Re: Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Jon
... Julian, You are under the impression he is trying learn something and use the process. Trolls engage people hook, line, and sinker on lists in order to
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1569 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] OT: weird Photoshop behavior under OS X
2003-05-28 by Bill Morse
Hi Bernd! I ve gotten similar behaviors once in a while; it has seemed like a disk issue- file corruption. I have not seen it dependent on Classic. Have you
OT: weird Photoshop behavior under OS X
2003-05-28 by Ruhrfoto/Bernd L.
Hi, this is a bit OT, but it is a problem for me, if I want to print b&w images: If I open an image running PS (6 or 7) in the classic mode of OS X the image
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Julian Thomas
me too. Anthony was kicked from the sp list for this kind of trolling... the guy hasn t tried printing or scannign BW and has opinions about everything. ignore
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons- and plonk filters!
2003-05-28 by Bill Morse
I know what you mean- on the other hand, one great thing about email lists is the *plonk* filter- one of these guys was already on mine, others are newly
RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Austin Franklin
... I agree. Anthony s claim has been challenged, and I believe until he can demonstrate that his claim has merit in REALITY, it simply doesn t, and
RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Austin Franklin
Anthony, ... How high above the floor? Omni directional does not mean they don t have aim . It means their aim is very large. ... YOU believe it s the same
RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Austin Franklin
Anthony, ... You were the first to make a claim. You can t do that without expecting to be challenged. ... It won t make you a liar, it will simply make you
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Stephen Petegorsky
... And I would love to use it a lot less than I ve had to lately. Anyone else agree?
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Robert Morrison
... Anthony, All you need to do is search the archives of this list. We ve discussed this many times before. There are several companies that make photoshop
Preserving inkjet prints, cont'd
2003-05-28 by sandersm@aol.com
... I cannot speak to what galleries require. As for me, I do not dry-mount and matte my prints, so the warping is not an issue. I take a rigid board (most
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Anthony Atkielski
... Perhaps for you, but some artists are extremely finicky about getting things just so; and for them, understanding why certain things cannot be done is
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Anthony Atkielski
... You are the one who claims it can. What s the difference? ... Why? They are both positive assertions that carry a burden of proof. Why ask others to
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Anthony Atkielski
... Why? You ve provided even less support for your position than I have. ... No, I want to see you provide an example. You say you see it all the time, it
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Anthony Atkielski
... You re not in a bar, and you have a Delete key on your computer.
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Anthony Atkielski
... They are omnidirectional; they cannot be aimed. ... It s the same thing. But as I said, I wasn t optimistic that yet another analogy would work where its
RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Austin Franklin
Anthony, ... Because YOU are the one who claims it can t be done, and it s up to YOU to show an example of why, not up to me to show an example that it can.
RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by capuozzo
My two cents- it s really not critically important that I understand the principles in creating b&w images from digital color in order to create art. Capp
RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Austin Franklin
Anthony, ... The other option is that I m correct, and you are wrong. Strongly consider that. ... It has come up many times, and as I ve said, my premise is
RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Austin Franklin
Anthony, ... Look at the B&W photoresponse curve. Along the ENTIRE spectrum of the film, they produce nearly similar reaction. This is what s important, as
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Stephen Petegorsky
If I was in a bar and a few guys were arguing about this stuff while most of the other people were trying to watch something on the tv, I would respectfully
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1545
2003-05-28 by sandersm@aol.com
... It was immediate. It took a smooth tonal gradient, running from dark to light, and turned it into a light clump and a dark clump, so that the resulting
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning
2003-05-28 by Kevin Gulstene
Alesandro- To stay in keeping with the other scanning threads I really should start with some cutting or insulting statement ... nahhh ... ... Yes, that s
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Anthony Atkielski
... That s why it mystifies me that you don t seem to understant this. It _must_ have come up many times in the past, I should think. ... Show me an example.
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Anthony Atkielski
... But you are doing exactly the same thing, and yet you expect me to believe you, even as you refuse to believe me. Why is that? ... Show me an example of a
RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Austin Franklin
... No, Anthony. The premise what that you can turn scanned color film data into a visually indistinguishable image (tonal wise) from that of the same image
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Anthony Atkielski
... True, as long as the light is truly white, that is, as long as the intensity of the light at each frequency in the spectrum is the same (the spectral
MIS UltraTone ink
2003-05-28 by lewis541b
Tremendous results with the MIS UltraTone quad inkset (CFS) on an 1160. Of course in conjunction with Paul Roark s curves. I ve been an ongoing silver printer
RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Austin Franklin
Anthony, ... Since you ve conveniently clipped what this statement is related to, and I m not going to waste my time looking it up. ... Again, you have failed
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Anthony Atkielski
... Of _course_ it is relevant. The whole purpose of this list is to discuss black and white printing. Black and white prints normally come from black and
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Anthony Atkielski
... Light falling upon it. Light in a wide range of frequencies will cause the film to react, but the magnitude of the reaction per unit exposure varies by
RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Austin Franklin
Anthony, ... Again, so what? That in NO WAY negates the premise that you CAN in fact convert the RGB information into grayscale tonality in such a way that it
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Anthony Atkielski
... Explain to me why this statement would be true when you utter it, but not true when I utter it. ... I already have. Spectral yellow is rendered
RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Austin Franklin
Anthony, ... Well, the statement was that it occurs, and it does occur, and it does occur all the time. It don t think it s relevant what colors and what
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Anthony Atkielski
... A lot of people. Many photographers use colored filters for black and white, in order to change the response to light. A red filter, for example, darkens
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Anthony Atkielski
... That depends on the exact colors, and on the exact film. And filters can further modify the results. ... Nobody ever said it wouldn t look good. It just
Re: [Digital BW] newby
2003-05-28 by Edward Wiseman
Darcy.. OK on the 1280..You CAN use pre-filled carts( and maybe that s all you can use an a machine you have access to), however, your long-run savings
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, Spectral Sensitivity
2003-05-28 by Anthony Atkielski
... Anthony already has three film scanners, two ink-jet printers, a PostScript laser printer, a flatbed scanner, and a dye-sub printer.
Re: [Digital BW] Permajet papers
2003-05-28 by Ernst Dinkla
... From: Alessandro Pardi To: Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:08 AM
Re: [Digital BW] newby
2003-05-28 by dgtodd@midsouth.rr.com
I am the technology coordinator at a high school and I have access to a 1280 printer. I will start with your suggestions of ink and give it a try. Thanks, I am
RE: [Digital BW] Scanning B&W negatives for Printing
2003-05-28 by Doug Fisher
... negatives (the grains overloads it and it gives up). Is this true for all B&W negatives?
Scanning B&W negatives for Printing
2003-05-28 by fools_luv_company
Couple of issues which I hope someone can tell what to do: 1)The CanoscanFS4000 FARE (dustRemoval feature) cannot work on B&W negatives (the grains overloads
Re: [Digital BW] newby
2003-05-28 by dsmithhfx
I m not sure I would agree that a newby should go out and get a CIS, especially if they may want to experiment with different inksets, and in view of the
Re: [Digital BW] newby
2003-05-28 by Edward Wiseman
Darla.. I would definitely go with the MIS inks, probably the VM series with the workflow as set up by Paul Roark, who will send you his curves for
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1519
2003-05-28 by claudej1@aol.com
In a message dated 5/21/2003 9:14:36 AM Pacific Daylight Time, ... see Schneider s Digitar lenses on their site. Claude [Non-text portions of this message have
newby
2003-05-28 by dgtodd@midsouth.rr.com
I am just looking into B&W printing. I have been doing color digital photography for quite some time. I want to start printing some of my photos in B&W. I am
RE: [Digital BW] Preserving pigment inkjet prints, cont'd
2003-05-28 by Paul Roark
Sanders, In my fluorescent light fade testing, I ve noticed no advantage to the light UV sprays. By the time I had enough coating on a print to see any
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1518
2003-05-28 by claudej1@aol.com
In a message dated 5/21/2003 1:59:23 AM Pacific Daylight Time, ... That be me. Claude [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1517
2003-05-28 by claudej1@aol.com
In a message dated 5/21/2003 12:16:48 AM Pacific Daylight Time, ... Simple. I m leaving out the hybrid (film/scanner) workflow. This offer is open to anyone
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1517
2003-05-28 by claudej1@aol.com
In a message dated 5/21/2003 12:16:48 AM Pacific Daylight Time, ... I probably should have said compared to T-max 100 with a minus development in D-76 1:1