... Agreed, when you place the purchase order, ask for a guarantee that the boot loader will provide adequate protection as you define
Re: [lpc2000] Re: Flash Security Clarification --- some sad facts
2005-12-26 by Dominic Rath
... Sorry, but please ignore the remainder of this thread. Seems there are more people interested in this discussion than those that want to see it stopped.
Re: Flash Security Clarification --- some sad facts
2005-12-26 by unity0724
... hardware. ... goal in ... Current CRP implementated by Philips should be secure enough. Please look at the CHIP from TOP-DOWN, the bigger picture: If only
Re: Flash Security Clarification --- some sad facts
2005-12-26 by rtstofer
... security. I guess I am just bored of the month long harangue of Philips. This isn t a discussion, it is a prolonged attack without one shred of proof that
Re: [lpc2000] Re: Flash Security Clarification --- some sad facts
2005-12-26 by Dominic Rath
Exactly, that s my point. If you accept that the bootloader is free of bugs, you can be reasonably sure that there are no holes left. At least there are no