RE: [Digital BW] duotones
2003-03-02 by Austin Franklin
Hi Todd, ... That never stopped me ;-) Good to see a post by you, even though you TRIED to slip by unnoticed with just a TF ...hope all is well. Austin
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1640 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] duotones
2003-03-02 by Carolyn Frayn
... hey Todd... also a way to create color files using fewer inks, less expensive runs when that was a consideration... also, using the exact ink mixed for
Re: [Digital BW] duotones
2003-03-02 by TF
Thanks Tyler. Good to see you! :-) Todd
RE: [Digital BW] duotones
2003-03-02 by Austin Franklin
... Yes, Todd...posting to this group more often. ;-)
Thanks for the offers
2003-03-02 by Seth Rossman
I guess I left the wrong impression while telling all of you about the 2200 ink availability. I know what it is like get stumped by a shortage. It was D1
Re: [Digital BW] duotones
2003-03-02 by Tyler Boley <tyler@tylerboley.com>
... wrote: snip... ... not a darn stinkin thing that I can see. Hi Todd. If people find creating subtle color effects with duotones an intuitive way to work,
Re: [Digital BW] duotones
2003-03-02 by TF
Sorry I don t have any advice to your problem, but I ve been wondering about Duotones for some time, and now seems like as good an opportunity to bring it up
RE: [Digital BW] Jon Cone Shoots himself in foot!
2003-03-02 by Austin Franklin
Hi Kevin, ... And...some of us are both ;-) Regards, Austin
Re: [Digital BW] win 2000 piezo driver problems
2003-03-02 by Kevin Gulstene
Barry- This is what I did to correct that problem on my system: 1. install the latest driver from epson (you did that) 2. search for piezography and manually
Re: [Digital BW] Jon Cone Shoots himself in foot!
2003-03-02 by Kevin Gulstene
Barry, Let s not get carried away. Take a deep breath buddy ;) ... His release says the opposite. It says that he will be supporting EPSON printers. ...
Jon Cone Shoots himself in foot!
2003-03-02 by flyfishingusa2002 <tflyfish@citlink.net>
There is no doubt that the promised new product from Cone means that all his exsisting Epson owners will be forgotten. It s my assesment that Cone is going
I am trouble with imageprint with mis inks. Help please.
2003-03-02 by silverdigital2003 <silverdigital@adelphi
I am just new to this group and am having problems with imageprint and mis full spectrum inks. Could someone give me some help. I am using han photo rag
RE: [Digital BW] Epson v Canon
2003-03-02 by Roger L Sopher
You looked in the wrong place - The commercial (business) series will print up to 42 wide. ... From: John Vitollo
RE: [Digital BW] Epson v Canon
2003-03-02 by Austin Franklin
... Er, didn t Jon just say 4,000+? Austin
Re: [Digital BW] Epson v Canon
2003-03-02 by John Vitollo <jvlist@comcast.net>
... Looks like only to 13 inches: http://www.usa.canon.com/html/conCprCatProdIndex.jsp?section=10199
Re: [Digital BW] Epson v Canon
2003-03-02 by Martin Wesley
... From: Truman Prevatt To: Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 4:34 PM Subject: Re:
RE: [Digital BW] Epson v Canon
2003-03-02 by Ton Guiking
I think Canon had not to do new investments. It s the general improvement of printers (and maybe especially the Canon s) that makes another way of profiling
RE: [Digital BW] Jon Cone's new B/W system FYI
2003-03-02 by Ton Guiking
... Then read the article, and you ll see: The Company now plans to completely reincarnate their PieographyBW for EPSON products. An upgrade for more than
Re: [Digital BW] Epson v Canon
2003-03-02 by Truman Prevatt
I guess I wonder if the market in fine art b/w market is big enough to make Canon want to duke it our with Epson. Canon ( I am sure like most companies ) is
Re: Epson v Canon
2003-03-02 by sceptre12345 <am1000@videotron.ca>
Epson wasnt treatened in its market niche. So maybe that Canon has entered that niche, maybe (wishfull thinking here) we will finally that new printer a lot of
Re: [Digital BW] Jon Cone's new B/W system FYI
2003-03-01 by mh <mh@toomanyartists.com>
That, and the fact that one will have to buy the system (ie the profiles) for $175 which Austin probably won t do since the plugin works fine (and, as said
Re: [Digital BW] Epson UltraSmooth Fine Art Paper
2003-03-01 by Paul Roark
Tom, ... On 2/17 I posted a review of the UltraSmooth, comparing it to EEM/EAM and Eclipse Satine. Here are the relevant parts of it, with comments relating
Epson v Canon
2003-03-01 by Jerry in Houston
If it is true, as it apparently is, that Canon printers are set to become serious players in the fine art b/w market, it should be good news for the Epson
Re: [Digital BW] Jon Cone's new B/W system FYI
2003-03-01 by Tony Terlecki
... The thing is that the 3000 droplet size is huge if you use the Epson driver. The old piezo software had it s own dither pattern which overrode the Epson
Re: [Digital BW] Jon Cone's new B/W system FYI
2003-03-01 by Eddy <eddy@fotoartes.com>
... to use his ... future. ... Austin, it works with any printer driver. To quote Jon: The new PiezographyBW does not use any proprietary printer drivers,
Re: [Digital BW] Epson UltraSmooth Fine Art Paper
2003-03-01 by Tom Andrews <tandrews@boulder.net>
Hi Paul, I am hoping that you or someone else can provide a comparison between EEM, Epson UltraSmooth Fine Art, and Epson Smooth Fine Art papers in smoothness,
Re: [Digital BW] Epson Ultrasmooth Fine Art Paper
2003-03-01 by David Jackson <djackson@attbi.com>
... I talked with IJM earlier this week about the new paper and the guy I talked with was very secretive. He told me they were printing with the paper for
Re: [Digital BW] Piezography Media Kit
2003-03-01 by Tony Terlecki
... Jerry, I have owned a Canon S800 for over a year on which I do all my colour printing. Absolutely superb output. Apparently the new i950 is even better but
RE: [Digital BW] Epson Ultrasmooth Fine Art Paper
2003-03-01 by Tim Atherton
No Idea - here s the full text from them (you can sign up for their little mailing list flyers - good deals sometimes) www.inkjetgoodies.com : Arches Infinity
Re: [Digital BW] Epson 2200 inks
2003-03-01 by Christopher Williams
One here in New Orleans available at a local store. Chris ... From: Seth Rossman Subject: [Digital BW] Epson 2200 inks ... at ... guy.
Re: [Digital BW] Optimal dpi
2003-03-01 by Stephen Kobrin <skobrin@hotmail.com>
Thanks Bob, that is clear as a bell and makes sense, at least to me. Steve ... detail) on ... using PS ... to 360 ... as it ... advice. ... as many ... dpi.
RE: [Digital BW] Piezography Media Kit
2003-03-01 by Roger L Sopher
Hi Jerry, I have a Canon S9000 that I use for proofing, glossies etc. The quality of the prints is every bit as good as the 1280 in my opinion. If you like
Epson 2200 inks
2003-03-01 by Seth Rossman
(X-POST!!) For those of you that have 2200 s (I can t get one yet) I just saw a SHELF full of all the colors, including the hard to get stuff --the lights --
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1356
2003-03-01 by Jerry Olson
Rick, are CIS systems made for the canons? How about the quality of prints compared to Epson? And how about ink costs, if a CIS isn t available? Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] Epson Ultrasmooth Fine Art Paper
2003-03-01 by Jerry Olson
Tim, how much is this paper? Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] MIS Variable Mix PS7
2003-03-01 by Jerry Olson
... It works just fine with MIS VM Inks. I ve been using it since it came out with MIS VM inks. Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] Piezography Media Kit
2003-03-01 by Jerry Olson
Quick Question, Anyone on the list seen a high quality photo print from any canon printer? IS IT AS GOOD as the epson 1280, 2200? Only reason I never
Re: [Digital BW] duotones
2003-03-01 by Martin Wesley
... Dennis, Even though your monitor is calibrated, it does not mean the prints will come out looking like what you see on screen. You need a printer profile
Re: Piezotone inks (New Piezotone or Not?)
2003-03-01 by mh <mh@toomanyartists.com>
... hmm, I did not catch that part. Maybe it could be all-pigment then. I still worry about whatever it is that helps it absorb into the glossy paper or
RE: Piezotone inks (New Piezotone or Not?)
2003-03-01 by Doug Fisher
... Cone-speak is more like it. ... specifically, he just says they are the first pigmented inkset set for Canon printers. I think if they were ALL
Re: Piezotone inks (was:RE: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1356)
2003-03-01 by mh <mh@toomanyartists.com>
... I think the pdf press release is a little confusing because in some parts he is talking about the new canon inks and in others he is talking about the
RE: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Jon Cone's new B/W system FYI
2003-03-01 by Tim Atherton
... You mean he s a salesman... :-) Artists beware - it s known how gullible you (we?) are....!
Re: [Digital BW] duotones
2003-03-01 by Carolyn Frayn
... duotones aren t in a space, so I m not sure they know how to behave the way you are hoping, convert your duo or multi tone file (which is a gray file with
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1356
2003-03-01 by Rick Colson
Re: Jon Cone s new B/W system FYI From: flyfishingusa2002 Let s clear a few things up. First of all, Cone s new system is based on Piezotone inks which have a
Re: [Digital BW] win 2000 piezo driver problems
2003-03-01 by Barry Gilliand <bgilliand@mindspring.com>
Just finished installing the latest win 2000 driver from the epson site, restarted, still getting the unsupported message. Any other suggestions? Thanks,
Re: duotones
2003-03-01 by Peter Nelson <peter@studio-nelson.com>
... files ... get ... Would I ... dialogue ... Could you be a little more specific? Is this a SIMULATION of a duotone or a real duotone? In duotone printing
Re: [Digital BW] MIS Variable Mix PS7
2003-03-01 by Stan McQueen
... Paul, I ve been using PS7 with MIS-VM and your curves for months now with (what I consider) outstanding results. Two prints that I printed using MIS-VM,
Re: Smartscan 3600
2003-03-01 by sceptre12345 <am1000@videotron.ca>
It looks like the Pacific Image Pro 3600. Probably made by Microtek and sold under various brand name.
duotones
2003-03-01 by Dennis Stein
Hi- I am printing duotones and getting results that are off from the monitor image. Monitor is calibrated, papers are profiled. Color files look excellent. I
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Optimal DPI
2003-03-01 by Shire,Stanley
IMHO the 2200 is a very nice printer. Better than my (lately lamented) 1270. That said, the grayscale images with the Epson driver show metamerism (not nearly