RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning
2003-05-29 by Alessandro Pardi
Strange , as I always say when someone reports me a bug :-) But interesting. What scanner are you using? Alessandro ... From: Daniel Staver
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1568 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning
2003-05-29 by Daniel Staver
I just had a roll of HIE that was nearly impossible to scan. I got detail all right, but there was horrible streaking in the image. By increasing the exposure
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning
2003-05-29 by Alessandro Pardi
Hi Austin, ... exposure ... the ... I ... film. I see. So what both you and Kevin are saying is basically that the scanner, during calibration, finds a
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning
2003-05-29 by Austin Franklin
Hi Alessandro, ... Hum. My scanner only changes exposure time (at least calculates exposure time) during calibration, when it is basically calibrating the
MF Digital Backs
2003-05-29 by Robert Morrison
I m wondering if anyone is using a medium format back with a Hasselblad 2000 or 200 series camera? Leaf has told me that their backs only work with the
Re: [Digital BW] Bit files as it relates to dig. cameras?
2003-05-29 by Bill Morse
Hi Cleavis Yes, I shoot raw files with my Oly E20; working with raw files can be a pain, especially on a Mac, where Bibble and AdobeRaw are the only
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning
2003-05-29 by Kevin Gulstene
... I agree, I thought that s what I said :( I meant to convey that when you see a histogram you are usually seeing the data points spread out over the
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning
2003-05-29 by Alessandro Pardi
Hi Austin, thanks for your answer. My statement is that I think that all scanners can change exposure time based on their analysis of the piece of film they re
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning
2003-05-29 by Austin Franklin
Hi Kevin, ... I agree, providing the system can calibrate to the current state of the light source. ... Hum. Typically, I believe, auto-exposure would be
luminos paper source question
2003-05-29 by scott lanes
Hi all. I m helping a friend print her portfolio and she would like to use Luminos Museum Parchment. Where is the cheapest place to buy this? Is there another
Re: [Digital BW] SPECIAL JERRY OLSON MEMORIAL PRINT EXCHANGE
2003-05-29 by Tom OConnell
Keith- That s a terrific idea...consider it done. If you would send me the address of the gallery offline, I ll cover the shipping etc to get him a set. BTW,
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning
2003-05-29 by Kevin Gulstene
Alex- ... I see what you mean. I think that the density range of virtually all silver negatives that you would want to scan are within the range that a
7500 on EBay
2003-05-29 by Paul Roark
There may be a good deal on a 7500 on EBay. I ve been very happy with my 7500 and Ultra Tone B&W inks. I use matte paper (usually EEM) on a 24 roll. Doing
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning
2003-05-29 by Austin Franklin
Hi Alessandro, ... Can you say what you mean by this? ... Sorry, I wasn t paying attention. Raw scans are precisely the data out of the A/D, but justified
Bit files as it relates to dig. cameras?
2003-05-29 by Lyons Cox
I haven t done much comparison but was sitting here curious. For those of you shooting digital cameras are you importing at the 16 bit option and converting
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning
2003-05-29 by Alessandro Pardi
Kevin, it s really amazing how some people can turn technical issues in ego wars. They will be disappointed to read that I agree with your statements :-) What
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons- andplonkfilters!
2003-05-29 by bgs
I m an optimist. I always hope there s a secret message in there someplace! ... From: Bill Morse To:
RE: [Digital BW] Very interesting article on evolution of Digital Printing
2003-05-29 by Seth Rossman
Andre, et al- There will always be writers/reviewers like him. Heck, if we wanted to figure out how many fractions of a pennyweight of silver is in a sheet of
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons- and plonkfilters!
2003-05-29 by Bill Morse
HA!! Ernst, you re going to have to do all whole lot better if you want to make my filter- it s very, very exclusive!! And what are these guys doing hitting
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning B&W negatives for printing
2003-05-29 by Seth Rossman
No more than replacing with dyes in E-6 or C-41 does. Seth =-----Original Message----- =From: B. Alex Pettit Jr. [mailto:a_pettit_jr@yahoo.com] =Does this
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning B&W negatives for printing
2003-05-29 by Anthony Atkielski
Portra 400BW, at least, combines extremely high resolution and extremely fine grain with high speed--practically the best of all worlds. The resolution isn t
Re: [Digital BW] SPECIAL “JERRY OLSON MEM ORIAL” PRINT EXCHANGE
2003-05-29 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
An additional thought... I ve spoken to the owner of a small gallery in North Dakota (where Jerry lived) who has had Jerry s Images displayed there.. I was
Re: [Digital BW] Very interesting article on evolution of Digital Printing
2003-05-29 by sceptre12345
If bought in pint sizes, the whole set (7 inks) comes to $340. for a total of 112 oz. Therefore, 128oz or a gallon of this inkset would come to $388.00 Cheers,
Re: Scanning B&W negatives for printing
2003-05-29 by B. Alex Pettit Jr.
Hello David, Does this Replacement process decrease the resolution in the final image when compared to normal BW silver film ?? Thanks, Alex ... processing
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons- and plonkfilters!
2003-05-29 by Ernst Dinkla
... From: Bill Morse To: Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 9:21 PM Subject: Re: [Digital
RE: [Digital BW] best course of action to print black&white on Epsons 2200
2003-05-29 by Daniel Staver
... ink ... inks ... There are other RIP s available, but you mentioned the Piezo or R9 plugins with a selection of 8 inksets. None of them exist for the 2200.
Re: Scanning B&W negatives for printing
2003-05-29 by PhotoWorkshops Partnership
On 29/5/03 8:47 am, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com ... As I understand it Digital ICE and similar software cannot distinguish between dust and
RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-29 by ellery
Try a mass selection - in outlook click on from to reorder by sender, roll to first post hold shift key, scroll down to last still holding shift key , delete
Re: Paper for MIS ULTRA-TONE inks
2003-05-29 by Ron Norman
... the ... Might want to look at John Lewis s message #30968, he was singing the praises of MIS Ultra-Tone...he would know.
Re: [Digital BW] best course of action to print black&white on Epsons 2200
2003-05-29 by Martin Wesley
... From: Daniel Staver To: Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 3:54 PM Subject: RE: [Digital
Re: [Digital BW] Very interesting article on evolution of Digital Printing
2003-05-29 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
OK, I ll buy Mark s numbers on inks costs.. Hell we ve known that dirty little OEM secret for years... OTOH: He s nuts in calling film and traditional prints
Paper for MIS ULTRA-TONE inks
2003-05-29 by ed021us
Hi all Looking for suggestions for paper for the new inks. Both with the EBONIE and PC blacks. Thanks Ed Blake blakephoto@attbi.com
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-29 by bgs
Pressing a button 50 times at my age is called vigorous exercise! ... From: Austin Franklin To:
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-29 by Ken Carney
Did you guys like, go to college or something? ... From: Jon Dubovsky To: Sent:
RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-29 by Austin Franklin
... Gosh, pressing that button some 50 times...oh the horror! You sound like George Jetson... ;-)
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-29 by bgs
Count me in as an aye vote. Is it over yet? I was away for a couple of days and came back to this. I guess the Delete is better than sticking tooth picks in
Printed with Rolls...hows it lay afterwards?
2003-05-29 by Cleavis
I was wondering for those that print with rolls of paper...how well it lays out afterwards? Do people consider cutting strips off of rolls and sending them
RE: [Digital BW] Scanning B&W negatives for Printing
2003-05-28 by Seth Rossman
Because, like the Digital ICE and things like that, it sees the raised area of grain as dust. Since the silver is removed in color processes, the emulsion
Mottling problems with MIS inks on 2100
2003-05-28 by Daniel Staver
As you may know I ve been refilling 2100 cartridges with MIS Ultratones for a while now and more recently also their 7600 archival color inks. When I just used
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Action to remove dirt and dust
2003-05-28 by Daniel Staver
Check that 64bit RGBI is set as TIFF file type as well as Bits per pixel in the input and output tabs. I m not sure why the setting is in two places but
Re: Action to remove dirt and dust
2003-05-28 by garethlock4472
Thanks, just working through your flow now but I don t seem to get an IR channel in PS7. I am scaning B&W negs using a Nikon CS IV through Vuescan with 64 bit
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by John/Julie Gittins
It s a good topic, but the negatives (due to handling) now outweigh the upside. I agree with you, Stephen. John ... From: Stephen Petegorsky To:
Re: [Digital BW] Scanning B&W negatives for Printing
2003-05-28 by DigitalLipothymy@aol.com
In a message dated 5/28/2003 1:46:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time, ... does anyone know the reason why it won t work on films other than C-41 process films? i have
Dumb question?
2003-05-28 by Johnny Eades
I print with an Epson 1280 Hextone inks and use Paul Roark curve for cool neutral. The way I calibrated the monitor and printer was to take a 21 step grayscale
RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, Spectral Sensitivity
2003-05-28 by Austin Franklin
... Actually, I did. I found out that the spectral response of Portra 400 is wider than Tri-X. Austin
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Julian Thomas
hi Jon - I KNOW he isn t trying to learn something. It takes a lot to get kicked off the LUG and even more to get kicked off the sp list - I used to co-admin
RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, Spectral Sensitivity
2003-05-28 by Seth Rossman
Not a chance. Seems like it belongs on the Techie and Geek list. Seth =-----Original Message----- =From: sceptre12345 [mailto:am1000@videotron.ca] =Sent:
RE: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1545
2003-05-28 by Roger L Sopher
Pardon me for jumping in... I have tried four different krylon products as a fixative for B&W prints to keep the coating from flaking. The matte spray was not
RE: [Digital BW] Very interesting article on evolution of Digital Printing
2003-05-28 by Seth Rossman
I agree. He is just grabbing abstract ideas to justify his statements. I would tell HIM, If bullfrogs had wings, they wouldn t bump their butt when they hit
Re: Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by sceptre12345
So this guy has been trolling Street Photography , Leica User Group , rec.photo.equipment.large-format and now this group!!! How long is this going to last