piezo, sundance and PixelPixasso
2003-03-01 by mh <mh@toomanyartists.com>
Are the Sundance Image Technology, Inc. and the R9 Corporation owned by Cone and they just aren t telling anyone? I think their relationship must be closer
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1642 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] Epson Ultrasmooth Fine Art Paper
2003-03-01 by mh <mh@toomanyartists.com>
By EEM do you mean Epson Enhanced Matte (ie the old EAM?) Isn t that acidic as well as possible use of brighteners? -mh
Re: [Digital BW] Epson Ultrasmooth Fine Art Paper
2003-03-01 by mh <mh@toomanyartists.com>
I believe this refers just to how the paper withstands atmospheric reactions (as opposed to light). Wilhelm probably justs tests the ph and proclaims a rating
Optimal DPI
2003-03-01 by Bob Frost
Austin, Not quite so easy I m afraid, according to Epson. It is dependant not only on the driver, but also on the OS and the software program you are printing
Ink cartridge lifespan (a bit OT)
2003-03-01 by dsmithhfx <dsmithhfx@yahoo.com>
Hi, Can anyone venture a guess as to what is a reasonable life span/# of refills for Epson-mfg. ink cartridges for the 1270? I refilled a color cartridge for
Re: [Digital BW] Epson Ultrasmooth Fine Art Paper
2003-03-01 by Steven Karafyllakis <stevek@evcom.net>
... it comes to ... Now there s an interesting question... how in the world do you do an accelerated DARK FADING test? Has Wilhelm captured a miniature black
Re: [Digital BW] Optimal dpi
2003-03-01 by Jerry Olson
Not really Stephen. 240-300 is just fine for photographs. Jerry
RE: [Digital BW] Epson Ultrasmooth Fine Art Paper
2003-03-01 by Tim Atherton
The same newsletter also had this: Arches Paper, a company with a 500 year tradition of making the finest watercolor papers, will be introducing the new
Re: [Digital BW] Epson Ultrasmooth Fine Art Paper
2003-03-01 by Jerry Olson
That all depends on its pricing. Jerry InkjetART expects
Re: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-03-01 by Jerry Olson
Flyfish, My Personal observation. You can see a difference up to 480 DPI. Anything less than that isn t as detailed and sharp as it is at 480 DPI. This
RE: [Digital BW] Epson Ultrasmooth Fine Art Paper
2003-03-01 by Paul Roark
My testing of Epson UltraSmooth paper showed a dmax with Epson drivers and Museum/MIS 7600 matte black that was less than EEM. Also, EEM beat it on
RE: [Digital BW] Epson Ultrasmooth Fine Art Paper
2003-03-01 by Doug Fisher
... Heh... this longevity statistic s title always cracks me up when it comes to art that must be seen (in lighting of some sort) to be appreciated.
Epson Ultrasmooth Fine Art Paper
2003-03-01 by Tom Husband <thusband@sbcglobal.net>
I saw this in the latest newsletter from Inkjetart. It s to be introduced at PMA. Looks interesting: * ULTRASMOOTH FINE ART PAPER is a 100% cotton rag that
Re: Optimal DPI
2003-03-01 by Peter Nelson <peter@studio-nelson.com>
... . . . etc. No $#!+, Sherlock! That is exactly my point!! Which was that Epson is a strange and eccentric company and the example I was using was that they
Re: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-03-01 by Carolyn Frayn
... yup, that s why they market and sell a RIP alright. Carolyn
RE: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-03-01 by Austin Franklin
Hi Peter, ... Sigh. Having designed a few halftone system, and the associated algorithms (and hardware), I am actually miffed that a company with the
Re: Optimal DPI
2003-03-01 by maracaholics <maracaholics@yahoo.com>
just so their printer can produce a half-decent black-and-white -- That statement is off-base. The whole point of the Epson RIP is to allow graphic designers
RE: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-03-01 by Austin Franklin
Hi Barry, ... Yes. I have done that extensively with the Piezo driver, but not with the Epson driver, as it doesn t matter to me. I believe I stated my
Re: Optimal DPI
2003-02-28 by Roy Harrington <roy@harrington.com>
... Barry and others, Someone created a pdf file that has a bunch of test patterns at different resolutions. These take a little figuring out but if you read
Re: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-02-28 by Peter Nelson <peter@studio-nelson.com>
... That would certainly be a more sensible and natural way to do it. With the amount of compute-ponies available in the average desktop PC these days, I
Initial win against 3rd party cartridge maker
2003-02-28 by Peter Nelson <peter@studio-nelson.com>
Lexmark has won the first-round against a company making third-party cartridges for its printers. If this holds up it could set a precedent that could result
Re: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-02-28 by flyfishingusa2002 <tflyfish@citlink.net>
Bob and Austin, So far all I read is pure theory and second guessing. Has anyone actually tried to make a high res. file with say, Photoshop and print at
Re: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-02-28 by Bob Frost
Austin, Not quite so easy I m afraid, according to Epson. It is dependant not only on the driver, but also on the OS and the software program you are printing
RE: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-02-28 by Austin Franklin
... Bob, Let me ask you a question about this. It appears that, according to this, this limit is a PS limit, not an Epson driver limit. That s odd
RE: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-02-28 by Austin Franklin
Bob, ... According to what was posted, if the printer has a max of ~44 , it is not considered a large format , at least as far as the purported resampling
Re: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-02-28 by Bob Frost
Peter, The desktop Epsons are up to and including the 2200/2100 models, and the large format Epsons are the 3000 and upwards that Epson also refer to as their
Re: Converting to B&W
2003-02-28 by Tom Husband <thusband@sbcglobal.net>
Ah, that s the thing. I already have NC3. But you can t convert using it. Tom ... DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, flyfishingusa2002 ... that
RE: [Digital BW] Optimal dpi
2003-02-28 by Austin Franklin
Hi Steve, ... That depends on what your printer is. The printers that print max ~44 , like the desktop printers claim to upsample to 720. It s only the large
Re: Converting to B&W
2003-02-28 by Tom Husband <thusband@sbcglobal.net>
Peter, this sound interesting but can it be done in 16 bit? Thanks, Tom
Re: Converting to B&W
2003-02-28 by flyfishingusa2002 <tflyfish@citlink.net>
Tom, Yes it only works in PS7.01. , but rather thamn fork out for NC3, why not upgrade to 7 and the plugin? Adobe says on their wesite that it MIGHT be
Re: [Digital BW] Converting to B&W
2003-02-28 by Tom Husband <thusband@sbcglobal.net>
Thanks Stanley. I ve used Power Retouche Tone Converter http://www.powerretouche.com/TonedPrints.htm and it works with 16 bit too but I d like to be able to
Optimal dpi
2003-02-28 by Stephen Kobrin <skobrin@hotmail.com>
So, for those of us who are not as deeply into the technology as many on the list, what is the bottom line here. Is there any real advantage to sending
Re: Converting to B&W
2003-02-28 by Tom Husband <thusband@sbcglobal.net>
Thanks Barry. I did see your post but I have PS6 and thought I d wait until PS8 comes out before moving up. The plugin only works on PS7 right? If it s that
RE: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-02-28 by Austin Franklin
... Easy to tell. If it resamples to 720, your maximum print length is ~44 , and if it resamples to 360, max print length is ~88 . ... I would assume desktop.
Re: Converting to B&W
2003-02-28 by Peter Nelson <peter@studio-nelson.com>
... I use separate layers for the R,G, and B channels and mix and balance them individually to get the tonal qualities I want, and also because that allows me
RE: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI Followup
2003-02-28 by Austin Franklin
... Hi Peter, The PRINTERS can realize image data up to their printing resolution. It s the DRIVER that is the limiting factor here. Case in point, the
Re: Converting to B&W
2003-02-28 by flyfishingusa2002 <tflyfish@citlink.net>
Tom, You missed my post about using the new Adobe RAW plugin to convert to B/W. Am I on the only person who has tried it? I have previously tried most other
Re: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI Followup
2003-02-28 by Peter Nelson <peter@studio-nelson.com>
... following ... Just to add my earlier studies to the weight . Here are tests I did on the HP970CSE and the Epson 870, also showing that those printers can
Re: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-02-28 by Peter Nelson <peter@studio-nelson.com>
... It certainly sounds like it from that technical bulletin. I wonder what they mean by large format? Are 2200 s and 1280 s considered desktop or large
RE: [Digital BW] Converting to B&W
2003-02-28 by Shire,Stanley
Tom: The Convert to BW Pro plugin from The Imaging Factory works with 16bit images. http://www.theimagingfactory.com/ ... From: Tom Husband
Converting to B&W
2003-02-28 by Tom Husband <thusband@sbcglobal.net>
Do most folks convert color images to B&W via the Channel Mixer? I convert my D100 NEF s to TIF and then use the Channel Mixer but I know there re several
Need some help please.
2003-02-28 by silverdigital2003 <silverdigital@adelphi
I am new to this group. I have been using the piezotone inks, but decided to try the mis full spectrum inks in my epson 7000. On cleaning and charging the
Re: [Digital BW] 740 with MIS FS Quad Inks
2003-02-28 by John/Julie Gittins
Alan, My results were fine without mods to the workflow or the curves, and with PQGF as the media . Other than experimenting with other media choices
OT...New Canon 10D $1499!!!
2003-02-28 by sceptre12345 <am1000@videotron.ca>
Canon 10D preview at: http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/E10D/E10DA12.HTM http://www.steves-digicams.com/2003_reviews/10d.html
Re: [Digital BW] 740 with MIS FS Quad Inks
2003-02-28 by meshugena313 <meshugena313@yahoo.com>
I actually haven t used my 740 with FS Inks in a while since I was have quite a bit of trouble with air in the nozzles. However, I ve had very nice contrasty
Re: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI Followup
2003-02-28 by Dan Honemann <dan_honemann@yahoo.com>
... Thanks for the very informative posts. I look forward to reading the results of your tests with the 2200. Mike Chaney, author of Qimage and Profile Prism,
RE: [Digital BW] 740 with MIS FS Quad Inks
2003-02-28 by Seth Rossman
Alan- Try different settings. If I recall correctly, Glossy Film puts less ink down so it dry, etc., better. Just try different paper settings without
RE: [Digital BW] OT...New Canon 10D! !!
2003-02-28 by Seth Rossman
Kodak s body redesign is not really an N80. Not like you can take a plastic injection mold and use a magnesium alloy, eh? And, not the plastic. Look, Nikon
Canon 10D
2003-02-28 by BMercerTX@aol.com
Hope this isn t adding fuel to the flame but the specs on the camera are now posted at http://www.canoneos.com Billie
2100 CIS and pigment/dye inks
2003-02-28 by Keith Cooper
Hi Below is part of a recent post on the Prodig group about a forthcoming bulk ink system for the 2100. I thought it might be of