Re: [Digital BW] More Foveon...
2003-02-27 by Veniamin Kostitsin II
Claude, ... yes it will. so will a 600x800 picture downloaded from the web. at what cost and to what final quality ? no matter how great this 3 MP are ... they
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1645 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Sundance Septone and R9 PixelPixasso Information
2003-02-26 by Gregory Schern <gschern@yahoo.com>
I know some of you have discussed this a little, but I figured there was no need to wait for PMA! I ve posted information and some quick scans from some prints
Re: [Digital BW] listen you two codgers - detail aint detail
2003-02-26 by Sue Tallon
... posting ... Likewise Austin. Sue Sue Tallon Photography suetallon@beatcom.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Current Digital Camera Threads
2003-02-26 by Martin Wesley
The digital camera discussion/debate comes up from time to time, and while it does have relevance to the digital production of black and white prints, the
RE: [Digital BW] Re: To Austin...
2003-02-26 by Austin Franklin
... Here is what a web search claims: Claude Jodoin Claude Jodoin, Cr. Photog.,CPP, has been a photographer for 23 years. He is Technical Editor for PPA s
Re: To Austin...
2003-02-26 by sceptre12345 <am1000@videotron.ca>
Jerry, Who may I ask is Claude Jodoin ? Before you decide to spend hard earned bucks on the Foveon X3, here s something you might want to know about the Sigma
RE: [Digital BW] More Foveon...
2003-02-26 by Austin Franklin
Claude, ... Any actual images to support that claim, that can be downloaded? Is it stated exactly what processing was done to the images, and exactly what
To Austin...
2003-02-26 by Jerry Olson
Austin, a post from Claude Jodin: The Foveon X3 is a little better than the D60 and only slightly better than the S2 in the sharpness department. It will also
RE: [Digital BW] To Austin...
2003-02-26 by Austin Franklin
... Er, yeah, Jerry? Did you think I somehow didn t get it? ;-)
RE: [Digital BW] listen you two codgers - detail aint detail
2003-02-26 by Austin Franklin
... Sue, If you don t like a discussion, or the person posting, just delete the posts, instead of whining. I get tons of posts about things I have no interest
Re: [Digital BW] New way to convert RAW to B/W!
2003-02-26 by Jerry Olson
I have heard that that plugin will be included with the next major version of Photoshop. Anyone else heard that? I d hat to buy the software only to find it
Re: [Digital BW] Re: OT Canon 10D
2003-02-26 by Jerry Olson
Thanks for the lone (so far) compliment. That s all I ever meant. MY images are as good as 100 Provia if you don t go much beyond the 13x19 inch print size on
Re: [Digital BW] Digital Black and White Photgraphy
2003-02-26 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... Well, do remember to come out once and again to eat... Keith Just some guy, and caretaker of the Multiverse s largest EPSON printer User Community
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1347
2003-02-26 by claudej1@aol.com
In a message dated 2/26/2003 1:04:57 PM Pacific Standard Time, ... The Foveon X3 is a little better than the D60 and only slightly better than the S2 in the
Re: [Digital BW] OT Sharp photos from NASA
2003-02-26 by Eric Maquiling
... Will my email self-destruct in 5 minutes after reading this email? :) Now I m paranoid you told me about these things. What if the gov ment wants to know
OT Sharp photos from NASA
2003-02-26 by Jerry Olson
Derek, NASA, the government, and the Navy, (I was a photographer s mate in the Navy) had sharper lenses in 1964 than the average civilian camera has today. The
Re: [Digital BW] listen you two codgers - detail aint detail
2003-02-26 by Sue Tallon
on 2/26/03 9:37 AM, Austin Franklin at darkroom@ix.netcom.com wrote: Mike, ... The Jerry/Austin debate isn t about camera A vs camera B. It isn t about
Re: [Digital BW] OT...New Canon 10D! !!
2003-02-26 by Bob Frost
Seth, I ve got an F100, F80, and D100, and all three have almost identical features and controls (slightly better autofocussing and autoexposure on the F100).
Digital Black and White Photgraphy
2003-02-26 by Mike <darkroommike@yahoo.com>
Can anyone recommend a digital black and white photography group I can join? I got another 20 message digest in my inbox this afternoon about Canon vs. Sigma
New way to convert RAW to B/W!
2003-02-26 by flyfishingusa2002 <tflyfish@citlink.net>
If you haven t already heard Adobe has a new plugin to convert from RAW to RGB with Photoshop 7.01. I have just purchased the plugin and the results from my D1
Re: Number of Nozzles--Better?
2003-02-26 by Johnny Eades <jeades1@sc.rr.com>
Added after several responses to the message below. None of the messages referred to the nozzle count.Do more nozzles available make for a better and smoother
Re: [Digital BW] Re: OT Canon 10D
2003-02-26 by Bob Frost
Hi Jerry, For once I agree with you! I bought a 6 MP Nikon D100 recently (despite all the things I ve said about lack of pixels in digital cameras in the
RE: [Digital BW] OT...New Canon 10D! !!
2003-02-26 by Austin Franklin
... An interesting discussion has been going on on the Leica list for a few years. People buy Leicas to use Leica glass, which is very high end glass...and
Re: [Digital BW] OT...New Canon 10D! !!
2003-02-26 by dsmithhfx <dsmithhfx@yahoo.com>
... debate is ... sometimes must ... I find this discussion is not good enough -- it is unworthy of photographers who aspire to be anything more than
Re: [Digital BW] Re: OT Canon 10D
2003-02-26 by derek_c@cix.co.uk
By definition NASA or rather satellite makers use obsolescent technology! Firstly a satellite project starts years before it gets into space, and they can t
Re: [Digital BW] listen you two codgers - detail aint detail
2003-02-26 by Jerry Olson
... I ve been told this by the older members of my family. I don t know if it s true, but they have some old records... ... Warren, English. ... No, I said
RE: [Digital BW] listen you two codgers - detail aint detail
2003-02-26 by Austin Franklin
Jerry, ... Phew! Mine are White. ... Hum. I d put you at...72 ;-) Regards, Austin
RE: [Digital BW] Re: OT Canon 10D
2003-02-26 by derek_c@cix.co.uk
Originally they did indeed get film back with re-entry capsules. These days they are all digital. In article ,
RE: [Digital BW] OT Canon 10D
2003-02-26 by Austin Franklin
Hi Kevin, ... Well, though you are right...there are two issues. One is the spacing between the photosites is miniscule, compared to the size of the
Re: [Digital BW] listen you two codgers - detail aint detail
2003-02-26 by Jerry Olson
Actually some very distant relatives did come over on the mayflower. Or so my family has said. (Warren, mothers side of the family). Have no idea if it s true.
RE: [Digital BW] listen you two codgers - detail aint detail
2003-02-26 by Austin Franklin
Jerry, ... Er, OK, that s scarry...we may be related...because mine are as well... What was their last name? ... Not a chance you re 27. I demand to see a
Re: [Digital BW] listen you two codgers - detail aint detail
2003-02-26 by Jerry Olson
And it will end with this post. I ve had enough. Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] OT Canon 10D
2003-02-26 by Kevin Gulstene
Austin- ... If my understanding is correct, the sensors in a ccd do not butt up against each other precisely. There is a small gap between each sensor in the
RE: [Digital BW] listen you two codgers - detail aint detail
2003-02-26 by Austin Franklin
Mike, ... The Jerry/Austin debate isn t about camera A vs camera B. It isn t about digital vs film, or about Foveon vs other. It is about realistic
RE: [Digital BW] OT...New Canon 10D! !!
2003-02-26 by Austin Franklin
Jerry, ... Why not just make monochromatic images that are either pure black or white? That will give you maximum sharpness. As soon as you bring in tonality,
RE: [Digital BW] listen you two codgers - detail aint detail
2003-02-26 by Austin Franklin
Oh Jerry, ... Only if you lick the lense before you take the picture. There is seriously something wrong somewhere if you believe the above is true. I shoot
Re: [Digital BW] listen you two codgers - detail aint detail
2003-02-26 by Mike <darkroommike@yahoo.com>
Permit me to delurk for a moment. I, so far, am still learning about digital printing and haven t said much in the week or two I have belonged to this group
Re: [Digital BW] Re: OT Canon 10D
2003-02-26 by Jerry Olson
... Never said it was that much greater. Said it was a bit better than the D60 chip. Not a LOT better. J
Re: [Digital BW] listen you two codgers - detail aint detail
2003-02-26 by Jerry Olson
Hi Garry, Austin is obsessed with technical matters. I m obsessed with what I see, and is it good enough for me? I KNOW that there are many digital cameras
Re: [Digital BW] OT...New Canon 10D! !!
2003-02-26 by Jerry Olson
But some of us WANT maximum sharpness, and are not satisfied with a good photo that isn t sharp. Especially in landscape photography. If it isn t sharp, It
Re: [Digital BW] epson2200 roll matte paper availability
2003-02-26 by Jerry Olson
Media street will cut you any width you want, you might want to ask Norm at normlevy@mediastreet.com J
Re: [Digital BW] Re: OT Canon 10D
2003-02-26 by Jerry Olson
I suspect that NASA has MUCH higher quality equipment than we ordinary photographers do. In fact I know they do. J
RE: [Digital BW] Re: OT Canon 10D
2003-02-26 by Austin Franklin
Jerry, ... Then you are seeing data that was simply not there in the original image, or a VERY poorly done 6M image. ... Jerry...you keep misunderstanding what
RE: [Digital BW] Re: OT Canon 10D
2003-02-26 by Austin Franklin
Veniamin, ... Not correct. It has 3M image sites. Each image site has three sensors, but the point is each of the three sensors sees the EXACT same light
Re: [Digital BW] Re: OT Canon 10D
2003-02-26 by Jerry Olson
True Truman, BUT if all chips get exactly the same treatment, the Foveon STILL wins. It simply has more detail than a 6 megapixel chip, which I have seen with
RE: [Digital BW] Re: OT Canon 10D
2003-02-26 by Austin Franklin
Jerry, ... Yes. Not manipulated images, but actual from the camera images. ... Er, that the Foveon has color problems, and doesn t have as much detail as the
Re: [Digital BW] Re: OT Canon 10D
2003-02-26 by Jerry Olson
Austin, have you actually seen the results of a foveon chip? seen a direct comparison with anybody else s 6 megapixel chip? If you have, what did you see? Do
Re: [Digital BW] Re: OT Canon 10D
2003-02-26 by Veniamin Kostitsin II
wrong foveon has 9 million (+-) image sites that record a 3 MP image, not 9. it is a very wide spread misconception based on sigma * foveon marketing bohoo.
RE: [Digital BW] listen you two codgers - detail aint detail
2003-02-26 by Austin Franklin
Garry, ... I d dare say, Garry, you re probably either not much younger than I am, or possibly even older, of you were doing Cibachromes in 1977. I was not
Re: Number of Nozzles--Better?
2003-02-26 by Tom Husband <thusband@sbcglobal.net>
... The ... Epson ... printing ... size ... this ... Hi Johnny, The Canon uses Bubble Jet technology which uses heat to create a bubble in the ink chamber