Re: [Digital BW] Any New Film Scanners Coming?
2003-05-30 by Clayton Jones
... Oh no, not again... Clayton
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1567 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] Any New Film Scanners Coming?
2003-05-30 by Truman Prevatt
The first real 2D CCD that was any pratical use in imaging dates back to the 70 s and that was a 1 k by 1 k (1 megapixel) monochromic CCD. That sucker was
Re: [Digital BW] Any New Film Scanners Coming?
2003-05-30 by Carolyn Frayn
Hi Martin.. ... When you shoot color, or color for B&W and B&W, and require very good scans for all, how does that change the specs for sampling resolutions?
Re: [Digital BW] Any New Film Scanners Coming?
2003-05-30 by Carolyn Frayn
... I do not shoot on a tripod, use a variety of films and speeds. I certainly see a difference in the print when making larger prints by upsampling compared
UK Print Exchange.....
2003-05-30 by scrber
Not sure if this has been discussed before, I couldn t find any record of it in a quick search of the archives. I love the idea of the print exchange that is
(no subject)
2003-05-30 by owenpevans
Hi everyone, I was reading about the RIP from Colobyte named Imageprint 5.5 and the last statement made by Michael Reichmann is quoted below. I thought this
RE: [Digital BW] Any New Film Scanners Coming?
2003-05-30 by Daniel Staver
... The new Minolta also has a grain-dissolver, which is a built-in diffuser that s supposed to reduce the grain without sacrificing detail. It can be switched
RE: [Digital BW] MF Digital Backs
2003-05-30 by Austin Franklin
Hi Robert, ... Interline sensors work this way, but not the type of CCD used in these digital backs. Interline are the type used in the cheapo digicams and
RE: [Digital BW] Any New Film Scanners Coming?
2003-05-30 by Austin Franklin
Anthony, ... Not to nitpick, OK, well, I will...Moore s purported law is not a law what so ever. It was an assertion. An assertion that most everyone in
RE: [Digital BW] MF Digital Backs
2003-05-30 by Austin Franklin
Anthony, ... Name the ways. The F(E) lenses have closer focus. The MTF is typically equal to or superior to the CF(E) counterpart (of which the 110/2 has
Re: Scanning B&W negatives for printing
2003-05-30 by PhotoWorkshops Partnership
On 29/5/03 6:43 pm, Alex Pettit Jr ... Nope. Best think of it as each dye cloud sitting where a grain of silver halide would have been. Same resolution,
Re: [Digital BW] Any New Film Scanners Coming?
2003-05-30 by Martin Wesley
... From: Carolyn Frayn To: Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 8:34 PM Subject: Re: [Digital
Re: [Digital BW] MF Digital Backs
2003-05-30 by Anthony Atkielski
... That s true for 35mm pros, too; but the solution seems to be to just recommend that they buy special, digital lenses to replace their investment in
Re: [Digital BW] MF Digital Backs
2003-05-30 by Robert Morrison
... I understand this logic for a 35mm SLR user...but the problem is that it doesn t really work for a Hasselblad user. The average Hasselblad pro probably
Re: [Digital BW] Any New Film Scanners Coming?
2003-05-30 by Anthony Atkielski
... Since they never quite managed 4000 dpi for 120, I wouldn t hold my breath. Additionally, each increase in resolution is a smaller improvement than its
Re: [Digital BW] Any New Film Scanners Coming?
2003-05-30 by Anthony Atkielski
... Moore s law does not apply to analog devices, and both scanners and electronic ( digital ) cameras are analog devices. A digital device such as a
Re: [Digital BW] MF Digital Backs
2003-05-30 by Anthony Atkielski
... Nowadays there seems to be an assumption that the only important part is the electronic part, so perhaps it is taken for granted that you ll just buy
Re: [Digital BW] Any New Film Scanners Coming?
2003-05-30 by Anthony Atkielski
... It doesn t matter how long in the tooth they are as long as they do a good job.
Re: [Digital BW] MF Digital Backs
2003-05-30 by Robert Morrison
... Austin, Couldn t the CCD itself be made to act as the shutter...simply powering up for a given amount of time? You could delay the sensor just a touch to
Re: [Digital BW] Any New Film Scanners Coming?
2003-05-30 by Carolyn Frayn
Hi Austin... ... Once again I ve been debating the microtek/minolta/polaroid specs... the polaroid was out as I couldn t find one, the microtek is the same as
Re: [Digital BW] Any New Film Scanners Coming?
2003-05-30 by Bob Michaels
Austin: I m certainly a technical type person. But I remember some guy named Moore back 30 years ago who came up with this idea about computers getting twice
RE: [Digital BW] MF Digital Backs
2003-05-30 by Austin Franklin
Hi Robert, ... Correct. ... There are some very critical issues with making this work. One of them is synchronizing the shutter with the digital back. The
Re: [Digital BW] MF Digital Backs
2003-05-30 by Robert Morrison
Even if you could get the clearance, I m not sure it would work. The impression that I got from Leaf was that there was a synchronization problem between the
RE: [Digital BW] Any New Film Scanners Coming?
2003-05-30 by Austin Franklin
Hi Carolyn, ... The sensor size is limited in width to what is available from the sensor manufacturers. Minolta doesn t make it s own linear CCD. I don t
RE: [Digital BW] MF Digital Backs
2003-05-30 by Austin Franklin
Phil, Why do you believe there is focus shift? This isn t the same type of filter that blocks all but IR, it blocks IR. If you pass IR, you would have a
Re: [Digital BW] Any New Film Scanners Coming?
2003-05-30 by Carolyn Frayn
... snip ... Dunno, do we? ;) I d like an 11k spi drum scanner but isn t going to happen ...With the new Minolta 35mm film scanner announced at 5400 spi...
RE: [Digital BW] MF Digital Backs
2003-05-30 by Austin Franklin
Hi Phil, Well, hum...actually not...the IR filter is to prevent color contamination of the image data...but none the less, you could use a front mounted IR
Re: [Digital BW] MF Digital Backs
2003-05-30 by Phil Lindsay
Hi Austin: The IR filter is needed in the optical path for correct focus. The IR function can be partly handled with a Hot Mirror Filter Phil
Re: [Digital BW] MF Digital Backs
2003-05-30 by Phil Lindsay
Austin: Two problems with taking out the IR filter - (1) focus shift and (2) very weird color. A Tiffen Hot Mirror helps the color a bit. Phil
RE: [Digital BW] MF Digital Backs
2003-05-30 by Austin Franklin
Phil, ... Take the IR filter off ;-) Austin
RE: [Digital BW] Any New Film Scanners Coming?
2003-05-30 by Austin Franklin
Murph, ... I d be interested in knowing what about the current line-up is long in the tooth in your opinion? ... They probably won t get any higher resolution
Re: [Digital BW] MF Digital Backs
2003-05-30 by Phil Lindsay
Hi Robert: I have tried using my Kodak ProBackPlus on my 2000FC - NO GOOD!! - the IR filter frame just touches the rear shutter curtain. If the filter holder
Re: [Digital BW] Scanning B&W negatives for Printing
2003-05-30 by john eckenrode
... that is true, neither HP5 nor TMAX are chromogenic -je __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync
Any New Film Scanners Coming?
2003-05-30 by murph278
Does anybody know if there are any new medium format film scanners in the works. The current line-up is getting long in the tooth and want to know before I
Re: newbie queries on OPM/IJC
2003-05-30 by Antonis Ricos
John, first off, please submit these questions / bug reports to bowhaus as well. I d rather you hear an official answer too. I am responding to your
RE: [Digital BW] UPDATE on JERRY OLSON memorial print exchange *****
2003-05-30 by Roger L Sopher
If there is room I ll get something appropriate to you. Roger Roger L Sopher rlsopher@deCorrales.com http: deCorrales.com ... From: Tom OConnell
Re: [Digital BW] UPDATE on JERRY OLSON memorial print exchange *****
2003-05-30 by Bill Morse
Hi Tom- I d love to participate if there is room. Bill Morse PhotoProspect Cambridge, MA USA
Re: [Digital BW] Scanning B&W negatives for Printing
2003-05-30 by DigitalLipothymy@aol.com
In a message dated 5/29/2003 7:55:59 PM Eastern Daylight Time, ... i am probably wrong, but i *think* that HP5 is a standard B+W film, and not a C-41 process
Re: [Digital BW] Scanning B&W negatives for Printing
2003-05-29 by derek_c@cix.co.uk
These dust removal methods use an infrared scan along with the visible light channels. A dust particle is opaque to infrared and will be spotted out, whereas
UPDATE on JERRY OLSON memorial print exchange *****
2003-05-29 by Tom OConnell
Hi everyone- I ve received a number of emails from people who would like to participate but don t have (or particularly want to shoot) a cat photo. Point well
The worlds most expensive inkjet paper from DigitalArtSupplies?
2003-05-29 by Tim Atherton
$6.16 per sheet of Letter sized Arches Infinity - what a rip off... Being interested in the new Arches paper, and a long time Arches user for other purposes, I
Re: newbie queries on OPM/IJC
2003-05-29 by nick90290
... Yes that s right. Mildly irritating, but it s a small price to pay to be able to control the color tinting of your prints, in my opinion. ... scale ...
Re: [Digital BW] Very interesting article on evolution of Digital Printing
2003-05-29 by Tom OConnell
HI KEITH- ... dirty ... IT S WORSE THAN GILETTE ... prints digital ... ... BUT, ... just ... HMMMM...SOUNDS LIKE PHOTOSHOP LAYERS? ... the ... papers or ...
any experiences with sundance pro rip ??
2003-05-29 by photographyworks
hi guys & girls thx bernard
Whoops - Your website - Re: Action to remove dirt and dust
2003-05-29 by Richard Smallfield
That email was supposed to be off-list - sorry, Richard Dear Daniel, I m a lurker on the BW printing list and have just seen your site and would like to
Epson 1160: Air Bubbles or Print Head Failure?
2003-05-29 by chervinsky02144
Hi, I am writing to gain some insight as to what is going on with both of my 1160 printers. I have been successfully using Lyson SG inks in the printers for
Your website - Re: Action to remove dirt and dust
2003-05-29 by Richard Smallfield
Dear Daniel, I m a lurker on the BW printing list and have just seen your site and would like to commend you on your work. It s great and inspiring. I shoot
newbie queries on OPM/IJC
2003-05-29 by johngeyles
I have downloaded OPM (from bowhaus.com) and started to try it, with a feeling of great optimism that it is the silver bullet that will yeild great B&W prints
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning B&W negatives for printing
2003-05-29 by DigitalLipothymy@aol.com
In a message dated 5/29/2003 4:33:12 AM Eastern Daylight Time, ... that makes sense. i have only had one experience with C41 B+W film, and had it developed at
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning
2003-05-29 by Daniel Staver
I m using a Canon CanoScan FS4000US... I have no idea why it worked, but the negatives were dense almost to the point of being opaque. My first roll of