rEalm,
Thank you very much for the very detailed reply! Damn, you've got me
REALLY considering buying one of these puppies. Now, where do I get
the money? Hmmm.....I have one last question: when you say that the
XL7 only offers sysex dumps for storage, you mean in addition to
onboard (ie: flash) memory, correct? The 505 (as I'm sure you know)
can store 200 patterns, 250 patches, 50 songs, etc. Can the XL7 also
save patterns/patches/songs onboard? If so, I'm gonna have to get
myself one. Damn you! The missus is gonna kill me! :)
Fab
--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, erik_magrini@B... wrote:
> I currently use an MC-505 (which I love), but I just heard about
the XL7,
> and it sounds great. Has anyone had any experience with both
machines, and
> if so, how do they compare?
>
> >>>Yep, I'm moderator of this list and the MC505 list. :) <<<
>
> What I love most about the 505 is the sequencer, and specifically,
the
> grid/step recording features. It's so damn easy to program the
thing -
> which is handy for a dummy like myself. Does the XL7 have an
> easy-to-program sequencer?
>
> >>>All of my comments are my owbn personal opinionl just so we get
that
> out of the way asap. I think that in terms of ease of use and a
fast
> workflow, the XL-7 beats it hands down. You don't have to stop the
> sequencer to enter any of the record modes or save, so you really
can keep
> on working all day (caveats below) without having to stop your
music.
> Where the 505 takes the edge is when it comes time to edit what
you've
> previosuly recorded, as it has more options like groove quantize,
and
> real-time transpose.
>
> The grid editing on the XL-7 is identical to the 505, except for
the
> layout of the grid buttons (2 rows of 8, not 1 row of 16). The XL-
7 even
> lets you sue the grid for adjustint gate time too. <<<
>
> Also, I've heard the sounds on the XL7 are even better than those
on the
> 505, which is great (not that I think the 505's sounds are bad, but
> there's always room for improvement).
>
> >>>I had to sell my mc505 a few years ago, and when it was time for
> another "groovebox" I finally had it narrowed down to the 505 and
XL-7.
> The XL-7won because it really does sound a lot better than the
505. Much
> cleaner sound, way more detailed, and the modulation options on the
emu
> synths kicks butt over any other rompler (you get 24 patch cords
per
> instrument, 4 instruments make up a patch, just like the 505).
Also, you
> get digital out too, very nice. <<<
>
> How good is the XL7 at creating your own sounds/patches?
>
> >>>It's very easy witht eh 16 knobs, and deep editing via the menus
isn't
> that bad either. <<<
>
> p.s. I assume you can't buy these in stores anymore, right? Is ebay
the
> only place to find them now?
>
> >>>Nah, you can still find them in stores, they're not
discontinued. <<<
>
> ---------------
>
> If I had to list areas where the 505 was better, it would be these:
>
> - Effects. The 505 just has more interesting effects, though I
think the
> Emu reverb sounds better.
> - Groove quantize. The Swing quantize on the XX-7 is my favorite
of any
> sequecner, but it's the only option besides straight quantizing.
> - Back up. At least the 505 has an out-dated form of data storage,
the
> XX-7 doesn't have any except sysex dumps for your sounds, and the
included
> E_Loader software for backup patterns and songs.
>
> Feel free to ask any questions, there's quite a few former 505
users on
> this list ;)
>
> rEalm
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person(s)or
entity
> to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
legally
> privileged material. Delivery of this message to any person other
than
> the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive
privilege
> or confidentiality. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or
other
> use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information
by
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
> receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
> material from any computer.
>
> For Translation:
>
> http://www.baxter.com/email_disclaimer
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]