RE: Re: Current Digital Camera Threads
2003-02-27 by Jon
I agree with the others that have posted. This mindless pedantry is lowering the value of the list. I m no longer on the Leica User Group (LUG) because of two
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1644 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] New way to convert RAW to B/W!
2003-02-27 by Jerry Olson
Thanks Bob, I think I ll just stick with my canon software for my D60 for now. It does a fine job for me. All these upgrades are really starting to have an
Re: [Digital BW] 740 with MIS FS Quad Inks
2003-02-27 by Jerry Olson
Hi, Why not try the same print at all media settings and see which you prefer? they will all give you a slightly different print. For Me, it s the Heavyweight
Re: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone and R9 PixelPixasso Information
2003-02-27 by Gregory Schern <gschern@yahoo.com>
Tom, One thing I can assure you of is that they are most definitely NOT the same product... Greg ... the Septone ... What is is ... brain keeps ... Information
Re: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone and R9 Pixel Pixasso Information
2003-02-27 by Gregory Schern <gschern@yahoo.com>
Tina, The Epson 3000 will continue to be supported under the ImageExport plug-in which is continually being updated. The PixelPixasso RIP has all of the
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Number of Nozzles--Better?
2003-02-27 by Ernst Dinkla
... From: To: Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 10:11 PM Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Number
RE: [Digital BW] New way to convert RAW to B/W!
2003-02-27 by Seth Rossman
Hi, John- The plug-in issue is not whether it is better than native PS; it s whether it is better than Nikon Capture (NC). It boils down to where the 100 bucks
RE: [Digital BW] Interpolation [was Optimal DPI]
2003-02-27 by Austin Franklin
... Bob, You may very well be right. Some of information I m finding agrees with you and basically says that nearest neighbor doesn t generate any new data ,
Re: [Digital BW] New way to convert RAW to B/W!
2003-02-27 by John Vitollo <jvlist@comcast.net>
... Raw Camera plug-in has a whole new algorithm for upsampling/interpolating images. Much better than Photoshop s.
RE: [Digital BW] Interpolation [was Optimal DPI]
2003-02-27 by Austin Franklin
Bob, Can you send me a file, both before and after, and let me see this for my self? That is not what nearest neighbor is supposed to do. I have used pixel
Re: [Digital BW] New way to convert RAW to B/W!
2003-02-27 by flyfishingusa2002 <tflyfish@citlink.net>
Bob, With respect, you have already changed the content of the thread and not renamed it. I also have the latest version of NC, but it does not allow me to
Re: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-02-27 by Bob Frost
Austin, QImage is at www.ddisoftware.com/qimage/ Bob Frost. ... From: Austin Franklin
Re: [Digital BW] Interpolation [was Optimal DPI]
2003-02-27 by Bob Frost
Austin, Surely not. If I take an image of 10 black and white lines of pixels (to keep on-list) and interpolate one new line by Nearest Neighbour in PS, it is
RE: [Digital BW] Re: OT Canon 10D
2003-02-27 by Austin Franklin
... Ah, gee, thanks, Bob. The biggest source of misinformation about digital imaging on the Internet...but luckily, this article was written by someone
RE: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-02-27 by Austin Franklin
Has anyone tried either of these? If so, speak up! BTW, do you have the URLs for these two programs (or is as simple as the name)? Thanks, Austin
RE: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-02-27 by Austin Franklin
Hi Bob, ... Nearest neighbor takes the nearest neighbors, adds them up, then divides by the number, and basically gives an average. It certainly isn t an
Re: [Digital BW] Satellite digital photography OT
2003-02-27 by Eric Maquiling
On 02/27 08:26, Truman Prevatt wrote: [...] ... [...] Man, you never know what you learn on these photo lists! Amazing information...and I live in Salinas
RE: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-02-27 by Seth Rossman
Actually, Bob, Qimage claims to be even better. Now they use a vector interpolation, allegedly better than Lanczos!! Seth =interpolation. Which is why
Re: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone v. UC VM 4.3
2003-02-27 by Jeff Korte <jeffkorte@mn.rr.com>
Hello Paul, I am considering the switch from your MIS VM hex set to the new UC VM 4.3 when it is available. Do you have any suggestions to make this as smooth
Re: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-02-27 by Bob Frost
Austin, Finally got round to querying you on this! Surely Nearest Neighbour interpolation just duplicates pixels (or should I say quadruplicates?). And,
RE: [Digital BW] listen you two codgers - detail aint detail
2003-02-27 by derek_c@cix.co.uk
Of course we could always get back on-list and discuss whether a Bayer camera or a Foveon sensor gives better B&W images :-) In article
Re: [Digital BW] Satellite digital photography OT
2003-02-27 by Truman Prevatt
The original Corona program was declassified some years back as was the fact of the National Reconnaissance Office. Corona was the first space based imaging
Re: Re: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more
2003-02-27 by Julian Thomas
shadow tutorial here http://www.piezography.com/ts/shadows.html scanning workflow here http://www.inkjetmall.com/store/cone_ts/scanning.htm Julian ... From:
RE: [Digital BW] 740 with MIS FS Quad Inks
2003-02-27 by Seth Rossman
I am guessing, but sounds as though you used the XP driver for 740 instead of installing the Epson driver before the printer. That so?? IF you did, delete the
Re: Re: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more
2003-02-27 by Marco Fogarolo
Julian Where I can find the JC s tutorial on shadow detail? Thanks Marco ... where I ... not ... as a ... papers.
RE: [Digital BW] Satellite digital photography OT
2003-02-27 by Seth Rossman
You must be joking!! You start researching classified satellites and I think you d have visitors. /r, Seth =Does anyone know what sensors are used in the
RE: [Digital BW] Please snip your quotes! Have a heart!
2003-02-27 by Seth Rossman
DITTO!! /r, Seth =frequent posters, quote the entire posting to which they are =responding; some people even quote the whole thread to which they are =adding.
Re: [Digital BW] Re: OT Canon 10D
2003-02-27 by Bob Frost
Austin, Here s one reference for info: www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/film/fuji-pepper.shtml Bob Frost. ... From: Austin Franklin
PMA March 2-5 Booth N203
2003-02-27 by Diana York
If you are at the show, please stop by Booth N203 and say hello! Diana York toll free 888-807-2248 Hawk Mtn Papers Fine Art Print & Photo Papers
Re: [Digital BW] New way to convert RAW to B/W!
2003-02-27 by Bob Frost
Jerry, When you buy the ACR plugin, Adobe tells you that it will be included in a future update of Photoshop (they don t say next ), but that you will not get
Re: [Digital BW] Satellite digital photography OT
2003-02-27 by B. Alex Pettit Jr. <a_pettit_jr@yahoo.co
The technology involves advanced optics and imaging technology using low noise CCD chips, but with adaptive optics playing the major role in high res systems.
740 with MIS FS Quad Inks
2003-02-27 by amh0159 <ahyde@bigpond.net.au>
I ve just taken my first step into B&W printing after absorbing much of the info in this newsgroup. Thanks everyone. I m using Jeff Randalls workflow with the
RE: [Digital BW] Satellite digital photography OT
2003-02-27 by Darren Collins
Wouldn t it be more the lens than the sensor? ... From: grnskl [mailto:grnskl@earthlink.net] Sent: Thursday, 27 February 2003 4:40 PM
Satellite digital photography OT
2003-02-27 by grnskl <grnskl@earthlink.net>
Perhaps this is tangential, but given today s black and white newspaper images of the missiles beside the mosques, perhaps not. Does anyone know what sensors
Re: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone and R9 PixelPixasso Information
2003-02-27 by Martin Wesley
... From: Thomas Fors To: Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:57 PM Subject: Re: [Digital BW]
Re: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone and R9 PixelPixasso Information
2003-02-27 by Thomas Fors
Has anyone else noticed the striking similarity between the way the Septone and PixelPixasso product on that page is described (What it is... What is is not...
Re: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone v. UC VM 4.3
2003-02-27 by Martin Wesley
Paul, Tough to compare from the on screen views. Comparing the Septone prints to the scans on your site I would guess that the VM 4.3 can go colder than the
Re: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone and R9 Pixel Pixasso Information
2003-02-27 by Martin Wesley
Tina, These Septone inks and software are specifically for the new 7-ink printers. There is no way to adapt it to the 4-ink 3000. Your best bet for variable
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Current Digital Camera Threads
2003-02-27 by Austin Franklin
... Mitch, What may seem nonsense to you, is not to others. It s unfair to expect that people adhere to YOUR view of what is and isn t nonsense . The
Re: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone and R9 PixelPixasso Information
2003-02-27 by Martin Wesley
Greg, Thanks for the additional info. Let us know when the inks and software are actually available for purchase. Martin Wesley ... From:
[Digital BW] Sundance Septone v. UC VM 4.3
2003-02-27 by Paul Roark
Well, after Gregory s posting information and photos of the new Sundance Septone inkset at http://www.inkjetgoodies.com/sundance_septone.htm I just could not
Re: Current Digital Camera Threads
2003-02-27 by Mitch Alland
For: Martin Wesley ... Martin, thanks. I am of Sue s opinion and am grateful for your posting. It seems to me that people should realize that when a thread
Please snip your quotes! Have a heart!
2003-02-27 by Mitch Alland
Most of the readers of this list get the daily digest rather than as individual e-mail messages, which means we have to scroll through miles and miles of
Re: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone and R9 Pixel Pixasso Information
2003-02-27 by Tina Manley
Gregory: What about the Epson 3000? Are you abandoning it? Tina ... Tina Manley, ASMP http://www.tinamanley.com photos available from:
RE: [Digital BW] Re: OT Canon 10D
2003-02-27 by Austin Franklin
Bob, ... That depends on the film. Slower films, like 160 or lower, don t show much grain, if at all, with 4k scanners. ... That s a scanner/film issue that I
RE: [Digital BW] OT...New Canon 10D! !!
2003-02-27 by Seth Rossman
Bob- Never called the F100 cheap or amateurish. Too bad Nikon didn t use F100 bodies for the D100. I used my F100 more in Kosovo, than my F5. Less finicky in
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Number of Nozzles--Better?
2003-02-27 by Seth Rossman
Sorry, you are asking about 48 nozzles on one technology against 512 nozzles on a printer with a totally different way of doing things. Each manufacturer would
RE: [Digital BW] Re: OT Canon 10D
2003-02-27 by Seth Rossman
Bob! Go figure!! Glad to have you along. Seth =photographic friends). It is so much easier to produce a good =18x12 from the D100 (with some upsampling to
RE: [Digital BW] New way to convert RAW to B/W!
2003-02-27 by Seth Rossman
Adobe says it will. tal BW] New way to convert RAW to B/W! = = =I have heard that that plugin will be included with the next =major version of Photoshop.
RE: [Digital BW] Re: OT Canon 10D
2003-02-27 by Seth Rossman
Seems to ME we could put Nikon and Canoin in this scenario and have the same answer = =Firstly a satellite project starts years before it gets into =space, and