Re: [Digital BW] Re: Gray Balancer Conflicts
2003-03-03 by Diane Fields
Truman, I had my 2200 on ME before XP. There have been many posts on other forums about the fact that Epsons often have trouble connected to hubs. I honestly
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1638 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Gray Balancer Conflicts
2003-03-03 by Truman Prevatt
Given my experience with the network adaptor and XP I suspect it is XP rather than the Epson. On my old box (ME ) I had a scanner, my 1280 and my network
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Gray Balancer Conflicts
2003-03-03 by Diane Fields
The Epson printers do not do well on a USB hub--put them on separate USB ports. Before I put installed XP and added 2 more USB ports, I installed my 1280 on
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Gray Balancer Conflicts
2003-03-03 by Truman Prevatt
That just might fix it. When I was fighting with XP over the wireless network adaptor, it connected to the computer via USB. In theory any USB device that has
Re: Gray Balancer Conflicts
2003-03-03 by disch7634 <disch7634@yahoo.com>
... Gray ... I was thinking about the parallel port thing after you brought it up. I have both of my printers connected to the USB hub. Maybe if I would hook
Re: Gray Balancer Conflicts
2003-03-03 by disch7634 <disch7634@yahoo.com>
... Gray ... I was thinking about the parallel port thing after you brought it up. I have both of my printers connected to the USB hub. Maybe if I would hook
Re: Gray Balancer Conflicts
2003-03-03 by Peter Nelson <peter@studio-nelson.com>
... the ... to ... as ... That s why I was wondering what resource it was competing over. It may not be the printer itself, but something like the parallel
Re: [Digital BW] Canon i9100
2003-03-03 by derek_c@cix.co.uk
Piezography have just announced an inkset for the earlier Canon printers, but I don t know whether they ll be suitable for the i950 and i9100. In article
Digital Negatives with 1160
2003-03-03 by Chris Hargens <ldmr@cruzio.com>
With the hope of combining the strengths (while avoiding the weaknesses) of the digital and wet darkrooms, I ve been exploring the possibility of creating
Re: Gray Balancer Conflicts
2003-03-03 by disch7634 <disch7634@yahoo.com>
... printing ... have ... both ... I stripped all of my peripherals and their software off and restored XP to before they were added, everything worked fine. I
Re: [Digital BW] Gray Balancer Conflicts
2003-03-03 by Truman Prevatt
May try to run one, the other or both in ME compatibility mode. I am not a big fan of XP. I got a new computer in December and was stuck with XP. So far I m
Re: Gray Balancer Conflicts
2003-03-03 by Peter Nelson <peter@studio-nelson.com>
... to ... How did you decide that the Gray Balancer and the 785 were conflicting? What resource were they conflicting over? I have the Gray Balancer, a
Re: WYSIWYP ink formula and workflow for 1280 (Roark please chime in)
2003-03-03 by Steven Karafyllakis <stevek@evcom.net>
... I actually have been using a different density for each ink; In the end it just got too tedious keeping track & refilling, etc., so I averaged out each
Gray Balancer Conflicts
2003-03-03 by disch7634 <disch7634@yahoo.com>
Last weekend my computer started restarting itself randomly. I turned off the auto restart in XP and was able to trace it down to the Gray Balancer software
Best Commercial Wide Format Printer
2003-03-03 by jwvee2003 <j.vee@gte.net>
What is the most practical wide format printer to use as a nucleus for a fine art printing business? I would like to be able to print both monochrome and
Re: unblocking shadows, bo (MIS dye inks)
2003-03-03 by Stan <doctorflash@hotmail.com>
I print on an Epson 3000 using Piezography inks. I find that using Cone s Wells River gives me good blacks with a hint of detail - no blocking up. I usually
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Optimal DPI
2003-03-03 by Truman Prevatt
Peter you are absolutely correct. Most large technology based companies are organized somewhat the way you describe. In most cases the divisions such as yours
Re: Sample RIP images
2003-03-03 by Peter Nelson <peter@studio-nelson.com>
... from ... OK, I ve looked at the IP print under sunlight and it looks real good - no noticable metamerism going between fluorescent and daylight! I ve also
Re: Optimal DPI
2003-03-03 by Peter Nelson <peter@studio-nelson.com>
... I work for a company that s about 3 times the size (by revenue) of Seiko Epson Corporation, and has about 3.5 times the number of employees. Like Seiko
Re: WYSIWYP ink formula and workflow for 1280 (Roark please chime in)
2003-03-03 by Shilesh Jani <shilesh.jani@smith-nephew.
Steve, Thank you for this tip. The key insight you had was to make the density of cyan the same as magenta, and photocyan the same as photomagenta. I am
Re: Optimal DPI
2003-03-03 by maracaholics <maracaholics@yahoo.com>
I see where you re coming from, but if you ve worked at a technical corporation, you know that the decision-makers are not as savvy as the engineers. Do the
RE: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-03-03 by Austin Franklin
Hi Stan, ... Does it invoke the Epson driver, like the Piezo driver does? Knowing what we believe we know about resampling to 720, it is very possible
RE: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-03-03 by Shire,Stanley
Yes, IP has it s own driver. Does the difference in limit mean that either a)Epson and IP are not calling the same print routines from the OS or b) IP is not
RE: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-03-03 by Austin Franklin
Hi Bob, I don t believe there is any OS limit to page length, per so, there is only the application limit, driver limit and hardware limit. I believe that
unblocking shadows, bo (MIS dye inks)
2003-03-03 by dsmithhfx <dsmithhfx@yahoo.com>
Hi, I m fairly new to black + white photo inkjet printing, and I m beginning to get good (/better) results from most of my negatives using the following
Re: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-03-03 by Bob Frost
Stanley, When Epson talk of OS limits to print size, I assume they mean printing using the built-in OS printing routines, e.g. from your IE or Mac equivalent
Re: [Digital BW] Canon i9100
2003-03-03 by Ernst Dinkla
... From: Martin Sluka To: Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 9:49 AM Subject: Re: [Digital
Re: [Digital BW] Re: !!! New Piezography count-up !!!
2003-03-03 by Julian Thomas
give the guy a break! he s got a major product launch at the show - most of the staff are there. during shows the response time at IJM is always slow. Julian
Re: !!! New Piezography count-up !!!
2003-03-03 by mh <mh@toomanyartists.com>
I think it was the PMA countdown, now it says the New Piezography countdone, and it is now counting down. But weren t we told he was going to put stuff up on
!!! New Piezography count-up !!!
2003-03-03 by deepdeepblack <mikolaj-i@tlen.pl>
Hello group, It seems that JC does not care so much about visitors of the Piezography.com page, who have been waiting for news watching famous caountdown...
Re: [Digital BW] Canon i9100
2003-03-03 by Martin Sluka
At 09:07 +0100 3.3.2003, Ernst Dinkla wrote: ... It is quite easy imagine how to produce two size of drop mechanically - add two different electric potentials
Re: [Digital BW] Canon i9100
2003-03-03 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
I can tell you that my S9000 is so fast I hate using my 1280 and 1270 anymore.. If anything the i9100 is a tad faster.. They both make the 2200 look like it s
Re: [Digital BW] Canon i9100
2003-03-03 by Ernst Dinkla
... ink on paper as fast as possible - the IRIS printer are able to put on one place as much as 96 pl (in 3 pl steps!!!) - not the eject the smallest drop. It
Re: [Digital BW] Canon i9100
2003-03-03 by Martin Sluka
At 21:18 -0300 2.3.2003, André Vallejo wrote: ... Try calculate a bit: There is a general problem of inkjet printing - to put enough ink on paper as fast as
Re: QuadToneRIP for Mac OS X
2003-03-03 by Roy Harrington <roy@harrington.com>
... half-dozen different curves now and at least twice that many combinations of settings, and my prints all look nearly identical to one another. I think
WYSIWYP ink formula and workflow for 1280
2003-03-03 by Steven Karafyllakis <stevek@evcom.net>
Hello all; Between buying a wide-format printer and all the excitement and hushed (we re all sooo restrained about it) anticipation of all these new printing
Re: Sample RIP images
2003-03-03 by A. Andrew Gonzalez <a_andrew_gonzalez@ya
I just bought the IP RIP Mac os X . The course dithering/dot grain in the mid to light areas are just too excessive to be acceptable for my printing needs. I m
Re: QuadToneRIP for Mac OS X
2003-03-03 by Charles Bandes <byronbulb@yahoo.com>
Hmmmmmmm. Something simple seems to be going wrong. I ve tried a half-dozen different curves now and at least twice that many combinations of settings, and my
Sample RIP images
2003-03-03 by Peter Nelson <peter@studio-nelson.com>
Thomas Fors was kind enough to send me a couple of sample images from RIPs he s using: the IP RIP and the Epson RIP. The Epson RIP had a strong, unpleasant
[Digital BW] Re: I'm tired of watercolor, I want to paint with oils
2003-03-03 by Peter Nelson <peter@studio-nelson.com>
... Marketing is when you take an existing concept that already HAS a name, and give it another name. Example: giclee for inkjet printing on fine-art media.
Re: QuadToneRIP for Mac OS X
2003-03-03 by murph278 <maybeck@attbi.com>
I tried it and had the same problems - I have the exact same setup as you (OSX, 1280, VM inks, etc). I couldn t get the variable tones to work and there was a
Re: [Digital BW] Re: I'm tired of watercolor, I want to paint with oils
2003-03-03 by Carolyn Frayn
... or marketing...
Re: [Digital BW] Canon i9100
2003-03-03 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... Not the pigment inks you can t... The Canon nozzles and printhead require a much lower viscosity ink.. MIS doesn t make a stable pig with that low a
Canon i9100
2003-03-03 by André Vallejo
Sorry,just found the droplet size info: 4 picoliters. Interesting....
Canon i9100
2003-03-03 by André Vallejo
Someone says this canon printer or it s predecesor can print as good prints as the 1280,which is good,and having separate inks can be even better. But does
Re: QuadToneRIP for Mac OS X
2003-03-03 by Charles Bandes <byronbulb@yahoo.com>
This is so cool! But is it just me or does the Gimp driver give _really_ cruddy dither patterns? I might be doing something wrong, I m not quite sure yet. Is
[Digital BW] Re: I'm tired of watercolor, I want to paint with oils
2003-03-02 by Peter Nelson <peter@studio-nelson.com>
... Yes, because this is a technical field where precise communication matters. I think we should use words according to their precise meanings. Mark Twain
Re: [Digital BW] Re: I'm tired of watercolor, I want to paint with oils
2003-03-02 by Carolyn Frayn
... I m perfectly aware of that. I didn t say that it was in Photoshop. You choose the inks you are asking the press to use, you use photoshop to try and
RE: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-03-02 by Austin Franklin
... Hi Bob, I am only quoting from the hardware documentation for the printer that lists it s limit, and that limit is listed not dependant on any OS, or
[Digital BW] Re: I'm tired of watercolor, I want to paint with oils
2003-03-02 by Peter Nelson <peter@studio-nelson.com>
... use ... spot ... precise ... Not in Photoshop, you don t. Photoshop has no direct control over the ink. The driver does that. Furthermore you re not